Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%
  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%

  • Total voters
    363
Scientific demagougery is not clever. It's actually the definition of mid-witted mediocrity. You're co-opting the style of intellectualism with none of the associated substance. You're, like everyone else on this site, a lame brained loser.
So why are you here?
 
My first work, The Wisdom of Autphag, contains a number of criticisms of scientific empiricism: first, the etymological, epistemological and etiological basis for its finding, which I'd established well before the neoreactionaries took off, has its presumptions based on the purity of the analysis of data as a reliable midpoint that is completely unassailable by deliberate manipulations in the process of methodological construction of the analytical method of rubric/assessment, and that much was deliberate. The Jews during the Enlightenment were certain that they could foist scientific empiricism as a means of deliberately forging certain phenomena in society, the autism apparatus of matriarchal domination, medicalizing what was essentially a heirarchical stratification tool to degenerate them in ensuring the "destruction of patriarchy" and the usurpration of neo-matriarchalism, under the guise of a grassroots political movement like feminism, despite abudant documentation of its Judeomasonic origins. Since none of you are genuinely interested in concepts like absolute truth and genuine epistemological investigation though, I'll leave you to brew in your swill for now, sows.
 
My first work, The Wisdom of Autphag, contains a number of criticisms of scientific empiricism: first, the etymological, epistemological and etiological basis for its finding, which I'd established well before the neoreactionaries took off, has its presumptions based on the purity of the analysis of data as a reliable midpoint that is completely unassailable by deliberate manipulations in the process of methodological construction of the analytical method of rubric/assessment, and that much was deliberate. The Jews during the Enlightenment were certain that they could foist scientific empiricism as a means of deliberately forging certain phenomena in society, the autism apparatus of matriarchal domination, medicalizing what was essentially a heirarchical stratification tool to degenerate them in ensuring the "destruction of patriarchy" and the usurpration of neo-matriarchalism, under the guise of a grassroots political movement like feminism, despite abudant documentation of its Judeomasonic origins. Since none of you are genuinely interested in concepts like absolute truth and genuine epistemological investation though, I'll leave you to brew in your swill for now, sows.
Come back soon. You were great.
 
My first work, The Wisdom of Autphag, contains a number of criticisms of scientific empiricism: first, the etymological, epistemological and etiological basis for its finding, which I'd established well before the neoreactionaries took off, has its presumptions based on the purity of the analysis of data as a reliable midpoint that is completely unassailable by deliberate manipulations in the process of methodological construction of the analytical method of rubric/assessment, and that much was deliberate.
I think this is something acknowledged by most serious researchers.

The Jews during the Enlightenment were certain that they could foist scientific empiricism as a means of deliberately forging certain phenomena in society, the autism apparatus of matriarchal domination, medicalizing what was essentially a heirarchical stratification tool to degenerate them in ensuring the "destruction of patriarchy" and the usurpration of neo-matriarchalism, under the guise of a grassroots political movement like feminism, despite abudant documentation of its Judeomasonic origins. Since none of you are genuinely interested in concepts like absolute truth and genuine epistemological investigation though, I'll leave you to brew in your swill for now, sows.
So the foundation of the support and popularity of scientific method is the desire of Jews to hold down autists? You were never this limited in the past. Maybe I remember you with rose-colored glasses.
 
you finally realized /cow/ had found more interesting NEETs, huh? why don't you show us your leet algorithm-writing skills again. that was really effective at getting attention.
 
enquire
neurotypicals
self-aggrandized
neurodiversitarian nemeses
histrionic
etheric
ideological precepts
race-chauvanistic
scientific empiricism
Scientific demagougery
mid-witted mediocrity
negrotypically minded retrograde
banally autistic
etymological, epistemological and etiological
neoreactionaries
methodological construction of the analytical method of rubric
matriarchal domination
heirarchical stratification
epistemological

Hmm, hmm. Yes. I find this post to be rather shallow and pedantic.
 
Oh, the grandiose, pseudointellectual, antisocial personality disordered Jews are now crawling from underneath the floorboards. Great.

Also, I'm only narrowing my focus for the sake of an unnavigable clusterfuck of a site with a jarring layout that's so aesthetically rapacious as to leave one practically blinded in a way making /cow/ seem visually appealing.
 
Oh, the grandiose, pseudointellectual, antisocial personality disordered Jews are now crawling from underneath the floorboards. Great.

Also, I'm only narrowing my focus for the sake of an unnavigable clusterfuck of a site with a jarring layout that's so aesthetically rapacious as to leave one practically blinded in a way making /cow/ seem visually appealing.
I love how you're using big words to hide the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Oh, the grandiose, pseudointellectual, antisocial personality disordered Jews are now crawling from underneath the floorboards. Great.

Also, I'm only narrowing my focus for the sake of an unnavigable clusterfuck of a site with a jarring layout that's so aesthetically rapacious as to leave one practically blinded in a way making /cow/ seem visually appealing.
Have you been to the EDF Forums and seen the layout over there?
 
Back