So what? Correlation isn't causation. This is the same logic that convinced Australian politicians to put people who purchased fleshlights on a database because they decided it was tangentially related to child pornography.
I'm not even insisting you can't mock lolicons since more coomskulls really
do need to stop making it their internet identity. The problem is heavily conflating drawings with an actual crime is just going to get people who don't particularly deserve it into serious trouble, set some terrible legal precedence & encourage the vultures to try and enact some more censorship "for the greater good." tl;dr -
View attachment 3694022
You might be misunderstanding.
Pedophilia isn't a crime, molesting children is.
Pedophilia is a paraphilia where the sick fuck sufferer is attracted to children.
We aren't calling people who jerk off to lolishit criminals, we're saying they are pedophiles, which they are by definition.
It's not the media it's the intent of the observer, the lolishit pedophile is aroused by depictions of children being fucked.
Not all pedophiles are child molesters, but they all deserve the rope.
I see no benefit in leaving a ticking psychological time bomb alive until they harm a child.
All child molesters started out jerking off to images, and at some point the images weren't enough.
Tell me honestly, what do you call someone who seeks out, shares and is aroused by images of sexual images of children.
Lolicon pedophiles are pedophiles.
Lolicon translates to pedophile.
You're literally arguing against sense.
And its mighty suspicious anyone would defend this filth without having a vested interest in it.
