Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Winston Niles Rumfoord]

Is it too late to pull up?

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I don't think that's ever been confirmed I think dear feeder has denied it in fact

He literally did for the Patrick lolsuit and the hearing was recorded. You can watch it yourself. It was minor, but it's a fact.

assumptions. For example, he's saying it's a violation that April didn't get to talk to Nick (her attorney) before talking/release, but that's presuming she asked for him as an attorney. Usually the side-piece isn't as well trained as the bottom bitch.

Why would she need legal advice? She's being released. Is Nick the ace attorney going to advise April to stay in jail?

How do they even know April wanted Nick as her attorney or even asked for an attorney?

We just need to know who his favourite porn actress (and actors) are

Cynthia redeemed?????

NICK.

I recall a conversation on Nick's show about that. I don't recall if it was "favorite" but certainly naming names. I think it was one of the shows Drex was on with a third guest in the first half of 2023.

That's 9 for Cynthia.

Unreal!

 

[Oxyjen]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81D8CCguW4g
"30% are like they were literally in the room" - Aaron talking about ceiling cats.

 

[Hrothgar]

Yeah, the fact that Nick has an archive of Youtube videos talking about degeneracy, joking about child abuse, being drunk as fuck as well as obviously fucked up on more than alcohol while bitching about how he has to drive his kids around in a few hours couldn't POSSIBLY have anything to do with the week delay or not just doing a simple wellness check.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

I wonder if Nick can successfully pivot his massive fuck up into rejuvenating his youtuber career by being open and honest about his failures and showing his attempts to do better and make up for his mistakes.

I know that's like asking 'but what if DSP wasn't retarded' or 'what if Bossman stopped doing drugs and saved parts of his winnings', but I suppose it's more of a question of IF Nick did everything right is it even salvageable.

I'm not sure he could recover from this, his niche was being tradcath and wholesome. Now that that's gone, why would any of his core audience not just find new people to watch content of, Nick's content has never been THAT good.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

"If you want to own Nick Rekieta you have to put together a logical legal argument blah blah blah"

You don't need to tell us how to own Nick Rekieta. Our strategy of saying mean things on a thread Nick isn't obligated to read to make him seethe owns him pretty well as is. He'll do the rest of the work himself.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

View attachment 6026471
LEGAL MINDSET
LEGAL MINDSET
LEGAL MINDSET

Ralphamale W again!

 

[LanceHaver]

Retarded.
Same thing as saying that parents should be allowed to rape and torture their kids.

What is this Nazi germany???

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

The problem with these constitutional arguments against Nick's arrest is that they're all predicated on absence of information. We don't have the search warrant. If the police had particularized accusations from the mandatory reporter, affirmed those through independent investigations, and they related to the presence and use of drugs, child neglect, and use of firearms, then these constitutional arguments would be significantly undercut. They're arguing from the basis of a bare allegation of child neglect from a pastor, when the accusations in the search warrant could be that there were starving kids, drug-induced negligent discharges, and exposure of children to drugs. They might also not relate to any of that, and the warrant could be overbroad or defective. Maybe Nick was targeted by the prosecutor and the police in a way that does not correlate with the particularized assertions in the search warrant.

Nobody knows because the search warrant has not been released, so all of the arguments are mostly hypothetical. Engaging in noseguarding on the basis of hypothetical arguments arising from ignorance is misrepresentative of the circumstances, and it purposefully sweeps away moral criticisms of Nick on the basis of what may or may not be legally appropriate.

A lot of the lawyers covering this are conflating the moral criticisms of Nick with the legal arguments about his arrest. Legally, given that we don't have all the pertinent information, some of these constitutional arguments could be neutrally made. They may even be right, given we don't have all the documents and information yet. Morally, we can watch Nick's behavior degenerate over the past two years, we can see how he treated his family and community, we know he was doing drugs and swinging as his kids were downstairs hungry and unengaged, we know he was engaged in alcoholism, and we have accounts from people like Aaron about what Nick was up to. There's no moral argument in defense of Nick. There may be a legal argument, but even if that legal argument succeeds that does not excuse Nick's behavior.

Lawyers are very good at conflating morality and legality so that everyone focuses on the legal argument—which is what we want when we're in trouble and hire a lawyer. But the castigation of Nick's critics on the basis of complex legal argumentation is purposefully obfuscating and frustrating. When normal people see that—especially people like those on KF or Kino Casino viewers who have followed Nick's behavior for years—they get very angry because they feel like people like Barnes or Legal Mindset or whoever are saying Nick can't be rightfully criticized if there are avenues to his legal vindication. What they fail to understand, or at least what they fail to treat with the gravity it deserves, is the position that even if Nick gets out of everything because the search and arrest were unlawful, it does not change anything about the near-100% certainty that Nick's alcoholism, drug use, and personal conduct created an unforgivable situation for his innocent children.

I think Sean understood these two things the best, and that's probably because he's actually followed Nick's thread over the course of Nick's decline. Legal Mindset demanding legal arguments from Nick's critics on Kiwi Farms is absolutely fucking retarded, because most people here aren't making legal justifications for Nick's arrest. What most people are saying is that Nick is a fucking terrible parent, a bad husband, a spiritual hypocrite, a druggie, and an alcoholic who put his kids' wellbeing at risk, all of which morally justify being separated from his kids and being subject to just desserts. I don't need to justify a search warrant with case law to argue that Nick created a dangerous and neglectful home for his children, and acting like Nick's critics can't speak unless they attach unimpeachable legal justification to his arrest rightfully pisses people off.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

He literally did for the Patrick lolsuit and the hearing was recorded. You can watch it yourself. It was minor, but it's a fact.

You're right I was confusing that for what Josh said about why he was waiting to go full alog on Balldoman because he had given him some unspecified advice that ended up working out really well (which many people have speculated was introducing him to Barnes)

 

[AGoodBrazilian]

My proposition to a rebranding of the Rekieta logo:

 

[CreyZark]

Just out of curiosity if the warrant ends up being thrown out for being unlawful would that happen before or after the trial? And what would that mean for the CPS investigation since it's a separate thing?

recall a conversation on Nick's show about that. I don't recall if it was "favorite" but certainly naming names. I think it was one of the shows Drex was on with a third guest in the first half of 2023.

I have heard nick mention the meme girl with all the black dudes around her, I don't know if it's his favorite but that's probably how nick is feeling right now when everyone from jim to dsp to irategamer are dunking on him for being a massive faggot

 

[Scan_Lines]

Mindset controls his feelings better than us and is entirely objective.
It's like watching the infamous She-Hulk scene, fucking lmao

 

[Fully Eshay Skits Bruh V4]

Is it too late to pull up?

It's far to late bro, the plane has already crashed into Baldo tower.

 

[Drive-By Comment]

Mindset controls his feelings better than us and is entirely objective.
It's like watching the infamous She-Hulk scene, fucking lmao

Although I would not mind hearing speculation on "why was it a warrant and not wellness check". Did I miss something or did he just think it should not have been warrant.

 

[The Omni Cuckold]

Legal Mindset going after Randazza is crazy.

Randazza probably 100% understands that Nick can fire him after those comments. He probably knows it is bad form for a lawyer to comment on that.

The point is that Randazza, after probably watching Nick fuck up his own case and providing more billable hours with all those fuck ups, still believes it is important to speak to Nick's friends that they should help him instead of running defense for his addiction.

He is prioritizing his own feelings of regret for not helping a friend with addiction over his earnings as a lawyer.

Grifter lawtubers aren't even paying attention to this part.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Nick gave himself the black eye by being such a fucking sped that he Daniel Larson's himself

if that hitting himself shit is true man that's really funny. that's funny on such a metalevel. Dick Licketa is REAL.

 

[Chazzed Up]

I wonder if Nick can successfully pivot his massive fuck up into rejuvenating his youtuber career by being open and honest about his failures and showing his attempts to do better and make up for his mistakes.

I know that's like asking 'but what if DSP wasn't retarded' or 'what if Bossman stopped doing drugs and saved parts of his winnings', but I suppose it's more of a question of IF Nick did everything right is it even salvageable.

I'm not sure he could recover from this, his niche was being tradcath and wholesome. Now that that's gone, why would any of his core audience not just find new people to watch content of, Nick's content has never been THAT good.

Possibly, I mean Mumkey had a leaked sex tape and was doing drugs with a BPD nutcase but he got out of that situation and tmk went back to making videos. His thread here blew up for a while. He never presented himself as a wholesome family man like Nick though, and he's a lot younger than Nick so probably more forgiveness for making a mistake.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

---Barnes asserts that the raid was retaliation for Nick's criticism of Judge Fischer and the prosecutors.
---He also claims that Nick has previously exposed the local police for corruption.
---This was an opportunity to go after the county's biggest critic.

Nick at best has just made fun of Fischer. He has never 'exposed' any 'corruption' in the county. This is the most retarded thing I've heard, he isn't James O'Keefe. He is so lazy he wouldn't pre-read articles or look them up for his show. No way is he doing any investigation work to find corruption.

---Bail requirement of confiscating guns should be unconstitutional.
---Drug testing violates the 4th amendment.
---Confiscation of guns should not be a condition of bail, it's excessive and also violates 2nd amendment.

Then don't take the bail and sit in jail. This is the alternative. Bail denies a lot of rights to individuals. This is not some novel concept, thousands upon thousands of defendants are found to be innocent are deprived of these rights when out on bail. I imagine this is very set case law at this point, but if they disagreed there has been plenty of time to challenge it before now. They just don't like it since it applies to their internet friend now.

---The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
---Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their their kids.

So leaving drugs within reach of kids isn't neglect? Maybe we shouldn't allow neglect charges when parents beat, lockup, and/or starve their children. That is depriving children of their right to life. Junkie mom leaves a bag of fentanyl on the table next to her kid? Yeah no problem just let it continue till you have a dead kid.

However much you hate lolbertarians, you don't hate them enough.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Is it too late to pull up?

Nose dived right into a mountain m8.