A question for the guests:
Why do you support someone who refuses to use their very public and self-proclaimed very large platforms to state the known side effects of the DIY hormones they support through directly linking it on said platform? All they'd have to do is make a video or a tweet stating or reposting the listed risks from the very same website so that the people being shown it understand the risks.
Not just posting the link either. Just saying it. Mentioning how the antiandrogens can cause deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and pituitary tumors. How the testosterone recipes cause blood clots, heart attacks, and strokes. Things that kill people at worst and ruin lives at best. And yes, this is on the DIY HRT website, and you can further look this all up on your preferred choice of WebMD or Pubmed.
If I was to ever endorse any sort of medical product or treatment (Which, to powerlevel slightly, is something I have done before as a professional in my field) I explicitly make those risks clear because I know I am liable for the risks they take from my suggestion. Yet Keffals refuses to admit to that liability, and sweeps those risks under the rug, refusing to even mention that risks exist at all. Why openly support someone who refuses to state the risks of the chemicals they are endorsing to children, who just want to feel comfortable in their bodies? If even one of you has the candor to log on with a throwaway email and try to justify continuing your support ofthis person after reading all of this, you are already demonstrating more integrity than the person you leap to the defense of.
A reasonable person would, at this point, stop to ask why Keffals won't do it. Are our guests gonna be reasonable people, and ask why?