Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 57 23.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 3 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 76 31.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 29 12.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 75 31.3%

  • Total voters
    240
They're going to keep pumping Nick's tires on this unconstitutional search issue up to and most likely including financially supporting some unhinged lolbertarian appellate shenanigans. They're afraid to live in an online lawtube world without him. The ironic part is that not only will this cause Nick's downfall, it will also probably destroy their credibility as well.
It's the only way they can make bank off this. It has to go on as long as fucking possible and include some kind of legal analysis so it's not just "drama farming"... it's parasitic which is what we expect from attorneys anyway
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Nick is reminding Coomalot that HE’S WATCHING HIM. Better watch what he says or Balldo will get big mad.
Perhaps, but who cares? As Sean said, what is Nick gonna do? His name is shit and he’s a goddamn embarrassment. A lot of his acquaintances are basically saying, “you clearly have a problem and need to get help.” Some of the lolbertarians are, as I said before, trying to wish away laws they don’t like into the cornfields. (If wishes were fishes, we’d all cast nets) But that’s few and far between.

Is Nick going to go shoot Camelot? Is he going to go beat him up? Who is going to blacklist Camelot at the behest of Crackety Nicky Rackets?

Nick doesn’t need to focus on his streamer buddies. He needs to focus on his and Kayla’s parents.

You were skeptical when your son-in-law told you he was quitting his law practice to solely focus on his little internet radio show. But damn if he didn’t prove you wrong. That Rittenhouse trial made him a fortune. He even got mentioned on FOX News, the same network that has Tucker Carlson. I love Tucker! You were skeptical that he could keep it up, but once again he proved you wrong. The trial with Johnny Depp and that pretty lady, he again made a fortune. Same with that parade massacre guy’s trial.

Oh wow, what a coincidence! I was musing about my son-in-law’s great success and now my buddy, that is a fan of the show, is giving me a call. I wonder if my son-in-law was mentioned on FOX News again? I love Tucker!

Hey, buddy, how ya doing? I am sitting down. I was just getting ready to watch last night’s Tucker. I love Tucker! Wait, my son in law is talking about what on his internet radio show? Slow down, slow down. He’s strapping his testicles to a butt plug and fucking my daughter with it? How would you know about this? He’s talking about it on his show? Well, surely it’s just being mentioned in passing. Wait, he talks about it often and he’s publicly flirting with internet whores? Like out in the open? On his Locals? I don’t know what that… people are paying him money to post naked pictures of themselves? My daughter is on there and sending lingerie pictures to his audience!?

Dammit, now I’m too upset to watch last night’s Tucker and I love Tucker!

“Hello? Oh, hey, haven’t heard from you in a bit. You still catching my son-in-laws… uh, podcasts? No, streams, right? I always get those mixed up. He’s a wild one, isn’t he! Haha!

“I know that he has been complaining about listeners being down, but he can bounce back. Just needs to find that big trial to get right back on top!

“Sit down? Why? I just got back from the grocers with hot dogs. Got a ton. He’s got five beautiful and wonderful kids, dontcha know! Big Memorial Day celebration coming up! Let me put them away. Hold on.

“Sorry about that, I’m back. Did you know Tucker’s got a stream cast? Was listening to it on the way to the grocers. Fantastic! I hope Nick can one day get Tucker on his show. I love Tucker!

“Oh, right, what was it that you needed to tell me. I don’t need to sit down, I’m fine. Spit it out. Is Nick retiring?

“He what? Wait, hold on. He had… who… what… I… hold on, hold on. Nick… Okay, my girl? Kayla? No. This is not funny. This is a stinker of a prank for you to pull…

“The kids?

“The police… okay… yeah… okay… Well, hells bells, we’re gonna have to set up some beds and make some arrangements.

“No, no. I’m just… y’know… it’s all so… No, I get it and thanks for calling. We should go fishing again soon, weathers getting nice. Yep. Okay. Goodbye.

“Stinkbugs. I’m so darn tooting mad I don’t want to listen to the rest of Tucker’s pod stream. And I love Tucker!”
 
Last edited:
I’m wondering: what if Broke Dick Nick is sort of letting his balldoguards in lawtube “set the stage” for him, so to speak, and he’s biding his time to come back on stream?

He’s most likely seeing these faggots making their “muh balldoman dindu nuffin, it’s a gub’mint conspiracy! Muh constitution said owning guns and drugs is legal!” copes and regardless of how retarded those copes are, they’re swaying some of the most retarded of sycophants.

My point is this: how likely is it that Nick is gonna get a fucking deluge of superchat donos when he makes his next livestream simply because this “Nick is the victim (of a deep state conspiracy)!” narrative has already spread? Who’s to say that won’t steel his own attitude about how he hasn’t done anything wrong and he doesn’t have to make amends for or change anything?
I mean… perhaps? There were a few days where Nick could rake in over $300 in superchats even when he was tumbling, so the Return of the LawPope©︎ stream could generate decent revenue.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Procrastinhater
"A vague report" and "privileged information obtained for spiritual guidance"

I can make shit up too - the report was fully detailed and the pastor only came forward because one of the kids told him directly that they had seen Nick do a line in front of them. Barnes might, might, be correct, but we just don't know. Inventing possible defenses and then purporting them to be accurate and true is disgusting.
 
....png
lmao
 
I wonder if the police had him followed during the week between the wellness check and the arrest, and got the warrant because they want him to give them info about his dealer.
It could be different in the US, but here if it was just a CPS issue, unless there was good reason to believe a kid was being beaten or sexually abused the investigation doesn't start with the police showing up and the kids being taken immediately.
When it is so bad that the CPS are taking the kids, the worker shows up to take the kids with the police as a backup. If his wife was left to make arrangements for the kids before being taken in, it doesn't sound like the CPS was taking the kids right then. It sounds like the kids needed to be shipped off to someone else because all the adults in the house were being arrested.
 
If that's true, then that's more than all his lawtube buddies seemed to do. If they had, they would have surely told us.

Wow, did not expect that. Still skeptical. It's easy to say you were going to do something after it's too late.


You'd think, being right wing grifters on YT, would give a damn about gun safety and responsibility. They should call him a fucking idiot just for that one fuck up alone.

My small little circle of gun friends are really fucking anal about gun responsibility stuff, and that's how it's supposed to be.
Leave it to Broke Dick Nick to be the posterboy needed for the pending gun laws in MN. They are going to make an example of him and use this to push even stricter gun control laws through the senate.
IMG_8566.jpeg
KNSI) — The Minnesota House has passed HF 4300, the Safe Storage of Firearms Bill.

It requires firearms to be stored either unloaded and equipped with a locking device or placed in a locked firearm storage unit, such as a gun safe or a locked gun room, where they may be either loaded or unloaded. The requirement doesn’t apply to firearms under the person’s direct physical control or reach.

Gun control advocates and proponents of the bill noted most responsible gun owners safely secure their firearms, but “the reality is that too many gun owners do not.” A press release from the House says, “The vast majority of unintentional shooting deaths of children occur at home,” citing the death of three-year-old Thomas Pauza-Moore, who, in August 2023, was sent upstairs to charge a phone while his dad, Roy Pauza-Moore, played video games downstairs. In the closet of his dad’s room, Thomas found a loaded handgun sitting on top of an unlocked safe and shot himself in the head. He died three weeks shy of his fourth birthday.

It also mentioned safe storage of firearms could prevent suicide. In a study from 2022 (which is the most recent data available), 569 people in the state died due to gun-related violence. Of those, 407 were suicides. A 2021 study showed that 44% of those who attempt suicide decide to do so in less than ten minutes, and “even the slightest impediment to accessing a firearm – such as a trigger lock or gun safe – could provide a person struggling with suicidal ideation enough time to reconsider their decision.”

After 11 hours of debate, the measure passed 68-64 and moved on to the Senate.

Governor Tim Walz praised the bill’s passage, saying, “As a gun-owner, veteran, hunter, and dad, I know that basic gun safety is a critical part of responsible gun ownership. I applaud the House for passing a trio of common sense bills that would make Minnesota safer by making sure guns don’t fall into the wrong hands. I am ready to sign this legislation into law as soon as it reaches my desk.”

The other bills would stiffen the penalty for straw buyers, create a ban on binary trigger devices, and a sentence of up to 10 years in prison and a $40,000 fine if the transferee “possesses or uses the weapon in furtherance of an assault of a public safety officer or any other offense that causes bodily harm to a public safety officer.”

The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus calls the bills an infringement on Second Amendment rights.
 
Last edited:
I can sort of see how (retarded) Nick fans could noseguard about the way they got the legal/police warrant stuff, but they CAN'T deny that he had 25g+ of cocaine, and that it's pretty obvious that April was the corner demon that was a sidepiece of Nick, basically going against everything he wanted to portray (good Christian) and that he lied, opening the door to doubt everything he has said and done. So frankly, any fan that tries to defend him is a retard and honestly deserves Nick.

And let's not get started on people that will try to say that they got to Nick because he was saying too many "TRUTHS". Although maybe they got him arrested because of crimes against comedy.
 
Back