- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Too late...Please stop defending zoophiles. Almost every culture on earth has rules against having sex with animals. You're going to earn yourself a Halal thread if you keep defending these dogfuckers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too late...Please stop defending zoophiles. Almost every culture on earth has rules against having sex with animals. You're going to earn yourself a Halal thread if you keep defending these dogfuckers.
This toxic positivity that's been shoved down your throat and thinking you have to accept everyone even if it's vile and they "don't act" is making you defend an actual animal rapist who tortured animals to death. Animals are dead, animals are tortured beyond repair and here you are defending someone's feelings in the aftermath. Go think about your life you terminally online zoomer shitbrain.Im not defending him all I was saying is being zoo isnt something people can control. Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.
Of course the white woman would defend fucking dogsIm not defending him all I was saying is being zoo isnt something people can control. Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.
Very appropriate pink triangleIm not a woman and I dont know who that is
Terfs would be coddling her and trying to talk her down from the ledge instead of correctly telling her to 41%.Im not defending him all I was saying is being zoo isnt something people can control. Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.
Those people end up in jail or dead.Some people cant help their urges
You are one sick fuck. I guess what's a dog or a kid here or there to you, huh?Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.
A kink is a particular sexual act that a person enjoys more than others, it has nothing to do with uncontrollable urges. "I enjoy this the most" and "I can't help doing this" are completely different fucking things.Im not defending him all I was saying is being zoo isnt something people can control. Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.
Meant to update this but life is hectic, I come bearing even more good news for fellow kiwis! I was surprised to see a new feature for this thread, but hey, if you want an even better post to link about this would be it. @NullCharges are CR.11.202.(a)(3), CR.11.202.(a)(4), which is essentially not only did he possess obscene material with the intention to distribute it but did distributed it, and four counts of CR.10.604.(a)(5) which is disappointing as these are charges for animal neglect. It's clear he was objectively guilty of this in fairness, but I'm confused why the change was made.
What he may be subject to if guilty:
1. Imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both.
2. Imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or a fine not exceeding $5,000 or both.
3. Imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both. x 4.
Good. Burn in hell, furfag.Meant to update this but life is hectic, I come bearing even more good news for fellow kiwis! I was surprised to see a new feature for this thread, but hey, if you want an even better post to link about this would be it. @Null
The indictment was not publicly accessible for around a day. In that time, it is my understanding some sort of fuss occurred locally. It could be coincidental (as there's no supportive evidence or neighbors I could find speaking about this update after the fact), but the following day it was back up on case search with changes.
All counts of neglect (CR.10.604.(a)(5)) have been changed to Aggravated Cruelty Animal which means he is facing four felony charges. No more misdemeanors for the abuse besides the recording (and spread) of it, which means finally he is getting charges befitting the crimes.
Status code is CR.10.606.(b)(1)(2) for anyone curious. Interestingly, this section covers torture and mutiliation instead of sexually explicit crimes. However, he is a known necrozoosadist so there may be additional evidence inspiring this change in charges?
The potential if guilty is he would be subject to imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or a fine not exceeding $5,000 or both, for each count. This is amazing- And, better yet, there's improved options for keeping his filthy hands away from animals when he is free again beyond just his probation period, but for any length of time the court sees fit. Plus he'll still have to pay out of pocket to see a psychologist, just as a bonus.
If there is no pleading down that is four felonies on his record, and the potential for 12 years without counting the previously established charges nor those from his stalking case.
Sean goes to court tomorrow for stalking. His initial hearing for the above charges is currently scheduled at 03/13/2023, 10:30:00, at C18 St. Mary's County Circuit Calendar in Court Room 1. I expect this to be drawn out so I wouldn't expect substantial news for sometime going forward, but maybe I'll continue to be pleasantly surprised.
Sean has done and utterly fucked up despite his cockiness, and this should be presented as a message to all his disgusting degenerate friends that even if it takes time, you too can (and should) be locked away!
For options involving records/materials not accessible online to the public but not necessarily sealed, it can cost anywhere from $10-$75. Entirely depends on the requested content. I don't think anything you could request on Sean right now would exceed $30, but is probably significantly less. You'd need to know the county and court for whichever case you're interested in, but that's documented in this thread. On the long photos of indictments and cases shared here you can also find case/tracking/complaint numbers if required.Thank you for starting this thread and doxing this weirdo @Mr. Chuckie Sneed and for the updates and info @Stupidface . I’m so appalled that they have video of him sexually assaulting his dog by giving it a handjob, yet didn’t indict him on aggravated animal cruelty or any other felony. Such bullshit.
Seems he is in more trouble over stalking that gay furry. Is there any way to get more info or access to any of the materials from either trial, even for a fee? I’d be willing to do the needful if it’s just a monetary thing but cannot go there in person.
I don't believe in non-offending "virtuous" pedos or zoos. I can buy into the "born that way" or "history of abuse" arguments but if that's you, even if you've got a tragic backstory that made you like that, you're obligated to take yourself out of the game because you're a danger to society.Abuse can lead to fucked up sexual desires.
Acting on them, or normalizing them, is a quick way to become material for the chipper.
Lady, you're normalizing it. And thats all I can say on that topic.
Theoretically some of these "non-offending" people could be saved from the brain rot. In practice it's not possible because there are groups of people that unironically make arguments for it and form "support" groups around being disgusting freaks. In a pre-internet world I can imagine a solid beating and serious psychiatric help making these people into functional members of society.I don't believe in non-offending "virtuous" pedos or zoos. I can buy into the "born that way" or "history of abuse" arguments but if that's you, even if you've got a tragic backstory that made you like that, you're obligated to take yourself out of the game because you're a danger to society.
Quantum is waaay beyond non-offending so it's irrelevant either way.
Yeah, they need help. Current society does the opposite. Kinda just like trannies. Keep pushing them into itTheoretically some of these "non-offending" people could be saved from the brain rot. In practice it's not possible because there are groups of people that unironically make arguments for it and form "support" groups around being disgusting freaks. In a pre-internet world I can imagine a solid beating and serious psychiatric help making these people into functional members of society.
In our world though, these groups of people have validated this degeneracy to the point where there's no going back. I've said this in another thread but I'm mind blown that people feel comfortable discussing that they are indeed dangerous nasty predators on public platforms. It's absolutely disgusting and sad that this is where we are.
Im not defending him all I was saying is being zoo isnt something people can control. Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.
Im not defending him all I was saying is being zoo isnt something people can control. Some people get urges just like any other kink and as long as they dont act on them continuously or hurt someone thats no reason to call them bad people. Not all zoos are like this person.