Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[Geranium]

Why the fuck is Zac in DC all the time

Zac's term doesn't start until January, and he was there for some LGBTQ+ politicians event, so I think he's just made a vacation of it with Tony.

Bigger question, for me, is whether Tony's new, dickless, repressed-gay boyfriend is staying in Tony's house, where Tony's 7-year-old son lives. Appropriate role models!

Edit:

There's a knock at the door of Erin Reed's Germantown house.
A small boy, KIDDO, answers, and finds a SALESMAN.

SALESMAN: Son, is your mom home?
KIDDO: She's dilating with Aunt Zooey

 

[Geranium]

Apologies for double posting, but Tony is so painfully stupid it triggered me. Well, I say "painfully stupid", but there's an equal chance that he’s just cynically making baseless arguments, because facts, what even are those? (twitter.com, archive.vn)

Once upon a time, Tony was (he claimed) using his statistics madskillz to reduce crime in Baton Rouge. Now he paints a small dip in a stock on one trading day, a dip that is not inconsistent with the stock's usual volatility, as a sign that investors are dropping any stock linked to a particular billionaire because of his (alleged!) political views.

And fucking lol at comparing Tesla's year-to-date (YTD) performance with the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which includes only 30 companies, and includes them based on share price, not market capitalisation. Anyway, with all the caveats about "what does a stock price really mean?", Tesla is down just over 50% YTD. Tesla's listed on the Nasdaq, and the Nasdaq composite is down 25% YTD. Tesla gets treated as a tech stock, and the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index is down 35% YTD. In a bad year, Tesla’s stock price has done badly.

Does this tell us anything about investors' reaction to Elon Musk's supposed deep-seated hatred of troons? Er, I think it probably does not. Does it even have a real, material effect on Elon Musk's wealth? Also, probably not, as much of his wealth was bound up in securities anyway, not actually sitting in his bank account.

Sorry, enough sperging. Maybe at some point Tesla can return to those halcyon days of the Elon Markets Hypothesis, of "Gamestonk!!" and large bitcoin purchases. Will it make a difference either way to troons? No.

 

[The Silent Perjority]

I said a similar thing before when Tone went to pride with all the "girls" but he looks so odd standing with people who smile. This new boyfriend does big grins for all the pics and Tony just stands there with his tight lipped chinny reckon, it just makes him look like a creepy weirdo, like the bloke from Sparks with the Hitler mustache.

Get your fucking railings sorted Tony for the love of god. How can you be perfectly content to mutilate you genitals but won't go and get your broken biscuits fixed?

 

[Geranium]

I said a similar thing before when Tone went to pride with all the "girls" but he looks so odd standing with people who smile.

Additional material for your consideration:

(source, archive)

Also from the White House thing they went to, here’s Zac Raasch / Zooey Zephyr having a male-pattern-baldness-off with Richard / Rachel Levine:


Zac did an interview with the Associated Press (source, archive)


I got ya “understanding” right here.

 

[gaystoner]

Next to an (out of focus) woman whos at least 30+

 

[gobbles]

Rachel Levine looks especially masculine in that photo! He shouldn’t wear his hair up, and he should probably ditch that trench. The epaulettes, the dropped shoulder seams, and the unbroken fabric across his chest emphasize his broad shoulders and wide neck.

I also love when troons harp on about hiding their true selves until adulthood which is coincidentally when female-specific biology really starts manifesting. Periods, on-going boob growth, changing waist/hip proportions, childbearing, ovarian cysts, etc all come to mind. It doesn’t matter how early they start—they’ll still miss all of it. I wonder how many kids’ bodies will need to be destroyed before they acknowledge that there is no “early enough”.

 

[Geranium]

Tony just stands there with his tight lipped chinny reckon, it just makes him look like a creepy weirdo, like the bloke from Sparks with the Hitler mustache.

Here’s another:

(source, archive)

 

[Dick in a Folgers Coffee]

Tony takes Zac out
View attachment 4063449
View attachment 4063452

The picture of these two looks like a fucking monkey picking fleas out of one of its siblings

 

[OK_Cogitator]

I thought Erin would be the dumper since he uses people but that would be hilarious.

Ya see I always figured at the end of a relationship that Mr. Mac Tonight here just unhinged that mandible and consumed the smaller troon whole.

 

[Kees H]

Here’s another:
View attachment 4073574View attachment 4073589
(source, archive)

Pictures like this should be illegal - I got HIV from just looking at it.

 

[Chukipz]

Next to an (out of focus) woman whos at least 30+

View attachment 4072662

Dunno about you guys, but I get serious vibes of Marylin Manson in court...

 

[A1 Steak Sauce]

Who did it better?

or



Tony has finally reached 100k followers on Twitter. I’m shocked to have noticed this before him. Be sure to credit me for this information Tony.

 

[Backinpogform]

Who did it better?
View attachment 4074066
or
View attachment 4074063

View attachment 4074093
Tony has finally reached 100k followers on Twitter. I’m shocked to have noticed this before him. Be sure to credit me for this information Tony.

What’s hilarious about this photo is he has edited it with the eye-enlarger filter to look more feminine and it just makes him look even rapeier

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Dunno about you guys, but I get serious vibes of Marylin Manson in court...
View attachment 4073808

Ngl, I thought that actually was Marilyn Manson for a second.

 

[doodoocaca]

Apologies for double posting, but Tony is so painfully stupid it triggered me. Well, I say "painfully stupid", but there's an equal chance that he’s just cynically making baseless arguments, because facts, what even are those? (twitter.com, archive.vn)
View attachment 4070358
Once upon a time, Tony was (he claimed) using his statistics madskillz to reduce crime in Baton Rouge. Now he paints a small dip in a stock on one trading day, a dip that is not inconsistent with the stock's usual volatility, as a sign that investors are dropping any stock linked to a particular billionaire because of his (alleged!) political views.

And fucking lol at comparing Tesla's year-to-date (YTD) performance with the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which includes only 30 companies, and includes them based on share price, not market capitalisation. Anyway, with all the caveats about "what does a stock price really mean?", Tesla is down just over 50% YTD. Tesla's listed on the Nasdaq, and the Nasdaq composite is down 25% YTD. Tesla gets treated as a tech stock, and the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index is down 35% YTD. In a bad year, Tesla’s stock price has done badly.

Does this tell us anything about investors' reaction to Elon Musk's supposed deep-seated hatred of troons? Er, I think it probably does not. Does it even have a real, material effect on Elon Musk's wealth? Also, probably not, as much of his wealth was bound up in securities anyway, not actually sitting in his bank account.

Sorry, enough sperging. Maybe at some point Tesla can return to those halcyon days of the Elon Markets Hypothesis, of "Gamestonk!!" and large bitcoin purchases. Will it make a difference either way to troons? No.

lmao what the fuck even is IV
>TSLA, volatile?!!?!

Maybe I could sell Erin some FDs lol

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Apologies for double posting, but Tony is so painfully stupid it triggered me. Well, I say "painfully stupid", but there's an equal chance that he’s just cynically making baseless arguments, because facts, what even are those? (twitter.com, archive.vn)
View attachment 4070358
Once upon a time, Tony was (he claimed) using his statistics madskillz to reduce crime in Baton Rouge. Now he paints a small dip in a stock on one trading day, a dip that is not inconsistent with the stock's usual volatility, as a sign that investors are dropping any stock linked to a particular billionaire because of his (alleged!) political views.

And fucking lol at comparing Tesla's year-to-date (YTD) performance with the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which includes only 30 companies, and includes them based on share price, not market capitalisation. Anyway, with all the caveats about "what does a stock price really mean?", Tesla is down just over 50% YTD. Tesla's listed on the Nasdaq, and the Nasdaq composite is down 25% YTD. Tesla gets treated as a tech stock, and the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index is down 35% YTD. In a bad year, Tesla’s stock price has done badly.

Does this tell us anything about investors' reaction to Elon Musk's supposed deep-seated hatred of troons? Er, I think it probably does not. Does it even have a real, material effect on Elon Musk's wealth? Also, probably not, as much of his wealth was bound up in securities anyway, not actually sitting in his bank account.

Sorry, enough sperging. Maybe at some point Tesla can return to those halcyon days of the Elon Markets Hypothesis, of "Gamestonk!!" and large bitcoin purchases. Will it make a difference either way to troons? No.

I've said this endlessly about others (congrats to Tony in unthinkingly joining the mob yet again) but none of these dummies show a long term stock graph, nor do they mention that Elon himself said (on Twitter naturally) Tesla was too high in 2020 and it's pretty much been dropping ever since. They're obsessed with finding only proof of their stupid theories even if it means they have to embrace theories that make no sense and are easily refuted by evidence. They know nothing about the stock market, they have no idea how many of these trades were automatic because a price threshold was crossed, they have no idea how many were institutional investors, etc. They just see NUMBER GO DOWN and AHA I WAS RIGHT THE PEOPLE (who always agree with me if they're allowed to by the conspiracies against me) ARE PUNISHING ELON!

What's the easiest way to refute this nonsense and show they don't even understand the stock market? Every trade has two sides, for every seller there's a buyer.

Here’s another:
View attachment 4073574View attachment 4073589
(source, archive)

Had to look again because I thought that was entirely Tony's neck at first glance of the thumbnail.

 

[doodoocaca]

There is a simple method for converting annualized volatility into daily volatility – divide the annualized number by the square root of business days in a year, which is normally just under 256. Coincidentally, that square root of 256 is 16, hence the rule. As of today (2022-12-14), Tesla's Volatility is 54.85%. 54.85/16 = 3.428125.

tl;dr TSLA price is expected to swing 3.43% in a day.

Also going "omg stonk went down" right after a FOMC meeting where JPOW turned up interest even more? Really? God damn Erin, do a little homework.

 

[White-Kettle Shufflepunk]

It doesn’t matter how early they start—they’ll still miss all of it. I wonder how many kids’ bodies will need to be destroyed before they acknowledge that there is no “early enough”.

Scam idea, find new, expectant parents, tell them their zygotes are trans, wave some kind of flashy toy in front of the lady’s belly and tell them you swapped their sex. Sorry, “aligned it.”

 

[garbage cake]

Cow Crossover! Dylan Mulvaney comments on Tony’s instagram that he loves the couple content:

Skinwalker buddies!

Crazy, you'd think a "queer legislative researcher" would know

Tony has dropped “queer” from his “queer legislative researcher” title he made up. Such expertise! Not in like fashion, or being a woman, or having good dental hygiene, or good taste in men, but he certainly searches things on Twitter and reposts them a lot.

 

[Punished Neco]

Gaptooth's partner has announced a list of their top 5 bills that they plan to have put to a vote in Montana, 1 caught my eye in particular.

[A]
Bill LC3607 which as described would revise adoption laws to seemingly make it easier for trans etc to adopt.
If you want to have a horrifying thought then consider that it could be hinting that sometime in the future that Gaptooth & Co. will be seeking to adopt.