- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
From a slightly less charitable position, I think it's reasonable to interpret this as asking for something to be done. Maybe that's really not what he intended, but it sounds like it is when you refuse to elaborate on what exactly the problems are and speak about it in this way whenever it's brought up.
My take is that Nick wasn't actually lobbying for censorship of his thread, because he knows that's impossible.
I think he was hoping to persuade Josh personally that the allegations weren't true. Enough that he'd stop covering it on MATI.
Like Nick mentioned during the Sean meltdown, it doesn't matter if your boss finds out about evidence against you if it's confined to your darkweb KF thread and documented by a user named ButtBlaster3000.
But when your former e-friend and site admin has seen enough credible evidence to hang you, seen enough to broadcast it to thousands of listeners every week and the thread starts leaking to non-Rekieta kiwis and YT clips channels, your image crisis has inched up another DEFCON level.