Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Oh God, I hope Jim doesn't float back across the pond when he finds out Britain has more restrictive abortion laws than the US. We have enough plastic pollution littering out highways without his nasty naugahyde wig enveloping the countryside like the Axis octopus.
I hope he goes to Toronto. I think he's surely rich enough to immigrate and it just seems to be an ideal place for Jim.

Edit: I like how our Canadian Kiwis have clear Canadian usernames lol.
 
Last edited:
Oh God, I hope Jim doesn't float back across the pond when he finds out Britain has more restrictive abortion laws than the US. We have enough plastic pollution littering out highways without his nasty naugahyde wig enveloping the countryside like the Axis octopus.
He probably mistakenly thinks, like many do, that the UK has abortion on demand.

I guess it technically functions that way because it would be unusual for the two doctors who have to sign off on it to outright refuse. They're mostly concerned with ensuring that the woman isn't being coerced into ending the pregnancy and that she understands the implications and potential complications during and after.

Also, not to get too clinical and cold about it, but I'd guess most abortions are non-surgical too, so it's just much cheaper too, long-term, for the NHS.
 
Is it North East American wrestling that's excluding him? Just asking because all the wrestling he's doing right now is in the North East (of England) and is even called North Wrestling.
Looks like the event he's next taking part in is sold out, so he's got that to boast about. The next one after that is in Sheffield and he's included in the show.

Even though the brewery he performs at, in Newcastle, has been called out due to homophobic remarks from the owner, the wrestling company has a very inclusive set of rules for the audience - https://www.northwrestling.co.uk/policies/fan-code-of-conduct
I'm pretty sure even when he did wrestling in the US they were inclusive, the truth is that he was simply too shit to ever be popular in the US.
 
I hope he goes to Toronto. I think he's surely rich enough to immigrate and it just seems to be an ideal place for Jim.
It is odd he didn't aim for Canada since it's the most cucked of all the white nations and would happily indulge all his bullshit. I'm gonna guess the UK was more of a comfort zone/safe space for him, despite his theatrics about 'TERF island'.

God knows Jim will always choose the path of least resistance whenever it's presented to him.
 
It is odd he didn't aim for Canada since it's the most cucked of all the white nations and would happily indulge all his bullshit. I'm gonna guess the UK was more of a comfort zone/safe space for him, despite his theatrics about 'TERF island'.

God knows Jim will always choose the path of least resistance whenever it's presented to him.
Canada's crazy, but it's insular crazy. It's hard as shit to get in compared to the UK or US.
 
Oh God, I hope Jim doesn't float back across the pond when he finds out Britain has more restrictive abortion laws than the US. We have enough plastic pollution littering out highways without his nasty naugahyde wig enveloping the countryside like the Axis octopus.
As if Jim thoughts on the issue go any deeper than 'People on Twitter are upset'.
 
It is odd he didn't aim for Canada since it's the most cucked of all the white nations and would happily indulge all his bullshit. I'm gonna guess the UK was more of a comfort zone/safe space for him, despite his theatrics about 'TERF island'.

God knows Jim will always choose the path of least resistance whenever it's presented to him.
His fuck buddies aren't in Canada though.
 
I was amidst an argument on another site last night and realised that this is essentially the problem with the entire abortion debate in the US. Each side (Abortion is killing a human with a soul Vs It's only a clump of cells with no right to life) is just shouting right past one another. It's a pragmatist arguing with a moralist, and it isn't getting you anywhere. Neither position is remotely compelling to the other, when really both are kind of right.
What both sides need to do is wind back on the hyperbole and find some common ground to bash it out properly. Otherwise this will end up as a civil war or something.

The issue I think you'll find is that for, essentially all of human history, the moment you could prove that an unborn life, was indeed alive, it was considered by virtually every single culture to be life worth protecting.

The only differences today are that we're better at detecting it early, and we've had a hundred years of Neo-Liberalism doing its absolute damnest to destroy the moral fabric of everyone aligned with them.

Its hard to make the arguments that abortion should be fine, when for basically all of human history we've disagreed. Further, I see no reason why myself, or any other person on the right would want to sit down with some dumb bitch who "shouts her abortion" to do anything other than find some way to ensure she never have an abortion again, be it in minecraft or in some less extreme way.
 
Its hard to make the arguments that abortion should be fine, when for basically all of human history we've disagreed.
We only found out how to do that with a reasonable safety not so long ago. While the mindset of treating abortion as a mean of contraception is wrong, it is just a sympthom of a global issue. And it won't be solved by just outlawing abortion.
 
The issue I think you'll find is that for, essentially all of human history, the moment you could prove that an unborn life, was indeed alive, it was considered by virtually every single culture to be life worth protecting.

The only differences today are that we're better at detecting it early, and we've had a hundred years of Neo-Liberalism doing its absolute damnest to destroy the moral fabric of everyone aligned with them.

Its hard to make the arguments that abortion should be fine, when for basically all of human history we've disagreed. Further, I see no reason why myself, or any other person on the right would want to sit down with some dumb bitch who "shouts her abortion" to do anything other than find some way to ensure she never have an abortion again, be it in minecraft or in some less extreme way.
This is totally wrong. Methods for inducing miscarriages and abortifacient medecins appear in tons of medical texts, all the way back to the bronze age. There's evidence of abortion techniques from vedic India and Egypt. The Romans literally hunted a plant to extinction for its aborting qualities. Most modern prohibition and laws on abortion date to the the 19th century, and outside of the Christian sphere were actually quite rare, mostly involving treating it as property damage to the father (since the popular understanding was of women purely as vessels for male seed). None of these methods were the modern surgical procedures, but abortion had been around for as long as medicine has.

Even people who seriously considered the moral question in Christianity, like Saint Augustine, specifically regarded abortion prior to ensoulment (which he thought of as the fetus being recognizably human) as not homicide, and opposed abortion prior to that on the grounds of encouraging sexual immorality. The Christian world in general varied a lot in rules, and again the question of when the soul entered the body was a big reason for rating cases differently. Otherwise the issue again was sexual immorality.

Neoliberalism is also not hundreds of years old. It dates to the 80s, and your entire stupid constitution is itself a classically liberal document. I understand that people treat the word liberal like some all purpose boogeyman, but neoliberalism is more specific than that, and as an ideological positioning "liberalism" and its associated rights-based framing structure is literally the foundation of the United States.

I actually am of the opinion that our global society is far too flippant with the idea of terminating human life, though I have the self-awareness to realize that as a man, I don't have to bear the actual still substantial risks of pregnancy, which in terms of medical risk alone (to say nothing of afterwards) makes the ethical question more complicated, imo. But claiming that the thoroughly modern and ahistorical idea of life beginning "at conception" and fetal life being sacred, that fuels the pro-life movement is somehow some sort of universal cross-cultural truth is just bad history.
 
Last edited:
E37A33B1-97F8-4A59-AAF2-2C0932042001.jpeg
Rocky Horror Picture Show looks better than this.

Holy Shit, that eyeliner is hideous.
D7BAB749-0073-4590-BD19-2B6AEBFC79CC.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back