Doomworld Forums
Show all 252 posts from this thread on one page

Doomworld Forums (http://www.doomworld.com/vb/index.php)
- Blogs (http://www.doomworld.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?forumid=33)
-- My resignation from Skulltag staff. (http://www.doomworld.com/vb/52295/)


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 10:16:

My resignation from Skulltag staff.

There was some question over my recent disappearance from the staff roster over on Skulltag.net.

Yesterday I voiced disagreement over a staff policy. In lieu of an actual discussion, my opinions were shouted down with otherworldly strawman arguments, bizarre accusations, and insistence that I had no idea what I was talking about. I repeatedly tried to clarify what I was actually asking for, only to be rudely dismissed repeatedly and talked down to, including questions of whether I was having a bad day and insistence that they knew better.

I was then told, summarily, that my questioning of Eruanna's policy was argumentative and made "discussion impossible". At this point I was less concerned about the rule and more about the visible instability of the staff I was working with. I'm willing to accept that my opinions are only my opinions, and that they don't need to be shared by the rest of the staff, but none of my suggestions or criticisms were even given the slightest bit of consideration. As I had no interest in being a staff member in name only, whose only allowed purpose was to be a yes-man to Metal and Eruanna, I resigned.

So, that was that. I look forward to continuing my contributions to the Doom community in other ways, and wish Metal and Eruanna the best of luck in finding new staff members who will be less questioning of their wisdom. I now no longer doubt the horror stories I've heard from other former staff members.

I wasn't going to make a public announcement of this, but I've already seen attempts to rewrite history to make me look like the aggressor in all this, so I figured I'd post my side of the story. I was going to post it on Skulltag itself, but the thread was conveniently locked while I was writing my post. Funny thing, that.


Posted by Csonicgo on 08-20-10 10:21:

I totally agree with your reasoning for resigning.


Posted by YMB on 08-20-10 10:35:

Sounds like you did the right thing, as it's clear they didn't want to "include" you in their elite group.


Posted by ClonedPickle on 08-20-10 10:36:

Re: My resignation from Skulltag staff.


esselfortium said:
I was going to post it on Skulltag itself, but the thread was conveniently locked while I was writing my post. Funny thing, that.


didn't do it


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 10:41:

Sounds to me like you got what you deserved. What you did was completely unacceptable. The skulltag admins always know what's best. That's why the community is so awesome and is by no means a cesspool of stupidty and furfaggotry. You have no right to question anything they do because they know exactly what they're doing and are completely incapable of being wrong so obviously what you did was wrong.


Posted by Use3D on 08-20-10 11:12:

You can always join my group Essel, The KickAwesome DoomMasters.


Posted by Whoo on 08-20-10 11:17:

lol

I hear 'ya.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 12:50:

I saw this yesterday, and I wasn't surprised then and I'm not surprised now. Anytime anyone brings up an issue with the Skulltag community, they're immediately ostracized (see also: hex_vulture). Basically, if Metal and/or Eruanna says it's so, then it's fucking so. When they say that doom skies suck, you better either be putting in unreal skys or at least a skybox! Seriously they're not interested in dissent in the ranks, and if the skulltag community were any worse it'd be a combination of /b/ and Maoist China.


Posted by Maes on 08-20-10 13:12:

They're just applying the Rooster in the Henhouse principle by the book. And you surely don't want to be the hen, when the Rooster is around...


Posted by Bank on 08-20-10 13:35:

Skulltag is a fantastic port with an absolutely abysmal and unnecessary online community.


Posted by Mr. T on 08-20-10 13:50:

Yet another perfect example of why women shouldn't be allowed to be in a position of power at all, jesus


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 14:42:


Mr. T said:
Yet another perfect example of why women shouldn't be allowed to be in a position of power at all, jesus

Thank you so much for saying what so many of us were thinking.


Posted by Mr. Freeze on 08-20-10 15:29:

What a bunch of bullshit.

It's really sad that such a great source port is so prone to such mudslinging and lockstep admiration. And that's not even counting the non-staff who I have problems with (Cutman, Firewolf, etc).

Almost makes me want to go to ZDaemon.


Posted by Philnemba on 08-20-10 16:03:

Even through I love Skulltag, I really don't care much for their community. In fact before I registered for Doomworld, I gave myself a choice whether to join Doomworld or Skulltag by a flip of a coin. I'm so glad it was tails and made the right decision :)


Posted by exp(x) on 08-20-10 16:28:

Re: My resignation from Skulltag staff.


esselfortium said:
I now no longer doubt the horror stories I've heard from other former staff members.

:)


Posted by Vulture on 08-20-10 16:46:

HEY THIS SOUNDS SO FAMILIAR.

I will leave you with this linky link www.odamex.net


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 16:48:

Nice BAWWWWWW. 10/10. Would read again.


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 16:49:


SoulPriestess said:
Nice BAWWWWWW. 10/10. Would read again.

What a troll. Quoting this so you can never edit it out.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 16:50:


Infurnus said:

What a troll. Quoting this so you can never edit it out.



He earned it. If you saw the full logs, you'd see how argumentative he was. He would not listen or reason with me. But eh. He's essel. He's king of the world, amirite?

TO DOUBT ESSEL IS A DISGRACE UPON ALL!


Posted by AlexMax on 08-20-10 16:51:

This is why I don't post outside of the projects, bugs and feature requests forum. However, unlike ZDaemon, it seems like the administration merely doesn't give a shit about places like Skullrant, as opposed to trying to shut them down.

The port is great. But community-wise, you're better off sticking to places like Skullrant.


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 16:52:


SoulPriestess said:


He earned it. If you saw the full logs, you'd see how argumentative he was. He would not listen or reason with me. But eh. He's essel. He's king of the world, amirite?

TO DOUBT ESSEL IS A DISGRACE UPON ALL!


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 16:54:


SoulPriestess said:
Nice BAWWWWWW. 10/10. Would read again.


<@Metal> Ah, Essel baws in public, And we're the bad guys.
<@Metal> No one insulted him or talked down to him.
<@Metal> He's blowing the whole thing out of proportion.
<@Metal> Completely.

What would I be "bawwing" about? Honestly, this is pathetic. You're not even trying. I resigned of my own volition because you're visibly unstable, particularly Eruanna.

I was going to just step away and forget this, but in the interest of preventing this rewriting of history, I'm going to post a full, unabridged log of the #stmods discussion that led to my resignation! I'll let you folks be the judge.

http://pastebin.com/Yhb4YP2a

For those who consider it tl;dr, I'll include a few juicy snapshots.



<Metal> I still don't see any need to have to answer to anyone around here.
<Metal> I don't feel the need to explain my actions to anyone
<Metal> Once you give this community the freedom to do one thing, they bite your whole arm off
<Metal> And take more and more
<esselfortium> Uh...
<esselfortium> There are far larger communities than this one that have no problem at all discussing, either in private or public, reasons for bannings and punishments. This is ridiculous.
<Metal> Of course it is
<Metal> Everything is ridiculous
<Metal> Doesn't matter how I go about things
<Metal> It's always "the wrong" way
<Metal> So you know what
<esselfortium> Even to me this looks like nothing more than "the mods are always right and get the fuck out if you question it". I can't imagine what it must look like from the outside.
<Metal> Do you what you want
<Metal> I dunno
<Metal> I'm done with this
* Metal has quit ()





<esselfortium> this is awfully silly.
<SuperGod> essel do you have a bad day today?





<Eruanna> I don't really give a flying fuck how "good" of a member Decode was before he pulled the shit he did. He was stupid enough to do it, and that's enough said. Why can't people talk to him directly? Why do we have to ANSWER to a bunch of spoiled fucking brats who don't fucking know enough to mind their own fucking business? And what's worse, why do we have to answer to an entire group of faggots
<Eruanna> who ALSO don't know enough that if we start letting people like Ambient and Decode get away with the shit that they do, then people will expect to be able to just walk all over us and get away with whatever they want?
<Eruanna> This is not an acceptable way to run a community to me.
<Eruanna> It ends HERE.
<esselfortium> .....
<Eruanna> so if you want to resign over one rule, do it now.
<esselfortium> I didn't say anything about Decode. :-\





<Eruanna> We might be wrong, but someone HAS to be right, and it has to be the right group of people. This is why we allow moderator discussions, such as this one.
<Eruanna> But we have learned from experience
<esselfortium> But there's been no discussion. There's just been you telling me I don't know what I'm talking about and it has to be this way.
<Eruanna> the Skulltag community itself, at large, cannot handle such responsibility
<esselfortium> The more you treat a group like children, the more childish people it'll attract. Works every time it's tried.
<esselfortium> If you want to drive out anyone remotely worth keeping around, treating them like little kids is the best way to do it.
<Eruanna> And treating them like adults has magically made everything better?
<esselfortium> "magically"
<esselfortium> nice attitude, it's good to know my contributions are valued
<Eruanna> We've been through that road already
<Eruanna> and it has *NOT* worked
<esselfortium> So totally blacking out any discussion of bans ever for any reason is surely the way to fix it, and couldn't possibly create a larger divide between the staff and userbase.
<esselfortium> Makes sense.
<Eruanna> sometimes such a divide is necessary. if people knew enough to treat us with respect, and treat us like adults, this would never have been a problem.
<Eruanna> it's sad that a few bad apples spoil the bunch, but that's what happened
<esselfortium> By "divide" I mean "flush that last bit of respect down the toilet"
<esselfortium> I'm now finally understanding what I've heard from every former ST staff member I've talked to about staff status more or less being a title and nothing else. Everything I say is dismissed, and with a totally unwarranted attitude.
<esselfortium> It's no wonder there's been so much turnover in the past few years I've been observing the ST community.
<Catoptro1ancy> we need more essel = (
<esselfortium> No one with a shred of sanity or self-respect would want any part of this group.
<Eruanna> I am trying to be as reasonable as possible about it. But meh, you are practicing what you preach, essel, in a bad way.





<Eruanna> what I'm seeing from you
<Eruanna> you are being argumentive
<Eruanna> and dismissive
<Eruanna> and when I try and discuss things with you
<Eruanna> you are putting your own opinion about how I SHOULD be acting into it
<Eruanna> which is clouding my intentions of dealing with this matter
<Eruanna> and as long as you are doing that
<Eruanna> we cannot have a reasonable discussion
<Eruanna> you don't seem to understand I am upset
<Eruanna> and I'm trying best to restrain myself
<Eruanna> from doing something utterly drastic
<esselfortium> "Argumentative and dismissive"? Are you kidding? I've explained my reasons for thinking what I do. All you've given me is the older-and-wiser "we have experience and it has to be this way". Nothing I've said has been seriously considered at all.
<ClonedPickle> then perhaps we should halt the conversation until your mood has improved
<esselfortium> No, I understand you're very upset. That's why this is all so absurd.
<Eruanna> I fucking explained my reasons to you, essel.
<esselfortium> You're pissed as hell that I disagree with you. That's been obvious.
<Eruanna> I explained them to you
<Eruanna> No, I'm pissed that you won't listen.
<esselfortium> Your reasons were strawman arguments and "sorry but it has to be this way". Those aren't reasons.



My personal favorite part was in the last quoted bit, where Eruanna effectively told me "I'm trying to have a discussion, but we can't do that if you're going to disagree with me!"

Anyway, there we go.


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 16:55:


SoulPriestess said:
He's essel. He's king of the world


Posted by bytor on 08-20-10 16:56:

Whether you were right or wrong it sounds frustrating and disappointing for you. Keep yer chin up, esselfortium.


Posted by ClonedPickle on 08-20-10 16:59:

<ClonedPickle> then perhaps we should halt the conversation until your mood has improved


too bad this didn't happen at all


Posted by Xenaero on 08-20-10 16:59:

I sympathize with you, but I also warned you in the first place that this sort of thing would happen, so I hope it didn't come as much of a surprise.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 17:02:


SoulPriestess said:
Nice BAWWWWWW. 10/10. Would read again.

It's a damn shame we can all call you a leaky cunt and you cant close a thread here isn't it. Now get the fuck back into the kitchen, men are talking.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:03:


What would I be "bawwing" about? Honestly, this is pathetic. You're not even trying. I resigned of my own volition because you're visibly unstable, particularly Eruanna.


When you (essel) are blowing things way out of proportion, making a mountain out of a mole hill, that's not showing any visible instability on your part?

You are much harsher to prospective mappers. I've seen you on private TSoZD forums. It's either ESSEL'S WAY OR THE HIGHWAY. You should be ashamed of yourself and how you conduct yourself overall in the community, but with the herd of sheep at your command who think you're a god, you don't see your own personality faults, do you?

I'm glad I'm not you. At least the community is honest with me when I make a mistake... sometimes.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:05:


SoulPriestess said:


When you (essel) are blowing things way out of proportion, making a mountain out of a mole hill, that's not showing any visible instability on your part?

You are much harsher to prospective mappers. I've seen you on private TSoZD forums. It's either ESSEL'S WAY OR THE HIGHWAY. You should be ashamed of yourself and how you conduct yourself overall in the community, but with the herd of sheep at your command who think you're a god, you don't see your own personality faults, do you?

I'm glad I'm not you. At least the community is honest with me when I make a mistake... sometimes.


Uh. What? Sorry, but no. Remmirath, 40oz, and a hell of a lot of other people ask me for my input voluntarily on a pretty regular basis. I'm often thanked for it, even. Criticizing peoples' maps and giving advice on them is pretty different than shouting down opinions that are opposed to yours. You're not even attempting to make yourself look good here.

And I didn't quit over the rule; I'm fine with disagreements. I quit over your complete inability to even hear out my opinion without throwing sarcastic jabs and nonsense in my face. I'm not interested in being a yes-man whose stated purpose is to make your decisions look like a group consensus.

If I was as obviously unstable as you claim based on things I've been doing for years, then you guys wouldn't have asked me multiple times to become a member of the Skulltag staff. Your own argument betrays you, as usual.


I'm glad I'm not you.

At least we can agree on one thing. If you were me, I don't know what kind of life I'd be leading.

__________________
Released: Seventeen More Times (album) - Listen free online! | Vaporware Demo | SpaceDM9 | A Terrible Flood (album) | SpaceDM5 | Greenwar 2 | 32in24 series | Claust1024 | Testing Facility
In Progress: Vaporware | KDiKDiZD | TSoZD | ???
Resources: EDF Monster Library | Mapping Tips | CC4-tex | EsselTX


Posted by ClonedPickle on 08-20-10 17:08:


SoulPriestess said:
you don't see your own personality faults


This seems to be a trend with a lot of people around here.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:08:


esselfortium said:

Uh. What? Sorry, but no. Remmirath, 40oz, and a hell of a lot of other people ask me for my input voluntarily on a pretty regular basis. I'm often thanked for it, even. Criticizing peoples' maps and giving advice on them is pretty different than shouting down opinions that are opposed to yours. You're not even attempting to make yourself look good here.

And I didn't quit over the rule; I'm fine with disagreements. I quit over your complete inability to even hear out my opinion without throwing sarcastic jabs and nonsense in my face. I'm not interested in being a yes-man whose stated purpose is to make your decisions look like a group consensus.



Again, you're blowing things way out of proportion.

And is this all about looking good? So you quit staff just to look good, too, then, didn't you?

Obviously, you are not fine with disagreements. That was completely evident the day you quit.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 17:10:

The above post has enough projecting in it to make Carn embarrassed.


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 17:10:

Essel's got no problem with disagreements, just about people who go shit-faced-crazy over disagreements, from what I see.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:11:


SoulPriestess said:


Again, you're blowing things way out of proportion.

And is this all about looking good? So you quit staff just to look good, too, then, didn't you?

Obviously, you are not fine with disagreements. That was completely evident the day you quit.


Ah, the strawman arguments and ad hominem attacks again. Awesome, I love those!

I stated perfectly clearly why I resigned. You're doing a terrible job of smearing me, I've got to say. If I didn't know better I'd suspect someone had hijacked your account to make you look like a power-thirsty control freak with a bad attitude.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:13:


esselfortium said:

Ah, the strawman arguments and ad hominem attacks again. Awesome, I love those!

I stated perfectly clearly why I resigned. You're doing a terrible job of smearing me, I've got to say. If I didn't know better I'd suspect someone had hijacked your account to make you look like a power-thirsty control freak with a bad attitude.



I'm not trying to smear you at all. I'm not even trying to hurt your reputation. Unfortunately, I can't say the same about you.

All I'm doing is plainly stating it the way I see it. It seems you have issues with that, though.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:13:


SoulPriestess said:


I'm not trying to smear you at all. I'm not even trying to hurt your reputation. Unfortunately, I can't say the same about you.

All I'm doing is plainly stating it the way I see it. It seems you have issues with that, though.


I posted the unabridged log, you know. It's on the previous page, if you somehow missed it.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:16:

And how did you assume I missed it? Are you putting words in my mouth again?


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:18:


SoulPriestess said:
And how did you assume I missed it? Are you putting words in my mouth again?

"Again"? Huh.

I assumed you must have somehow overlooked it, because it makes the state of the situation pretty clear. Incredibly, your own posts here have only dug a deeper hole for yourself, something I would have thought impossible.

I'm not a "god," nor am I trying to be one. I'm just an honest guy who got sapped into being part of your staff for a month or so.


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 17:18:


SoulPriestess said:
And how did you assume I missed it? Are you putting words in my mouth again?

Why are you so hostile? Your first posts in here were trollposts, why do you think you can strawman and ad hominem so easily? Do you think you have your own personal audience that thinks and believes everything that you do? Are you really that egotistical? <- look see I can do it too!


Posted by Csonicgo on 08-20-10 17:20:

And the Skulltag administration shows its true colours.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 17:21:


ClonedPickle said:
This seems to be a trend with a lot of people around here.
If you are talking about this forum, then no, not really. We call people out, make fun of them, and move on with our discussions. Somehow projects that gain momentum and then a cult following spawn asshole leaders. You don't see shit like this around here because we don't have a collective project to be over sensitive about if someone complains. I'm a big user of all ports, but I've stayed off the forums for this reason.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:25:


esselfortium said:

"Again"? Huh.

I assumed you must have somehow overlooked it, because it makes the state of the situation pretty clear. Incredibly, your own posts here have only dug a deeper hole for yourself, something I would have thought impossible.

I'm not a "god," nor am I trying to be one. I'm just an honest guy who got sapped into being part of your staff for a month or so.


Well - let's see....

1) In the log... you assumed I was talking down to you. I was not. I was merely stating points.

2) You brought private matters to the public. In most circles, this is a big no-no. Prior to this, I NEVER posted in public about this. I am not responsible for the actions of those that do. I am sorry for the people who may have "attempted" to disgrace you, and triggered you to post this "blog" post, but even still, I was not a part of it.

3) There were many times when you've been particularly harsh - when people asked for it or not. Your standards are ridiculously high - and it all the more has shown to me that if there's something you don't like - you have no problem talking it down, even when it is perfectly good. (edit) Why does everything have to be ABSOLUTELY PERFECT to you?

4) You are making mountains out of mole hills. You aren't even being clear when you are explaining things. I kind of expect this to have no effect on you. In fact, it's clear what your aim is - "make Skulltag admins look like crap." It's all you care about - and you've even bluntly stated "You are only digging your hole deeper for yourself." To me, this shows you care not about the problem, but for shitting on other people's names. If that's not your intention, then maybe you should focus on trying to resolve the problem, instead of dragging this out on a public forum.

5) And as for the comments about you being "god" - well - that's just the way I see you right now. Because you have so many sheep at your beck and call. You have more "yes men" than I do. I can't be the only one who sees that.


Posted by Bank on 08-20-10 17:25:


Csonicgo said:
And the Skulltag administration shows its true colours.

They wouldn't happen to be yellow, red, and orange would they?


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:30:

Anyway, whatever. The claims of my supposed instability and immaturity


You should be ashamed of yourself and how you conduct yourself overall in the community, but with the herd of sheep at your command who think you're a god, you don't see your own personality faults, do you?

become even sillier when it's pointed out that I've been in the community for years and haven't changed my behavior recently. This isn't an argument from authority; I'm not claiming that my longevity in the community gives me an excuse to do whatever I want (since nearly everything else I've said has been misconstrued and warped, I'll at least try to cover all the bases). What I'm saying is: You knew exactly who I was. I haven't changed. You liked what you saw enough to ask me sometime around 2008 or 2009 to join the staff, when I politely turned you down. And I was apparently a valuable enough asset to ask to join you again more recently.

So, yeah, sure. I'm unstable and a terrible person or whatever you want to call me, but you trusted and claimed to respect me enough to ask me multiple times to join your staff. Doesn't add up. It's obvious enough that I don't really need to point it out, but why not.


SoulPriestess said:
And as for the comments about you being "god" - well - that's just the way I see you right now. Because you have so many sheep at your beck and call. You have more "yes men" than I do. I can't be the only one who sees that.

No. There are just a lot of people who currently think you're an idiot.


Posted by Mr. T on 08-20-10 17:30:


SoulPriestess said:

5) And as for the comments about you being "god" - well - that's just the way I see you right now. Because you have so many sheep at your beck and call. You have more "yes men" than I do. I can't be the only one who sees that.



Did you ever consider that maybe he is right and you are wrong? Oh wait, no that just depends on your yes men ROLL EYES


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 17:30:


SoulPriestess said:
1) In the log... you assumed I was talking down to you. I was not. I was merely stating points.

Bitch, please. From one troll to another, don't try to turn an attack troll into a concern troll. It doesn't work.


5) And as for the comments about you being "god" - well - that's just the way I see you right now. Because you have so many sheep at your beck and call. You have more "yes men" than I do. I can't be the only one who sees that.

Glad to know you can admit you have yes men.


Posted by brinks on 08-20-10 17:30:

I've been working the ol' noggin to think of an appropriate response to this debacle, and after much deliberation I do believe I have arrived at the only logical conclusion.

lol women.


Posted by ClonedPickle on 08-20-10 17:33:

When did DW get filled with womanizers?


Posted by Whoo on 08-20-10 17:34:

Re: Re: My resignation from Skulltag staff.

Though I don't believe I've told Essel the horror stories I have, I'll go ahead and quote exp(x).


exp(x) said:

:)


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:36:


No. There are just a lot of people who currently think you're an idiot.


Such is the curse of being an admin for one of the most popular multiplayer Doom ports. Any time you speak your mind, there's a ton of people who disagree, despite those that do.

You know what? I don't care about them. I'm not going to shed a tear over them. If they want to tell me how to improve, they can POLITELY come on IRC, say, hey, I think you need to improve with suchandsuchandsuch, and say, you know, if you stopped doing this, or started doing this, it would make you an awesome admin. And hopefully they will aknowledge my right to reject or accept their criticism, silently, for my own good. I don't have to conform to another person's view of me, even though I would prefer to please.

But nobody does that, so what's the use? Instead, they troll and spam and do things in non-productive ways. And then they wonder why we don't listen to them.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:37:


SoulPriestess said:


Such is the curse of being an admin for one of the most popular multiplayer Doom ports. Any time you speak your mind, there's a ton of people who disagree, despite those that do.


Oh please. Playing the victim now, after all this?


You know what? I don't care about them. I'm not going to shed a tear over them. If they want to tell me how to improve, they can POLITELY come on IRC, say, hey, I think you need to improve with suchandsuchandsuch, and say, you know, if you stopped doing this, or started doing this, it would make you an awesome admin.

*raises hand* I did that!

See where it got me, and how polite and mature the response was? I can't imagine why no one else would bother.


But nobody does that, so what's the use? Instead, they troll and spam and do things in non-productive ways. And then they wonder why we don't listen to them.

Such generalizations!


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:39:


esselfortium said:

Oh please.


Yes, please indeed. I doubt you'd understand though, would you?


esselfortium said:

*raises hand* I did that!

See where it got me? I can't imagine why no one else would bother.


I tried reasoning with you. I really did. You were the one who blew things out of proportion. I've tried resolving it on the spot, but you opted to leave instead. *shrugs* With a hissy fit, I might add, as evidenced here.


esselfortium said:

Such generalizations!


And yet so true!


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 17:41:


SoulPriestess said:
Such is the curse of being an admin for one of the most popular multiplayer Doom ports. Any time you speak your mind, there's a ton of people who disagree, despite those that do.

Now you're doing the victim troll? Holy shit. For a woman you have huge balls. I don't even have the stones to go from attack troll to concern troll to victim troll in one thread. Do you carry your balls in a wheelbarrow or something?


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:42:


SoulPriestess said:
I tried reasoning with you. I really did. You were the one who blew things out of proportion. I've tried resolving it on the spot, but you opted to leave instead. *shrugs* With a hissy fit, I might add, as evidenced here.

*bell rings*

It's time to play... Read That Log!



<Eruanna> ok
<Eruanna> I don't really give a flying fuck how "good" of a member Decode was before he pulled the shit he did. He was stupid enough to do it, and that's enough said. Why can't people talk to him directly? Why do we have to ANSWER to a bunch of spoiled fucking brats who don't fucking know enough to mind their own fucking business? And what's worse, why do we have to answer to an entire group of faggots
<Eruanna> who ALSO don't know enough that if we start letting people like Ambient and Decode get away with the shit that they do, then people will expect to be able to just walk all over us and get away with whatever they want?
<Eruanna> This is not an acceptable way to run a community to me.
<Eruanna> It ends HERE.
<esselfortium> .....
<Eruanna> so if you want to resign over one rule, do it now.
<esselfortium> I didn't say anything about Decode. :-\





<Eruanna> We might be wrong, but someone HAS to be right, and it has to be the right group of people. This is why we allow moderator discussions, such as this one.
<Eruanna> But we have learned from experience
<esselfortium> But there's been no discussion. There's just been you telling me I don't know what I'm talking about and it has to be this way.
<Eruanna> the Skulltag community itself, at large, cannot handle such responsibility



Need I continue?

(For the audience at home, Eruanna and SoulPriestess are the same person!)


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:42:


John Smith said:

Now you're doing the victim troll? Holy shit. For a woman you have huge balls. I don't even have the stones to go from attack troll to concern troll to victim troll in one thread. Do you carry your balls in a wheelbarrow or something?


You suck at trolling.


Posted by Whoo on 08-20-10 17:43:


SoulPriestess said:

You suck at trolling.



lolololololololololololo


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 17:43:


SoulPriestess said:
You suck at trolling.

The fact that mentioning that you associate with me at the zdoom theatre is potential grounds for banning would seem to dispute that assertion. Now make me a sandwich.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 17:45:


John Smith said:

Now make me a sandwich.


What kind?


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 17:48:

One that doesn't have vagina juice on it. Seriously you need a man. Someone who will make you cringe when you hear the word "belt." For some women thats all that will stop them from being menstrual about everything. I have seen it first hand. It's not your fault. It's ok. It's really hard for some chicks to make it outside of the home. Really, we can't hold your behavior against you, its in your biology to do this. Don't worry about it.


Posted by ClonedPickle on 08-20-10 17:52:


John Smith said:
I have seen it first hand.


hmmmmmm


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 17:54:


John Smith said:
Now make me a sandwich.


SoulPriestess said:
What kind?


oh god it's just trolls trolling trolls now


Posted by Belial on 08-20-10 17:55:


SoulPriestess said:
3) There were many times when you've been particularly harsh - when people asked for it or not. Your standards are ridiculously high - and it all the more has shown to me that if there's something you don't like - you have no problem talking it down, even when it is perfectly good. (edit) Why does everything have to be ABSOLUTELY PERFECT to you?

No that's me.

Reminds me of the good old times, going from number 1 basher of sporkmaps, Simplicity ep1 included, to main tester of Simplicity's full version.


Posted by Metalhead2 on 08-20-10 17:55:

Hi. I don't post here too often. But thought I would for this lovely topic. I never intended to bash, disgrace, insult or talk down to you Essel. I left the channel mainly to avoid an argument. It's very unfortunate that it continued.

Let's get one thing straight. Gender has nothing to do with this, at all. Those comments are really immature, as far as I'm concerned. However, this all could have been handled much much better.

I understand you all want to side with Essel, but fact of the matter is, he is telling only his side of the story. I'll explain mine in a less wall of text sort of way. And basically, as I said, I explained to him why I didn't want to change the rule and wanted to try it for a while before we changed anything about it. After that, things escalated to an uncomfortable level. So I left.

After leaving I read the log and had seen the argument continued anyway between the whole channel. What Essel posted, wasn't the whole thing, unfortunately, only bits and pieces.

As far as this whole 'let's blame Eruanna' thing goes, *I* made the rule, she simply agreed with me on it, and voiced HER opinion on it with Essel after my departure from the channel. This does not make her hostile, or an idiot. She was simply doing the same thing Essel was, and that was voicing her opinion on it. I also had seen in the log that OTHER staff members were agreeing with her. There is a reason for this.

I'm not saying Essel is inexperienced or anything of the sort, but the Skulltag community sometimes needs different rules for different things. We tend to experiment different rules to see what will and can make the community a better place. I'm not going to sit here and say we're perfect, or that we're right because everyone makes mistakes, it's completely natural.

However, Essel, I really wish you didn't bring the drama here. I wanted to eventually discuss things with you privately after all was cooled down and settled. But right now it seems as if you want to flare things up more between us, and that is not what I wanted, nor was it my intentions. I'll leave this at that. I'm sorry all this had to happen.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 17:57:


ClonedPickle said:
When did DW get filled with womanizers?
We sometimes get tired of fucking ass, so we turn to assholes of the opposite gender.


Posted by Bank on 08-20-10 17:58:



Call now!


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 17:59:


Metalhead2 said:
Hi. I don't post here too often. But thought I would for this lovely topic. I never intended to bash, disgrace, insult or talk down to you Essel. I left the channel mainly to avoid an argument. It's very unfortunate that it continued.

While I wasn't particularly impressed with the professionalism of your reaction, it was mainly Eruanna's behavior a few hours later that convinced me to quit.


After leaving I read the log and had seen the argument continued anyway between the whole channel. What Essel posted, wasn't the whole thing, unfortunately, only bits and pieces.

Incorrect! I posted a few snippets for tl;dr purposes, but I also linked to http://pastebin.com/Yhb4YP2a a full, unedited, unabridged log of several hours of chat, from the time I first brought the issue up to the time I left the channel.


As far as this whole 'let's blame Eruanna' thing goes, *I* made the rule, she simply agreed with me on it, and voiced HER opinion on it with Essel after my departure from the channel. This does not make her hostile, or an idiot. She was simply doing the same thing Essel was, and that was voicing her opinion on it. I also had seen in the log that OTHER staff members were agreeing with her. There is a reason for this.

Agreeing or disagreeing with a rule is not the issue here. The behavior and means of doing so was absolutely unacceptable for someone running a community.


However, Essel, I really wish you didn't bring the drama here. I wanted to eventually discuss things with you privately after all was cooled down and settled. But right now it seems as if you want to flare things up more between us, and that is not what I wanted, nor was it my intentions. I'll leave this at that. I'm sorry all this had to happen.

I've seen the vilification that often happens to those who depart from the Skulltag staff on bad terms, and opted to intercept it.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 18:02:


Bank said:


Call now!

Mmmm, that SoulPriestess has a sexy voice.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 18:03:


esselfortium said:

I've seen the vilification that often happens to those who depart from the Skulltag staff on bad terms, and opted to intercept it.

Had you not brought this here, there would've been none. I was fine and willing to just forget about it. But meh, that's not what you wanted is it?


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 18:03:


SoulPriestess said:
Had you not brought this here, there would've been none. I was fine and willing to just forget about it. But meh, that's not what you wanted is it?

Yawn. I'm getting tired of answering the same attacks rephrased in different ways.

Anyway, had I not brought it here, the Skulltag staff would have swept it under the rug.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 18:08:


esselfortium said:

Yawn. I'm getting tired of answering the same attacks rephrased in different ways.

Anyway, had I not brought it here, the Skulltag staff would have swept it under the rug.



And you have a huge issue with that? I'm not even going to say what I feel about that.

But I'll say what I think - now you're showing your true colors.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 18:10:


SoulPriestess said:


And you have a huge issue with that? I'm not even going to say what I feel about that.


Well, yeah, I had an issue with sweeping a bad situation under the rug. I didn't like the idea of this unfortunate situation that's happened to others before me having to happen to anyone else, so I blew the whistle.


But I'll say what I think - now you're showing your true colors.

Yep, these are my true colors. I'm waving them proud, just like I have all the rest of the time I've been here.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 18:11:


SoulPriestess said:
And you have a huge issue with that?

Wow. Holy shit. Talk about true colors. Jesus Christ. That sort of talk would make some dictators blush.


Posted by stewboy on 08-20-10 18:11:

Reading the log, I'm pretty sure both sides were to blame for the incident. I see lots of miscommunication and misunderstandings from everyone. Essel, I do think you could have put many of your statements a bit more tactfully, as could everyone else, although perhaps the pressures of being an admin make that difficult.

Also Essel, I'm not sure it was a good idea to bring this out into the open, and especially here. You know you're probably more well-respected here than on ST, and of course most of the people likely to post would take your side (without knowing the full story first though). And predictably, the attitude in this thread has so far been quite anti-ST administration, except for the admins themselves. Especially the trollposts/anti-women posts. All they're doing is pushing the ST and DW communities further apart (even though this mainly concerns the admins.)

My main reaction so far is one of sadness that people that I look up to and respect are fighting among each other like this. I do truly believe that this could have been at least partly resolved (though perhaps never fully) by a few quiet discussions in private between the parties in question.


Posted by Whoo on 08-20-10 18:11:

Essel is acting the way he always has been. You should listen to Bank's advertisement, it's really good quality. And if you already have, listen again! It's great stuff.


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 18:12:

Maybe this is just all a joke, and that Metalhead and Euranna are sitting in a hot tub, under the stars, cuddling each other and giggling at our reaction to the drama.


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 18:12:


SoulPriestess said:
Had you not brought this here, there would've been none. I was fine and willing to just forget about it. But meh, that's not what you wanted is it?

Wow, just wow. You're just mocking him aren't you?


Posted by Lizardcommando on 08-20-10 18:14:


Bank said:
http://tindeck.com/image/tkml/stats.png

Call now!



That... was... beautiful...

/claps and sheds a manly tear.

Shouldn't you have just continued this discussion in private? I don't really see any reason to leave it out in the open like this, well, at least until things have been settled or something.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 18:15:


Infurnus said:

Wow, just wow. You're just mocking him aren't you?


No. I'm just clearly pointing out that he's doing this for nothing more than attention.


Posted by Metalhead2 on 08-20-10 18:15:


esselfortium said:

While I wasn't particularly impressed with the professionalism of your reaction, it was mainly Eruanna's behavior a few hours later that convinced me to quit.



Well, to be quite honest with you, I wasn't having the best day in the first place, but I do not want to get into detail about that. The last thing I wanted was an argument at that time. I was hoping that it would be left alone after I had left.



esselfortium said:
Incorrect! I posted a few snippets for tl;dr purposes, but I also linked to http://pastebin.com/Yhb4YP2a a full, unedited, unabridged log of several hours of chat, from the time I first brought the issue up to the time I left the channel.


Alright, my bad, I didn't see that.



esselfortium said:
Agreeing or disagreeing with a rule is not the issue here. The behavior and means of doing so was absolutely unacceptable for someone running a community.


The whole thing was blown way too far out. I didn't see any need for the argument that proceeded in the channel. However, that's what happens when opinions clash. It happens everywhere, and everyone has a different attitude on everything. It really depends on how strongly you feel about something. I can see that you strongly disagree with the rule, and she strongly agrees with it, and that's probably what sparked the fuse. It happens. However...



esselfortium said:
I've seen the vilification that often happens to those who depart from the Skulltag staff on bad terms, and opted to intercept it.


This is still unreasonable to me. I don't see any need to intercept with that. The only staff I know of that you could be talking about would be Whoo (Of whom I asked politely to tone down his attitude towards other users), Xen (Who shared a disagreement with myself, which again, turned ugly, much like this one, but is somewhat cleared up now), Carn? I dunno who else you could be talking about. Anyhow, Point of it is, there's going to be disagreements, arguments and things aren't going to always go 'professionally', or how you want them to. Like I said, it's sad to have seen this happen. And I don't like how it's being taken out here on Eruanna, when it initially began with me and you.

I'm there to do two things, and that's just to administrate the community and play the game. As everyone should do. Map, play, whatever. But all this drama is completely unnecessary. I honestly don't see the need for it. I'm hoping you draw back on all this and see I'm not trying to insult or argue with you here, but merely trying to make amends and make things 'right' so to speak.


Posted by Ralphis on 08-20-10 18:18:

Essel was wrong, he's a dumb dog dick, and I hate his guts along with the rest of you pathetic, gelatinous tapeworms

User was banned for this post.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 18:20:

So that's why Ralph's title was changed. That's some insight.


Posted by Whoo on 08-20-10 18:21:


Metalhead2 said:
The only staff I know of that you could be talking about would be Whoo (Of whom I asked politely to tone down his attitude towards other users)




While it's not 100% rude, it's still not very polite pal.

And now I'm going to sit back, grab some popcorn, and enjoy the rest of the show until I go to bed.


Posted by Quasar on 08-20-10 18:28:

This thread wins a Golden Poo:


Posted by Bashe on 08-20-10 18:30:



I made this 4 u guys... i hope u love it <3


Posted by Pavera on 08-20-10 18:30:

That PM seems reasonable enough to be considered polite in a firm, business like manner. But that's just me.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 18:30:


Krispavera said:
That PM seems reasonable enough to be considered polite in a firm, business like manner. But that's just me.

Yeah, I don't really see an issue with the PM.

S-sorry Whoo ._.


Posted by Whoo on 08-20-10 18:33:

Aw man, there goes an ego point!


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 18:34:


Whoo said:
While it's not 100% rude, it's still not very polite pal.

And now I'm going to sit back, grab some popcorn, and enjoy the rest of the show until I go to bed.



Fixed.


Posted by Use3D on 08-20-10 18:35:

boy skulltag sure is gay


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 18:37:


Use3D said:
boy skulltag sure is gay
After the fall of the NEWDOOM empire, it had to shift somewhere.


Posted by DoomCup on 08-20-10 18:42:


SoulPriestess said:

No. I'm just clearly pointing out that he's doing this for nothing more than attention.



Um, wow. Are you incapable of hearing yourself? Do you have no clue what each and every one of your posts in this thread have been? You have been wielding all the maturity and mental accuity of a 12 year old thowing a tantrum about your friend leaving your stupid clique. I am frankly amazed that someone like you can possibly have a position on a software project, and not because of your gender, but because of your blatant disregard for the rest of your community.

I hope you're eventually capable of seeing where you went wrong, and start making an effort to turn that around. It's not too late. If things keep up the way they are, skulltag will become a footnote in doom history, and nothing more.


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 18:44:



You know what? I don't care about them. I'm not going to shed a tear over them. If they want to tell me how to improve, they can POLITELY come on IRC, say, hey, I think you need to improve with suchandsuchandsuch, and say, you know, if you stopped doing this, or started doing this, it would make you an awesome admin.


OH HEY CHECK THIS OUT!

Let's take a look at Essel's first two lines in the log!


<esselfortium> I really have to say I don't like the new rules about ban discussions.
<esselfortium> Wasn't part of the deal with ST's new staff supposed to be about transparency and fairness with all that?


Now let's take a look at the first thing you said in the log!


<Eruanna> I am the one who banned Decode - and I see *NO* reason *WHATSOEVER* to have a discussion about it. People need to learn to deal with shit. And essel - no offense - but you've been in Doomworld a lot longer than you've been here - I don't think you really have much of an idea how things work here.


Essel "went on IRC politely" and offered his input on the subject, maintaining a calm and reasonable attitude throughout the conversation, and how did you respond? You immediately greeted his argument with increasing hostility and dismissed everything he said stating that he hadn't been in the Skulltag community long enough to understand how things worked.

Oh and incidentally:
Eruanna: Joined Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:51 pm
Esselfortium: Joined Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:19 pm

Looks to me like Essel's been in the Skulltag community a bit longer than. Maybe he's the one who should be the administrator. I have no idea what's gotten in to you but right now you're being a childish hypocritical idiot.


Posted by rf` on 08-20-10 18:47:


esselfortium said:
Uh. What? Sorry, but no. Remmirath, 40oz, and a hell of a lot of other people ask me for my input voluntarily on a pretty regular basis. I'm often thanked for it, even. Criticizing peoples' maps and giving advice on them is pretty different than shouting down opinions that are opposed to yours. You're not even attempting to make yourself look good here.

Adding my two cents, I've often talked to essel about his opinion on maps and my own projects. While [quite] often we don't see eye to eye, he's never freaked out on me about it, and nor have i. I don't see how you guys have such a big problem.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 18:51:


Craigs said:


Essel "went on IRC politely" and offered his input on the subject, maintaining a calm and reasonable attitude throughout the conversation, and how did you respond? You immediately greeted his argument with increasing hostility and dismissed everything he said stating that he hadn't been in the Skulltag community long enough to understand how things worked.


/me rolls eyes
I was not hostile. Do you need your coat trimmed? I bet you could make a lot of wool.


Craigs said:


Oh and incidentally:
Eruanna: Joined Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:51 pm
Esselfortium: Joined Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:19 pm

Looks to me like Essel's been in the Skulltag community a bit longer than. Maybe he's the one who should be the administrator. I have no idea what's gotten in to you but right now you're being a childish hypocritical idiot.


Join date does not indicate experience with dealing with people. Especially ones who BAWWW over their friends' bans and can't learn to deal with the fact that they broke simple rules. If you pay attention to the context in which that was said, you'd understand that bans are the ONLY thing which we will not discuss - reasonably or otherwise.

I was perfectly reasonable when I talked to him in that log. I was firm, I stood my ground, and I never lost my cool. No matter how many times or how many people say it, I never was hostile towards him. Maybe critical, but not hostile. There IS a difference.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 18:55:

SoulPriestess, you can't even post anymore without looking like a ignorant douche bag. Your almost a parody.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 18:56:


SoulPriestess said:
I was perfectly reasonable when I talked to him in that log. I was firm, I stood my ground, and I never lost my cool. No matter how many times or how many people say it, I never was hostile towards him. Maybe critical, but not hostile. There IS a difference.

Translation: "No matter how many people call me out on pitching a fit, or what a bunch of silly IRC logs say, I was calm, and I was right. Because, really, when am I not calm or not right?"


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 18:56:


Technician said:
SoulPriestess, you can't even post anymore without looking like a ignorant douche bag. Your almost a parody.

Speak for yourself. :)

lol



John Smith said:

Translation: No matter how many people call me out on pitching a fit, or what a bunch of silly IRC logs say, I was calm, and I was right. Because, really, when am I not calm or not right?"


Taking my wording and twisting it to your own means doesn't automatically make it into something I said. It just proves you can't read properly.


Posted by Use3D on 08-20-10 18:57:


SoulPriestess said:

No. I'm just clearly pointing out that he's doing this for nothing more than attention.



Also before this thread gets closed or helled and before I goto sleep, I'm going to say that I've known Essel for several years now, and you are simply full of crap. If he wants to air some of your dirty laundry over here, fine, he's been part of this community a lot longer and is welcome and to do so. It doesn't surprise anyone, in case you haven't noticed. It's not like tales of your incompetence haven't reached every person involved with Doom. You are unwelcome, transparent, foolish, petulant and probably ugly. So kindly take another huge loss for your useless staff with some dignity and just leave.

No one is interested in your 'side', you've already lost. Just go already.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-20-10 18:57:


SoulPriestess said:
I was perfectly reasonable when I talked to him in that log. I was firm, I stood my ground, and I never lost my cool. No matter how many times or how many people say it, I never was hostile towards him. Maybe critical, but not hostile. There IS a difference.

I can't believe you've made me post this again.


<Eruanna> I don't really give a flying fuck how "good" of a member Decode was before he pulled the shit he did. He was stupid enough to do it, and that's enough said. Why can't people talk to him directly? Why do we have to ANSWER to a bunch of spoiled fucking brats who don't fucking know enough to mind their own fucking business? And what's worse, why do we have to answer to an entire group of faggots
<Eruanna> who ALSO don't know enough that if we start letting people like Ambient and Decode get away with the shit that they do, then people will expect to be able to just walk all over us and get away with whatever they want?
<Eruanna> This is not an acceptable way to run a community to me.
<Eruanna> It ends HERE.
<esselfortium> .....
<Eruanna> so if you want to resign over one rule, do it now.
<esselfortium> I didn't say anything about Decode. :-\



<Eruanna> what I'm seeing from you
<Eruanna> you are being argumentive
<Eruanna> and dismissive
<Eruanna> and when I try and discuss things with you
<Eruanna> you are putting your own opinion about how I SHOULD be acting into it
<Eruanna> which is clouding my intentions of dealing with this matter
<Eruanna> and as long as you are doing that
<Eruanna> we cannot have a reasonable discussion
<Eruanna> you don't seem to understand I am upset
<Eruanna> and I'm trying best to restrain myself
<Eruanna> from doing something utterly drastic
<esselfortium> "Argumentative and dismissive"? Are you kidding? I've explained my reasons for thinking what I do. All you've given me is the older-and-wiser "we have experience and it has to be this way". Nothing I've said has been seriously considered at all.
<ClonedPickle> then perhaps we should halt the conversation until your mood has improved
<esselfortium> No, I understand you're very upset. That's why this is all so absurd.
<Eruanna> I fucking explained my reasons to you, essel.
<esselfortium> You're pissed as hell that I disagree with you. That's been obvious.
<Eruanna> I explained them to you
<Eruanna> No, I'm pissed that you won't listen.
<esselfortium> Your reasons were strawman arguments and "sorry but it has to be this way". Those aren't reasons.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 18:58:

Essel that is the epitome of calm, rational, and reasonable. Really how hard is it to realize this? Gosh.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 18:59:


SoulPriestess said:

Speak for yourself. :)

lol

No, I'm not being mean, please look at what you're writing.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:00:


esselfortium said:

I can't believe you've made me post this again.







<Eruanna> I don't really give a flying fuck how "good" of a member Decode was before he pulled the shit he did. He was stupid enough to do it, and that's enough said. Why can't people talk to him directly? Why do we have to ANSWER to a bunch of spoiled fucking brats who don't fucking know enough to mind their own fucking business? And what's worse, why do we have to answer to an entire group of faggots
<Eruanna> who ALSO don't know enough that if we start letting people like Ambient and Decode get away with the shit that they do, then people will expect to be able to just walk all over us and get away with whatever they want?
<Eruanna> This is not an acceptable way to run a community to me.
<Eruanna> It ends HERE.
<esselfortium> .....
<Eruanna> so if you want to resign over one rule, do it now.
<esselfortium> I didn't say anything about Decode. :-\


That was NOT directed AT you. It was directed at the people BAWWing over bans - and I was voicing my support for the very rule that YOU disagreed with.


<Eruanna> what I'm seeing from you
<Eruanna> you are being argumentive
<Eruanna> and dismissive
<Eruanna> and when I try and discuss things with you
<Eruanna> you are putting your own opinion about how I SHOULD be acting into it
<Eruanna> which is clouding my intentions of dealing with this matter
<Eruanna> and as long as you are doing that
<Eruanna> we cannot have a reasonable discussion
<Eruanna> you don't seem to understand I am upset
<Eruanna> and I'm trying best to restrain myself
<Eruanna> from doing something utterly drastic
<esselfortium> "Argumentative and dismissive"? Are you kidding? I've explained my reasons for thinking what I do. All you've given me is the older-and-wiser "we have experience and it has to be this way". Nothing I've said has been seriously considered at all.
<ClonedPickle> then perhaps we should halt the conversation until your mood has improved
<esselfortium> No, I understand you're very upset. That's why this is all so absurd.
<Eruanna> I fucking explained my reasons to you, essel.
<esselfortium> You're pissed as hell that I disagree with you. That's been obvious.
<Eruanna> I explained them to you
<Eruanna> No, I'm pissed that you won't listen.
<esselfortium> Your reasons were strawman arguments and "sorry but it has to be this way". Those aren't reasons.

Again - proves that I have not lost my cool. I kept it the entire time. And I directly criticized you for your behavior. I was not hostile. Just honest.


Posted by Revenant on 08-20-10 19:02:


SoulPriestess said:
Again - proves that I have not lost my cool. I kept it the entire time.


I'M NOT SHOUTING! FUCK YOU SPOILED FAGGOTS I DON'T HAVE TO PUT UP WITH YOUR FAGGOT SHIT


Posted by Snakes on 08-20-10 19:03:


SoulPriestess said:

Again - proves that I have not lost my cool. I kept it the entire time.



... Okay, as someone who thinks that essel could have, at least temporarily, dropped the matter, this is without a doubt one of the most bizarre things I've ever read. How can you honestly read that little part of the log and say that?


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 19:04:


Again - proves that I have not lost my cool. I kept it the entire time.




<Eruanna> which is clouding my intentions of dealing with this matter
<Eruanna> you don't seem to understand I am upset
<Eruanna> and I'm trying best to restrain myself
<Eruanna> from doing something utterly drastic
<Eruanna> No, I'm pissed that you won't listen.


I'm just going to go ahead and let this speak for itself.


Posted by DoomCup on 08-20-10 19:04:


SoulPriestess said:

Join date does not indicate experience with dealing with people. Especially ones who BAWWW over their friends' bans and can't learn to deal with the fact that they broke simple rules. If you pay attention to the context in which that was said, you'd understand that bans are the ONLY thing which we will not discuss - reasonably or otherwise.

I was perfectly reasonable when I talked to him in that log. I was firm, I stood my ground, and I never lost my cool. No matter how many times or how many people say it, I never was hostile towards him. Maybe critical, but not hostile. There IS a difference.



A difference that can be lost through text. However, I have to say, the impossibility of discussing, on an official skulltag forum, why someone got banned is distressing. At best it would indicate the incompetence of the people levying such bans, and at worst it would indicate that perhaps the bans were not deserved or made for personal reasons. There is no reason why people shouldn't discuss the banning of other members.

The response to esselfortium's question was not only uncalled for, it was obscene in its maleficent tone and its drapings of using authority as a cloak protecting the ones calling the shots from any transparency or accountability.

I am thankful that I am not a member of the skulltag community. It must take a great deal of willful ignorance or corruption to put up with such draconian and tyrannical methods of project management.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 19:05:

You really believe what you're saying SoulPriestess? You really are that fucking stupid aren't you? I tip my hat to you madam. Working through that severe mental retardism you have to be able to post things on the internet must have been a great deal of time and effort. I applaud your dedication and work ethic. You are truly an inspiration to downs children everywhere.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 19:06:

rules are for bitches.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:07:


DoomCup said:

I am thankful that I am not a member of the skulltag community. It must take a great deal of willful ignorance or corruption to put up with such draconian and tyrannical methods of project management.



Alright - Mr. Expert.

How would you run it better?

And I challenge you - I doubt you can pull it off - to word your response without a single insult. If you can do that, you win.


Posted by Revenant on 08-20-10 19:08:


SoulPriestess said:
How would you run it better?



Wasn't there a thread to this effect on the Skulltag forums already?


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 19:09:


SoulPriestess said:


Alright - Mr. Expert.

How would you run it better?

And I challenge you - I doubt you can pull it off - to word your response without a single insult. If you can do that, you win.



You first.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 19:10:

The correct way to run the forums is to lock threads where running the forums comes up in the form of a question.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:10:


Revenant said:


Wasn't there a thread to this effect on the Skulltag forums already?



And it ended in a shit fest. Which is why it got locked and removed. I am asking for input WITHOUT that. I don't think I can get it. People are too immature - but prove me wrong. PROVE ME WRONG! Prove to me ... that you are mature enough to voice your opinion, without looking like a total jackass (that is - being honest, and not using insults and saying OMG ERUANNA AND METALHEAD ARE RETARDED - which by the way has already been said so many times)


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 19:10:


Revenant said:
Wasn't there a thread to this effect on the Skulltag forums already?

There were two of them. That got locked. Over disagreements about how to run the forums.


Posted by stewboy on 08-20-10 19:11:


Infurnus said:


You first.



Well, to be fair, she wasn't the first one to be insulting in this particular thread.


Posted by DoomCup on 08-20-10 19:11:


SoulPriestess said:


Alright - Mr. Expert.

How would you run it better?

And I challenge you - I doubt you can pull it off - to word your response without a single insult. If you can do that, you win.



For one thing, I would allow open discussion of people's bans. I would also make clear the situations that would lead to a ban. All official business would be carried out in the open for all to see, so that there is no ambiguity about what is going on.

Those should be a good start.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 19:14:


SoulPriestess said:
People are too immature - but prove me wrong. PROVE ME WRONG!


heh


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:14:


DoomCup said:


For one thing, I would allow open discussion of people's bans. I would also make clear the situations that would lead to a ban. All official business would be carried out in the open for all to see, so that there is no ambiguity about what is going on.

Those should be a good start.



Alright. You win one point. No insult in that at all. Good job.

Now, I challenge you to answer me this... with everything completely out in the open, and people completely up in your business, and the need to remove trolls and cheaters to keep things sane (and to keep the port alive) - and with people criticizing your EVERY step... how would you go about this? Knowing full well that no matter what you do - there's going to be a shit fest.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 19:15:

you could try not responding to shit you think is stupid.


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 19:15:


SoulPriestess said:


Alright. You win one point. No insult in that at all. Good job.

Now, I challenge you to answer me this... with everything completely out in the open, and people completely up in your business, and the need to remove trolls and cheaters to keep things sane (and to keep the port alive) - and with people criticizing your EVERY step... how would you go about this?

I would just do what Carnevil did: press the red button and nuke everyone, texas bbq style


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 19:15:

http://www.skulltag.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=159

Relevant make the community better topics. Both got locked because, basically, the modmins and the forum population couldnt agree on what kind of changes to make. One of the threads ended with a different staffer being removed and ostracized from the community. I'd encourage everyone here to fully read these threads so that they can understand the depths of the management failure that is the Skulltag community.


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 19:15:


SoulPriestess said:
PROVE ME WRONG! Prove to me ... that you are mature enough to voice your opinion, without looking like a total jackass (that is - being honest, and not using insults and saying OMG ERUANNA AND METALHEAD ARE RETARDED - which by the way has already been said so many times)



Infurnus said:


You first.



This is pathetic Eruanna. You can't even make one post that doesn't immediately contradict yourself. Come back when you can think straight.


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 19:15:


stewboy said:


Well, to be fair, she wasn't the first one to be insulting in this particular thread.


Yes she was. http://www.doomworld.com/vb/showthr...1030#post901030


Posted by Snakes on 08-20-10 19:16:


SoulPriestess said:


Alright. You win one point. No insult in that at all. Good job.

Now, I challenge you to answer me this... with everything completely out in the open, and people completely up in your business, and the need to remove trolls and cheaters to keep things sane (and to keep the port alive) - and with people criticizing your EVERY step... how would you go about this? Knowing full well that no matter what you do - there's going to be a shit fest.



*Hits buzzer*

Address the criticisms!!!!!


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:17:


Craigs said:




This is pathetic Eruanna. You can't even make one post that doesn't immediately contradict yourself. Come back when you can think straight.


And you can't even make one post where you know what you're talking about. But I am not going to ask you to come back, because I won't ask anything of you at all.


Posted by DoomCup on 08-20-10 19:18:


SoulPriestess said:


Alright. You win one point. No insult in that at all. Good job.

Now, I challenge you to answer me this... with everything completely out in the open, and people completely up in your business, and the need to remove trolls and cheaters to keep things sane (and to keep the port alive) - and with people criticizing your EVERY step... how would you go about this? Knowing full well that no matter what you do - there's going to be a shit fest.



I would welcome the criticism. It's the right of the members of a community to question and criticize the actions of their superiors. As for the "trolls and cheaters" bringing a "shitfest", I think these are a small price to pay for transparency and accountability.


Posted by Da Spadger on 08-20-10 19:20:

Hello. I am a representative of the Society of Combating and Prevention of Tired Cliches. (S.C.P.T.C.)

According to subsection 92z, column H, the current discussion (Internet Drama as pertaining to status of one or several members of moderator, admin or other position of importance.) is part of or a whole cliche which may be described as tired or overused. As part of my authority given to me by S.C.P.T.C. I am hereby changing the topic to one less used on the Internet.

The topic is now about writing new captions for Family Circus cartoons.

The cartoon is as follows.



Thank you, and have a nice thread.


Posted by stewboy on 08-20-10 19:20:


Infurnus said:

Yes she was. http://www.doomworld.com/vb/showthr...1030#post901030



See: posts by Craigs, John Smith, Bank, Mr T, Mr Freeze.


Posted by Revenant on 08-20-10 19:24:


SoulPriestess said:
Now, I challenge you to answer me this... with everything completely out in the open, and people completely up in your business, and the need to remove trolls and cheaters to keep things sane (and to keep the port alive) - and with people criticizing your EVERY step... how would you go about this?


I'd grow some skin and do my job. Maybe figure out why people are "criticizing my every step" and see if that actually holds some merit instead of sweeping everything under a rug and playing "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

People have the right to question authority. If one doesn't recognize and welcome this fact then they can hardly be called a useful leader.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:25:


DoomCup said:


I would welcome the criticism. It's the right of the members of a community to question and criticize the actions of their superiors. As for the "trolls and cheaters" bringing a "shitfest", I think these are a small price to pay for transparency and accountability.



Well - here's something you may or may not know about me.

I do not regard myself as a "superior." I never asked for this elevated status. The people I deal with - whether I ban them or not - are my peers. What I am doing, is simply removing them from something that I was told to watch, and keep sane. I am in no way better than they are. Any admin of any community would do good to remember that. Even managers at different workplaces could afford to adopt that.

As far as accepting criticism goes - I accept it, and welcome it. But on one condition: In the end, I am the judge of my own actions. I allow others' opinions to influence my own, but when it comes to deciding my actions, I ultimately have to retain my own view about things. To let 500 opinions, many of which contradict each other, run the community, is insane. No one person has the exact same view as another with how Skulltag should be run - and it seems the most popular opinions are downright insane and mostly designed to drive the administration out. No matter what, I have to make a decision, and I have to make it in good faith that I am right. Because no matter what decision I make, no matter what I do, I will be wrong according to a good vocal minority.

Well - hypothetically, let's say there are no Skulltag admins. Some people would be happy, but some wouldn't be. Let's historically look at communities in years past who have run themselves as an anarchy. If that's what you really want, then you can say goodbye to banning cheaters. You can say goodbye to removing trolls - especially the ones who talk you down at every turn. You think you're being a troll here? You're NOTHING compared to what could be - and what you'd have to deal with.


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 19:25:


Revenant said:


I'd grow some skin and do my job. Maybe figure out why people are "criticizing my every step" and see if that actually holds some merit instead of sweeping everything under a rug and playing "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

People have the right to question authority. If one doesn't recognize and welcome this fact then they can hardly be called a useful leader.

I'm questioning the authority of your posting.


Posted by Revenant on 08-20-10 19:27:


SoulPriestess said:
I do not regard myself as a "superior."


Then stop acting as one.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:27:


Revenant said:


Then stop acting as one.



I'm not.


Posted by Carnevil on 08-20-10 19:28:


SoulPriestess said:


I do not regard myself as a "superior." I never asked for this elevated status.


Right. You just took it for yourself.


Posted by SoulPriestess on 08-20-10 19:29:


Carnevil said:

Right. You just took it for yourself.



Wrong.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 19:31:

I like where this thread is going. And I agree with carn.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 19:32:

I don't! there's so much hostility! It doesn't belong here!


Posted by Infurnus on 08-20-10 19:32:


stewboy said:
See: posts by Craigs, John Smith, Bank, Mr T, Mr Freeze.


There's a difference between jest and what you were talking about.


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 19:34:


SoulPriestess said:

I am in no way better than they are. Any admin of any community would do good to remember that. Even managers at different workplaces could afford to adopt that.
I'm not.





<Eruanna> the Skulltag community itself, at large, cannot handle such
<Eruanna> And treating them like adults has magically made everything better?


Doesn't seem to stop you from talking about them as though they are just ignorant children.


Posted by Carnevil on 08-20-10 19:36:

LALA


Posted by Spleen on 08-20-10 19:37:

The proper way to run a forum is to wait until you are in a good mood before responding to people who are being immature. People don't need to be answered in 10 minutes. This is not tech support. If you run the forum, you don't have to race to post before the topic is locked, like I am right now, but I'm not a moderator here so I don't have that luxury.

Both Eruanna and people who criticize her are people who have contributed much to the Doom community. But internet arguments aren't a race. I think when we get upset, we all need to step back and say "Okay, I disagree with you. Let me think about it and get back to you in a day."


And I'm disappointed in all of the people who are using this topic to get some cheap laughs while poking fun at everyone who lost their cool. Everyone snaps once in a while, that's part of being human.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 19:38:

The skulltag community is not even half as unstable and immature as it's made up to be anyway.


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 19:38:


Craigs said:
ignorant children.
No craigs that's ignorant! You're being ignorant! the skulltag admins are only doing what's best for the community!


Posted by Revenant on 08-20-10 19:38:


Carnevil said:
LALA


This post was better before you edited it out.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 19:39:


Carnevil said:
LALA

Dont quit on us now. You just straight up said that Eruanna took advantage of some page loading errors to get rive to turn over the entire site to her. And you're right. And don't edit posts when so many people are watching the thread.

EDIT: http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/772/carnf.jpg THE POST


Posted by Da Spadger on 08-20-10 19:40:

As the offer of captioning Family Circus comics didn't seem to be of interest to the present company, I'd like to offer a Garfield strip instead. An image editing program may be needed in order to apply captions to the now empty speech and thought bubbles.



Sincerely,

Spadger Z. LolStrogg,
3rd rank thread topic enhancer
S.C.P.T.C


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 19:40:


Carnevil said:
LALA
You meant to say before the ninja edit:

Carnevil said:

You took advantage of a situation in which some people were experiencing page loading errors and got Rivecoder to turn control of the entire site to you


Posted by Carnevil on 08-20-10 19:47:

There was a reason for the ninja edit. There are late-breaking developments in this story. More to come later!


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 19:49:


spoiler - highlight to read:

Carnevil knew too much and now he's revealed too much and now the Skulltag team is coming to kill him


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 19:49:


Da Spadger said:
Hello. I am a representative of the Society of Combating and Prevention of Tired Cliches. (S.C.P.T.C.)

According to subsection 92z, column H, the current discussion (Internet Drama as pertaining to status of one or several members of moderator, admin or other position of importance.) is part of or a whole cliche which may be described as tired or overused. As part of my authority given to me by S.C.P.T.C. I am hereby changing the topic to one less used on the Internet.

The topic is now about writing new captions for Family Circus cartoons.

The cartoon is as follows.



Thank you, and have a nice thread.



"MOM, SOULPRIESTESS IS PUTTING PINECONES UP MY ASSHOLE"


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 19:49:

Well I'm glad there is more to come later Carn!


Posted by DoomCup on 08-20-10 19:52:


Carnevil said:
You took advantage of a situation in which some people were experiencing page loading errors and got Rivecoder to turn control of the entire site to you



SoulPriestess, after I dealt with you on an even basis, giving you advice on how better to use your authority, it turns out it may not even be legitimate. If true, this is completely shameful. I'm sure the community, were it an open one, would be well within their rights to call for your resignation.

Of course, you could do so yourself as an act of good will, but I doubt you will.


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-20-10 19:52:


Craigs said:
Carnevil knew too much and now he's revealed too much and now the Skulltag team is coming to kill him
Next thing you know, SoulPriestess and MetalHead will be the admins of Project Vega as well!


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 19:54:


Doom Marine said:
Next thing you know, SoulPriestess and MetalHead will be the admins of Project Vega as well!


Please no, it's one of the few games i'm lookin forward to

edit: no offense to metalhead you still my bro


Posted by Craigs on 08-20-10 19:59:

http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/...lotthicknes.png
THE PLOT THICKENS


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 20:00:



IT THICKENS MORE


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 20:00:

Skulltag forum is now conveniently down for maintenance less than an hour after I post links to skulltag threads. J Edgar Hoover would like to present the skulltag modmins a lifetime achievement award for hiding information.


Posted by 40oz on 08-20-10 20:02:

We need doom radio now more than ever. Bank! Get in here!


Posted by Mike.Reiner on 08-20-10 20:02:


40oz said:
We need doom radio now more than ever. Bank! Get in here!

Oh god yes!


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 20:02:

We need to all sit down and play some Odamex more than ever!


Posted by Catman847 on 08-20-10 20:03:


Craigs said:
http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/...lotthicknes.png
THE PLOT THICKENS



Damnit Craigs, I spent about 30 seconds wondering why the "Try Again" button didn't work.


Posted by Revenant on 08-20-10 20:03:


Catman847 said:


Damnit Craigs, I spent about 30 seconds wondering why the "Try Again" button didn't work.



So did I. Then I remembered that I use Opera. Funny, that.


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 20:12:


Posted by Catman847 on 08-20-10 20:14:

That kinda looks like Essel is saying "F SkuLlLag." But interesting nontheless.


Posted by GreyGhost on 08-20-10 20:14:


Da Spadger said:
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/5162/garfield78.gif
I call bullshit - that cat's too fat to be Garfield!




One door closes - another opens. Congrats essel, may you last longer here.


Posted by Creaphis on 08-20-10 20:18:

Neat. I guess that tells us what the admins here think about all this: the same thing as everyone else here thinks about this.

Lol skulltag


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 20:26:

EDIT: Set Abominae has shown me the light of GodJesus and set me straight.


Posted by Csonicgo on 08-20-10 20:29:

Needs Stalin or Che.


Posted by Technician on 08-20-10 20:30:

EDIT: Set Abominae has shown me the light of GodJesus and set me straight.


Posted by ALMN on 08-20-10 20:37:


Posted by Set Abominae on 08-20-10 21:19:

I don't come to the DoomWorld forums often. Not unless something important [and/or utterly pointless] is going on. Today's visit brings me here to find this thread. After taking two long hours to read through the log Esselfortium provided and reading through the entire thread, I have 3 things to say.

1) I understand Essel's point of view, why he felt alienated and why he decided to leave the SkullTag staff team. However, I can't see the need for a public, drama-filled [not to mention trolled] thread.

2) I understand the position of Eruanna, Metal, and the rest of the SkullTag staff. It's true, you can't please everyone and I can clearly see why they are so easy to offend and make angry. However, I believe the criticism of the community can be handled better.

3) Those who are here only to poke fun and laugh at others need to get the fuck out - this is serious discussion and your posts do not contribute [whether you believe so or not] to the thread, the forum, the problem OR the doom community in general.

In conclusion, doomers, please make sure to not turn things into a genuine trollfest in the future. And remember kids [and adults for that matter], this is the internet. No matter what side of the fence you stand on, in the end, it means absolutely nothing in the real world. So cry me a river, build me a bridge and GET THE FUCK OVER IT.


Posted by stewboy on 08-20-10 21:32:


Set Abominae said:And remember kids [and adults for that matter], this is the internet. No matter what side of the fence you stand on, in the end, it means absolutely nothing in the real world.


Wrong, but let's not get into that.


Posted by Set Abominae on 08-20-10 21:39:


stewboy said:


Wrong, but let's not get into that.



Fair enough.


Posted by John Smith on 08-20-10 21:45:

Things are going to be super fun tomorrow.


Posted by Lizardcommando on 08-20-10 22:25:


ALMN said:
http://gyazo.com/a4d65335cd1f7c4726b84db4a829c1eb.png


Shouldn't you be using the sickle and hammer symbol instead of the swastika if you're using that typeface?


Posted by Planky on 08-20-10 22:55:


Set Abominae said:

3) Those who are here only to poke fun and laugh at others need to get the fuck out - this is serious discussion and your posts do not contribute [whether you believe so or not] to the thread, the forum, the problem OR the doom community in general.



Internets! Serious business!


Posted by Mr. T on 08-20-10 22:58:


Lizardcommando said:


Shouldn't you be using the sickle and hammer symbol instead of the swastika if you're using that typeface?




Posted by Cutman on 08-21-10 03:00:

Arg, so this is why the forums are down? How many times have we had the forum close down because of a bitchfest in the IRC? I'm not saying who's wrong or right here but taking the entire community down because of one little bump in the staff is a little annoying, especially for people who want to actually use the forum for something like editing reference. :(

If it's down for actual maintenance, then disregard this post.


Posted by Mr. Freeze on 08-21-10 03:13:

Wait...am I actually slightly agreeing with Carn?

Did just seriously download ZDaemon?

OH GOD HELP I'M STEPPING INTO THE TWILIGHT ZONE


Posted by Danarchy on 08-21-10 04:17:

Posting in epic thread.

See, this is why I post on DW exclusively these days. All the other corners of the Doom community are run by tin-pot dictators from their moms' basements.


Posted by Quasar on 08-21-10 04:21:

Here's my take on the whole thing:


Posted by ALMN on 08-21-10 05:33:


Lizardcommando said:


Shouldn't you be using the sickle and hammer symbol instead of the swastika if you're using that typeface?



I'm not good at drawing :(


Posted by AlexMax on 08-21-10 05:53:


Mr. Freeze said:
Did just seriously download ZDaemon?


Jokes on you, ZDaemon is way way way way way worse about this.

At least on Skulltag forums, the feature requests/bugs/projects forums are the only ones worth hanging out on, at least on the official forums. There are also communities such as Skullrant which have nothing to do with the official forum community and that Metal/SP don't really give a shit about.


Posted by Catman847 on 08-21-10 06:30:

Being a previous member of Skulltag Staff, I'll give my opinion about this. It'll be with a logical view, and not biased towards any side (Quite frankly, I'm not to fond of either party, no offense intended).

Personally, I think this whole event was taken way out of proportion by the rest of the staff. If you wanted to keep the ban thing private to prevent any drama that may occur, then it would have helped to be fully straightforward about it to essel.

Now, in regards to the ban discussion, I propose a solution (which will be forwarded to Skulltag's administration once the forums return). Just have a list of all IPs banned, the name that was banned, and the reasoning. Then, have that thread locked. People will be able to see why X was banned, without having a place to spew their drama. I would also suggest an addition to the rules about this, so that people do not start "UNBAN X" crusades again, and give clear-cut punishments for disobeying this rule (Maybe 1. Verbal Warning, 2. Forum Warning, 3. Purgatory, 4. Temporary Ban, 5. Permanent Ban). Hopefully, this will alleviate some of the people wondering about these shadow bans.

All in all, I think that taking this whole escapade to Doomworld may have been a bad idea, but the way that a few people were acting (Like Soul Priestess in this very thread) was just as bad.


Posted by DooMAD on 08-21-10 06:59:

<insert casual opinions from an unbiased third party>

After several pages of reading I'm still having trouble finding an explanation for why the discussion of bans shouldn't be permitted. Censorship is a dangerous road to walk in an online community, you might have noticed that people grow accustomed to being able to say whatever they want on the internet and they get a bit annoyed if you try to take that away from them. I'm not suggesting there's an easy answer, but people are still going to ask the question whether you like it or not. You'll also have noticed that "because I say so" usually doesn't help.

As for trolling in the thread, it's generally accepted practice here. A small price to pay for freedom of speech. It also serves as a form of community self-policing, where a hostile environment means you better know what you're talking about before you say it, or the community will rip you apart for it. It's not pretty, but it's surprisingly effective, heh.

As a side note, it seems we have a pretty fickle community here, as last I recall it was Carn who was the big baddie in all this and everyone was queueing up to give him a good bashing about his style of leadership, yet now we're all for it if he's posting in contast to the current admins. Or perhaps it's just an excuse for some easy trolling, who knows? Maybe it's all just "lol internets".



Catman847 said:
All in all, I think that taking this whole escapade to Doomworld may have been a bad idea, but the way that a few people were acting (Like Soul Priestess in this very thread) was just as bad.

To be fair, Essel probably wouldn't have felt it necessary to take the discussion anywhere if discussion was actually permitted in the Skulltag community.


Posted by Spleen on 08-21-10 07:20:


DooMAD said:
To be fair, Essel probably wouldn't have felt it necessary to take the discussion anywhere if discussion was actually permitted in the Skulltag community.

And here we see the effects of e-censorship. If an admin forbids discussing a subject in one place on the internet, it gets discussed in another place. Whether or not censorship is a good idea, and whether or not it leads to the community being more divided, I don't think the administration of a single Doom port has the power to enforce it across the entire internet. I can see an argument for less drama on the Skulltag forums, though, as long as the staff is okay with the drama spilling out to other places.


Posted by Shaikoten on 08-21-10 07:21:

A long, long time ago the Skulltag staff was small and harmonious, and the community was significantly less retarded and contributed a lot back. Watching the steady descent into idiocy over the past six years has been very entertaining and informative as to how not to run an online community. Namely, don't treat it like it's serious business. Once people get the ideas in their heads that mod or admin status somehow translates into actual power over people, it's all over.

As an Admin on ST forums all those years ago I think I probably locked something minuscule like 2 topics and made more than 1000 posts. If your community somehow finds a need to lock topics with the frequency of the ST forums, you can usually tell something has gone very, very wrong, and people are taking discussion about a teenaged video game way too seriously.


Posted by ALMN on 08-21-10 07:33:


Shaikoten said:
A long, long time ago the Skulltag staff was small and harmonious, and the community was significantly less retarded and contributed a lot back. Watching the steady descent into idiocy over the past six years has been very entertaining and informative as to how not to run an online community. Namely, don't treat it like it's serious business. Once people get the ideas in their heads that mod or admin status somehow translates into actual power over people, it's all over.

As an Admin on ST forums all those years ago I think I probably locked something minuscule like 2 topics and made more than 1000 posts. If your community somehow finds a need to lock topics with the frequency of the ST forums, you can usually tell something has gone very, very wrong, and people are taking discussion about a teenaged video game way too seriously.



QFT

This entire thread/discussion has been a learning experience for me. I've gone through the "deadmin metalhead" and "fuck the staff" phases, and now I realize that sometimes what the staff does may call for those reactions from some people. I think it's straight up dumb that the community can't know who of their own members is banned, and why those members are banned. If the ST staff would release a banlist including names and reasons, the community would know who to look out for in terms of ban evasion, and would be able to thwart ban evaders more easily.

Also I agree with everything Catman says.


Posted by Qent on 08-21-10 08:25:


DooMAD said:
After several pages of reading I'm still having trouble finding an explanation for why the discussion of bans shouldn't be permitted.
I cannot speak for the Skulltag admins or their reasons, but my short experience in the Skulltag community indicates that discussion about bans results is more people doing things to get banned. Certainly it would be ideal if everyone could have a reasoned discussion about why so-and-so was banned, but that was not how it turned out. People started getting the idea that admins were elected representatives of the community or something, whose power needed to be kept in check by that community.

What I find ironic about this is that the removal of public ban discussions was requested by the community. It was one of the few concrete results of the Community Discussion threads.

All in all I feel that this falling-out is a horrible tragedy resulting from a lack of empathy by all parties. I know it's too much to ask that things just "go back to how they were," but in lieu of that I sincerely believe it's best just to "forgive and forget" this whole thing.


Posted by AlexMax on 08-21-10 09:14:


Catman847 said:
Now, in regards to the ban discussion, I propose a solution (which will be forwarded to Skulltag's administration once the forums return). Just have a list of all IPs banned, the name that was banned, and the reasoning. Then, have that thread locked. People will be able to see why X was banned, without having a place to spew their drama. I would also suggest an addition to the rules about this, so that people do not start "UNBAN X" crusades again, and give clear-cut punishments for disobeying this rule (Maybe 1. Verbal Warning, 2. Forum Warning, 3. Purgatory, 4. Temporary Ban, 5. Permanent Ban). Hopefully, this will alleviate some of the people wondering about these shadow bans.


Even better, you could have a symbolic link to the actual master banlist somewhere. Like this one. I know that Skulltag has one, because I've seen copy and pastes from it before.


Posted by esselfortium on 08-21-10 09:15:


Qent said:
I cannot speak for the Skulltag admins or their reasons, but my short experience in the Skulltag community indicates that discussion about bans results is more people doing things to get banned. Certainly it would be ideal if everyone could have a reasoned discussion about why so-and-so was banned, but that was not how it turned out. People started getting the idea that admins were elected representatives of the community or something, whose power needed to be kept in check by that community.

What I find ironic about this is that the removal of public ban discussions was requested by the community. It was one of the few concrete results of the Community Discussion threads.


I don't know whether this was the case, but there's a world of difference between removing the public ban discussion threads (i.e. so-and-so was banned, here's a thread to voice your opinion on it) and outright disallowing anyone from asking in private why someone they know was silently banned. The discussion threads are an open invitation for trolling and nonsense, but trying to silence the topic entirely leads to rather unfortunate and undesirable implications that don't really help the users or the staff any.


Posted by SoM on 08-21-10 09:18:



<Eruanna> I am the one who banned Decode - and I see *NO* reason *WHATSOEVER* to have a discussion about it. People need to learn to deal with shit. And essel - no offense - but you've been in Doomworld a lot longer than you've been here - I don't think you really have much of an idea how things work here.




SoulPriestess said:

/me rolls eyes
I was not hostile. Do you need your coat trimmed? I bet you could make a lot of wool.



First off, SoulPriestess, READ YOUR OWN WORDS. I don't see how what you said could be construed as anything but hostile. Just because you preface something with 'no offense' doesn't mean you are free to abandon all tact.

Secondly, "I WAS NOT HOSTILE, YOU'RE JUST A SHEEP!" <--- lol


Posted by zap610 on 08-21-10 09:30:

I'm not going to even begin posting about how poorly this was handled by both communities since nobody wants to hear some unknown schmuck preach what we already know.

As for the actual argument, I think Shai's logic would have worked for it. I don't think the staff should be outright obligated to post public bans and reasons in a format every time it happens, but I also think that making it a rule to hide it from other users is just as silly. It should have just been a bit casual (depending on the situation). If a civil user asks the staff at a reasonable time why a user was banned, the staff member could choose to answer it if he or she feels like it. Eventually it would come out since nobody would be making an attempt to hide it. But given the way the community works, I wouldn't be surprised if it has user after user asking the same exact question and we can all agree that would become annoying. In that instance it probably wouldn't be answered, but again, it doesn't mean that it would be hidden. It's just too many rules about common sense.


Posted by jdtm on 08-21-10 09:36:


SoulPriestess said:

I do not regard myself as a "superior." I never asked for this elevated status.



Carnevil said:

Right. You just took it for yourself.



OOOOH SNAP


Posted by Bucket on 08-21-10 10:24:


Idiots say:
PERHAPS A FORUM ISN'T THE BSET PLACE FOR DRAMA BLUH BLUR DE DUR

For me, this seems to be the Year of Calling People on Their Shit.

And really, a public forum is the MOST appropriate place for that. Some people who are poisonous to a community are allowed to continue their retarded ways simply BECAUSE this sort of issue stays in the dark.

I, for one, had no clue this bullshit is going on, but now I'm glad I do. I'm informed and prepared for any future encounters with the people involved in this crap. Maybe next time someone decides to be a shithead and manipulate you for their own shortsighted goals, you'll know about it before it's too late.


Posted by Ladna on 08-21-10 11:05:

I think it's a huge shame that Doom, the game that was once the refuge for rebels, free thinkers, and outcasts, now has as its multiplayer ambassadors Skulltag and ZDaemon - the administrations for which actively practice censorship and pursue personal vendettas. It's beyond pathetic to the point of comedy that anyone would get so worked up over a video game, and essel probably made the right call in walking away.

Fortunately, Odamex will never ban you, because it doesn't have a ban list. You're free to play Odamex how you like, and you're free to say whatever you like about Odamex and the people who write it, because they're not assholes, and they really couldn't do anything to you anyway.

Odamex is also licensed under the GPL, so anyone interested in looking at the source is free to do so. And of course, those interested in contributing should contact the dev team on IRC (irc.oftc.net, #odamex). Let's help Odamex become the best multiplayer Doom port!

I should also make it clear I don't speak for Odamex in any capacity. My affiliation consists of contributing exactly 1 patch yesterday. But I had a huge amount of fun working with the dev team, and I would hope that others would have the same or more fun as I did.


Posted by Coopersville on 08-21-10 12:00:


ClonedPickle said back on page 1:
<ClonedPickle> then perhaps we should halt the conversation until your mood has improved


too bad this didn't happen at all


Posted by Mattfrie1 on 08-21-10 12:11:

Posting in epic thread.

Skulltag is the only sourceport I use regularly (Coming from someone who doesn't map or mod at all). If it dies, I won't be happy...

EDIT: Well, someone didn't want the Joker's Popcorn littering the thread.


Posted by Technician on 08-21-10 12:17:


Ladna said:
I think it's a huge shame that Doom, the game that was once the refuge for rebels, free thinkers, and outcasts, now has as its multiplayer ambassadors Skulltag and ZDaemon
You struck the nail on the head.


Posted by Danarchy on 08-21-10 12:48:


Shaikoten said:
A long, long time ago the Skulltag staff was small and harmonious, and the community was significantly less retarded and contributed a lot back. Watching the steady descent into idiocy over the past six years has been very entertaining and informative as to how not to run an online community. Namely, don't treat it like it's serious business. Once people get the ideas in their heads that mod or admin status somehow translates into actual power over people, it's all over.

As an Admin on ST forums all those years ago I think I probably locked something minuscule like 2 topics and made more than 1000 posts. If your community somehow finds a need to lock topics with the frequency of the ST forums, you can usually tell something has gone very, very wrong, and people are taking discussion about a teenaged video game way too seriously.


Most reasonably post in the thread. I commend you. It is sad because at one time Skulltag was my favorite source port, and I think I even had an account on the forums. That being said, on with the shenanigans...


zap610 said:
I'm not going to even begin posting about how poorly this was handled by both communities since nobody wants to hear some unknown schmuck preach what we already know.

Hey, the Doomworld community handled this just ffine. If someone plunks down a troll thread on our doorstep, it is our moral and legal obligation to troll the Hell out of it. It's what we do best.


Bucket said:

For me, this seems to be the Year of Calling People on Their Shit.

And really, a public forum is the MOST appropriate place for that. Some people who are poisonous to a community are allowed to continue their retarded ways simply BECAUSE this sort of issue stays in the dark.


Agreed. I mean, look at NewDoom. Anything remotely bad that was said about wmull/Phoebus or NewDoom got deleted and the poster either banned or threatened. Hell, you didn't even have to dis the place, all you had to do was MENTION another Doom-related site and you'd have the same fate. The forums themselves remained blissfully unaware that the guy running the show was a hugely arrogant, egotistical fucknut of colossal proportions. Any major member of those forums that got banned usually ended up coming here and sharing their story, thus wmull decided to ban everyone who even was seen POSTING on this site because obviously anyone reading the Doomworld forums had seen the heretical truth and was now branded doubleplusungood.

Basically what I'm hearing is that the Skulltag forums have become NewDoom mk II. And that's terrible.


Ladna said:
Fortunately, Odamex will never ban you, because it doesn't have a ban list. You're free to play Odamex how you like, and you're free to say whatever you like about Odamex and the people who write it, because they're not assholes, and they really couldn't do anything to you anyway.

Odamex is also licensed under the GPL, so anyone interested in looking at the source is free to do so. And of course, those interested in contributing should contact the dev team on IRC (irc.oftc.net, #odamex). Let's help Odamex become the best multiplayer Doom port!

I should also make it clear I don't speak for Odamex in any capacity. My affiliation consists of contributing exactly 1 patch yesterday. But I had a huge amount of fun working with the dev team, and I would hope that others would have the same or more fun as I did.


That's all very informative and reasonable...HEEEEEEEEEEY, you're just a shill for Odamex. I won't stand here and- ODAMEX ODAMEX...MUST...PLAY...ODAMEX!


Posted by ALMN on 08-21-10 13:58:

Staff still doesn't like reasoning about telling the community who's banned.


«20:51:52» {@c} 10:46 < FREE_WHOEVER_IS_BANNED> if we don't know who's banned, how could we spot anyone who's ban evading?
«20:51:55» {@c} Leave that to the mods
«20:52:01» {ALMN_} what if the mods are gone?
«20:52:08» {ALMN_} By the time they get back, it'll be like they weren't even there!
«20:52:09» {@c} PM a mod?
«20:52:22» {ALMN_} How can you pm a mod about someone who's ban evading if we aren't allowed to know who's banned?
«20:52:32» {ALMN_} We won't be able to tell who's ban evading without knowing who's banned.
«20:52:35» {ALMN_} which is my main point
«20:52:37» {ALMN_} and has been
«20:52:38» {ALMN_} for a while


EDIT: Me and Meatlhed had a chat



«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:08:40» {Metal} If you want to paste this, feel free. I do want everyone to know why.
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:09:18» {Metal} Back before the community grew, it was easy enough to say "Yes, this person was banned for this, and he will be back at this time"
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:09:29» {Metal} But as the community grew, of course, so did the jerks.
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:09:37» {ALMN_} it's in the package
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:09:42» {Metal} Explaining why someone is banned now, turns into a flamewar almost every single time.
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:09:55» {Metal} For the time being, I didn't want to deal with it anymore, so *I* made the rule.
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:02» {Metal} I wanted to try it out, just like we do with many other things.
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:07» {Metal} Honestly
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:08» {ALMN_} makes sense
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:15» {Metal} I don't mind explaining it to someone who is going to be rational.
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:17» {ALMN_} i wouldn't want to deal with PMs sayin "unban so-and-so"
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:19» {Metal} But getting this...
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:27» {Metal} "Why is this person banned"
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:35» {Metal} "Because they broke this rule"
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:40» {Metal} "AGH YOU'RE SO NAZI"
«21:24:25» {@ALMN_} «21:10:53» {Metal} Then they would proceed to go on a charade.
«21:24:58» {@ALMN_} «21:11:52» {ALMN_} Did you see catman's post?
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:12:04» {Metal} Yes.
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:12:30» {ALMN_} I think after this whole thing mostly blows over, you guys should try doing things the way catman said for a little bit
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:12:34» {ALMN_} just to see how things go
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:13:16» {Metal} Public banlist?
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:13:57» {ALMN_} something like that
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:14:24» {ALMN_} Like i said in the thread and more recently in #skulltag, the community should have a way of knowing who's banned, so they could spot ban evaders.
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:14:53» {Metal} I see.
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:15:00» {Metal} Then I might take the rule out itself.
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:15:07» {ALMN_} That's pretty much the only reason I can think of to have it public though, i don't know about everyone else's opinions about it.
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:15:41» {Metal} Well, I'll try and see what I can do.
«21:24:59» {@ALMN_} «21:15:50» {Metal} I just want all this fixed and everyone to calm down.


Every line has my name in front of it because to post this without nnsScript's horrible log handling i had to paste it all back into mIRC so it wouldn't be a mess of crazy symbols.


Posted by GreyGhost on 08-21-10 14:30:


Danarchy said:
See, this is why I post on DW exclusively these days. All the other corners of the Doom community are run by tin-pot dictators from their moms' basements.
Mine will be different - it'll be run from a shed in the backyard. :)


Posted by Philnemba on 08-21-10 15:12:

I have to say, this is the most entertaining reading in Doomworld I've ever read since CJwright got banned :)


Bank said:
parody ad
Call now!



ROFL!


Posted by Xaser on 08-21-10 15:48:

Hmm, seems that every time I'm without an internet connection for a couple of days, some sort of hugely massive dispute occurs. I'll bet if I were to go to the Bahamas for a week, we'd have World War III. ;)


Posted by Belial on 08-21-10 16:04:


«21:10:19» {Metal} But getting this...
«21:10:27» {Metal} "Why is this person banned"
«21:10:35» {Metal} "Because they broke this rule"
«21:10:40» {Metal} "AGH YOU'RE SO NAZI"
«21:10:53» {Metal} Then they would proceed to go on a charade.

See this is what I don't get.

"They" ask a question, get a clear answer, who gives a shit about what "they" do afterwards.


Posted by Cyberimp666 on 08-21-10 16:17:


Belial said:

See this is what I don't get.

"They" ask a question, get a clear answer, who gives a shit about what "they" do afterwards.



See: Liberty Doom.


Posted by Carnevil on 08-21-10 20:05:

http://www.skulltag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=26625

And there you go. The thrilling anti-climax to this episode.


Posted by Csonicgo on 08-21-10 20:08:

I still came.


Lol, I really didn't think it'd go this far. At least Essel hasn't been successfully demonized for, you know, doing the right thing.


Posted by Technician on 08-21-10 21:21:

Cool.


Posted by Ralphis on 08-21-10 22:33:

A day before the change over:

code:
[02:56] <Ralphis> here's my prediction [02:56] <Ralphis> skulltag is going back to skulltag.com [02:56] <Ralphis> im calling it [02:59] <Carnevil> Do you always jump to conclusions [02:59] <Ralphis> I just ruined your surprise [02:59] <Carnevil> Yeah, I'm getting it all back. And also magic unicorns are flying out of the sky!


Praise me


Posted by stewboy on 08-21-10 22:50:


Ralphis said:

Praise me



You are very handsome


Posted by kristus on 08-21-10 23:49:


Ralphis said:
Praise me

You are a strapping young lad of epic proportions.


Posted by Doom Marine on 08-22-10 00:48:

Everytime Ralphis rears his ugly head, it causes a Skulltag revolution.


Posted by myk on 08-22-10 01:09:


<<a>Carnevil> Yeah, I'm getting it all back. And also magic unicorns are flying out of the sky!
I knew that thing that flew by my window wasn't just a pigeon...


Posted by GreyGhost on 08-22-10 02:44:


Carnevil said:
http://www.skulltag.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=26625

And there you go. The thrilling anti-climax to this episode.

It looks like you've also inherited Eruanna's IP ban list. Is there any likelihood of the policy to block entire dynamic IP address ranges being reviewed and/or a working contact address being added to the ban information page?


Ralphis said:
Praise me
YOU ARE HUGE! THAT MEANS YOU HAVE HUGE GUTS!


Posted by Mr. T on 08-22-10 03:04:


Eruannus said:
Lastly, I'd like to state fully and clearly, that despite the rumors that may go around, the recent departure of one of our moderators had very little to do with my decision to step down - in fact, it was only "the straw that broke the camel's back." Before rumors start circulating that he's the one who caused it... I'd like to make it clear that I had been planning this for a very long time.



Pssst did you hear, Eruanna quit because Essel departed recently


Posted by Mattfrie1 on 08-22-10 04:24:


Ralphis said:
Praise me


♪ I have to celebrate you baby,I have to praise you like I should ♪

+1 internets to anyone who gets the reference.


Posted by Shaikoten on 08-22-10 04:38:


Mattfrie1 said:


♪ I have to celebrate you baby,I have to praise you like I should ♪

+1 internets to anyone who gets the reference.



+1 internets for an extremely easy fatboy slim reference?


Posted by Danarchy on 08-22-10 04:46:


Ralphis said:
Praise me

I pretty much figured that was going to happen myself, after Carnevil mentioned "recent developments" or whatever.


Mr. T said:


Pssst did you hear, Eruanna quit because Essel departed recently


Yeah, sure, she was planning it all along. Lawl, damage control.


Posted by Creaphis on 08-22-10 05:39:

It's an odd time when Carn regaining control of Skulltag is good news.

Just joking Carn, congrats :)


Posted by exp(x) on 08-22-10 05:55:

Hey, Carn. Congratulations. Don't fuck it up again.


Posted by Patrick on 08-22-10 08:47:

hey guys I havent in been in the community lately due to health reasons, I'm glad to see that everyone has finally put their differences aside and stopped causing pointless drama over ....

oh


...backs away slowly...


Posted by Use3D on 08-22-10 10:18:

Now she can go back to being a full-time carpet cruncher.


Posted by POTGIESSER on 08-22-10 10:43:


Danarchy said:

Yeah, sure, she was planning it all along. Lawl, damage control.



LOL I knew I skipped to the this page after reading 3 pages of batshit for a reason :D


Posted by Technician on 08-22-10 10:45:


Use3D said:
Now she can go back to being a full-time carpet cruncher.
Now it's making sense.


Posted by fraggle on 08-22-10 10:47:

I for one am proud to call myself an esselfortium yes man sheep.

Now you've finished with this Skulltag bollocks you'll have the time to finish KDiKDiZD, right?


Posted by J-selva on 08-22-10 10:57:

Yeah, this is kinda why I stayed away from the Skulltag community. But I think I'll be getting back to it soon...


Posted by GooberMan on 08-22-10 18:39:

*waits impatiently for ststaff.wad*


Posted by ALMN on 08-22-10 19:44:


GooberMan said:
*waits impatiently for ststaff.wad*


Play ALMNwad while you wait!


Posted by myk on 08-22-10 20:12:


Technician said:
Now it's making sense.
Perhaps she is gay and all, but if it really makes sense, then Use3D should be acting in a girlie manner.

Really, though, doing something relatively humble in these situations is not easy, unlike throwing rotten tomatoes at easy targets.


Posted by Csonicgo on 08-22-10 20:48:


ALMN said:


Play ALMNwad while you wait!



I have to admit that wad is hilarious shit. Thanks for making it.


Posted by Scuba Steve on 08-23-10 01:47:

Posting in epic thread.


Posted by BlackFish on 08-23-10 03:20:


GooberMan said:
*waits impatiently for ststaff.wad*


Heh, stforums.wad :)

We need dwforums4 but i don't think enough drama has happened here recently.


Posted by Kaiser on 08-23-10 08:45:

Coming soon... Skulltag DLC for CIF3!


Posted by ALMN on 08-23-10 12:37:


Csonicgo said:


I have to admit that wad is hilarious shit. Thanks for making it.



Wait until it's done you'll love it more than you could possibly ever love a woman


Posted by Kirby on 08-23-10 12:41:

Just read through this whole thread.

This deserves it's own two-hour TV Movie.


Posted by Abyssalstudios1 on 08-23-10 20:06:

/me wanders into "blogs"

Holy shit. The entire time I was reading this, I was preparing massive wall-of-text replies in my mind. And then... it's done. Euranna is gone, Carn gets his port back, and... well. Perhaps things will settle down a bit.

Ah, Skulltag. How I love it so. The .exe, at least. Its community, however, is mixed. There is little or no trolling in the servers (although I don't play Ghouls v Humans or All out War; perhaps things are different there). The IRC is a good place to hang out. The clan scene is decent, and people are willing to help out mappers in need.

Oh, and props to Torr for not getting into another shitfest. The guy knows how to keep his head down. If only Carn, Torr, and Rivecoder could reunite. Productivity would shoot through the roof.


Posted by Szymanski on 08-24-10 11:50:

Like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel
Never ending or beginning on an ever spinning reel
Like a snowball down a mountain or a carnival balloon
Like a carousel that's turning running rings around the moon
Like a clock whose hands are sweeping past the minutes of its face
And the world is like an apple whirling silently in space
Like the drama that you find from the Skulltag mastermind........


Posted by Hellbent on 08-24-10 17:03:


Szymanski said:
Like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel
Never ending or beginning on an ever spinning reel
Like a snowball down a mountain or a carnival balloon
Like a carousel that's turning running rings around the moon
Like a clock whose hands are sweeping past the minutes of its face
And the world is like an apple whirling silently in space
Like the drama that you find from the Skulltag mastermind........

I was momentarily debating if i was gonna go to what music are you listening to or this thread first. And I went here, but when I was reading this I thought I was in the other thread. Did you write those lyrics are they to a song? They're pretty good.


Posted by Planky on 08-24-10 17:23:

http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/thet...sofyourmind.htm


Posted by exp(x) on 08-24-10 18:56:

Alternatively: http://tinyurl.com/327gg7j


Posted by Szymanski on 08-25-10 00:01:


Hellbent said:
Did you write those lyrics


Heh no, I was going to rework them but I lack the talent.


Posted by DuckReconMajor on 08-25-10 05:09:


esselfortium said:
(For the audience at home, Eruanna and SoulPriestess are the same person!)
I learned something today!

Da Spadger said:
The topic is now about writing new captions for Family Circus cartoons.

The cartoon is as follows.


ok poop is coming out

DooMAD said:
It also serves as a form of community self-policing, where a hostile environment means you better know what you're talking about before you say it, or the community will rip you apart for it. It's not pretty, but it's surprisingly effective, heh.
This is why everything I post here is just stupid jokes, heh.

Shaikoten said:
Namely, don't treat it like it's serious business. Once people get the ideas in their heads that mod or admin status somehow translates into actual power over people, it's all over.

As an Admin on ST forums all those years ago I think I probably locked something minuscule like 2 topics and made more than 1000 posts. If your community somehow finds a need to lock topics with the frequency of the ST forums, you can usually tell something has gone very, very wrong, and people are taking discussion about a teenaged video game way too seriously.

Ugh, the "it's just Doom and the idiots who still play it" argument. People take Doom and its community seriously, and have strong feelings about it. There's still a way to be civil.

Creaphis said:
It's an odd time when Carn regaining control of Skulltag is good news.
lol it's the Simpsons episode where Burns goes to jail and the plant is all WOOHOO SMITHERS then they piss Smithers off and he gets meaner than Burns was so Homer and the gang break him out of jail


Posted by Shaikoten on 08-25-10 05:22:


DuckReconMajor said:
Ugh, the "it's just Doom and the idiots who still play it" argument. People take Doom and its community seriously, and have strong feelings about it. There's still a way to be civil.


My argument here is not that it's impossible to take your projects and work within the Doom community seriously. Rather, that you shouldn't let positions of "power" go to your head within the community, because ultimately, who gives a fuck anyways?


Posted by dew on 08-25-10 07:19:


where's some TFT, goddamit?!


Posted by Shaikoten on 08-25-10 10:27:

All of this drama has occurred at the worst possible time for me to make a TFT, it would seem. I may make a belated one though, the demand has been very high. Besides, Soulpriestess is very fun to draw:


Posted by Danarchy on 08-25-10 18:30:


DuckReconMajor said:
ok poop is coming out

This reminds me of something I saw not too long ago where people were replacing the punchline of every comic with that line. It was fucking hilarious.


Posted by DuckReconMajor on 08-25-10 18:33:

http://www.doomworld.com/vb/showthr...8497#post898497


Posted by Danarchy on 08-25-10 18:46:


DuckReconMajor said:
http://www.doomworld.com/vb/showthr...8497#post898497

Oh right, I got the link here.


Posted by scalliano on 08-26-10 12:27:

Just popping in to thank everyone for the most entertainment I've had on these boards since the GZDoom shitfight. I just wish I had Kaiser's leet scripting skills...


Posted by Ten on 08-26-10 13:31:

Re: My resignation from Skulltag staff.


esselfortium said:
I now no longer doubt the horror stories I've heard from other former staff members.


Coming from a fellow former Skulltag staff member myself, my only gripe was how biased the promotions were within the staff. I was there a good 2+ years as a global moderator, yet some other guy who had only been in the staff for a total of 6-7 months at all was promoted to administrator over me. Same thing is *still* going on today. These people who have only been in the staff for a matter of months are rising up to administrator out of nowhere. It's ridiculous.


Posted by Technician on 08-26-10 14:21:


scalliano said:
Just popping in to thank everyone for the most entertainment I've had on these boards since the GZDoom shitfight. I just wish I had Kaiser's leet scripting skills...
Yup,... I think we made a difference here.


All times are GMT +12 hours. The time now is 19:59.
Show all 252 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.2.5
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000, 2001.