Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

Seething about women again already :story: (archive)
View attachment 3422023
View attachment 3422027
Tony definitely that "friend" you have who wants nothing to do with you ever again after you disagree on anything.

Over 200 comments in that Ovarit thread (archive) and each is a gazillion times more correct than Tony will ever be.

View attachment 3422047

They call out Cheese Stringio for this (archive):
View attachment 3422045
And naturally reference the evergreen tweet:
View attachment 3422046

Pro tip for any Ovarit people lurking: include our Tony fan art and he'll stop screenshoting your threads.

Trannies have literally had a massive role in this by driving generally liberal people towards the republicans because they don't want their sons being put on hormones in secret and their daughters running track against some hulking 'laydee' with a beard and cock

I find it difficult to parse Tony's word salad so can someone confirm for me that the argument he is essentially making is that the abortion thing is the same as the trans thing because it all falls under the umbrella of 'bodily autonomy'?

I'm no fan of abortion, but I view it as a necessary evil in most cases. Mutilating the mentally ill and/or grooming victims, on the other hand, is just plain evil, although I guess it does have one thing in common with abortion in that both reduce the chances of bringing yet more useless, fucked up people into the world.

He's stolen this arguement from general troon discourse, it makes more sense in the original context until you actually dig into it, but Tony shot his imaginary load over imagining how intelligent he'd look putting it out there and didn't bother to get it right

basically it goes 'if women are defined by their biology so men can't be women, then women essentially exist to be walking incubators, unless people without uteruses can be women too'

of course like most troon logic it's deeply misogynist as soon as you scratch the surface; women get the right to bodily autonomy which overrides whether they have the equipment to make babies or not; it's just that AGP trannies like Tony can't conceive of women outside of a means to satisfy men, be it by having babies or validating troons as women. If these bitches aren't fulfilling their function of validating Tony's fetish, they're obviously working for the religious men on the other side, because women have no agency outside of serving men.

you can see it in his divorce chimpout; he and his wife are breaking up but HOW DARE she tell HER FAMILY about him trooning out even though they likely asked about why they broke up
she should just be quiet and sit in her woman storage closet until he summons her for his coming out ceremony and then divorce court
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've tried to avoid this subject here for probably obvious reasons, but people like Keffals are as communist as they are female. Spoilering the rest for those that don't want to read my whinging.
I'm glad I accidentally poked you into historical political sperging again (always fascinating), but don't worry. When I say troons into communism there's only one type of communism and it's reddit give me free shit communism, not even an attempt at working, just "utopia now me no work and be taken care of by daddy anarchist queer state". It's why I think it'd be very lucky for them to put their money where their mouth is and move to a place that has IRL communism implemented.

Maybe by "genocide" he just means "inability to transition and live as the opposite gender". qWhich is completely incomparable to genocide. Lol
It's his equivalent of not giving any treatment to cancer patients or banning insulin so diabetes can never be treated again in his mind. The problem is that the definition and science of transgenderism is so fucking new that they still haven't settled the "is it an mental or physical illness, and if it's neither, why does insurance cover it?" debate. And since studies to research and treat trans patients get cockblocked by the dickless lobby if the results come out wrong, they're not getting better treatment, even if the most optimal treatment is... anti-dysphoria therapy and drugs.
 
As penance for my earlier Judeo-Bolshevik outburst I bring you news of the good works of Saint Anthony of Twitter.

Suffer the little children to come unto Tony. (source, archive)
kids-1.pngkids-2.pngkids-3.png
(Presumably Rolling Stone (article) don't want to be reminded when they covered trans issues more seriously.)

Saint Anthony, teacher of the Cis. (source, archive)
educate-yourself.png
 
How do you even genocide a group of people who aren't a race or ethnicity? You can practically annihilate ethnic groups by killing as many of them as possible, but even if you were to kill as many troons as you could, it would have no effect on more people trooning out in the future. It's not even an immutable trait, I think given the right circumstances a lot of non-trans people have the capacity to troon out. It's like saying, "I'm going to stop ballerinas from ever existing again by killing as many as possible". It doesn't follow, you can't permanently wipe ballerinas from existence by making all of the current ones die.

Maybe by "genocide" he just means "inability to transition and live as the opposite gender". Which is completely incomparable to genocide. Lol
This is basically what they get to. The fascists are going to force everyone into the closet which is effectively murdering them since not LARPing as the opposite gender from your birth sex is literally dying. And you can't object that the fascists aren't actually doing anything like changing the law or actually rounding up trans people, they're "creating the conditions" and "making threats" and that's forcing people back into the closet already. The absence of evidence is Literal Proof of the Literal Genocide.
 
Suffer the little children to come unto Tony. (source, archive)
Sorry, quoting myself like a narcissist again.

But I'm reading the Rolling Stone article about parents of "trans kids" and it's really quite unnerving, and not in the way that was clearly intended. (Btw Tony, it's the mother of the "trans kids" who says "I didn’t want to talk to anyone. I didn’t want to know anyone. I didn’t want anyone to know me.")

For instance, here's "Violet", the mother of two "trans kids":
“I do a lot to make sure that where we’re going are safe places and what we’re doing are safe things. I’m a really extroverted person. I’ll tell anyone my life story, but the way things are in Texas, I had gotten to a point where I didn’t want to talk to anyone. I didn’t want to know anyone. I didn’t want anyone to know me. To have some place where you don’t have to watch what you say, there’s just this understanding there.”

Families of trans kids in states across the U.S. have increasingly begun relying on parent networks as they struggle to make impossible decisions about their future. Many of these groups are forced to meet in secret — whether in members-only Facebook groups or at undisclosed locations — to ensure their children are not harmed.
Obviously the troons will say this is "just like the Jews under the Nazis!" or whatever. But to me it just sounds (and I don't say this lightly!) like pedophiles. They don't want anyone to know about their home life, they don't want to involve anyone who's outside their secret group of adults, they stage clandestine meetings with those in similar positions so that their business is hidden. They are the ones who know exclusively what's best for their children, and what outsiders might think best would "harm" their children.

They're organising their children's lives so that they know that any professionals they might interact with are "in the know" and won't inform on them:
Where would she even begin in narrowing down which [school district] is the best one for her kids? How would she find doctors that she knew wouldn’t misgender or deadname them? … She says that … other parents … were able to offer referrals and personally vouch for medical providers they knew in the state who were “friendly, positive, and inclusive”

Those who fear that their questionable actions towards their children will be discovered have a network of like-minded people who will help them out:
At least six families have moved as a result of the increasing scrutiny on trans youth in [Texas], and the group has been their major engine of support as they seek to relocate.

Anyway, lots of these child abusers are headed for Colorado so maybe we'll be lucky and get another few seasons of The Tranch, or at least a long-lasting spin-off.

Sorry for double posting, but the sheer volume of nonsense from Tony today makes me think he's got the day off. (Lots more craziness on his Twitter today that hasn't made it into the thread!)

Another day, another lesbian transed out of history. This time it's Alberta Lucille Hart / Alan L Hart. As ever, Tony is "safely" picking up a figure that by internet consensus was a true and honest trans. (TikTok, archive)


Not having heard of Hart before, it's not entirely clear from the most obvious sources whether she really thought herself to be a man (usually my cut-off for personal interest in these people). Most popular history articles written in recent years obviously go along with "amazing transman Alan Hart" but it doesn't take much research to find an interesting source that says something different.

In his 1976 book Gay American History, which is available (with an account) on the Internet Archive, Jonathan Katz includes a patient history written by psychiatrist J Allen Gilbert of Hart, followed by Katz's own commentary. The whole section runs pages 258-279, and Katz's commentary is the last three pages of that. I've nothing to add myself, but it's interesting enough to be worth quoting Katz's comments in full.
Jonathan Katz said:
Dr. Gilbert's account raises many issues. First, despite the confusion of Dr. Gilbert and [Hart] herself about her sexual nature, [Hart] is clearly a Lesbian, a woman-loving woman. Dr. Gilbert's final statement that [Hart] is now married to a “normal” woman would be laughable if one did not know the difficult preceding history. The marriage involves two women, one of whom has had a hysterectomy and passes for a male—two women living and loving together, two Lesbians.

Despite Gilbert's comment about an “abnormally” large clitoris (the same value judgment made about Lucy Ann Lobdell in the early 1880s), Gilbert’s physical examination is not reported to have revealed other than a perfectly formed, if not “average” female. It is also clear from Gilbert's report that [Hart] does not identify herself as of the male gender. She does not wish to possess a male body; she wants to play “the role of a male,” not be male. It is not the male’s penis she covets, but the male’s socially given power. Her decision as a young girl to be the “man” in the family expressed her wish to care for and take care of her own mother, another woman. In order to do this she “regarded herself as a boy’—but only in the sense of “wanting pockets on her clothes” (a poignant sign of “masculinity” mentioned twice by Dr. Gilbert), in wearing short hair and trousers, in playing boys’ games, in reading adventure stories and fantasizing herself as the romantic, dashing hero, in hating housework and “small talk,” in being inquisitive about the world, an active, “obstinate, independent child,” in having “masculine ambitions,” in loving and wanting to be loved by another female.

Clearly, too, [Hart] could only perceive her own situation in the world in heterosexual terms, according to the traditional heterosexual model of male-female husband-wife relations. She found no alternative, no way of transcending this socially dominant model.

According to her report, [Hart] had “no thought of shame” about her first active Lesbian relations. Shame came later, she says; it was learned—from such sources as medical textbooks in which she read about her “true condition.” It is noteworthy that this shame only came to her as an adult; so prevalent and widely accepted today is the idea that all important feelings are acquired and set in childhood. It is noteworthy, too, that if her analysis with Dr. Gilbert did not itself create her feeling of shame about Lesbianism, it clearly intensified it. This story represents one more example of the pernicious treatment of Gay people by the medical profession. [Hart] entered therapy to cure a specific, minor phobia; she ended by having a hysterectomy.

It is precisely the late-created shame [Hart] felt, and her analysis itself, that motivated her request to be sterilized. Since there was obviously no liklihood of [Hart] becoming pregnant, her desire to be sterilized clearly expresses her need to neutralize guilt about Lesbianism, to legitimize for herself her socially unsanctioned relations. Despite her active Lesbian career, [Hart] apparently still needed to come to terms with feelings about the impropriety of two women having sex. Although her hysterectomy was in a sense voluntary, the social pressures to which she was subjected suggest that in another and just as true sense it was socially coerced. Notable also is the complicity here of an even rather benign, sympathetic, undogmatic psychiatrist in his patient's own strange move to be sterilized—a move that may be characterized as justification by punishment, a psychic ploy Gay people have sometimes in the past adopted to legitimize themselves. There is a macabre irony in this not unkind doctor's falling readily into the sadistic role offered him by his patient.

The story of [Hart] illustrates only too well one extreme to which an intelligent, aspiring Lesbian in early twentieth-century America might be driven by her own and her doctor's acceptance of society’s condemnation of women-loving women.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
(Btw Tony, it's the mother of the "trans kids" who says "I didn’t want to talk to anyone. I didn’t want to know anyone. I didn’t want anyone to know me.")
I know these Troons are lazy about information, but it does boggle my mind how frequently it seems Tony-chan doesn't read the fucking articles he shares and expounds on. He will skim a piece, make incorrect claims about its contents, and then sits back getting asspats from all the other Troons who don't read anything. I know that this isn't a Tony-chan centered phenomenon and people not reading the articles before commenting/sharing is a tale as old as social media, but Tony can't even be arsed to do so as his "job."
 
of course like most troon logic it's deeply misogynist as soon as you scratch the surface; women get the right to bodily autonomy which overrides whether they have the equipment to make babies or not; it's just that AGP trannies like Tony can't conceive of women outside of a means to satisfy men, be it by having babies or validating troons as women. If these bitches aren't fulfilling their function of validating Tony's fetish, they're obviously working for the religious men on the other side, because women have no agency outside of serving men.

you can see it in his divorce chimpout; he and his wife are breaking up but HOW DARE she tell HER FAMILY about him trooning out even though they likely asked about why they broke up
she should just be quiet and sit in her woman storage closet until he summons her for his coming out ceremony and then divorce court

Agreed, you see this a lot.

The vast majority of the pushback against TRAs has been done by women, mostly "normal" non-politician women working behind the scenes. And a lot of it started in the UK, where the religious conservative movement doesn't exist in the same way that it does in the US.

But most TRAs can't conceive of that; women who don't worship troons are just being brainwashed and led by the "religious right" and having their dumb female heads filled with naughty ideas by far-right conservatives. If woman are not fulfilling their role as emotional support humans for male troons, it must be because other men already captured them to be their support humans (the religious right).

It can't be because women simply don't like what troons are doing. Females having preferences and opinions? What?
 
@Geranium
but only in the sense of “wanting pockets on her clothes” (a poignant sign of “masculinity” mentioned twice by Dr. Gilbert)
Okay so this is weird but for some reason it stuck out to me...

I have noticed troons crow about not having to deal with pockets in their skirts/dresses several times whereas the vast majority of natal women cheer when they have pockets to the point where it's a meme...

1656463809104.png


I could probably extrapolate this into something meaningful but brain doesn't feel like it right now so... thanks, it has pockets!

P.S. Thank you for link to book, will read when brain is functional again.
 
It's always hilarious to see people who have NO skills or abilities that any other country would want, fantasizing about escaping to some place loaded with people of pallor.

I'm reasonably certain they are all stocked up on the welfare bums they're ever gonna need, just from their own domestic sources. They don't need you coming in there with your pricey "medical needs"< and inability to contribute meaningfully to their tax base through actual work.
 
It's always hilarious to see people who have NO skills or abilities that any other country would want, fantasizing about escaping to some place loaded with people of pallor.

I'm reasonably certain they are all stocked up on the welfare bums they're ever gonna need, just from their own domestic sources. They don't need you coming in there with your pricey "medical needs"< and inability to contribute meaningfully to their tax base through actual work.
They mainline all the "AMERICA IS BACKWARDS AND HORRIFIC, OTHER COUNTRIES ARE PERFECT" shit straight into their veins but never bother to research other countries outside of the equivalent of what travel magazines write.

Americans like this don't bother to know anything about Canada which you can go fuck around in whenever you want, they certainly aren't going to bother to learn about Sweden or Iceland or Denmark outside of assuming it's some kind of diverse peaceful commune where everyone happily makes wooden shoes and eats Haggis at big potluck dinners and the royal family lets you kick up your feet at one of their castles if you get sick since Nokia pays for everything through 90% corporate taxes.
 
View attachment 3427391
Yeah not even my shoppe skills can help it. I always say that bangs are beneficial for troons, but tony takes this to another level. Now if only Tony would invest on that crater he has in his mouth.
Chin reduction is another surgery for the list

The bangs just futher emphasise his fucking lego head

also, aside from being a fucking nonce, how is all his cosying up to people half his age not peak transing every gen z'er he meets
'for the low low price of licking my stinkditch, multiple expensive surgeries, and buying out goodwill, you too can be a divorced, blockheaded, snaggletoothed eunuch who starts a tiktok to try and be down with the kids instead of looking after my actual child'

sick sales pitch Tony, but where's the video of #genzarmy decking misogynists if it truly was fr fr ong no cap?

16 year old Tony:



18 years later, "adult" Tony:

between this and his 'diary' page you can really see where his current personality comes from;

Tony has always been an autistic weirdo and probably got attention through being able to rote recite shit about stuff that took his interest. He's then mistaken this for him being some kind of super genius. You can see it in how smug he is 'one of the few smart ones' and how he talks in general. It's more blatant here but he's always done it and still does; he tries to talk down to people but it just comes across as clumsy prolix (see what I did there)

when I suffer from erosion of family values that are much more common and much more disasterous to the "sanctity of marriage".

he could just say 'while the republicans talk about 'sanctity of marriage', real issues affecting real families are ignored

but hey cletus from the trawler could say that so he needs to show that he's much better than that by using big words. Problem is it's very fucking obvious that he's not comfortable with said words and it just comes off as weird and forced. You see it in his drug forum posts where he's awkwardly talking about being a chill escobar while clearly being an awkward nerd who maybe sold a tab of acid to a friend once and then regurgitated a bunch of shit he read online. Anthony Reed is walking talking proof that you can't always fake it till you make it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Miss Misery the pocket’s thing is just yet another example of how they don’t understand women at all and will forever remaining larping men. It’s one of the most frustrating things ever and the memes are on point.

It also gives them an excuse to mince around with a handbag which is ever so validating.
 
Back