- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
Just say "victory" and "treachery", faggot.In other words you don't know that zrada always follows peremoga.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just say "victory" and "treachery", faggot.In other words you don't know that zrada always follows peremoga.
It's not going to kill you to learn languages other than English and Urdu, you know.Just say "victory" and "treachery", faggot.
And we are back to nuclear shitpostingToo late, the last gay bomb was detonated over America in 2015 to celebrate Obama's second term.
In other words you don't know that zrada always follows peremoga.
What's your winning scenario here? If the west floods Ukraine with more mercenaries and they keep trying to take more territory, then they'll promptly turn into a radioactive pile of ashes. NATO has already proclaimed they will not respond unless attacked directly, so as long as the nuclear strike is restricted to Ukrainian territory, there will be no retaliation, and no refunds. There's no way for Ukraine to win here, other than promptly surrendering. SDAVAYSA KHOKHOL! AHKMAT SILA!
No, no. Come on. Tell me how you envision a scenario of Ukraine "winning" and NOT getting nuked.And we are back to nuclear shitposting
Nichevo always follows the failure of maskirovka. Or the failure of any Russian endeavor. Which, for any Russian endeavor not involving over a trillion dollars in American largesse (today's value of the American supplies sent to Russia 1942-1945), is every Russian endeavor
Easy. The strategic rocket forces refuse to carry out the order. The political leadership already fucked the military by sending them to die repeatedly in offensive actions that made no military sense but were driven by political goals. Including troops from the very own strategic rocket forces and sailors from the navy who were "voluntold" to serve in Ukraine as infantry or tank drivers to plug the manpower gaps.No, no. Come on. Tell me how you envision a scenario of Ukraine "winning" and NOT getting nuked.
I envision it by still having a connection to realityNo, no. Come on. Tell me how you envision a scenario of Ukraine "winning" and NOT getting nuked.
So it should be easy for you to describe, then. Go ahead. Tell me how Ukraine can win and not get nuked in return. What steps can they take to accomplish that?I envision it by still having a connection to reality, that which you lack
Unfortunately, nobody in this conflict asked Europe what they want.
So you're basing your entire theory on the assumption that someone will refuse an order? We already know that NATO won't respond to a nuclear strike unless it is directly on a NATO member nation, so your whole "end of the world" situation goes out of the window. Pretty pathetic, if you ask me.Easy. The strategic rocket forces refuse to carry out the order. The political leadership already fucked the military by sending them to die repeatedly in offensive actions that made no military sense but were driven by political goals. Including troops from the very own strategic rocket forces and sailors from the navy who were "voluntold" to serve in Ukraine as infantry or tank drivers to plug the manpower gaps.
Under no circumstances is the military going to obey the order to end the world and die for a manlet who can't take the L.
Ukraine continues winning on the battlefield, nuclear weapons do not get used. ThereSo it should be easy for you to describe, then. Go ahead. Tell me how Ukraine can win and not get nuked in return. What steps can they take to accomplish that?
What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do you think this is a movie, and that Ukraine has plot armor? Zelensky just threatened nuclear war, AGAIN.Ukraine continues winning on the battlefield, nuclear weapons do not get used. There
Do you realize you sound like you're on some kind of hardcore stimulant?
What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do
What makes you think they will? Ukraine takes back the territory that Russia stole from it by force of arms. How does that, in any way at all, justify using nukes?What makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do you think this is a movie, and that Ukraine has plot armor?
Soviet officers already made the decision to not fire nukes at least twice during the Cold War. We're only talking here because most people who work with nukes know how fucking stupid it is to launch them.So you're basing your entire theory on the assumption that someone will refuse an order? We already know that NATO won't respond to a nuclear strike unless it is directly on a NATO member nation, so your whole "end of the world" situation goes out of the window. Pretty pathetic, if you ask me.
I say you're blusteringWhat makes you so sure that nuclear weapons will not get used, when NATO has clearly stated they will not respond unless attacked directly? Do you think this is a movie, and that Ukraine has plot armor? Zelensky just threatened nuclear war, AGAIN.
You do realize that using a nuclear weapon will not automatically trigger MAD, right? That's a fucking retarded idea. NATO will pretend nothing happened and will go about its business, rather than risking a retaliation strike that will end the world.
Nato supplying Ukraine with wall hacks and aimbots. Completely unfair gamers.Ukrainian soldier scores a wallbang