- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
Yeah I watched that video out of curiosity and it's just retarded. Basically he compares a $50 mic that includes a USB interface, pop filter, mount and arm vs a Blue Yeti which an equivalent setup would cost 4x as much then acts like the $50 mic is complete trash. He also needlessly compares it to Airpods and his Electro-Voice RE20. The RE20 is a literal thousands of dollars studio mic that requires an interface and pre-amp (since it's dynamic) vs this thing which is all in one.Jewtube hotlink I know but I wish for the kiwis to look at the comments of this video, it seems Linus (again) has fucked up. This time his audio tests are using graphing methods that Audio engineers find lacking check the comments for some gems.
The Airpods predictably sound like shit, the RE20 and studio floor mic sounds great though at one point I looked away from the video when they swapped to the cheap mic and barely noticed the difference vs their Sennheiser MKH 50 boom mic which costs literally thousands as well. When taking into consideration YouTube compression and how unavoidably narrow Linus' vocal range is, basically anything sounds equivalent when reviewed by him. They should've at least tested it with someone who went through male puberty. (Anthony?)
The polar pattern the labs produced was absolutely incomprehensible as it just used differently colored lines for each orientation and graphed the frequency response as a linear plot. Here's what a typical polar pattern looks like

Linus' plot looks like this
