Infected MAP/NOMAP community - "Virtuous Pedophiles" has a prodigy

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Nate Higgers said:
I have some inside info about this situation

According to someone I know who teaches at that school, the teacher involved in the video is allegedly some kind of contrarian “make the most batshit statements” type. She’s allegedly planning to sue the school board and the district after she was “encouraged to resign” (read: not fired) but this took place in Texas where the teachers union isn’t as powerful as it’s a right to work state.

The video was filmed by a student of the person I know (allegedly)

Any other questions and I’ll ask but as far as I can tell this story has sort of died down over the fall/winter since it happened
Click to expand...
So basically she's a female Mr.Garrison
 
proba.jpg

 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Outer Space Traveller, Smokingpoop, Apis mellifera and 19 others
Something I've noticed in my search for older, rare films that aren't on streaming services but are shared on filehosting sites are creepy forums like these. There's a few of them, they all are inhabited by pedos that share films with child nudity and 'racy' scenes.
1679174975535.png
Capture.PNG

Members of FLM like to say that they're interested in films involving childhood and coming-of-age because they're ""nostalgic"", "bring back childhood memories", etc. But it's pretty obvious to any outside observer that these people are MAP adjacent pedophiles.
They mostly share films over eMule (filled with CSEM).
I've noticed they basically are MAP's despite not really using that term. Justifying their attraction to children as "protector instincts", "it's natural", etc. Typical MAP arguments. They make it pretty obvious they're attracted to kids by having literal lists of films involving pissing children.

1679175950469.png

1679176003736.png

It's not surprising this guy has a 'favorite age range'. Outwardly the users like to say that the site is "focused on films involving childhood" and that "we've been accused of being pedophiles", but a quick look shows the obvious truth.

1679176546143.png

1679176658343.png

1679176695955.png

1679177195113.png

1679177225326.png
 

Attachments

  • 1679177181696.png
    1679177181696.png
    11.4 KB · Views: 221
  • 1679177146499.png
    1679177146499.png
    79.9 KB · Views: 154
  • 1679176595099.png
    1679176595099.png
    65.5 KB · Views: 155
  • 1679175858519.png
    1679175858519.png
    102.7 KB · Views: 158
  • 1679176263953.png
    1679176263953.png
    89.7 KB · Views: 181
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Lunacy
Reactions: BIG SHOT Autos, JustTheFaxcts, Outer Space Traveller and 19 others
870EVO said:
View attachment 4717854
Click to expand...
Screenshot_20230327-092038.png
And of course instead of Twitter focusing on the bigger problem and implications of this whole thing, you get some stupid self hating white whore trashing white people and random Trump sperging out of nowhere. This is type of BS is why we are screwed and these fags will never be held accountable because the stupid goy cattle tends to shift their focus on retarded things rather than uniting against the main issue.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hog Grease and Markass the Worst
Gardener King said:
Something I've noticed in my search for older, rare films that aren't on streaming services but are shared on filehosting sites are creepy forums like these. There's a few of them, they all are inhabited by pedos that share films with child nudity and 'racy' scenes.
View attachment 4814329View attachment 4814313
Members of FLM like to say that they're interested in films involving childhood and coming-of-age because they're ""nostalgic"", "bring back childhood memories", etc. But it's pretty obvious to any outside observer that these people are MAP adjacent pedophiles.
They mostly share films over eMule (filled with CSEM).
I've noticed they basically are MAP's despite not really using that term. Justifying their attraction to children as "protector instincts", "it's natural", etc. Typical MAP arguments. They make it pretty obvious they're attracted to kids by having literal lists of films involving pissing children.

View attachment 4814561
View attachment 4814573
It's not surprising this guy has a 'favorite age range'. Outwardly the users like to say that the site is "focused on films involving childhood" and that "we've been accused of being pedophiles", but a quick look shows the obvious truth.

View attachment 4814657
View attachment 4814677
View attachment 4814685
View attachment 4814781
View attachment 4814789
Click to expand...

I'm less disturbed by that, than when the Cuties drama was going on, someone mentioned, IMDb keeps a list.

imdb1.jpg
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: BIG SHOT Autos, Outer Space Traveller, Marsh Rabbit and 8 others
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: BIG SHOT Autos, Rubick, Smokingpoop and 4 others
870EVO said:
They were always there. But the current cultural and institutional climate and the lack of consequence on social media has emboldened them. Plus sometimes it's not even them doing the grooming. The whole system has already done it for them.

View attachment 4523037
www.dailymail.co.uk

Girl,15, faces child porn charges for 'selling nude photos of herself'

The girl, from Michigan, allegedly recorded over 15 illicit videos in just two months, making around 20 sales and over $1,000, according to police reports. The footage did not show her face.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Then you have the sexting/selling between minors. Who knows how bad that is.
View attachment 4523178
Click to expand...
I never understood this. Why the fuck are you charging the child instead of, oh i don't know... THE PARENT WHO'S JOB IT IS TO LOOK AFTER THE CHILD?
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BIG SHOT Autos, Apis mellifera, mama Lazarou and 1 other person
CryoRevival #SJ-112 said:
Unless I'm very much mistaken, the 'no age limit on love' line in the original protests would have been contesting the law in the UK at the time, setting the age of consent for straight sex at 18, while the age of consent for gay sex was 21 in order to hit people with statutory rape charges.
Click to expand...

I'm making some anecdotal assumptions. Based on the first Gay Pride parades, on the one year anniversary of Stonewall. And within a few years, the establishment of organizations like North American Man/Boy Love Association(US), Childhood Sensuality Circle(Cali), Fach Und Selbsthilfegruppe Paedophilie(Belgium), Paeophile Information Exchange(UK), Verein für sexuelle Gleichberechtigung(Germany)

Today LGBT advocacy groups largely disavow them. But would you ever team up with Pedophile advocacy organizations for a political goal?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Apis mellifera, DopeAddictKittenV2, Hog Grease and 2 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: WonderWino, Apis mellifera, Markass the Worst and 2 others
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: BIG SHOT Autos, Nebulon X5, 420BlazeMy3601337Vagick and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: F-66 "hamiltonxxx"
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back