Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 57 23.8%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 3 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 76 31.7%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 29 12.1%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 75 31.3%
  • Total voters
    240
TurdThrower said:
Watching KC, yeah Nick might have actually been the one guy that Jim actually considered a friend from the internet with the way his disappointment came across last night.
Click to expand...
Jim and Jade wanted kids, and Jim also held Nick in high regard because he saw Nick as the one dude who could actually make something of his Internet career when he started gaining popularity.

It's not that Jim saw Nick as a friend, but someone who had it all, you could in some way look up to with a degree of respectability. Seeing Nick become this and not only squandering the happy family life Jim and Jade would probably kill for, but to be such a massive fucking piece of shit towards his kids, something Jim has shown utterly enrages him before, was probably like a knife right in the heart for Jim. They weren't friends, but from the way Jim put it, I feel he did respect Nick on some visceral level and everything about this whole situation was like a betrayal of the soul, for lack of better terms.

Not trying to speak for Jim, just putting in my interpretation of how that stream ended.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Autistic
Reactions: make_it_so, kokokrunch123, Harvey Danger and 10 others
Watching the casino and seeing them talk about Nick's response to people got me thinking about his response to other people making condemnations or doubts of Vic in regards to his allegations. Why are we supposed to believe the positive merits of Vic, but not the negative merits of Nick in regards to the case? Because its convenient to both of them and whatever is being promoted as the "righteous side"? I still believe that Vic got fucked over by his coworkers and Nick, but its possible he did everything he was accused of, in the same way the most negative thing in Nick's case are true about him. Not much more than that but still makes me wonder why I'm supposed to inherently believe the merit of one perspective over another.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Crinoids, thx1138 and Finger Pistols
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
Yes, a court is going to want to see a legit program. But in MN, going to rehab of some variety is considered very favorably. Moreso if some voluntarily before disposition.
Click to expand...
This just shows the sheer level of idiocy and incompetence Rekieta operates on. Even utter non-lawyer druggies know that going to rehab is a way to get off your narco rap.

Also holy shit Aaron is such a cuck piece of coping shit.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: mrfresh, CoolSixtyNiner, gmax alcremie and 9 others
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr, Gorton Colu, Turbo Hornbag Hervez and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back