Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lots of doomerisms on this thread. One must remember what we are actually talking about in regards to Russia.

Before you go out waving the Russian flag to own the Libs, you should remember what kind of a country we are talking about. Russia is a one-party dictatorship run by an oligarchic elite that considers their own people no better than cattle to the exploited for their own benefit. This elite was born at a time where every school taught the Marxist maxim of "religion is the opium of the masses". They just turned that around and are using a faux-traditional doctrine to keep their own population in line.

In terms of tyranny, this is no different from the globohomo wokeness of the West, it's just imposed on the people from a pseudo-traditionalist angle, where worshipping the state is the greatest virtue imaginable. The average Russian accepts this because he has been indoctrinated from birth to believe that everything the state does is right and everything one sees in the state-owned news is the whole truth. He doesn't have to think about politics, because the state does that for him. It's only when he personally gets his business forcefully foreclosed upon because a fat oligarch with a government job wants it for himself that he starts to reconsider his worldview.

The Russian government speaks a lot about the oppression of Russians and the right of self-determination for peoples, but their own country bans all types of separatism by imposing lengthy prison sentences for talking about separating from Russia, even incidentally. Nowhere in the world is the Russian more oppressed than in Russia,

It's absolutely true that the Western world has been becoming more and more authoritarian in the last two decades, but Russia is at a completely different ballpark. Even before Covid, the government de-facto banned any criticism of them or of government policy. If the government decides something is true, you must accept it uncritically or face either a fine or 15 days in jail. This is enforced even in social media, where I personally know people who have been fined for questioning Russian Covid policies and -numbers.

This same government is now looking to make it mandatory for every Russian resident to surrender their biometric data to the state so that you can be tracked everywhere you go. This has already been used to find and track people who have defied the severe corona-lockdowns in Russian urban areas. Moscow has already implemented "face-pay" where the state automatically charges your bank account for simply passing a checkpoint with a camera. This was done as a measure to "prevent the spread of the coronavirus", but will stay in place indefinitely. No matter where you go in Russia, cameras track you. You can't even check into a hotel without showing your mandatory internal passport.



The West is going in a shitty direction, but it's not too late for us to change course. We can still make a difference simply by rallying enough people to peacefully resist the woke insanity. Russia is so far gone that it will be incredibly hard for Russians to achieve any semblance of freedom or democracy through any peaceful means. Russia will have to collapse due to its own poverty and decadence and face an another 90s before that happens. Russia is an example of what could happen to the West if the current authoritarians get their way, not something to be emulated.
 
Last edited:
I used Japan as an example to the fact that we already did Essentially what you mentioned. I never suggested we nuke them because a Hiroshima or Nagasaki isnt a viable strategy today. I just explained how we absolutely eviscerated Japan.
He is trying to explain to your thick skull that if China starts losing, they can and will resort to the nuclear option. Any country would if its existence is being threatened and they have the capability to at least make the enemy pay dearly for their victory.

You are retarded.
 
I used Japan as an example to the fact that we already did Essentially what you mentioned. I never suggested we nuke them because a Hiroshima or Nagasaki isnt a viable strategy today. I just explained how we absolutely eviscerated Japan.
Bruh, that was 80 years ago. The world is different. The US is not going to engage in a conventional war with China or Russia because it will result in the fucking nuclear holocaust if China or Russia lose. Why are you seemingly in denial about this? Do you really think Putin, sitting in a bunker with NATO forces closing in, facing the prospect of a Nuremberg style trail and hanging after he loses is not going to glass a few cities in NATO countries and threaten to nuke more in an effort to get NATO to sign a treaty which leaves him in power?
 
To address some of the (nuclear) doomerism in the thread, there's only two situations where I think a nuclear weapon would be used in todays day and age.

1. The outcome where a rogue agent or nation obtains a wmd and uses it against another petty enemy. This, in my opinion, is the most likely next step for nuclear proliferation. I'm talking about something like where Iran bombs another middle eastern country or Russia 'accidentally' bombs a part of Ukraine. It'll most likely remind the general public that nuclear weapons are a real and serious threat and become a talking point in elections for the next 20 years.

or

2. A real, all out war happens and enemy soldiers are pushing a nuclear armed capitol. Like NATO forces closing in on Moscow or Beijing (because lets face it, America will never be invaded barring a civil war.)
 
do you have any idea how fucking expensive and involved state of the art microchip foundries are? "easily moved" my ass, if china wants them they'll take em, and they're not easy to replicate either, otherwise TSMC wouldn't still be sitting on a near
This Brandon Rogers-looking motherfucker is SEEEETHING. He's got some real fucking nerve to call upon banks, gas distributors and logistics companies to cut the truckers off. What are the odds that he gets those 1,800 extra cops like he wants?

The USA has deployed 4 naval destroyers to Europe to join the U.S. Naval buildup there

4 East Coast Destroyers Deploy to Europe Joining U.S. Naval Buildup

monopoly in the sector in the first place.
do you have any idea how fucking expensive and involved state of the art microchip foundries are? "easily moved" my ass, if china wants them they'll take em, and they're not easy to replicate either, otherwise TSMC wouldn't still be sitting on a near monopoly in the sector in the first place.
They are complex machines to be sure but not that difficult to relocate. I worked in one.

There’s assembly plants and there are foundries and neither of them are that difficult to relocate.

If it was a matter of an existential situation, yeah, they can be re-made.

No techno that the chinks possess is their own.

Again, the chip operations were moved to reduce likelihood of labor disruptions and to reduce cost. Not because of how smart these dog eaters were.
 
Doubt Nato would give any new stuff to Ukraine, where Putin could mass poke at it. It will be old stuff.
 
Anyone surprised by the relative indifference most of the thread has towards the ultimate fate of Eastern Europe or even the US-centric international system has not been paying attention. The military and productive class of the US (men under the age of 60 and especially those under the age of 40) have been wholly dispossessed of meaning and neglected by society. They don't care about Ukraine or the US becoming less wealthy due to a lag in international trade, because they're poor as shit now and have next to nothing to lose from the US economy losing out.

It's no coincidence that FDR, a navy man, considered the New Deal to be absolutely essential to making the American population ready for war. Until American politicians wake the fuck up and actually push for policies to give young men back their economic dignity, no one is going to care enough to go to war on behalf of this country.
 
Patton was a lolcow who thought he was the reincarnation of on of Napolepn's marshals
He was but the got the job done. He had good military strategies that were ignored to kowtow to morons like Montgomery and to keep muh coalition intact.

Indeed, taking input from people that fled Dunkirk and were cowed by an enemy with less manpower and hardware.

I believe WW II lasted longer than it should have due to this political correctness.
 
Lot of people here saying "why should we care about Ukraine?"
Well:
  • Crimea now Russian
  • Hong Kong now Chinese
  • Afghanistan now RU/CN aligned taleban
  • LNR
  • DNR
  • Africa now supported by B&R Initiative and CN development spending
At what point do we say that the west has broadly given up on being a major international player? America and its allies will soon find themselves dangerously irrelevant and cut off from setting the rules. In 50 years, your children will install WeChat and be surveilled by TenCent, the same way that America currently has with Google, Apple, Facebook, etc. When Taiwan's current population grows old and dies they will end up voluntarily joining China, the dominant economic and political force rather than sit as a peer to a west that's a shadow of it's former self.

Pics of "I hope Russians kill you *wave flag*" is degenerate "surrender to communism to own the libs" posting. America get your house in order rather than cutting off your nose to spite your face.


blyad
Hong Kong? It was given up peacefully through an agreement. No risk and still managed to fuck it up.

Taiwan will be much worse than HK.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GreeneCoDeputy
Why should a single one of us die for a dead gay oligarchy that transparently hates the actual people who built this nation in the first place? There's nothing in this ridiculous woke dystopia that worth my life or that of my sons. If there are any free people left in the world who value their freedom, let them fight their own wars.


China is has already killed its future with its retarded policy of killing most of its babies. They're somehow even less fertile than Europe even if you believe their obviously doctored statistics.
So the time for them to strike is now when they have a flopsided sexual ratio and plenty of cannon fodder.
 
Well if Putin is going to start a land war in Europe, now would be the time to start thinking about. Winter is ending in a couple weeks and if he doesn't win a quick victory from the jump he'll have all spring and summer to seal the deal before it starts getting cold again. Everyone is saying it's going to be "Now!" But it's been "imminent" for weeks already. If this is really about to pop off in earnest I would assume sometime in March. But who knows.
 
I'll still never understand why in the hell you neoliberal chucklefucks keep equating modern Russia to the former USSR. I don't know what they taught you in school, but I'm pretty damn sure the USSR fell like 30 years or so ago.

Every time some dumbass liberal shares an anti-Putin comic on social media or if I see one in the newspaper, they often depict Putin in Soviet-era garb and with hammer & sickle symbols or in a tank with a red communist star. I also see this shit whenever assorted leftoids circlejerk over muh Trump-Russia collusion and they depict Trump with a Soviet flag to imply he's a Russian asset. Saying modern Russia is communist is like saying Angela Merkel is literally Hitler.

Yeah, Putin is an asshole and Russia is clearly an aggressor, but it's a smoothbrain Facebook Boomer take to say they're a communist country.
yeah this is the part most war hawks conveniently fail to mention: the whole rationale of "containment" that was used to justify basically the entire cold war was based on the fact that the soviet union was expansionist to the extreme. the soviet union officially pursued the goal of bringing about a socialist world republic, by spreading communist rule to every country on the planet. how exactly they aimed to achieve this spread varied from direct military invasion to more covert means such as funding and training local communist forces, but the end goal was clear. this hyper expansionist ideology that had literal world domination as its end goal was the main reason why america was so committed to keeping them in check.

with new russia, that doesn't exist. even the most extreme hyper nationalists in russia do not seek literal world domination, at most they seek to take territory that used to be under imperial russian control in the past. and while that can still be seen as hardcore aggressive expansionism, it doesn't concern the western powers (especially not america) anywhere near as much as the old soviet aspirations to a communist world government did.

this difference is why "my fellow americans, we must keep up containment against russia!" type arguments are retarded.
 
There is never going to be a classic style war between nuclear powers that ends with one state conceding defeat and giving up power without at least a few nukes being launched. There is no need to argue semantics and split hairs more than that because it's retarded. A conventional war between Nuclear powers would result in the loser launching nukes from their version of Hitler's bunker. Why wouldn't they?
The nukes wouldn't wait that long to be used. Basically you need to flip you understanding of how nuclear options work. They are a use it or lose it sort of deal. Which means you would want to use them early, often, and massively. I would contend that a serious war with Russian would result in the gloves coming off immediately and swiftly with escalation in hours in a mad scramble to define the battle space. We're talking endless amounts of detonations just to control what's on the front. The problem as I see it is that the first side to not use nukes loses.

Russia hasn't been building those super-sonic cruise missiles to not put nukes in them.
 
Well if Putin is going to start a land war in Europe, now would be the time to start thinking about. Winter is ending in a couple weeks and if he doesn't win a quick victory from the jump he'll have all spring and summer to seal the deal before it starts getting cold again. Everyone is saying it's going to be "Now!" But it's been "imminent" for weeks already. If this is really about to pop off in earnest I would assume sometime in March. But who knows.
The projections are based on how long you can reasonably expect a mobilized army to sit still in one place and maintain order. We know that the Russian military is already getting rowdy just from their short time sitting in Belarus because of reports of quasi-banditry and also the fact that a lot of Russian military equipment has begun to appear on online marketplaces.

Putin either has to demobilize (which would be enormously expensive and probably put off an invasion until the end of the year) or move before the gopniks start breaking shit at home.
 
Every time Russia steps back and doesn't behave aggressively, they permanently lose things to America.

I don't blame them for what they're doing. They've allowed too much to be stolen as it is. It's like the Americans allowing the Chinese to... oh... oh right.
 
Every time Russia steps back and doesn't behave aggressively, they permanently lose things to America.

I don't blame them for what they're doing. They've allowed too much to be stolen as it is. It's like the Americans allowing the Chinese to... oh... oh right.
Every time they do act aggressively, they lose more of their people to the West. If you give an educated Russian a green card to the USA, he's never going to go back.
 
Every time they do act aggressively, they lose more of their people to the West. If you give an educated Russian a green card to the USA, he's never going to go back.
Russia - Invades neighboring country, replaces local culture, usurps sovereign governments, aggressively expands military influence into foreign entities, shuts out any attempts at diplomatic intervention, stifles local elections to allow only one legitimate candidate.

Also Russia - Why do countries keep joining NATO?

There have been plenty of Russians in my country that despise the USSR and think any attempt to reform it is foolish. Doesn't stop some people from thinking that 'le west is le evil'.
 
Anyone surprised by the relative indifference most of the thread has towards the ultimate fate of Eastern Europe or even the US-centric international system has not been paying attention. The military and productive class of the US (men under the age of 60 and especially those under the age of 40) have been wholly dispossessed of meaning and neglected by society. They don't care about Ukraine or the US becoming less wealthy due to a lag in international trade, because they're poor as shit now and have next to nothing to lose from the US economy losing out.

It's no coincidence that FDR, a navy man, considered the New Deal to be absolutely essential to making the American population ready for war. Until American politicians wake the fuck up and actually push for policies to give young men back their economic dignity, no one is going to care enough to go to war on behalf of this country.

What I think is also important that Ukraine isn't Nato. But your points are valid.

Its like, imagine USA is Mr Burger. Mr Burger sees Mr Vodka punching his co-worker, he'll go yeeehaaaw. But if Vodka is punching a stranger, there is less enthusiasm.

There is no inherent alliance nor any cultural exchange. Most Americans at best know of about Germany, France, Britain, but even those ceased to exist I doubt they would be too perturbed.

"Eyy buddy, Rome-ania and New-crane and Hungry and Turky are fighting? Sounds like a hoot, are they in like... Africa near Wakanda?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freshly Baked Socks
It's kind of amusing how the roles are now reverse. NATO/globohomo are now an expansionist entity bent on world domination by any means necessary, and Russia/China are now attempting to contain their expansion for the safety of everyone else.

Here's a map detailing the expansion of NATO itself. Also don't forget all the "soft" and "cultural" expansion done by globohomo infiltrating the cabinets of countries such as Canada, NZ, and Australia.
1645644445922.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back