22:10
ππ£ππ€ππππ ππ£π Γ
Loveless was fired for sowing seeds of discord and manipulating staff. He went directly to Ultra's boyfriend and told him that he was 'mentally unstable', creating strain in their relationship. He also went behind Nitro's back, and said unfavorable things about him. Loveless was then fired - not for a few days, though, because he was staying at Nitro's house.
Loveless eavesdropped on an executive chat voice call. I don't know much about this, but apparently, he was preparing a sort of coup with other members of staff.
Loveless then proceeded to tell two staff members who had run our security team that they were being fired, and that there had been unsavory things said about them by the executives - which was not true. What we had said was that we were going to bring in staff to support them from other conventions. These two had alt-right ties.
They misinterpreted this, and called Ultra, a Jewish person, a slur, in a message to Nitro.
These staff members did not perform well in their roles as members of the security team, but we were restructuring staff, so nothing was confirmed or denied at the time. These staff members were inebriated on the convention floor while on the clock, and there were also reports of sexual harassment regarding one of them.
We released this statement on Twitter, name-dropping them- which was an unfortunate and incorrect decision. However, they retaliated by igniting drama, threatening legal action (which they had absolutely no grounds for), and going directly after Ultra.
Ultra presented the executive staff with two options:
1) Let him resign/fire him, which would quell the nazis, and would let the con move on without drama.
2) Have the executive board release a statement, signed by all members, backing up Ultra and reaffirming that the leadership was strong. The document would also state that due to restructuring of the convention as a whole, all current/previous staff members would be relieved of their positions. This would create a clean, strong slate for the convention to refresh itself.
We were to make this decision as a board, without Ultra. At this time, the conversation became heated, and it began to break down. People suggested that writing the letter would be an 'ego stroke' for Ultra, a permanent commitment to supporting whatever his actions might be in the future, which was far from the case. Both of these would have been PR moves, made in an attempt to quell drama. He never wanted his ass kissed and he never wanted power, he wanted the convention to run smoothly.
During this meeting, a staff member who will not be named was in the room. He decided to give his two cents during the executive voice chat. He called Ultra a dictator, which was a) unnecessary and b) unhelpful. He should not have been involved in the call at all. This staff member was not a member of the executive board, but he fell into a tizzy as he was asked politely not to interject into the executive staff call.
In the time that Ultra was not involved in this specific decision, everything that he said would happen happened. The internal staff is unstable.