these are very valid criticisms - i'd like to say with full honesty that i did
do slight edits in two of the screenshots provided, fully expecting keffals to reveal additional info. her tweet regarding this was deleted within two minutes, so this pretty much flopped. the edits are as follows:
1)
shortened the email field to hide the attachment - this was a deliberate (but retarded) decision on my part. the only edit made was to shorten the box.
so this is something i'd already referred to in
this message that the "paperclip icon" is appended to any email with an attachment. first screenshot includes a paperclip. so yes, i did crop it out. i created a new, blank message and put the footer in microsoft paint to close it off.
i also mentioned in the attached reply that it
includes PGP - this is not contradictory, as there were
no additional security measures in place, as stated here.
2)
removed the countless authentication failure notifications - this one is self-explanatory. only wanted to include the relevant ones and not an image full of AUTHENTICATION FAILURE AUTHENTICATION FAILURE
to address the rest of your arguments, i'll just go point-by-point:
- IPs not showing up in security logs: i actually don't know. for as long as i remember, it has shown my IP in these logs, regardless of whether i was logged in via clearnet or VPN.
- york and leeds discrepancy - i think this has to do with the whole thing about 14 leeds st being her mainly known address, and the police department involved corrected themselves. i don't know why this is the case either.
- not reporting to london police service - already mentioned here
so hopefully that addresses anything, i don't have much else to say about it. i personally
am guilty of trying to steer the narrative slightly in favor of getting more milk, but i think the person who sent the email could also be put at fault as well, as they used easily accessible info to send out the email.