Linus Gabriel Sebastian & Linus Media Group / Linus Tech Tips - Narcissistic corporate shill YouTuber driving his media empire into the ground. KILL COUNT: 2

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
One thing I didn't mention in the Wan Show recap this week was that a prototype of the LTT backback was being worn by someone at LTX, they asked how they got it, and it turned out one of the employees at LTT took it home then gave it away to a Goodwill type thrift store, which is where the person picked it up at. This led to Linus saying this was not the correct thing to do and all prototypes should be returned to the company. The excuse he used instead of copying IP was that it was a prototype and the poor quality or designs would reflect poorly on LTT stuff in the future.

And then we see he sold a prototype water cooler and gave fuck all a response, just....the level of leaf faggotry knows no bounds, canadians are a parasite on the world.
 
Steve at 6:58 - 9:00 talks about 'pissing off the wrong people with direct connections at youtube'.

What's the likelihood we see GN get shadow banned from the algorithm?
100% If this happened before the LMG tranny "came out" (Castrated himself) but now it's just a race between the Trannies at Youtube pressing the shadowbanning button on GN's channel. TLDR: Youtube will shadow-ban GN because the tranny at LMG exist.
 
One thing I didn't mention in the Wan Show recap this week was that a prototype of the LTT backback was being worn by someone at LTX, they asked how they got it, and it turned out one of the employees at LTT took it home then gave it away to a Goodwill type thrift store, which is where the person picked it up at. This led to Linus saying this was not the correct thing to do and all prototypes should be returned to the company. The excuse he used instead of copying IP was that it was a prototype and the poor quality or designs would reflect poorly on LTT stuff in the future.

And then we see he sold a prototype water cooler and gave fuck all a response, just....the level of leaf faggotry knows no bounds, canadians are a parasite on the world.
He has no consistent principles or ethics. He only cares about what's good for himself and the company. It's okay if LTT sells off someone else's prototype, but you better not give away one of LTT's own prototypes!
 
Tech tubing will see the same fate - With all the various economic factors blowing up out there, Technology is likely to stagnate on a consumer practicality perspective - Most marketable features are already near peak performance (Phone Cameras, batteries, display resolutions and colors) or already so far into the excess that it stopped being consumer a long while ago and went full enthusiast (See the entire 4080+ lineup) where nobody normal can afford to participate. This will probably stagnate further as global industrial chains realign and we see 5+ years of limited net capacity growth in chips as shits reshuffled and reshored somewhere else. Depending on your level of global economic doomerism, you may want to factor in a major global recession or depression atop of that.
The only tech channel I watch regularly is Level 1 Techs. The guy on there who isn't Wendell had a pretty good joke about this recently.

"Here is the last GPU you'll ever purchase"
"Wow its so good that I'll never need another?!?!?"
"No"
From the 10 Actors That Fell Off The Map comment section:
View attachment 5271865
View attachment 5271864

This is the video of the NCIX Bankruptcy Action - Day 2 FINALE:

9 minutes in is when the interaction occurs between Linus and the father and son over the NCIX play button plaque.

Comment section of that video to get an idea of what the sentiments and reaction to it was like:
View attachment 5271910
View attachment 5271911
View attachment 5271912
Linus says he has two other silver buttons from his other channel, and still he acted like this :stress:
 
Youtube will shadow-ban GN because the tranny at LMG exist.
LTT on Friday: "Gamers Nexus is over. Gamers don't have to be your audience."
He has no consistent principles or ethics. He only cares about what's good for himself and the company. It's okay if LTT sells off someone else's prototype, but you better not give away one of LTT's own prototypes!
This makes perfect sense when you realize Linus still runs a glorified advertising agency, not a journalism outlet.
 
Last edited:
linus02.png
There won't be a big WAN Show segment about this or anything. Most of what I have to say, I've already said, and I've done so privately.

To Steve, I expressed my disappointment that he didn't go through proper journalistic practices in creating this piece. He has my email and number (along with numerous other members of our team) and could have asked me for context that may have proven to be valuable (like the fact that we didn't 'sell' the monoblock, but rather auctioned it for charity due to a miscommunication... AND the fact that while we haven't sent payment yet, we have already agreed to compensate Billet Labs for the cost of their prototype). There are other issues, but I've told him that I won't be drawn into a public sniping match over this and that I'll be continuing to move forward in good faith as part of 'Team Media'. When/if he's ready to do so again I'll be ready.

To my team (and my CEO's team, but realistically I was at the helm for all of these errors, so I need to own it), I stressed the importance of diligence in our work because there are so many eyes on us. We are going through some growing pains - we've been very public about them in the interest of transparency - and it's clear we have some work to do on internal processes and communication. We have already been doing a lot of work internally to clean up our processes, but these things take time. Rome wasn't built in a day, but that's no excuse for sloppiness.

Now, for my community, all I can say is the same things I always say. We know that we're not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it's sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing. The Labs team is hard at work hard creating processes and tools to generate data that will benefit all consumers - a work in progress that is very much not done and that we've communicated needs to be treated as such. Do we have notes under some videos? Yes. Is it because we are striving for transparency/improvement? Yeah... What we're doing hasn't been in many years, if ever.. and we would make a much larger correction if the circumstances merited it. Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn't materially change the recommendation. That doesn't mean these things don't matter. We've set KPIs for our writing/labs team around accuracy, and we are continually installing new checks and balances to ensure that things continue to get better. If you haven't seen the improvement, frankly I wonder if you're really looking for it... The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes. I'm REALLY excited about what the future will hold.

With all of that said, I still disagree that the Billet Labs video (not the situation with the return, which I've already addressed above) is an 'accuracy' issue. It's more like I just read the room wrong. We COULD have re-tested it with perfect accuracy, but to do so PROPERLY - accounting for which cases it could be installed in (none) and which radiators it would be plumbed with (again... mystery) would have been impossible... and also didn't affect the conclusion of the video... OR SO I THOUGHT...

I wanted to evaluate it as a product, and as a product, IF it could manage to compete with the temperatures of the highest end blocks on the planet, it still wouldn't make sense to buy... so from my point of view, re-testing it and finding out that yes, it did in fact run cooler made no difference to the conclusion, so it didn't really make a difference.

Adam and I were talking about this today. He advocated for re-testing it regardless of how non-viable it was as a product at the time and I think he expressed really well today why it mattered. It was like making a video about a supercar. It doesn't mater if no one watching will buy it. They just wanna see it rip. I missed that, but it wasn't because I didn't care about the consumer.. it was because I was so focused on how this product impacted a potential buyer. Either way, clearly my bad, but my intention was never to harm Billet Labs. I specifically called out their incredible machining skills because I wanted to see them create something with a viable market for it and was hoping others would appreciate the fineness of the craftsmanship even if the product was impractical. I still hope they move forward building something else because they obviously have talent and I've watched countless niche water cooling vendors come and go. It's an astonishingly unforgiving market.

Either way, I'm sorry I got the community's priorities mixed-up on this one, and that we didn't show the Billet in the best light. Our intention wasn't to hurt anyone. We wanted no one to buy it (because it's an egregious waste of money no matter what temps it runs at) and we wanted Billet to make something marketable (so they can, y'know, eat).

With all of this in mind, it saddens me how quickly the pitchforks were raised over this. It also comes across a touch hypocritical when some basic due diligence could have helped clarify much of it. I have a LONG history of meeting issues head on and I've never been afraid to answer questions, which lands me in hot water regularly, but helps keep me in tune with my peers and with the community. The only reason I can think of not to ask me is because my honest response might be inconvenient.

We can test that... with this post. Will the "It was a mistake (a bad one, but a mistake) and they're taking care of it" reality manage to have the same reach? Let's see if anyone actually wants to know what happened. I hope so, but it's been disheartening seeing how many people were willing to jump on us here. Believe it or not, I'm a real person and so is the rest of my team. We are trying our best, and if what we were doing was easy, everyone would do it. Today sucks.

Thanks for reading this.
linus01.png

linus03.png
 
Last edited:
Backing up the first 13 or so pages now
Thread on the LTT forum
Clicking through the pages - comments that caught my eyes

I think the thing that will sting the most for Linus is that people overwhelmingly agree that they don't watch LTT for quality reviews but just for entrainment. For whatever reason, Linus does not think that capturing people attention and making them laugh or feel invested in a result is "enough" and instead he has to chase the ScIEnCE

ltt forum 7.PNG ltt forum 3.PNG

People are very very mad about the prototype
ltt forum 6.PNG
ltt forum.PNG
ltt forum 5.PNG

People also agree the quality is down
ltt forum2.PNG


FYI - the CEO hasn't properly started yet (or at least not for long). Once again an example of Linus announcing things waaaay too much in advance
ltt tweet.PNG
 
Lmfao Linus exhibits many classic lolcow traits. Anyone who has been watching Steve from Gamers Nexus for even a short time, let alone nearly a decade, would immediately know that his comments toward GN are nothing but cucknadian cope.
"It's not very journalistic to ignore personal relationships."
When you are so infected by the lugenpresse that every possible definition of the word "shill" applies to you. LMAOing @ Linus' life. Moving into objective, mathematical reviews as opposed to sticking with entertainment, was a massive mistake. He just won't admit it.
linus race mixing and vaccine tips.pnglinus goy tips.png
Linus race mixing and vaccine tips.
 
No one is saying anything on twitter from any of the major people outside of GN posting the tweet with a youtube link to the video.

LTT's twitter did post this an hour after GN's video dropped, in relation to Musk/Cuckerberg fighting.

00134.png
 
Linus gave a long response in the forum, @The Mass Shooter Ron Soye included the archive and screenshot of Linus reply (edit: includes screenshot and copy of text now)

There won't be a big WAN Show segment about this or anything. Most of what I have to say, I've already said, and I've done so privately.
Ladies and gents, opening bets now that he will not actually talk about it on Wan. LOOOL

To Steve, I expressed my disappointment that he didn't go through proper journalistic practices in creating this piece. He has my email and number (along with numerous other members of our team) and could have asked me for context that may have proven to be valuable (like the fact that we didn't 'sell' the monoblock, but rather auctioned it for charity due to a miscommunication... AND the fact that while we haven't sent payment yet, we have already agreed to compensate Billet Labs for the cost of their prototype).
That is nitpicky af
GN is also not a journalist lol - he is a youtuber and this drama is gold

There are other issues, but I've told him that I won't be drawn into a public sniping match over this and that I'll be continuing to move forward in good faith as part of 'Team Media'. When/if he's ready to do so again I'll be ready.
These issues are not bigger than the errors LTT has made sooo

To my team (and my CEO's team, but realistically I was at the helm for all of these errors, so I need to own it), I stressed the importance of diligence in our work because there are so many eyes on us. We are going through some growing pains - we've been very public about them in the interest of transparency - and it's clear we have some work to do on internal processes and communication. We have already been doing a lot of work internally to clean up our processes, but these things take time. Rome wasn't built in a day, but that's no excuse for sloppiness.
It is not excuse... but still let me make excuses. People LTT hires are incompetent, and they will continue to be given the non-competitive salaries LTT pays in such a high COL area

Now, for my community, all I can say is the same things I always say. We know that we're not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you.
Beside when, as Steve pointed out, they drag their feet in issuing corrections

But it's sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing. The Labs team is hard at work hard creating processes and tools to generate data that will benefit all consumers - a work in progress that is very much not done and that we've communicated needs to be treated as such. Do we have notes under some videos? Yes. Is it because we are striving for transparency/improvement? Yeah... What we're doing hasn't been in many years, if ever.. and we would make a much larger correction if the circumstances merited it. Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn't materially change the recommendation. That doesn't mean these things don't matter. We've set KPIs for our writing/labs team around accuracy, and we are continually installing new checks and balances to ensure that things continue to get better. If you haven't seen the improvement, frankly I wonder if you're really looking for it... The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes. I'm REALLY excited about what the future will hold.
Blah blah blah
Let's increase the bloat on managers and all employees on recording and scoring KPI! Nothing can go wrong!

With all of that said, I still disagree that the Billet Labs video (not the situation with the return, which I've already addressed above) is an 'accuracy' issue. It's more like I just read the room wrong. We COULD have re-tested it with perfect accuracy, but to do so PROPERLY - accounting for which cases it could be installed in (none) and which radiators it would be plumbed with (again... mystery) would have been impossible... and also didn't affect the conclusion of the video... OR SO I THOUGHT...

I wanted to evaluate it as a product, and as a product, IF it could manage to compete with the temperatures of the highest end blocks on the planet, it still wouldn't make sense to buy... so from my point of view, re-testing it and finding out that yes, it did in fact run cooler made no difference to the conclusion, so it didn't really make a difference.

Adam and I were talking about this today. He advocated for re-testing it regardless of how non-viable it was as a product at the time and I think he expressed really well today why it mattered. It was like making a video about a supercar. It doesn't mater if no one watching will buy it. They just wanna see it rip. I missed that, but it wasn't because I didn't care about the consumer.. it was because I was so focused on how this product impacted a potential buyer. Either way, clearly my bad, but my intention was never to harm Billet Labs. I specifically called out their incredible machining skills because I wanted to see them create something with a viable market for it and was hoping others would appreciate the fineness of the craftsmanship even if the product was impractical. I still hope they move forward building something else because they obviously have talent and I've watched countless niche water cooling vendors come and go. It's an astonishingly unforgiving market.
Blah blah blah

Either way, I'm sorry I got the community's priorities mixed-up on this one, and that we didn't show the Billet in the best light. Our intention wasn't to hurt anyone. We wanted no one to buy it (because it's an egregious waste of money no matter what temps it runs at) and we wanted Billet to make something marketable (so they can, y'know, eat).

With all of this in mind, it saddens me how quickly the pitchforks were raised over this. It also comes across a touch hypocritical when some basic due diligence could have helped clarify much of it. I have a LONG history of meeting issues head on and I've never been afraid to answer questions, which lands me in hot water regularly, but helps keep me in tune with my peers and with the community. The only reason I can think of not to ask me is because my honest response might be inconvenient.

We can test that... with this post. Will the "It was a mistake (a bad one, but a mistake) and they're taking care of it" reality manage to have the same reach? Let's see if anyone actually wants to know what happened. I hope so, but it's been disheartening seeing how many people were willing to jump on us here. Believe it or not, I'm a real person and so is the rest of my team. We are trying our best, and if what we were doing was easy, everyone would do it. Today sucks.

Thanks for reading this.
Blah blah blah


He just needs to drop labs. That is likely his single biggest source of headaches. From the get go people said it would not succeed and they were right. Drop the ego, or see the company be destroyed
 
Last edited:
Linus Sebastian said:
while we haven't sent payment yet, we have already agreed to compensate Billet Labs for the cost of their prototype).
So he doesn't care about who might have gotten their hands on the prototype? That a competitor could be reverse-engineering it right now and stealing Billet Labs' hard work?
 
That is some first class dissembling from Linus.

Starts by anchoring himself as the victim of a hit piece and betrayal by a trusted peer. Then in the following paragraphs variously sets up strawmen to beat down, reframes major errors as different perspectives or not errors at all, while "owning" some minor errors which can be framed as "process errors" which will "take time to address" while pleading for patience (and crossing all his fingers that he's done just enough to muddy the waters and leave an impression of addressing the points).

Fuck Linus up his rusty hole.
 
Thread on the LTT forum

https://linustechtips.com/topic/152...es-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/

The winds are not blowing in Linus' favor.
You have a bunch of shills there anyway. Some people complaining about how "Steve should've resolved this one callout in private" even though the entire video highlights a deeper problem with Linus' company.

It wasn't just the case of one LTT employee calling out GN and HU, it was the case of Steve noticing that Linus' company was being more and more irresponsible which started to impact consumers, therefore he stepped out and made a stink about it so that something can change for the good.

Linus' channel has over 10 million subscribers, he has massive leverage on the consumers because of that, and Steve's whole deal is that he aims for consumer rights, much like Louis Rossmann.

And of course you have the typical "Steve is just jealous of Linus' success". You know, the typical teenager who thinks the entire world revolves around clout and nothing else.

It really brings me joy that Linus' ego just took a massive hit with that video and he, like a proper narcissist, cannot handle it, and does his best to do damage control to make sure that it's not him at fault, it's everyone else and he's absolutely flawless in the situation.

"Auctioning it off due to miscommunication" is just pure blame shifting. "I'm not responsible for it, it's Billet Labs who's responsible for it because they weren't clear about it!". Which, I must say is immensely ironic given how RIGHT BEFORE THAT STATEMENT he complained about Steve not contacting him before making the video, even though he could've done the same with Billet Labs BEFORE doing the auctioning and he could've avoided all of it. But it's everyone else who has to contact HIM, not the other way around.

Whenever there's a fuckup done by his company, it's always "we" or "them". Never "I". He never admits to being at fault personally, even though he's the chief big dick of his own company. At least, before he placed a new CEO so that, once again, his ego would remain intact, because now, any major fuckup of his company lands on the new CEO, not him.

A lot of the shit he's writing is pure damage control corpospeak. "We're doing the best we can to improve things, it's not easy, you know". It would be easy if you could actually take some effort into making sure that your company is properly managed. And with all the resources you have it would be possible, but I guess you're too much of a penny pinching twat if 500$ to redo the test was too much for your multi million dollar company.

Also, notice how whatever blame he attempts to actually take up on himself is about misrepresenting their product on their video, but he constantly avoids admitting that it is his fault that they've screwed over Billet with that prototype block. It was Billet's fault because they weren't clear, it was "our" fault because "we" miscommunicated.

No. It was your fault. You were the part of the video and you could've actually read up on everything Billet sent you, but you didn't, because your ego didn't allow you to do so. You are the greatest smartest being alive, you can figure everything out. And not only have you misrepresented their product, you've clearly actively ignored all communication from Billet. Because if you didn't, the misrepresentation fiasco wouldn't happen in the first place.

Then by the end it's just pure narcissistic "give me asspats". Dealt with issues "head on"? No, Linus, you never did that. You always doubled down whenever you fucked up like a coward. Not once you ever dared to fully, honestly admit to making a mistake. The "Trust Me Bro" T-shirts is a perfect representation of it. You tried to weasel your way out of the issue, and after people got too vocal about it, you've desperately attempted to keep your ego from shattering by giving a fuck-off warranty and releasing shitty T-shirts that were the epitome of "I'm not owned".

Unfortunately people will see what he wrote and will take it as face value, and treat Linus as someone who has dealt with the issue like an adult while making GN look like the infantile bullies, while it's the other way around. Steve has pointed out multiple flaws in how your company is ran with plenty of proof to support it, and instead of doing the same thing and showing equally damning proof that GN was at fault, all you've proven is that once again, you're too much of a coward to fight back whenever people stick needles in your most sensitive spots you don't want anyone to know about.

Linus, you are a narcissist. The only thing that matters to you is your ego. You're being ran into a corner, and the more you try to fight back the more this facade slips.
 
Back