Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
She's obviously partly responsible, like all the other insufferable, politically correct feminists and soyboys who made a performative spectacle over how progressive they were.
Rowlings fate is indicative of what happens to all slovenly tarts who bend over backwards to feminists and limpwristed boys.

It's incredible that you and others like you are so up your unshaven armpits that you can't equate criticism against Rowling with anything other than tranny-shenanigans. The world is composed of other things than your retarded crusade against retarded trannies. Seethe and cope over the fact that dipshits like Rowling dug her own grave by pandering to those possessing of equally poor mental faculties as herself, you delectably dumb cunt.

"B-b-but you have a funny-looking avatar of a dumb kid. Checkmate, bigot!"

Seethe and sneed about it some more! <3
Do you shave your armpits, friend?

The "funny looking avatar of a kid" isn't quite that. It's indicative of a weirdly large swahe of men who got an oddly diamond hard hate boner for a weird teenage autistic girl. It suggests God knows what and honestly I have as much desire to examine it as I do the goop in the bins behind the Chinese takeaway.

But back to the subject at hand.
Do you shave your armpits?
 
Its not that there was media to convince them they were trans, its that they tried to become the thing they were most attracted to and they had an echo chamber to help them along and give them excuses and terminology to justify trying to make their fetish reality.
They’re fixing that now though, aren’t they. I forget which threads here in particular go into the types of books you might see pushed onto kids now re: DEI/gender, but it’s pretty blatant grooming.

I don’t know I would have realized the gravestone had a Bible verse given the remove, but that’s actually very beautiful and fits with the story well imo. Duh at Christmas, lol but as others have said, it didn’t seem like it was Christ-mas so much as Seasonal Winter Holiday.

Wizards DEFINITELY killed Jesus.
 
They’re fixing that now though, aren’t they. I forget which threads here in particular go into the types of books you might see pushed onto kids now re: DEI/gender, but it’s pretty blatant grooming.

I don’t know I would have realized the gravestone had a Bible verse given the remove, but that’s actually very beautiful and fits with the story well imo. Duh at Christmas, lol but as others have said, it didn’t seem like it was Christ-mas so much as Seasonal Winter Holiday.

Wizards DEFINITELY killed Jesus.
Honestly I have no real memory of what happened at the end of the books. The whole thing came off like when you ran out of time in an English exam in school and speed-wrote the ending.
It was news to me that Snape wasn't evil. I still don't actually really agree that he wasn't.
Rowling is a classic example of somebody who fed and supported a monster until she herself became a victim of it.
I feel like similarly it's very likely Glinner, had he not been hauled up on charges of previous media (or had held his hands up and said yeah I had a transphobicly iffy joke, I'm sowwy) - would have been a staunch fighter on team trans.
If things maybe went a bit different for certain people where it struck their ego they might have been on the tra side.
But maybe that's extremely ungenerous. Likely more true of Glinner than Rowling, as Rowling is a woman and Glinner is just.. an argumentative cunt.
Who knows. I can't speak to his motivations.
But I just wonder.
I think, perhaps both would have eventually come round even without being needled personally. But who knows. Arguably their presence of personality in the whole thing possibly gave it the stride to get to where it did.
I mean, I suppose there's all sorts of alit offs of possible realities..
 
I think, perhaps both would have eventually come round even without being needled personally. But who knows. Arguably their presence of personality in the whole thing possibly gave it the stride to get to where it did.
I mean, I suppose there's all sorts of alit offs of possible realities..
The point is that troons are so repulsive in their behavior that even people who by all rights should be on their side have had it with their shit.
 
Do you shave your armpits, friend?

The "funny looking avatar of a kid" isn't quite that. It's indicative of a weirdly large swahe of men who got an oddly diamond hard hate boner for a weird teenage autistic girl. It suggests God knows what and honestly I have as much desire to examine it as I do the goop in the bins behind the Chinese takeaway.

But back to the subject at hand.
Do you shave your armpits?
What the fuck are you rambling about?

Take your meds, please.
 
This death/resurrection posts of late in this threads caused me to (try to) rewatch the Battle of Hogwarts sequence in DHP2.

Hooooooboy. What a piece of shit. Even allowing for the weird tone resulting from it being PG-13 but also a little kids’ film, it’s BAD. All the shitty humor and one-liners (fuck you, Joss Whedon), the leads are just WRETCHED and clearly over it, and some of it just doesn’t make sense. Why is Goyle (or Crabbe. Whoever) randomly throwing fire in the Room of Requirement? Why is he confused by his wand? Why did he not realize the disaster he was causing, while Ron and Draco and the black kid did?

Thread tax: Ms. Rowling is bound and determined to hold Stonewall and Mermaids to account. It is pretty astonishing how quickly they’ve changed their tune. “Let’s forget about the child mutilation we’ve directly encouraged! We are very middle of the road!” IMG_1835.jpeg
 
This is a *thing* in American social justice discourse, which I first saw applied to black advocacy. The problem is never the argument. It's perfect and no person, reasonable or otherwise, could fail to be convinced by it. So self evidently true, merely hearing it recited converts the non-believer. Therefore the issue is that the person who does not agree hasn't truly listened, because if they had they would agree.

View attachment 5903296

"Why won't you just believe?" is what it comes down to. It's just the shallow, childish, unconsidered Tumblr activism coming from people who dress up in cause of the day because they think it makes them good people. If kids get fucked, maybe they ought not have been so fuckable in the first place. Or something. The argument is never wrong. The cause is just. Believe.
Now think about how most of these faggots treat religion. "Why won't you just believe?" indeed.

Does religion even exist as such in HP? There’s fucking magic.
Normal people would still have religion, but it's mostly irrelevant cause normies ain't the point.
 
Normal people would still have religion, but it's mostly irrelevant cause normies ain't the point.
I've always wondered how the UK got such a hateboner for religion (that isn't Islam).

Could it simply be overexposure? Corruption? Perhaps, but a lot of the hate seems to have reached its pique and some people are starting to realize that it wasn't as bad as the craziness is now.
 
Council of Geeks, a.k.a. Vera Wylde, a.k.a. Nathaniel Wayne, made a video over half an hour long about J.K. Rowling supposedly being 'a Nazi crime denialist' (because he can't technically call her a Holocaust denier, but you can tell he really wants to).

Ah yes, that recent furore where they tried to cancel her for saying that Nazis did not do stuff they didn't do (i.e., specifically target and genocide trannies). "Holocaust denier" was actually bandied around a bit on Twitter too. Apparently pointing out that the Nazis did not do something makes you a "Nazi crime denialist" no matter if the Nazis actually did the thing or not.

Hey, did you know the Nazis had a secret base in Australia where they were breeding mutant supersoldier kangaroos to kill Jews more efficiently? Don't try to disagree or you are literally denying Nazi war crimes.
 
Does religion even exist as such in HP? There’s fucking magic. I don’t remember mention of even constructed religions, at all. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a vague mention of muggles at least having Sunday services, but is HP meant to be a reimagining of the real world to the extent that real world religions are even tangentially mentioned? And ofc that’s not the same thing as drawing inspiration for the magic system from existing magic/mythology etc—there could be references there I missed/don’t recall. But it feels like claiming Mario and Luigi are Christians while Bowser is a Jew, ie batshit insane.
There is religion though wisely it's never really touched on much. There an acknowledgment that there is something beyond death and it isnt unpleasant. You can read between the lines to make up some dark head cannon though. Every "spirit" not ghost that appears actively tries to ward people off of immortality. You get the feeling the life after death is more desirable then living.
 
Can't reply to the right post for some reason, but I think that Europe is a lot less religious than elsewhere because it had catholicism vs protestantism, and had to just learn to get along or detach depending on what the order of the day was. The US was basically a protestant country from the off, the catholics are generally lower-class immigrant populations, there's a consistent religious throughline. England had that on steroids because it all happened within 20 years as part of Henry VIII's succession crisis. And Henry VIII's succession crisis is one of the earliest things we teach kids about because his wife-hunting is fairly easy to understand without knowing the broader politics + melodrama, so you're probably introduced to the idea that 'religion is something that's externally imposed on you' at like, 6, 8.
 
Back