Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I went down the rabbithole of tranny surgeons the last few days and came across an eccentric one named Dr. Will Powers. If there's an anon with lots of free time, I can tell this is an absolute goldmine. Filter it down to posts submitted by him and you'll see his interests are all over the place. He's well-versed in memes, crypto, he acknowledges the detransitioning community, etc.

REDDIT - Dr. Will Powers
IMGUR - Dr. Will Powers

Powers seems different from Dr. Gallagher in that he seems to be in it for the money and to make a name for himself as the best (aka least shitty) surgeon. Dr. Gallagher explicitly takes the sexual angle; while it wouldn't surprise me if Powers is also a weird creep, he's a normal looking dude with a wife.

He did a 2-hour presentation where he accidentally drops lots of hatefacts about trannies, including that 57% of black troons at his practice are HIV positive.

Full video here

Oddly his home burned down in 2017 or 2018 and his 3 cats died. This seems a bit odd - how common are major home fires?! I think this deserves more scrutiny

Powers's Reddit post about the home fire
Correct me if I'm wrong but Dr. Powers is not a surgeon, but a family doc with a focus on endocrinology. He treats HIV and prescribes HRT. A lot of HRT.

He also gets into fights with trannies pretty regularly when he tells them the truth i.e. there are side-effects to HRT. He did an interesting AMA on r/asktrans a few years back that seems to now be memoryholed where he had a pretty reasonable take for a tranny doc, IIRC. advising transes follow their doctor's instructions and not take every horse chemical they can get their large mannish hands on right away. This led to snart seething, cries of gatekeeping, etc. so that's probably why it's deleted because r/asktransgender's finest Internet autists can't handle being told that DIY HRT is a bad idea by an actual doctor. Dr. Powers does want to do research on HRT effects and on what a gayface looks like (lol) and posts results from his work fairly often for a practicing family doc.

He comes off as well-meaning, but does not have perspective on the majority tranny constituency of furious white autistics who will never encounter AIDS or listen to an authority figure, ever. My impression of him from his posting history has been that he is sincere about wanting to help trans individuals, but his perception is biased by his patient population being overwhelmingly HSTSes engaged in high-risk sexual activities with men, since he runs an HIV clinic and that was how he first encountered trannies. He's not in the same league as Gallagher, who comes off as an absolute psycho trying to rip the tits off any teenager that might grow up to be as pretty as her.
 
He's not in the same league as Gallagher, who comes off as an absolute psycho trying to rip the tits off any teenager that might grow up to be as pretty as her.
Hm...that could actually be a reason why she does it. That weird harpy has untreatened mental issues. I would say most Srs butchers are mentally ill/ have personality disorders.

I don't understand how a male surgeon can destroy dicks & balls on a daily basis & how a female surgeon likes to yeet breasts off. There is some weird psychological shit going on.
 
> Penises aren't fake just because they're surgically created or entirely detachable!
> Recognizing that all penises are real penises - even prosthetics.

By that measure, one of those jiggly Victoria's Secret miracle bras isn't a push-up bra, it's a real, true and honest set of titties. A bright pink, sparkly vibrator isn't a sex toy, it's a real penis. Orwell has nothing on this nonsense.

On a more general level, the intense emphasis on specific, nonjudgmental, very inclusive, hug-box language comes across as very female to me. I may be reading to much into this, but this kind of word-policing is something I'd expect on a make-up forum, not on a gun blog. If this was actually a forum populated by men, I'd expect a lot more content along the lines of 'It look like someone shoved an M-80 up your snatch. What cracked out chimpanzee took a crowbar to your junk?' not 'Oooh, what an affirming result! It's just so . . . organic looking!' That kind of delicate, multi-layered, emotionally-manipulative doublespeak is peak female socialization.
alright

@behindyourightnow RE ROGD and the Struggle to Grow Up. - same thing as some of psychological theories behind why currently out-of-favour, fatal fad anorexia develops too.
 
Last edited:
Capture6.PNG
I can't imagine how using the peritoneum to line the ditch would enable "better pH and flora", but I guess anything that isn't fecal anaerobes is an improvement?
 
A bright pink, sparkly vibrator isn't a sex toy, it's a real penis. Orwell has nothing on this nonsense.

On a more general level, the intense emphasis on specific, nonjudgmental, very inclusive, hug-box language comes across as very female to me.
It can be. Insee the same kind of thing on the other side, with TiMs refusing to acknowledge that there is any difference between a biological women and a man. Though i see more toxic positivity on the TiF side, and more desire to control the narrative on the TiM side. Both sides are delusional, and subscribe to magical thinking.

That being said, I find it hilarious that in the near future, somebody could say that they have a collection of real penises in a drawer, and no one will know whether that person is a sex toy enthusiast, or a serial killer.
 
wether it has the desired outcome is yet TBD, being as the is a massive wave of unprecedented numbers of people now seeking and hacks providing shoddy transition surgery, and these are very new and are still “healing”.

god know how many people who have already happily given their 5 star surgeon rating online are still “cathed up” waiting to STP should be any time soon bro!

it’s gonna be a long road to seeing how the guineapig bumper crop really fair.

wait til the tide goes back out before we can asses the wave of mutilation 🎵, huh?
In that tumblr belonging to the FTM who had 33 surgeries and an oleostomy bag for years someone asks them why they are now suing Dr Crane when they had formerly said positive things about him. The FTM says that there is enormous pressure on people with botched surgeries to be positive about their surgery experience, because they believe that the surgeons are the only ones who can fix their rotting crotch wounds and they are desperate to not step out of line and get ghosted. Like there might only be one “gender affirmation” surgeon who takes their insurance in the whole state, and maybe even other SRS surgeons won’t touch the mess the first surgeon made. Quite possibly some of the more ghoulish surgeons actively get off on stringing them along on this powertrip.
AghanBlue is completely incorrect lmao, you have no understanding of the state of trans healthcare research. On the topic of GAS, look at this meta analysis of almost 8000 patients of whom only 77 were regretful of their surgery.
Lol look at the dates of most of those studies. You can't compare studies that are mostly from the 1990s, 2000s and early 2010s when this stuff only exploded in the last 5 years or so. Trannies were formerly screened and monitored for years before they were able to get surgery, and they weren't doing it to minors. Now they're lopping tits off 13 year olds.

Not to mention the explosion in lucrative surgery opportunities has meant that a bunch of money-hungry butchers with mediocre skills have entered the game, when it was formerly done by experienced specialists.

Research into trans people has been going on for decades,

Why don't you sit down and have a think about how easy it is to get anything negative related to trans surgery or hormonal outcomes funded or published these days. Look at what happened to Lisa Littman and ask how many research scientists want to dive into the fray and go through the same shit. It's easier to just look the other way and let the butchers do their work.

I know you think you are diving in to enlighten the evil Kiwifarms bigots about trannies, but we are not the bad guys here, unless you think that talking about people on the internet does more harm than making a tidy profit cutting the wombs out of autistic teenagers with psychiatric problems.

But even if it's true that most SRS patients report satisfaction, who cares? There are countless examples in this thread of delusional people who are on their fourth revision, are incontinent, lost the ability to orgasm, half of their neodick has rotted off etc. and will still be like "still so worth it!!!" If you undergo the type of irreversible mutilation that SRS entails, you really have no choice but to cope. A sober assessment of what you voluntarily did to your own genitals will probably lead to a disillusionment with your entire transition on top of debilitating depression. It's not surprising that many decide to just up their dose of copium instead.
Not to mention that because the new online troon cult is based on constantly validating each other to maintain a mutual dissociation and denial of one's former self, any serious long-term negativity will get you exiled and you will lose your entire support system. Look how they treat detransitioners. Look how little interaction people like Sienna Grace get on their social media posts talking about their regret. Everyone just ghosts them. No one wants to hear about it, because other people's failures damage your own transition euphoria. There is enormous social pressure to keep treating one's transition journey as positive even when you're peeing through a tube and will never orgasm again.

Okay cool, retard doesn't actually have any evidence that being GAS is bad then? You just assume that the bad trans lobby is hurting kids because they are performing these procedures.

I am uninterested in anecdotes about bad outcomes, I am uninterested in vague finger pointing towards some conspiracy. Make a fucking claim, and provide some evidence for it. This is childish, it is always wild to me how confidently you people believe your own bullshit. You don't give a shit that you had to retract from the prior claim AfghanBlue made about there being no evidence of the outcomes of GAS, or that this is a new procedure. No, you swing right into your next talking point about how this analysis should've only focused on one group of trans patients, IE you think it should have been asking a different question.

You also try to get into some bs about methodology, but I really don't give a shit what you people think because the shit you people think is nonsense. This is a peer reviewed study published in Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryGlobal Open. You people don't know how to control better than they do, you don't know how to design a study or interpret the data. One of you morons was even posting that you can, for some reason, discount this based on them being self reported follow up studies. As if there was another way to obtain satisfaction data.

Furthermore, you can publish whatever the fuck you want. You might even get it mentioned by the BBC! Look at this study they mention. This is a study that consistently misgenders trans women, calls passing inherently a deceptive act, and favorably includes a quote about "all trans women raping cis womens bodies". Whatever you want to say about the validity of that, if you want to publish an anti trans paper nobody is going to stop you. This notion of some transpiracy is unfounded.

And as one last thing, do you guys really believe the fetish angle? What other fetish has such poor health outcomes for those who are unable to partake in it? What other fetish has the endorsement of most major medical organizations? What other fetish makes children significantly more likely to be threatened or injured with a weapon at school? Do you guys even really believe that or is it just an easy answer to a question that challenges you?
I'm not reading all that. Go dilate.
 
People who regularly laud how happy they are that they had surgery include Kevin (AmHole) Gibes, who is going in for revision because the cursed thing closed up, and Yaniv, whose neoclit fell off. I'm not sure patient satisfaction surveys are the best go-to on this particular topic, given the patient population.
 
perhaps some people are genuinely happy with their outcomes. perhaps some surgeries don't produce horrific results. I'm not denying the fact that sometimes it may "work". but how is it good when there are so many botched works? when there's pressure from the community not to speak about your bad experiences? I'm sorry, but people who say "well I can't feel anything in my genitals except for pain and I can't have sex anymore, also something is rotting down there" and "I'm so happy with my results, everything is great" aren't very reliable to me.

cosmetic surgery in general is not a fun easy thing. sometimes you get nice results, sometimes you get horrific pain and complications. even simple surgeries can go wrong. and genital surgery is not simple.

I'm not against surgery. but I don't like promoting or performing dangerous surgery on teenagers and mentally ill people who deserve proper care instead of ruining their bodies.
 
Yeah man noone ever publishes garbage, checking methodology is paranoid and pointless. The "Replication crisis" was made up by the methodological terrorism industry to sell more meth.
And there is absolutely no way to measure mental health improvement without using subjective data.
Haha the tard thinks that because he doesn’t understand bad study design and thinks methodology sections are scary it means no one else understands either

The very state of TRAs I swear. No one argues with them because no one wants to deal with the chimpout, so they start thinking they’re the smartest kids in the room because they know how to google studies and skim an abstract.

Behindyourightnow clearly didn't know what the fuck he was talking about,

Yet another violent misgendering in this thread. This is harmful. Please do better and stop taking part in a genocide.
 
I'd be more on boat with SRS/GRS if it wasn't such a hit or miss situation that can lead to really undesirable and miserable results.

It's true that it can relieve patients but on the other hand they could be stuck with sepsis, infections, the body rejecting the results of the procedure or worse. Not to mention the loss of sexual stimuli or the ability to orgasm.
Even though sex is not the world, it's still nice and masturbation is a common and healthy practice.

If we had a better alternative like prosthetics or understood the practice way better and in it's very detail, we would have an ethically unquestionable practice.
However as it stands now, SRS/GRS is a slippery slope and needs huge improvements.
 
SRS/GRS if it wasn't such a hit or miss situation that can lead to really undesirable and miserable results.
Except they never be “hit”, because you can create organ from another organ. We can grow artificial meat in the lab, but we can grow the whole fucking organ, because it doesn’t exist in a vacuum with plug-n-play. Even creating “passing” thing won’t make it work — won’t smooth and grow penis with erection, won’t lubricate vagina, just as silicon implants after mastectomy won’t allow breastfeeding.

And they don’t want the look — otherwise “no-depth vulva vagina” would be the “hit”; — they want wet panties, periods, and self lubrication during penetrating sex; as dudebros don’t want wrinkled soft penis, that men have for 98% of time, that fills with blood and straights and get hard; they want stand to pee and have a bulge, and penetrate for the sake of penetration.
 
long article in NY Mag about phalloplasty (archive). the whole thing could have been sourced from this thread and is worth a read.
2392AA58-3E49-48E8-BDD7-23A769D2AE04.jpeg

My Penis, Myself: I didn’t need a penis to be a man. But I needed one to be me.​

By Gabriel Mac
There is enormous social pressure to keep treating one's transition journey as positive even when you're peeing through a tube and will never orgasm again.
Literally this straight from the article:
“Once, a pre-op 52-year-old Black man who was struggling with money and his disability and insurance asked if having a penis was really going to make a difference, relieve any of this pain he was barely surviving, and I watched as the post-op group members calmly assured him that, yes, it would. If he could just hang on, hang on, hang in there.”

Remember Stumpdick talking about her flesh abomination like a literal infant? So does this woman
There’s a scene in Disney’s original Dumbo when the child elephant’s mom cradles him in her trunk and sings to him, exuding love. Quietly, but wholly. As a kid feeling utterly unheld by this world, I hated it.

As a grown man in a hospital bed, chest loosely draped with a gown in a low-lit December room, I looked down in the direction of a penis I’d assumed would be covered in bandages — but then there it just was. Laid out at an angle toward my left thigh, propped on a green cloth. And I, awed and heartful and weeping, sang that song to it.

Ba-by mine, la na na naaaaaaaaa.

Another one of his fellow victims has the fake dick die on their body, and is still going for it
One of the nodding heads in the group belonged to a nonbinary white person who was still horizontal in recovery from having had, a week prior, the worst happen, which was that after their procedure, in which all the fat and skin had been stripped from their left forearm from wrist to nearly elbow, along with major nerves, an artery, and veins, and then shaped into a tube and connected, in careful layers, to skin and blood vessels and nerves in their pelvis, their new penis had failed.

It died. On them.

But here they were, already getting ready for their surgeons to harvest a whole other part of their body within the month with zero hesitation. Because those three days they’d had their penis, they said, before being rushed into an eight-hour surgery that couldn’t save it — the feeling of it, even just for one moment, even still bloody and painful and packed with stitches: worth it.

Listen to trans voices! They’re unhinged, and clearly mentally ill.
 
Listen to trans voices! They’re unhinged, and clearly mentally ill.

Before trooing out she even wrote a book describing what a mentally ill wreck she is.

She also experimented with drugs:
 
Love when someone comes in to shit up a thread they don't like, and even admits to not having read it! :lol:
If the thread's too long, I highly recommend using the Highlight feature. This will show you (generally) the most interesting/informative/funny posts and saves you a lot of time. This works well for any thread on the Farms.
Capture.PNG Just press those << >> arrows to go backward or forward through the thread.

Of course, our troon friend here just wants to dismiss every bad SRS result as "anecdotal" and engage in lame, reddit-tier "debate me, bro!" thread derailment, so whatever.

I agree with all the posters here saying that troon testimony is extremely unreliable. After they get SRS, they're all deep into sunk cost fallacy - it's not like they can take back what they've done, ya know? Transitioning is basically a one-way street after they've been on HRT for awhile and start seeking surgery. And if they complain too much about complications or being unsatisfied with their results, their fellow troons will try to bully and shut them down for raining on their parade. Not to mention their surgeons might ghost them if they complain too much - we've seen countless examples of this!

Brutal honesty and dissent are simply not tolerated. Even slightly questioning the trans orthodoxy is not permitted, as we somewhat recently saw with Dr. Marci Bowers - a famous trans-identified SRS surgeon - who is now derided as a dangerous transphobe for daring to question whether puberty blockers are a good idea. Reddit troons have had this thread about it pinned to the top of the SRS subreddit for over two months now, clearly hoping to "cancel" Bowers for this grave heresy.
-----------

Seriously, just take a look at a site like Transbucket - where users upload pictures of their SRS results and rate their experience. Even if they've clearly been botched, they'll try desperately to sugarcoat it.
Here's a random example, literally the most recently updated submission on Transbucket as I write this:
https://www.transbucket.com/pins/16550
1.PNG
Rated 5/5 stars for both sensation and satisfaction. Happy customer, right?
But no.
"Would not recommend Dr.Selph to anyone, he doesn't care about your pain, he only cared about himself"
And then she also complains about needing emergency surgery because one of her testicular implants failed or had a problem. Does this sound like a 5/5 result to anyone else?
Even before this complication, she described herself as being in "extreme pain":
2.PNG
But of course, she's still "very satisfied" with the results! :) Troons just constantly lie to themselves and others, all in a desperate attempt to convince themselves that they aren't mutilating their body for no good reason.
Keep in mind that this girl was undergoing metoidioplasty + scrotoplasty. As far as SRS goes, this is relatively simple. Phalloplasty and MTF vaginoplasty are much more complex and have higher chances of devastating complications.

Let's take a look at her pictures, shall we?
After initial surgery:
a.jpeg
b.jpeg
c.jpeg
d.jpeg

e.jpeg

After emergency surgery:
f.jpeg
g.jpeg
Keep in mind that this is very tame compared to almost all the other horror shows in this thread, I'm just using it as an example.
This girl rated her SRS results as 5/5 stars while being in extreme pain, experiencing a complication needing further surgery, and disavowing her surgeon. Complete lunacy.
And as you can see for yourself, the surgery has not made her look like a man in any way, LMAO. What is the POINT ???
*sigh*
 
How does being castrated (in whatever form) affect the odds of prostate cancer?

I don't know if this is possible, but imagine if a female lion started assuming the role of a male lion. This female lion is now king of the pride, grows out a regal mane, gets the best cuts of gazelle, and maybe even mounts some bitches. What the lion probably wouldn't do is cut its arm off and sew the fleshy stump onto its genitals, because that kind of neurotic thinking requires a human. I wonder if bonobos do this?
 
Back