Susie Green & Mermaids UK - "Trans Kid Support Charity", Susie had her underage kid get GRS

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
MF does more harm than good with stuff like this. It's panto-tier shit and over-stating it like she does just devalues other things being said atm.
Yes, yes, very normal to put out a request for a child to have a photoshoot in their bedroom, deciding on posing an 11-year-old boy with an adult (both senses) model.
20221012-162936-4.png20221012-162719-4.jpg
(twitter.com, archive.ph)
20221012-162936-3.png20221012-162936-2.png20221012-162936-1.png
(mermaidsuk.org.uk, archive.ph)
20221012-162719-2.jpg20221012-162719-3.jpg

Very normal. Nothing untoward here at all.
 
Posted this in the resetera thread, but fits here as well

Someone just post a thread about pedo group mermaids

View attachment 3732577
Of course no word on why Mermaids is facing this backlash. I wonder if one poster will have the balls to post about any of the fuck up Mermaids have made in the past week.

Of course there's no word about the cause, it's fucking ResetEra. If someone even dares to mention the Mermaids' fuckups, they will be banned and their post cancelled.
(One more point to Kiwi Farms, where posts are never cancelled unless they break the law)

Edit: grammar.
 
Can't see any link between this pic and Mermaids, have I missed something? These are two drag queens from Ru Paul's Drag Race UK. (Left is "Scaredy Kat" and right is "Gothy Kendoll".) Both are over 18 and neither are trans AFAIK.

Don't get me wrong, the email & the other pics in your post are pretty damning.

But not sure why the Twitter user linked in your post also added this photo when the others were sufficiently horrific on their own.
 
I never used to have issues with people who had been in porn becoming teachers, or working with kids, but that was when it was usually some old video done under a fake name that was unlikely to actually be seen by any kids. It's significantly different to have people working with children who are actively doing "sex work", or posting pornographic and/or fetish content and sharing it on their public social media. One is a part of someone's life that they've tried to move on from; the other is a continuing, active choice.
This makes me think of all those stories: "Years ago I did porn and now I'm a schoolteacher/nurse. Some student / coworker recognized me, told everyone I did porn, I got harassed and then *I* got fired for it."
It's as if these people either don't recall being hormone-fueled horndogs as teenagers or are deliberately taking advantage of the fact that their audience is all hormone-fueled horndogs now (since these fuckers are practically always pedophiles, you can probably guess which option I'm going with).

I only had a few physically attractive teachers back in high school, and I was already distracted enough with how they looked clothed to make it modestly difficult to pay attention in their classes. I'm 100% certain I could never have taken any of those teachers seriously again if I knew what their tits or cooch looked like. It would have been impossible to concentrate on anything but matching the clothed body in front of me with the photos/videos in my memory. And I know I'm not the only teenager who would have reacted like that.

The absolute state of the world these days (:_(
Take heart, friend. This thread lit up like a Christmas tree a couple days ago when they finally started actually seeing real-world consequences for these actions! This is actual accountability for once! We're nowhere near the finish line but people are finally starting to stir from their collective slumber, even if only a little bit. And these perverts aren't doing what they should be doing in response to this. They're escalating and doubling down instead, which is the exact opposite of what they should be doing (i.e. policing their own, disavowing the obvious pervs, shutting their fucking mouths and backing off the kids for a few years) if they wanted public opinion to stop slowly swinging back towards sanity again.

Just look at the new movie 'bros' which has a scene defending exposing a minor (<14 in fact) to a gay sex show in order to help him come to terms with and get more comfortable with his sexuality. Used as an excuse in an in-story debate about whether (why) it's OK to talk about letter people crap and overt sexuality to school children! There is NOTHING anyone can say that will make me look at the involvement of these types of people with both porn and children, as being harmlessly incidental.. Sorry, that ship has sailed by LONG ago!
And you're correct. Anyone who wants to show pornography to someone (or a group) that's underage is universally a pervert and likely pedophile. There is zero reason for anyone to expose a child who isn't their own to pornography, and it's even suspect when a parent or guardian does it intentionally except maybe to address a child's genuine curiosity. Even then, it should be brief and accompanied by an explanation (as @nym rightly points out).

It's one thing for a fifteen year old to share a pornhub URL with his similarly-aged friends, but it's quite another for a teacher in their twenties or thirties to show a classroom full of 15-year-olds a high-definition video of a DVDA scene with "BLACKED.COM" boldly emblazoned in the bottom right corner. There's only one reason anyone would ever do that -- desensitizing children to sex acts and grooming them to be comfortable hearing about, witnessing or even participating in them.

It should be so simple. At some point they're approaching puberty, you're not only gonna have to sit the kid down and have that "birds & bees" discussion but at some point not long after "you're gonna see this porn stuff..."
Sadly, I think we need to start adding some more provisos to your (very sage) list here of how to prepare kids for pornography. I can think of at least one: "if someone besides us tries to show you pornography, especially an adult, like a teacher, school official, counselor, or whatever, stay away from them, stay on your guard, and tell us as soon as you can. We won't be mad at you and you won't be in any trouble at all for it."

Parents need to start warning kids that this shit's coming, potentially even supposedly trustworthy adults, and they need to know it's absolutely acceptable (and encouraged!) to narc on the perverts who try it. Kids who aren't afraid to ask their parents awkward questions about sex are already very well prepared for this, so it's every parent's job to make sure that's true for their own kids.
 
Can't see any link between this pic and Mermaids, have I missed something? These are two drag queens from Ru Paul's Drag Race UK. (Left is "Scaredy Kat" and right is "Gothy Kendoll".) Both are over 18 and neither are trans AFAIK.
Scaredy Kat is the one posing with the 11 year old, in what appears to be the same set as one of the other photos.

Edit: Apparently the photo of the 11 year old boy with the drag queen Scaredy Kat was taken at Drag Con UK 2020. Here’s another photo of Scaredy Kat on that set.
9E2B92EA-0EFD-4E53-A63D-EE57334F787F.jpeg
Source
 
Last edited:
Organizations like Mermaids honestly re enforces my belief that children trooning out is due to direct adult persuasion/intervention over children having "An existential gender identification crisis". In the US there are laws for a minimum age for certain permanent shit such as getting a tattoo (Basically permanent art on your body) requires you to be at least 18 (in most states), smoking (risk of cancer development) is 21, etc. At least you COULD undo the changes in my examples like lasering off a tattoo or successfully being treated for cancer but trooning out? You'll never have anything similar to your reproductive organs EVER again once they're gone, just mocking substitutes.
Yes, yes, very normal to put out a request for a child to have a photoshoot in their bedroom, deciding on posing an 11-year-old boy with an adult (both senses) model.
View attachment 3732685View attachment 3732676
(twitter.com, archive.ph)
View attachment 3732686View attachment 3732687View attachment 3732688
(mermaidsuk.org.uk, archive.ph)
View attachment 3732674View attachment 3732675

Very normal. Nothing untoward here at all.
"The cup is a memory that can't be thrown away whatever happens"
No, you're suppose to toss the cup, dumbass.
 
What channel was it? Sounds very ITV.
Pretty sure that wasn’t on TV! But BBC Three made a programme “Transsexual Teen, Beauty Queen” about Green’s son Jack’s attempt to become Miss England.

It’s infamous for a clip (below) where Susie Green laughs about how the puberty blockers she put him on (which she got from the US) resulted in him having a micropenis, “so there wasn’t much there to work with”. I think that means Jack now has a magical self-lubricating colongina.



 
Re
View attachment 3730493

FUCK YEAH! Department of Education found their delete button
Remember when HBomberGuy did that stream and gathered 600k pounds for Mermaids? I can't believe that in the end the guy he was mad about (Graham Linehan) fucking won lmao.
 
I remember a while back how the same kind of undesirable women were arguing against gender roles because of patriarchy or social construct or some trite. How did we go from that to “If you want to play with dolls it’ll cost you your genitals, kid” in such a short timespan?

One thing didn’t change, sadly; they still (ab)use kids for attention.
Because that shit is third wave bullshit, and if you listen to TERFs they're mainly from that second generation that has been fighting for their rights their whole lives, unlike these third wave cunts who had their rights handed to them on a silver platter and then did everything possible to piss them away in nonsense that is now biting them on the ass.
 
Because that shit is third wave bullshit, and if you listen to TERFs they're mainly from that second generation that has been fighting for their rights their whole lives, unlike these third wave cunts who had their rights handed to them on a silver platter and then did everything possible to piss them away in nonsense that is now biting them on the ass.
‘The slag who cried wolf’
 
nigger, how does a grown up woman (mother of two?) blog an 11 year old boy right beside fucking gay porn and not think maybe that's not a good thing to do?
These are the things Mermaids and its staff have done? Pointing them out is a way of showing Mermaids is unfit to work with vulnerable children?
 
Back