BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
No. It was pretty clear to everyone Wilson wanted to enter the war on the Entente side because of his British sympathies. But couldn't because of public sentiment and needed an excuse (as well as heavy propaganda) to join. Also his interventions in the Caribbean and Central America were costly and did crap all. Even if they were normal at the time, he did a shitty job and made things worse. Which is why people praise Teddy Roosevelt compared to Wilson. And no he didn't have the "right intention". He was controversial in his own time and now it's rare to encounter someone who defends Wilson. All I've seen were either neocon/lib internationalists, a white supremacist who hated Hitler and the one or two contrarian.
If Wilson was willing to join the war on the side of the Entente, how come did he try to end the war via mediation with America as a neutral party? He was trying to “everything that it is possible to do to define and defend neutral rights.” in a letter to the American ambassador to the United Kingdom at the time, which was along the lines of "Don't actively support a side but also don't do anything to enforce our neutrality" Basically sit down and wait for a miracle for the war to end pretty much. As for the supplies sent to the Entente, it was more so American business rather than the policy of Wilson since turns out selling goods to a nation under naval blockade in the early 20th century is a bit difficult and often doesn't give the best of profits. My statement about his interventions were more so about showing how disproportionate the troop numbers were rather than a comparison to show how minor American troop deployments were compared to the European Powers at the time. And I ain't saying Wilson was not controversial nor am I defending, I'm just saying maybe he's not as bad as modern academia makes him out to be. Plus I'm sure there's controversy for every US President in history, in office or not.

In relation to this thread however, it seems Vaush has kept true to his grifter nature.
1659467017223.png
 
Noticed that most of the “Ex right wingers” that became lefties and make videos about their “journeys” weren’t even that right wing. They were just kids that laughed at sjw cringe compilations and rare pepes before jumping on the next popular thing. In my observations most actual right wingers or far rightists have stayed that way in the last few years.

They are impressionable young people that just go with whatever’s popular. If being a traditionalist catholic became the next internet thing they’d all be chanting “Ave maria”
 
Noticed that most of the “Ex right wingers” that became lefties and make videos about their “journeys” weren’t even that right wing. They were just kids that laughed at sjw cringe compilations and rare pepes before jumping on the next popular thing. In my observations most actual right wingers or far rightists have stayed that way in the last few years.

They are impressionable young people that just go with whatever’s popular. If being a traditionalist catholic became the next internet thing they’d all be chanting “Ave maria”
The exceptions being faggots like Richard Spencer and Matt Heimbach but then again they were under tremendous pressure.
 
The exceptions being faggots like Richard Spencer and Matt Heimbach but then again they were under tremendous pressure.
I swear if any lefty brings up the idea that Richard Spencer is representative of the right and how if you don’t agree with destroying the US then you’re a nazi like him, im going to show them the tweet where Richard supports Biden for president. Richard Spencer is a grifter and the right wing knows this but the left likes to imagine he is a big figure.
 
Here’s another leftist whack job who randomly got into my recommendations, The Rational National, led by this fag Canadian named David Doel who ran for the Green Party in his country. Like the Serf Times the Guy is a total diehard leftist shill, but pretends he is unbiased. This is what you see on his channel description.

“Independent political commentary, media criticism, news and culture, with an occasional comedic tinge; hosted by David Doel. David comes from a background working in broadcast news, ran for political office as a Green Party candidate, and hosted an AM Radio show in downtown Toronto. Through 'The Rational National' he breaks down the latest political news, exposes media misinformation from all sides, and works to push society forward in a way that centres human rights and equality.”

however what you see is that he’s a total and complete leftist shill who will never attack democrats but will always attack republicans, or leftists who criticize democrats, as seen from his videos.
Yet, Tim Pool; the quintessential fence sitter, dwarfs him in views.
Screenshot_20220805-081948_Brave.jpg
 
Yet, Tim Pool; the quintessential fence sitter, dwarfs him in views.
View attachment 3564263
You think Tim will ever take a side or will remain "neutral" even when the building is on fire?

I swear if any lefty brings up the idea that Richard Spencer is representative of the right and how if you don’t agree with destroying the US then you’re a nazi like him, im going to show them the tweet where Richard supports Biden for president. Richard Spencer is a grifter and the right wing knows this but the left likes to imagine he is a big figure.
The only reason they have Richard Spencer as the right wing boogeyman is because he's the only guy they ever hit on, literally. Any other right winger would've made the leftists see God a few seconds after they fight.
 
I swear if any lefty brings up the idea that Richard Spencer is representative of the right and how if you don’t agree with destroying the US then you’re a nazi like him, im going to show them the tweet where Richard supports Biden for president. Richard Spencer is a grifter and the right wing knows this but the left likes to imagine he is a big figure.
Every time there's a new social-political movement that pops up on the Internet, the grifters always come in to try to capitalize on the biggest idiots that they can find. Back when New Atheism was a thing, Richard Dawkins was seen as the face of the online atheist movement where many atheists would quote him and shill for him a lot until New Atheism collapsed by the start of the 2010's per se.

Most people in the Atheist community now see Richard Dawkins the same way most on the Right see Richard Spencer because they're both grifters of their own respective communities and their own communities don't like them anymore. Back in the day, Richard Dawkins was once seen as an edgelord that 'Owned the Fundies' and as time went on most people in the Atheist community moved on from him and don't like him much anymore since many atheists see him as a fraud and a relic of a bygone era of the Internet now and it's the same with Richard Spencer where he was once liked by the most hardline Rightoids until he began to destroy himself later on anyway.
 
The exceptions being faggots like Richard Spencer and Matt Heimbach but then again they were under tremendous pressure.
Spencer is just an attention whore and will support just about any position to get it, while Matt Heimburger was always a laughing stock with his LARP political party. It's hard to even call it a party, more like a big white trash trailer shit show. The former lost all his relevance after the failed Charlottesville march, the latter lost his when he beat the shit out of his best friend after fucking his wife in a trailer, then proceeded to beat his own wife.

Other than that, it's just been dumb kids who watched Sargon once getting on board the former right winger grift. Likewise, we'll have the former breadtuber grift too soon enough. And it'll be just as pathetic as all other grifts are.
 
Other than that, it's just been dumb kids who watched Sargon once getting on board the former right winger grift. Likewise, we'll have the former breadtuber grift too soon enough. And it'll be just as pathetic as all other grifts are.
We know Xanderhal used to watch Andy Warski when he bigger during the Warski live / the Kumite days.

Xanderhal is exactly the type of low iq mongoloid who would be a fan of Tardski.
 
6'4" wildebeest says Dave Chappelle's jokes are like murder. Bitch, you look like Mara Wilson if she'd been cast in She-Hulk.

I would tell this guy to grow a pair but he'd just cut it off.

View attachment 3565105
Someone posted this last year with a message along the lines of "the moment when Tim Pool, Charlie Kirk, and Vaush realize they agree on everything and it turns into one bad take".

View attachment 3565115
and the image I was trying to find.
I assume all of you read about Tim Pool cutting the interview short to keep his channel safe.
So Tim's only loyal to the shekels, eh?

Surprised he didn't go BreadTuber.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nigor
Anarchism is a retarded system of government and would never work in practice
A lot of things are great ideas in theory but I don't remember which philosopher said it but reality is not theoretical
These people however are not anarchists cuz when I used to hang around with the anarchist left-wing back in the day they just wanted to smoke pot and hate the government
its not even good in theory. if i had a blueprint to a building that when built to those specs fell apart my design wasn't good in theory. if it doesn't work ever the theory is retarded.
Does anyone have any good books or philosophers that are pro-capitalist and pro-freedom? I would like to read more theory but I don’t really know where to start
Hans Herman Hoppe.
I assume he was your standard center right edgelord and went over to Breadtube because it was a big thing and they go wherever the money and attention is to grift. None of these grifters with this story like Faraday, Xanderhal, or Suris where ever dissident right. Once you really get into the dissident right, there really isn't any going back, unless you are forced to hide your views because of family, work or similar things
so he was always a faggot now he just wears a dress
 
No. It was pretty clear to everyone Wilson wanted to enter the war on the Entente side because of his British sympathies. But couldn't because of public sentiment and needed an excuse (as well as heavy propaganda) to join. Also his interventions in the Caribbean and Central America were costly and did crap all. Even if they were normal at the time, he did a shitty job and made things worse. Which is why people praise Teddy Roosevelt compared to Wilson. And no he didn't have the "right intention". He was controversial in his own time and now it's rare to encounter someone who defends Wilson. All I've seen were either neocon/lib internationalists, a white supremacist who hated Hitler and the one or two contrarian.
Wilson actually didn't want to participate in the war. He did sympathize more with the british. But he wanted his legacy to be one as a peacekeeper, therefore also trying to take control of the Versailles peace treaty negotiations and failing utterly to contain british and french vengeance upon the central powers, and instead sulkingly creating his League of Nations shit.
Wilson was pushed into the war though because Wall Street bet hard on the Entente. John Morgan Jr. was a massive anglophile like his father, and pushed basically all the banks and business interests in the US to side with the Entente. The influence was strong enough that the founder and CEO of Goldman Sachs got pushed out of his own company by the board because he sympathized with the central powers as a person of german jewish descent.
Wilson and Wall Street knew well that if the Entente lost, it would mean massive economic losses for the US, while a entente victory would lead to a economic boom.
When the february revolution happened in 1917, and it began to seem likely that Russia would seek peace with Germany, it became a immediate problem for the US as it became a possibility that the central powers could win, and two months later the US would officially join the war.

I don't agree with a lot of Wilson's policy decisions, but he was quite often a victim of circumstance. For example it was not Wilson's fault that the 1907 panic caused growing support towards a central banking authority. In fact once that idea became more prevalent it became a race between the two parties to become the one to decide the economic future of the united states. Our old pal J. P. Morgan shows up again here as he was a big proponent for a federal reserve, and would sit on the board for the federal reserve after its creation.
 
Noticed that most of the “Ex right wingers” that became lefties and make videos about their “journeys” weren’t even that right wing. They were just kids that laughed at sjw cringe compilations and rare pepes before jumping on the next popular thing. In my observations most actual right wingers or far rightists have stayed that way in the last few years.

They are impressionable young people that just go with whatever’s popular. If being a traditionalist catholic became the next internet thing they’d all be chanting “Ave maria”
But isn't that happening though? I have been noticing a lot of hyper religious trad-con stuff and traditional views on Youtube and most of the comments are usually from young adults or teenagers.
 
Such a disgustingly villainous quote to tell working class critics

Understandable.


So what I'm gathering is that he was a "SJWs get owned" type of guy that went to BreadTube due to BreadTube becoming more popular? Typical grifter, going for the big prize while never staying true to their supposed ideals.

Funnily enough, his recent videos seem to be stagnating.
View attachment 3533260

Only one of his videos cracked 20k views going up to last year when he has around 40k subscribers. That's a terrible views-to-subs ratio if I ever saw one.


I've heard of Day before. She's not too bad considering I do agree with Distributism and consider myself as such. Plus the fact she isn't a complete psycho when it comes to social issues. Still, I do believe that men should rule over men since to quote James Madison, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary." Also I find it funny how the German Peasant Rebels were influenced by Martin Luther even though Luther himself said they should be slaughtered like rabid dogs. Ironic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drxUe-yY-W0 apparently its not even tru. here he is doing the standard respond to anti-sjws thing four years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iiVBzUfBpw - also now he's defending puberty blockers on kids. so rational and nonpartisan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FagAlaska
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iiVBzUfBpw - also now he's defending puberty blockers on kids. so rational and nonpartisan
Like I said before, he's practically the next example of the Incel to Troon pipeline, he already went lefttist out of the need to grift, playing up all the same pro-LGBT talking points leftists used, and is using a Vtuber model that screams Troon (with the dick intact because reasons). All it takes is the coming out tweet or video for him and the starting of the HRT Kool-Aid to reach full Troon status.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drxUe-yY-W0 apparently its not even tru. here he is doing the standard respond to anti-sjws thing four years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iiVBzUfBpw - also now he's defending puberty blockers on kids. so rational and nonpartisan
So he's full of shit from the beginning? Guess he just wanted to gain those sympathy points from the "former right winger to BreadTube" crowd. Also, that video about him protecting puberty blockers for kids is definitely showing his "appreciation" for a certain group of the LGBT crowd. God forbid we let children grow up normally without chemically induced hormones that'll fuck them up big time.

1660011571559.png
 
Back