Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
LMAO at "19 hour days"

Screenshot 2023-02-26 111551.png


Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
 
LMAO at "19 hour days"

View attachment 4637147

Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
He is so fucking grating. Bet his brows will still look like shit. I feel bad for the technician who has to try to make something happen with those thatches.
 
LMAO at "19 hour days"

View attachment 4637147

Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
I really hate men who need to explicitly mention their tee-hee typical female activities, "getting your nails done is so validating, amirite ladies?" It's such a performative woman LARP thing trannies love.
 
“I’m going to get my nails done, brows threaded, eat at a nice brunch spot.”

How is he going to do that safely when trannies are currently facing a genocide???? It’s almost as if he’s free to go about his business like any other person.

I’m sure Anne Frank and the Hutus and Tutsis scheduled manicures and enjoyed brunch on the regular during their respective genocides.
 
LMAO at "19 hour days"

View attachment 4637147

Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
i mean i would believe he's wasting time on twitter 19 hours a day
 
Drag is kind of interesting in this context because it's not quite an identity catagory yet, but more of a... sacrement? One be seen seeing drag, if you get what I mean. Tony was talking about it like a kid's fucking first communion or something.
Remember when Erin Reed talked about being religious and having a volunteer position at his Christian church? Guess the old ✝️ got pushed out for more worship ot the land of gender. It's almost as if he'll latch onto anything that gives him power and treat it like it's serious business with a religious fever if it gets him his way, like drugs.

I wouldn't care if he bounced between religions, it's a personal journey after all, but it's clear he has no thought into his spiritual beliefs (hasn't even said "you know what I've been rethinking Christianity and it's not for me" which would have been acceptable) which further extends to his political and personal beliefs. It's a subtle reminder of how hollow he is.

I don't know why Tony is acting like he would be in danger in DC considering they have the highest percentage of LGBTQ in the country at 8.5%.
The same reason the tranch are always in danger: self induced paranoia by OCD thought feeding and anxiety. He needs to slow the fuck down so more of his hair doesn't fall out.

LMAO at "19 hour days"

View attachment 4637147

Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
He did have a real job and he didn't bitch about it that much, this is pure pity fishing and hoping people treat him like a martyr on Twitter. Based on likes & replies, it seems to be working.

Anyone equating tweeting with working (who isn't a paid advertiser) needs to get slapped upside the head for being blindingly braindead. Anyone who spends 19 hours a day on twitter when not in corporate damage control overdrive needs a fucking detox. Also remember when Erin Reed was a single mom who took care of her kid? Yeah, me neither.

How is he going to do that safely when trannies are currently facing a genocide???? It’s almost as if he’s free to go about his business like any other person.
It's because of his passing privilege allows him to seamlessly blend in with cis women that no one ever says anything to him. Ever since he got his penis removed his body has been indistinguishable from women, which is why he's dating a cis lesbian ( :story: ) and fighting for reproductive rights ( :story: ). The facists just can't tell. ( :story: :story: :story: )

I’m sure Anne Frank and the Hutus and Tutsis scheduled manicures and enjoyed brunch on the regular during their respective genocides
They didn't try hard enough. He's brave for leaving the house. *yawn*
 
Ugh, I never want to get behind in my dear Tony's thread again. It's hard to catch up thanks to all the wonderful nerds in this thread who post interesting stuff I want to read in full. <3
Here’s Zac’s (ongoing?) AMA: (old.reddit.com, archive.ph)

View attachment 4470131

He still has that creepy/clingy rose “calendar” on the wall, counting down until he next sees Tony.
Zac has a truly feminine spirit. you can tell because of his tastefully decorated apartment.
He may as well have stuck the roses on the wall with used gum.
Supplemental Declaration of Stephen B. Levine MD (Destroying Jack Turban's Pseudoscience)
Lol this whole thing rules. Highly recommended reading for Turban disrespecters.
Screenshot 2023-02-25 at 9.15.51 PM.png
“Brianna should've been able to enjoy her girlhood without being murdered for who she was. … Every anti-trans article, every anti-trans bill—this is where it leads.”
... if children are not allowed to transition, wouldn't that PREVENT them from being murdered for being trans (which totally happens, Tony said so)?
I am getting MATI imagining this perv adopting.
Screenshot 2023-02-26 at 1.04.34 PM.pngScreenshot 2023-02-26 at 1.08.00 PM.png
"It is estimated that almost 70% of the children in foster care are affected by prenatal alcohol exposure in varying degrees." It's similar in pre-adoptive kids.

How do you think Tony'd manage the high likelihood that he'd end up taking care of a child with a fetal alcohol disorder?
Some characteristics I've seen in adopted children with FASD:
- dangerous and illegal sexual behavior:
--- inviting strangers, including, who they met online, into the family home. this resulted in one family being robbed by the stranger.
--- having sexual conversations with children online, when they are an adult
--- using an iPad at work to take sexual photos and send to strangers online, not realizing that the workplace monitors the device
--- getting into strangers cars to have sex
--- having unprotected sex with strangers resulting in multiple STDs
- needing to live in an out of home placement (group homes)
- getting kicked out of several group homes
- compulsive stealing
- physical and verbal aggression, hitting their adoptive parents, saying the absolute worst things you can think of to the parents or siblings
- need for lifelong support for housing and employment

Many children with FASD won't show symptoms at birth, many will only start showing behavioral issues in later childhood or teen years, something you can't screen out during an adoption process unless you are somehow totally certain the mother did not consume any alcohol during pregnancy. They need extremely committed, understanding, loving families. They aren't a prop for your fucking narcissistic delusion that you can ever be a mother. You are simply a dickless perv who should stay way from kids.


Tony treated us to a pic of his man hand:
Screenshot 2023-02-26 at 4.17.01 PM.png
wtf is that between his legs?
1677449712700.png
archive
Screenshot 2023-02-26 at 4.17.07 PM.pngScreenshot 2023-02-26 at 4.18.53 PM.png
 
Tony should casually ask all his doctors during a visit what the last peer reviewed study they used in their practice is.

I don't mean this as a shot at peer review, I mean that no doctor (MD or PhD) is going to throw out their entire schema because of a single fucking paper.

I'd again say that Tony should know better having actually gone to graduate school, having briefly pursued a PhD and having once wanted to be a MD, but I'm no longer mincing words, Tony is a simpleton who probably cannot read and should not wear his ex-wife's clothes.


"Progressives" on Twitter every single day: "there should be no due process of any kind for anyone who says something I don't like that I saw quoted second or third hand."
As someone who regularly participates in the peer review process, I suspect that Tony doesn't actually know what it entails or how reviewers for a given article are chosen.

Your peer review is only as good as your peers. If anything, the current reproducibility crisis in science should give us pause when reading any academic paper, even in the most prestigious journals. All of the papers retracted for fraud have been peer reviewed by someone.

Peer review or not, the academic publishing industrial complex is profoundly broken. Just like Tony.
 
I don't know why Tony is acting like he would be in danger in DC considering they have the highest percentage of LGBTQ in the country at 8.5%.
Lol because DC is an extremely black city and blacks aren't down with the fags. Tony can't say it out loud, but that's really it.

Like many woke, liberal suburbanites, especially the trannies, I'm sure Tony is afraid of black people. Especially the really ghetto types in the city.

Hell, I don't think Tony would come to Baltimore or PG county at all unless there was a really good reason. Like maybe meeting up with some other local troon or something.

Baltimore's got the same negatives as DC to Tony, but it doesn't even have the benefit of being the seat of federal power, so there's really no reason for Tony to risk an encounter with Jamal.

I think DMX put it the best:
Last I heard, y'all niggas was havin' sex (Uh) with the same sex (Woo)
I show no love (Yeah) to homo thugs (Nah)
Empty out, reload, and blow more slugs (Boom)
How you gonna explain fuckin' a man?
Even if we squash the beef, I ain't touchin' your hand (Aight?)
I don't fuck with chumps (Yeah)
For those that been to jail, that's the cat with the Kool-Aid on his lips and pumps (Uh)
I don't fuck with niggas that think they broads
Only know how to be one way, that's the dog (Woo)

 
LMAO at "19 hour days"

View attachment 4637147

Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
So has Tony's son been staying with his mom or grandparents for the past two months? Or is Tony admitting to neglecting his child in favor of Twitter activism and his new boyfriend?
 
As usual, Tony has the facts all wrong.

Screenshot 2023-02-26 193706.png


After a session titled “Transgender Students in Texas Schools: What You Need to Know,” Lowe approached the teen, the complaint said, and, after speaking in complimentary terms about the session, told him that he was a Republican with differing views. Then Lowe began talking about what he described as the locker-room environment.


“Men like to walk around naked with their junk hanging around,” Lowe said, according to the student’s complaint.

“He then reiterated this statement by mentioning his children and how they participate in such practice,” the student wrote in the complaint. “He then said that having a person with differing external genitalia walking around naked wouldn’t be OK because ‘that’s the type of thing that turns people on.’”

The student, now 17, said in the complaint that Lowe’s discussion about a minor’s genitals and the arousal of an adult man made him very uncomfortable and bewildered.

“This conversation is very inappropriate. You need to stop,” the student’s mother told Lowe, the complaint said.


“No, you need to listen,” Lowe responded to the mother, according to the complaint.

“And this was cadence for the next couple of minutes until one of the organizers stepped in and physically placed himself between Lowe and my mother. It took the involvement of my mother, my representatives … and one of the organizers of the TASB/TASA to finally get Mr. Lowe to leave the room,” the student said in the complaint.

Complaint: Transgender student ‘felt violated, dehumanized’ by Frisco ISD trustee
 
As someone who regularly participates in the peer review process, I suspect that Tony doesn't actually know what it entails or how reviewers for a given article are chosen.

Your peer review is only as good as your peers. If anything, the current reproducibility crisis in science should give us pause when reading any academic paper, even in the most prestigious journals. All of the papers retracted for fraud have been peer reviewed by someone.

Peer review or not, the academic publishing industrial complex is profoundly broken. Just like Tony.
Most people seem to think peer review actually checks and confirms things when it's more like making sure obvious garbage doesn't pass. Often nobody even checks the math: I can't find it right now but I wanted to link to a blog post from a scientist who found some Chinese dude published a bunch of studies in (I think otherwise decent) journals where the data was mathematically impossible, the professor refused to release his data, "corrected minor errors" that were still mathematically impossible, the school defended the professor, the journal refused to do anything, etc. (Eventually the Chinese government got involved and so the journal finally retracted.)

This isn't to mention where you can pass garbage because everyone is ideologically compromised, the Sokal Hoax is probably more relevant today than it was back then. And I don't even mean this in political terms, I mean if you stick to conventions in the field you can pass garbage through, being politically correct just makes it easier. One of Sokal's criticisms was people bringing in things from outside their field and getting them wrong, I see this in papers all the time still. I've even pointed out to people papers/people using statistics that don't mean what they're saying (like confusing relative and absolute numbers) and nobody cares because they don't know any better and the results "confirm" assumptions in the field lmao pls kill me

To come back to Tony, he has absolutely no clue that people in the same field call out Turban's garbage because he probably can't read their critiques and understand them even if he was willing to entertain the possibility that Turban made an error or worse. Tony is probably not aware, nor does he care, that absolute cranks and fraudsters can publish at the top of their fields for their entire career.
 
Last edited:
LMAO at "19 hour days"

View attachment 4637147

Sure Tony, gaslighting on Twitter at 144 charcters at a time is thoroughly exhausting.

Can you imagine this idiot's groveling if he ever had a real job where he has to actually work and be productive?
19 hour days. None regarding childcare or raising his son. Gotta fight that genocide, eh Tony?

As someone who regularly participates in the peer review process, I suspect that Tony doesn't actually know what it entails or how reviewers for a given article are chosen.

Your peer review is only as good as your peers. If anything, the current reproducibility crisis in science should give us pause when reading any academic paper, even in the most prestigious journals. All of the papers retracted for fraud have been peer reviewed by someone.

Peer review or not, the academic publishing industrial complex is profoundly broken. Just like Tony.
I see more robust substack comments regarding papers. Peer review was already fishy when AGW - global warming - was all the rage. Now it's in the COVID camp. It happens a lot when papers on ethnic differences are published. When the Floyd riots happened, Nature came right out and said such research would never be published. So yeah, peer review is very select.
 
Back