The standard Christian cross isn't trademarked (and can't be), but ISOM
is. By the
ministry.
View attachment 5294807
Meanwhile, Rippa only has the trademark for Rippaverse.
View attachment 5294817
Honestly, the ministry
might have a case here against Rippa. I dunno. The thing, for me at least, is that it could
simultaneously be true that Rippa did a dumb, and is technically infringing on the ministry, while Vito is a piece of shit for going out of his way to instigate this suit by convincing the ministry there exists consumer confusion where there almost certainly isn't.