Karl Kasarda / InRangeTV / 2gACM / Karl-InRangeTV - satanist cuckold guntuber with cringe haircut and a Kubelwagen hates yt

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The super safety pretty much seems like a lightening link that's pretending to be a forced reset trigger. I haven't played with one, but it seems pretty clear that the secret sauce that he leaves between the lines is that the tail getting hit forward by the carrier effectively overrides the disconnector so long as you are not holding the trigger down so tightly that trigger can't bounce forward into the pad of your finger the tiny fraction of an inch it needs to force the disconnector over. You are (very) technically bumpfiring the gun, but if they fucked with the FRT guys they are defiantly going to fuck with the super safety guys.

I still think the Supreme Court is going to get rid of the NFA in the next 5 years.
 
How do you figure?

Have you read the cases? They're pretty fixated on having to find a similar rule from the time of the founding, they might keep some destructive device rules because there have historically been rules on keeping explosives, but I don't see how they ban military style firearms when you used to have to own one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulletSpongeRTR
Have you read the cases? They're pretty fixated on having to find a similar rule from the time of the founding, they might keep some destructive device rules because there have historically been rules on keeping explosives, but I don't see how they ban military style firearms when you used to have to own one.
My thought is they just don't take cases that'd strike the nfa down, that's what they've done historically.
 
My thought is they just don't take cases that'd strike the nfa down, that's what they've done historically.
I think they'll be forced to by a circuit split, there's basically no way to keep it out of the district/circuit courts and with the Bruin case being live one of them is going to strike it down. The court is also just friendlier to guns than it ever has been.
 
What do you guys make of the "super safety" by Hoffman? Another pozzed load like the bumpstock?
Considering the bump stock got ripped into long after the ATF registered a fucking shoelace as an MG, I wouldn't touch that thing with a 10' pole, and this hoffman dude strikes me as a glow in the dark to be honest.

That said, I couldn't care less wtf other people do with their guns if they aren't going on rampages at their local walmart. I wouldn't want that thing in or near my own stuff, but I don't have any stake in or concern about what other people do. Hopefully the NFA does get tossed out(I doubt it), and the ATF being repeatedly put in their place amuses me but... I wouldn't want to personally become a "test case" for this thing.
 
It's hard to pin down how the big names stand politically. I'm pretty sure Wild Arms Research is anti diddler and Ordnance Lab definitely is. PSR, Hoffman, Navi, etc go out of their way to avoid politi-speak which makes them a wee bit suspect. I think the super-safety print files could be a huge honey pot.
PSR crossdresses and has made comments on twitter about how they need to be inclusive. I can't speak about the first two, Navi might be a lolbert.
The 3D2A community was not gatekept enough.
 
I still think the Supreme Court is going to get rid of the NFA in the next 5 years.
Hawaii just struck down concealed carry because of some ridiculous “Aloha spirit” policy while quoting The Wire. It’s pretty clear the courts don’t give a damn and is letting magazine bans and AWBs stay on the books. We’ll be lucky to see anything like that struck down in the upcoming years but only if the GOP wins the presidency. Theyre stacking gun cases and putting pressure on Thomas to step down from SCOTUS so it’s either Thomas steps down and we get a fully libtarded DEI hire or Dems pack SCOTUS in the name of “balancing the court”.
 
It's hard to pin down how the big names stand politically. I'm pretty sure Wild Arms Research is anti diddler and Ordnance Lab definitely is. PSR, Hoffman, Navi, etc go out of their way to avoid politi-speak which makes them a wee bit suspect. I think the super-safety print files could be a huge honey pot.
PSR is 100% in the Better Way 2A camp. He openly shills it.


He's compromised.
 
Last edited:
(or alternative girl, as they are now called)
Back in my day, alt girls were goths, punks, emos, and the like, and they were actually girls for real.

But Wilson is not a felon and can still own guns but can not purchase any new guns
How's that work? If he's not a prohibited person, how are they gonna stop him from filling out any regular 4473 and buying a Glock? Some special court order?

I still think the Supreme Court is going to get rid of the NFA in the next 5 years.
I'd love for you to be right, but I don't see it happening, at least not that soon.

and putting pressure on Thomas to step down from SCOTUS
I hope that nigger lives forever.

(which, frankly, were not controllable at all).
Depends on application. Back before the ban, Karl and Ian made some pretty good demonstrations of how good the so called Bump SAW concept could actually work.
1708168793878.png

Not as good as true select fire, and you need to get the feel for it first, but you can legit bump fire a semi-auto RPK from a bipod reliably, and you could actually provide suppressive fire not far from a true RPK. The main downside is that your groupings WILL be larger, but not to the degree that this wouldn't be useful.
Wasn't just Karl and Ian experimenting with this either, quite a few people were doing this and getting surprisingly good results.
bumpsaw (2).jpg
bumpSAW lmg.jpg


The ban on bump stocks was overturned, by the way, but I'm wondering if people are waiting and seeing if it's gonna stick.
I suspect that the BRN-180 would be a lot better suited to being turned into a light support weapon than a regular AR15, maybe we'll be really lucky and Brownell's will one day come out with an upper has a stronger receiver body, an adjustable gasblock, and a heavy fluted barrel. Add the magic stock, a good optic, and some clamped PMAG40s, and you've got something that isn't just for fun.
 
How's that work? If he's not a prohibited person, how are they gonna stop him from filling out any regular 4473 and buying a Glock? Some special court order?
I was wrong, he plead guilty to a third degree felony, but I do remember him saying that he could still have the guns he currently has in his possession. I can try to find that video as well but havent had much luck.
(third degree felony timestamp)
 
How's that work? If he's not a prohibited person, how are they gonna stop him from filling out any regular 4473 and buying a Glock? Some special court order?
Texas Penal Code 46.04
"(a) A person who has been convicted of a felony commits an offense if he possesses a firearm:

(1) after conviction and before the fifth anniversary of the person’s release from confinement following conviction of the felony or the person’s release from supervision under community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision, whichever date is later; or

(2) after the period described by Subdivision (1), at any location other than the premises at which the person lives."

Can't buy new but you can keep what you have. 4473 is a fed form and a felon cannot pass the background check. But the fed does defer to state laws regarding who may possess a firearm.
 
Last edited:
I wish karl the cuck didn't take down the video of Ian shitting on comments from fudds defending bolt actions.
This one?

Ian Reacts to Salty Comments About Obsolete Bolt Action Rifles​


Other old InRange Videos about bolt actions:

Culture, Commentary & Rant - Bolt guns are Obsolete​


Bolt Guns Really Are Obsolete​


Goddammit, the fish cock video is gone too.

Taste Test - Fish Cock​

 
Last edited:
I wish karl the cuck didn't take down the video of Ian shitting on comments from fudds defending bolt actions.
Ahh that's a good one. What a shame.

The internet really has a false sense of permanence. This would have been exactly the same in the 90s if a TV station had just stopped airing a show, or a publisher stopped printing a book. If you didn't record it you lost it. But that was just the nature of media at the time. The internet is a step up in every way, because you don't have to get your hands on a hard copy of something to enjoy it. The flipside is that you don't feel like you're ever going to lose it, so very few people download/save content. Hell, if you're a normie all your entertainment is streamed or licensed now.

Not that this video is some kind of historical necessity, but that's almost worse. Much less likely for it to have been saved than something more popular.
 
Back