ALL SHALL YIELD TO CZAR GARFIELD
Possibly also Bill Watterson, due to some of his radical views on art and licensing
The cow itself is constantly tweeting about how he doesn't want to live near black people. What else are we gonna talk about? You know @Null has said the same things himself on his streams right?
Older people like me know Watterson for having one of the few comics worth looking at in the 80s, and Davis for the absolute merch juggernaut that was Garfield back then.
Watterson is one of the few syndicated cartoonists in recent memory with actually unbreakable principles who refused ever to suck Satan's cock and submit to merchandising. He quit before he could cow out, too. Somethings Adams might have considered.
I find it more annoying when a mod is sperging out about this kind of stuff. Yes maybe you don't agree with what others are saying here, that's fair, but what they are saying is very much related to the topic and like, where else do people here really get to express this stuff? Sure I guess they can make some gay thread like "Scott did nothing wrong" and get like 3 replies but other than that your options are either get banned/cancelled on another platform or have to deal with the cancer that is 4chan or 8chan.
I think Adams just feels that all that money isn't enough, he wants clout. Dilbert is way more famous than he is. As well as being very high on the smell of his own farts for years, he's not completely stupid. This was calculated, he even did that Twitter poll beforehand. He knew "fuck niggers" would be the (almost) most sensational thing he could say, worse even than attacking troons. There's only one higher target.
This thread is about observing and laughing at Scott Adams. It is not about validating your personal views on race.
If he says he likes drinking water, am I not allowed to "validate my views" on that either?
You are missing my point. Hell, I don't even fully agree with Scott, but with what Scott said and the consequences he is facing for saying what he said, it is natural that people will not only talk about whether what he said is justified or not but bring in information relating to what he said.
I don't agree with Clott on most things but the man has a hundred million dollars to spend during his golden years while posting /pol/ shit on Twitter. He won as much as Watterson but in a very different way.
He expresses controversial opinions on race in public. Obviously people are going to discuss the content of what he said while discussing him. I hope you're referring to not derailing the thread with nigger statistics rather than a hard-ban on any mention of Scott's political statements. That would be about the equivalent of some retarded game studio discussing their politics on a Twitter account, shoving those same politics into their game & then the /v/ janitor banning people for mentioning the topic.
How else was he gonna pay for his exes fake tits?
Shit how could I forget Gary Larson?!
