He plays the "Quality over Quantity" game with me though. But I'm tryin' :3
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :19
Well, I might be able to help you out with that. But we'll find out in a week or so.
I'm slowly working my way through him. Not sure if I'll actually be able to. But he has shown interest.
Oh? Got my curiosity sparked now. :P
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :25
I have a suiter friend who is currently visiting friends and made some videos. He's already made some suuuuuuper kinky content but he also plans on making some zoo videos as well. He prefers quality over quantity as well, so there is a good chance any videos he takes will turn out amazing.
I will find out from him in the next fews days what all has happened.
That's really exciting! I can't wait to hear the update on that c:
Also. I'm gonna forward a few messages. Don't message the guy obviously :P
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :57
If anything happens I will let you know.
Here is the thing, if I give you the videos my friend makes and they are the high quality videos he normally makes, you have to promise me you will have this person's collection.
This suiter is a good friend of mine, and I am not about to do this unless I get something guaranteed in return.
And it goes without saying that you can not share any videos of this suiter with ANYONE besides this cameraman.
I have not told you to not share videos before. This time, I am, so I am very serious about it.
Basically you tell this person "I have some high quality videos no one else has." You share them with him on the condition that he will trade in return. If it works, you send me everything you get from him.
If I get this content and share it with you, just understand, I will find out if you leak it.
I'm not worried about it. Honestly, you won't leak this. I'm fairly certain.
I won't leak it. I promise c:
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :15
I know you won't.
I will have the insurance to ensure that doesn't happen.
I hope any way. Damn memory. Fucking hate how forgetful I can be sometimes.
I know. This time it was unintentionally. Honest.
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :29
I will be totally honest, I don't buy it. You blatantly told me last time you didn't share something because "you wanted to share it later" in an attempt to seem like you had new content. So forgive me if I had a difficult time believing you "forgot".
You openly admit to being manipulative. Why should I believe anything you have told me?
I have been nothing but honest and professional towards you and our arrangement. You however, have broken that arrangement, twice.
Why should I continue to honor our arrangement? It is apparent that you have not now more than one occasion. I understand and am more than willing to accept a mistake once, but the second time is where things change.
When you sent me the original file of the videos you had, you told me EXACTLY how big it was, so you must have KNOWN it was missing content. Especially if the file that was missing was an entire GB in size.
Because I have no reason to be manipulative. Plus I only do that sometimes. It isn't a constant thing I do. I ain't that cold hearted.
I know.
Second time was unintentional. I asked you so I could make sure. I didn't want to send you something I may have forgotten to send initially and say it was new. As I said.
I'm confused as to your statement. What do you mean?
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :11
So when you tell me you simply forgot, after mentioning you intentionally withheld content AND mention you are manipulating, why should I believe anything to tell me. Again, if you forgot a single photo, I might understand, but you forgot an entire video that was over a GB in size. There is no way you could have forgotten that existed, especially after telling me the exact size of the folder you sent me. At some point, you should have gone "That is an entire GB smaller than what I have" because a GB is a lot, especially if that video is larger than the entire collection you are sharing combined.
Consider this your last chance to be honest with me.
If I find out you are withholding content from me again, our arrangement is off.
If you come forward and are honest, I will forgive you no matter what you tell me. But, if I find out you withheld from me again after today, our arrangement is off.
When I was gathering the collection for you, I didn't have all of it on me. I had to redownload basically everything from telegram out of memory of whom I had sent some of the content to previously, and slap it into a temporary folder and try to recall if I missed anything.
Which I did miss something as you can see here, but in the rush of the trading moment and my forgetfulness at times caused me to forget a file, especially given I had not actually viewed that file in quite awhile, and I hadn't sent said file to pretty much no one.
Nonetheless. I understand. I'm sorry for, once again, causing drama where it shouldn't have started to begin with.
I understand. Once again, I'm sorry, and I am being honest, this was not intentional withholding.
ζ0
ζeta 0mega 08.10.2017  :45
If you are withholding anything, now is the time to tell me. Do it now and I will forgive you. Do it to me later and our deal ends.
As far as I am currently aware of, I am not withholding anything else. But I will do a quick look through just to make sure. Okay?
Hey! Sorry for the delay.
I wish I was. I know many suiters that are into zoo that are going, however! I've been looking for an owner for them. Do you know any active owners that are going with their companion? If I may ask.
Also, I'm happy to hear that you are doing okay as well. I've been doing quite well as of late, to.
Huh. I haven't thought of that. I'll consider it, and I'll let you know if it's made or not.
Hope you've been having a good day as well by the way.
I might as well message here, given the lack of response time. Can you send me the proof of what was sent so I know it is true, so I can premptively ban them in the groups I am currently a moderator in, if he isn't already banned?
I appreciate you showing me the evidence involved. Thanks.
Will ban them now.
If I may ask, who tipped you off to this persons abusive interests? Just out of general curiosity.
It is good to meet you as well. You having a good day?
Seems your message has sent.
That's intriguing, however. I do not mean any disrespect by my curiosity, with that in mind. You're more than welcome to say no to my curiosity, but if you do not mind me asking another. Who is your alt?
Welcome back!
Glad to hear your day went good. It must be late for you, then, if you're almost ready for bed.
I understand. I just wanted to make sure that if you ever tried to wiggle your way under abusers noses, and you ended up sharing abusive stuff with them(not saying you would, mind you, I'm just thinking out loud) only for your alt to get the same kind of leak as the one you have provided to this individual above, that I didn't ban and or/report your alt account on accident.
I am sorry to hear about your issues as of late. What do you believe causes this issue?
I understand.
One last curiosity. Was this a recent sniff or something you've held onto for a while? I will not ask any further questions as far as I'm concerned as it seems I'm prodding a bit to much.
Good to see that it is now working for you.
General curiosity. I've noticed a few reports before, from what I am recalling, that were delayed reports. So I wanted to know if this was a recent discovery or something you had held onto for a bit.
Oh, and, here. Have a cute GIF that I found.
It is an adorable GIF, that's for sure.
Understood. I won't ask any further questions, unless a particularly interesting questions pops in my head.
It is also my recommendation that you hinder the sharing of the video you provided to me. May be on the wrong side, but it is not something that needs to be spread. The rest are publically available content, as far as I am recalling.
Because you never know the context at which something was created. I am one that believes in second chances, of a "Benefit of the doubt", per-say.
Plus it is downright rude to spread such private content, nomatter what it contains. Though that is just my opinion on the matter, especially since it contains ones suit.
It is not me, no. If it was, I would be reacting with much more gusto than I am now.
I won't blame you for asking questions, by the way. I know the way I am acting is on the suspicious side.
Of course.
If I didn't know, I wouldn't acknowledge it. It is rather suspicious, the way I'm acting. I mean no harm or intentional suspicion(or however you spell it) by it, though.
That is definitely true.
I am not sure how to properly elaborate, as I'm not sure what you want me to elaborate on. As I have stated previously, you're more than welcome to ask questions.
The context at which my statement was given mainly was given to you because of these few points:
1) It involves a Fursuiter.
2) It is definitely a wrong video, but it is still something extremely private. This leans towards my "Benefit of the doubt" belief. One does not simply make(or give away) such a video and give it away willy nilly, and if they do, they are idiots.
3) I had only asked that you keep it under wraps in regards to publicity. I understand people asking for proof to ban the person that had sent said video, but I see no reason to want to post it everywhere and make it more of a deal than it is(not saying that was what you were going to do, but I am stating generally regardless).
I hope that makes sense.
I know who it is that made the video, not the one that had sent it. It was not made for me, nor did I know he had even made it until now.
No.
It is of my belief that this particular video, if I was to guess, was a special circumstance for a friend of his. He is a pleaser individual, and he himself enjoys a good bit of new content here and there. I would imagine he had done this, and only that particular time, for a friend.
That is my guess.
It is definitely wrong, yes. He should not have done that, even for a friend.
I have known him for some time, and it is with utmost trust in this individual and what I know of him that this was a one off instance. Nothing more.
I am not telling, nor am I demanding. I am simply inquiring if you would be so kind as to let this lay on the low side and not publically post it. I cannot force you to do anything, nor would I want to try, either.
To which I understand and respect what you mean by that.
As I've said, he has given no signs of this kind of behavior at all in the past. Hence my belief this was a one off instance. Hence me inquiring this to begin with. I mean no disrespect to you or your feelings on the matter, and I won't force you to do anything. I was only asking out of curiosity.
I am not telling you what to do, as I have said before.
I won't force you, nor will I attempt to force you to do anything. I was only asking out of curiosity.
I know him, and I believe this is not something he is fully into. Whether or not it is that you believe that, is up to you. I won't blame you for thinking different than me in this regard.
When you do go to bed, with that in mind. Do sleep well and have good dreams, alright?
You would not. But I would very much appreciate it if you at least took into consideration what I know of the person behind the video. I want to keep him safe, I have utmost certainty that this was a one off instance and it will not happen again. I promise you this.
A person with way to much of a pleaser personality and a high libido.
I am not saying it is fine to record an abusive video. It was not and will never be fine that he recorded it. But I know him. This is one of the only exceptions in my logic in my head I will make, because I believe with my heart that he isn't the bad kind of person.
Alright.
Please just keep what I said in mind. I meant no offenses whatsoever and I hope you understand where I'm coming from.
I appreciate you listening to my rambling.
Sleep well and have good dreams. Message me later.
I do not appreciate you assuming I enjoy its contents just because someone apparently has. Regardless, thanks for the heads up.
You're generalizing my viewpoint because I defended one person.
And, no. I do not enjoy the content.
You are once again generalizing my viewpoint because I defended someone.
I do not enjoy the content.
Abusive material is just that, abusive material. It is all around horrible.
But, unlike some of you, I make sure I have an idea on who the person is before I place the negative tag on them, if the negative tag should ever even come up in the first place. And I make sure and see if they legitimately feel guilt for either what they like, or what they have done, if they have actually done anything before.
To which, my friend does experience major guilt. Hence me defending him, as it has been clearly stated that he will not be participating any more in doing that kind of thing.
I do not wish to argue. Reply to that or not. I don't care.
