Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
How is he SO BAD at this. I’m not even a fashion person and he makes me cringe.
He dresses like a skinwalked version of some chick from a 2008 indie movie that we all though was hot. I get it, dressing "quirky" and "not like other girls" was a thing around that time. It it the year of Allah 2022.

You are not a cute, weirdo teenage girl. You are an adult man who is crossdressing. Try to dress your age Tony. You know what my wife wears every day? Jeans, a t-shirt she picked up somewhere, and a jacket she likes. That's it. No "fuck me" sundress, no ridiculous wedges (she wears sneakers or flats), no fucking "look at me" patterns. How is this hard?

Woops, forgot this is an AGP disaster. I put on my robe and MATI hats.
 
An average kiwi would know that an ugly graphic t-shirt doesn't go with a floral skirt and dress sandals.
It took me a bit to figure out what was so familiar about this, but I get it. He's dressing like a dude. That's how a guy in his 20's would dress. Graphic tshirt, maybe something ironic or nerdy on it, and then jeans or slacks or whatever.
 
Plenty of women wear graphic tees in their 20s. Some wear them every day if they don't care that much and don't have a job with a dress code. The difference is they'd pair them with jeans (or something else casual... even a plain skirt works). It's not so much that he's wearing the shirt, but that he's wearing it with that skirt which is totally clashing in terms of style/formality/look.

Which I notice is one big difference between actual women and AGPs (the ones who aren't just outright dressed like anime school girls, I mean). Plenty of women have no sense of style, or always dress casually, or wear the same 5 outfits because they don't give a fuck. But I've never seen that "I grabbed items randomly from a donation pile with my eyes closed" look except on troons. It's almost impressive how little they know about how women dress, given that they are true and honest women themselves.

Edit: I guess a good opposite-sex equivalent would be a woman dressing "like a man" and putting on like, a nice office dress shirt and a tie and pairing that with basketball shorts. She's not just dressed unfashionably, she's literally dressed like an alien who doesn't know how the average human male dresses.
 
Adult women tuck their shirts into their skirts. Preteen girls on their way to after-school church activities led by a youth pastor dress like Tony. He’s aware of this. He isn’t unemployed. He sees how people dress. He WANTS to look like a preteen girl, hence the outfits and the voice affectation. Paging Mister Peter File!
 
Did he announce the slate of pro-troon primary candidates yet or will that be later on today at a press conference?
Looking at his feed, he's only announced one-
1650049296186.png1650049314347.png
Tweet | Archive
 
Did he announce the slate of pro-troon primary candidates yet or will that be later on today at a press conference?
I'm all for these lunatics making such a statement. I would love to see how the real word would react to an endorsement from internet troons. Maybe form a council of troons like a newspaper editorial board. Tony, Chuck Clymer, James Radich, and so on.
 
Goddamn imagine actually donating money to some internet dipshit's hobby campaign that will amass less than 300 votes in the primary.

Somehow leftists have convinced themselves that the way to win elections is by being a cool online personality. I think the reason they might think this is due to having severe brain damage.

Not sure if anyone is familiar with the Joshua4Congress guy. Basically he was some internet leftist on twitter who ran for Congress in the state of Washington in 2020. He billed himself as a "26 year old socialist truck driver" and was trying very hard to be the male AOC. He gained a huge following on Twitter and Tik Tok, getting thousands and thousands of retweets/views and over $250,000 in campaign donations from terminally online dorks.

Well, come election time, Josh managed to finish in FOURTEENTH place. He got about 200 more votes than a guy running under the "Congress Sucks Party."

AOC won because she actually put it in the work on the ground in her district and while she may have tweeted "omg yass" stuff, it was about things that actually had potential material impact in people's lives, as opposed to this Cunningham guy talking about My Little Pony and fucking "Posting Their L's" accounts. These candidates aren't serious people, and it's perfect that the most online activists out there support them. There is no real politics to be found in this sphere. 100% performative, a million times faker than real politicians
 
I don't know, this Adam guy just graduated from college last year and has never had a job but I think he can bring the socialist troon revolution to Maryland:
View attachment 3182672
It'll be funny whenever the results come out and show more rejected ballets than votes for him. The average normie doesn't care about Twitter politics.
 
Huh. Changed his pose.

Yep, right after we said in this thread that he always stands the same way. Shame he won't listen to us about his hair.

Goddamn imagine actually donating money to some internet dipshit's hobby campaign that will amass less than 300 votes in the primary.

Somehow leftists have convinced themselves that the way to win elections is by being a cool online personality. I think the reason they might think this is due to having severe brain damage.

Not sure if anyone is familiar with the Joshua4Congress guy. Basically he was some internet leftist on twitter who ran for Congress in the state of Washington in 2020. He billed himself as a "26 year old socialist truck driver" and was trying very hard to be the male AOC. He gained a huge following on Twitter and Tik Tok, getting thousands and thousands of retweets/views and over $250,000 in campaign donations from terminally online dorks.

Well, come election time, Josh managed to finish in FOURTEENTH place. He got about 200 more votes than a guy running under the "Congress Sucks Party."

AOC won because she actually put it in the work on the ground in her district and while she may have tweeted "omg yass" stuff, it was about things that actually had potential material impact in people's lives, as opposed to this Cunningham guy talking about My Little Pony and fucking "Posting Their L's" accounts. These candidates aren't serious people, and it's perfect that the most online activists out there support them. There is no real politics to be found in this sphere. 100% performative, a million times faker than real politicians

I think one problem troons have is that they don't realize (or can't accept) that most of the "acceptance" and ideological capture they achieved came about in an extremely top-down, non-grassroots way (via lots of billionaire funding, strategic donations to the ACLU and other institutions, well-funded LGBT charities refocusing after gay marriage, that kind of thing).

So they not only don't do any real work in terms of activism, they don't even grasp what real activism is. To them it's just "yelling at people on twitter," or maybe if they are lucky "accepting a well-paid 'activist' position that allows me to do the real-life version of yelling at people on twitter." And they think that must be how they got where they are, since they can't acknowledge how the ideological capture really happened. So of course, more twitter yelling must be enough! That will get all the normies in line! It's worked great so far!

It's a real "born on third base, thinks he hit a home run" situation.
 
I think one problem troons have is that they don't realize (or can't accept) that most of the "acceptance" and ideological capture they achieved came about in an extremely top-down, non-grassroots way (via lots of billionaire funding, strategic donations to the ACLU and other institutions, well-funded LGBT charities refocusing after gay marriage, that kind of thing).

So they not only don't do any real work in terms of activism, they don't even grasp what real activism is. To them it's just "yelling at people on twitter," or maybe if they are lucky "accepting a well-paid 'activist' position that allows me to do the real-life version of yelling at people on twitter." And they think that must be how they got where they are, since they can't acknowledge how the ideological capture really happened. So of course, more twitter yelling must be enough! That will get all the normies in line! It's worked great so far!

It's a real "born on third base, thinks he hit a home run" situation.
If that's true then why did it take a trans woman to throw the first brick at Stonewall huh? Why was it a trans woman who gave women the right to vote? Why was it a trans woman who made it so wives were no longer property of their husband?

YOU JUST GOT RATIO'D!

edit: This reminded me, there was (maybe still is I don't recall the name) a fairly popular Twitter "trans historian" who claimed that anti-prostitution laws in the United States were enacted so that police could imprison trans women for expressing their gender identity. Plenty of RT's and so on.
 
Last edited:
The skirt and the sandals are fine together, hell, he even has the right idea with the t-shirt being a dark purple that makes the colors of the skirt pop. But that is not a tee you wear with a skirt like that. @behindyourightnow is right that it's like wearing two completely different looks on the top and the bottom. A fitted, solid purple tee tucked into the skirt would have been a better choice. Graphic tees basically don't look good with anything other than denim, except in very rare cases. Here are some examples from a quick Google image search of "what to wear with a graphic tee":

Screen+shot+2014-02-09+at+2.19.33+AM.png
5b617e98581302d8f5bd4cd97c08997b.png
Notice the majority of looks are paired with a solid bottom, and many--particularly the ones with patterned bottoms--are accompanied by a solid layering piece (jacket/blazer) to not only dress up the outfit, but tone down the casual tee.
 
nice:
View attachment 3182435


The woman he's challenging is the Senate Majority Leader and has been in office since 2007. She's probably waking up in cold sweats thinking about her opponent being backed by the powerful @ErinInTheMorn machine.
Yeah, this sorta goofy shit might work on the west coast (east coast dems are very much entrenched, old school, mafia type power, not woke silicon valley type power) OR if he was targeting a House of Delegates seat, which is going to have a smaller district and thus they might have a chance of striking a small woke area. But a state senate seat is a big ask for someone like Adam Cunningham who's self identifying as a socialist. If anyone like Adam Cunningham wants to be successful as an east coast democrat in this state, he's going to need to put in his dues and work his way up the ladder.
 
Shame he won't listen to us about his hair.
Same re: his awful shoes. Erin, you are not a lesbian no matter how many tacky shirts and hideous rainbow clown shoes you wear.
A2CD6478-AF99-4FBC-9137-C296C6F83AF8.jpeg

Bonus lol, of course you don’t want to be associated with Rachel Dolezal. You’re worse, Tony, at least she isn’t pumping out ten tweets a day about how truly black she is.
2F764426-1B90-4624-B5ED-54B9355706E6.jpeg
 
Back