State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Maybe not the people from the church but I think the cops know what track marks look like and they noted it when he was arrested.

View attachment 6029564

Even my 80 yo mother, who has at most had two drinks of alcohol in her life and certainly no drugs, can recognize trackmarks and sores.

The cop, Quin Pomplun, has pretty terrible handwriting:


Interestingly, Officer Pomplun used to be a police chief at Sacred Heart, but in his new jurisdiction is just a Detective. Here's a photo of him (he's on the right):
View attachment 6029565
"bagies" this cop is probably 90IQ

Today's really not the day to shit on cops. This guy did his job, did his research, got a warrant signed by a judge - if she's not nitpicking why should you? - and fucking arrested two negligent coked-out parents letting their kids run around hungry and smelly in public. And he's clearly a good cop.

Sacred Heart is smaller than where he is now, and it makes sense you step back in a larger pond. Jesus.

 

[Gorton Colu]

Being starved is an emotional reach. It says a preschool teacher said they were hungry, and not fed. Which could mean they came to school without breakfast. There's almost as much evidence in the warrant to indicate they are Chantal like hambeasts who are always hungry and consider going an hour as "not fed".

And Aaron gave them spaghettiO's. So they should be all good.

I'd wait for a CPS report on the condition of the children before declaring they were "being starved". Then you can crucify him for it.

Have you seen his kids? The photos and church stream suggest that they are skellies like Nick. If they were planets then starvation would not be possible.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Sure, I think he eventually turned against the drugs, but not until after he realized the trade he made and that April wasn’t coming back

The reality of the situation is, Nick actually genuinely cucked Aaron. His marriage is over. April's gone, and Kayla never left Nick. If she ever planned to, it didn't wind up happening. Aaron can go on Livestream and cope and seethe all he wants about how much bigger his dick is, but he still is the cuckold in all of this. His testimony also helped ruin Kayla's life and got her children taken from her. Does he think she'll ever speak to him again after this? I doubt any lawyer would let her.

A lot of Nick's and Kayla's settlement, assuming they get one, is going to depend on them making their lives better. If that means divorce, so be it. A lawyer may even advise it since a lot of rehabs will urge you to cut contact with those involved in their drug habits. Talking with anyone who was involved in their debauchery is going to ruin their chances for recovery. In this particular case I wouldn't be surprised if they had no contact orders with the Imholte's for rehab.

 

[EggImpregnator]

So did Nick's own kids report him? I'm lost everything is moving so fast.

 

[paperwork]

View attachment 6029618

based

 

[Harvey Danger]

Spoiler: ARCHIVE EVERYTHING

"On 5/22/2024, Your Affiant was able to review the video"

That was Wednesday, the day after it went live, and was presumably deleted. Also the day after Josh's full reaction on MATI. That was too fast for them to file any paperwork against YouTube/Rumble and get a response.

Was KF and Tuesday's MATI the only places that had a full video available for him to review? If it gets entered into evidence, I'm sure they'll go the full "true and honest copy retrieved from Youtube on X date" for the record. But for the cop's immediate purposes....

A may be in order here.

Also, I had earlier speculated that Kayla's abuse charge was a result of the condition the cops found the day they went in, when she was in the house without Nick. This warrant is interesting, because while it mentioned the neglect reports, they're being cited in support of the suspicion of drug use. The search warrant lays out the drug investigation and is requesting entry to search for drugs and paraphernalia. This isn't a child neglect case.

That may explain why a wellness check on the kids didn't happen first--maybe that would have happened through CPS eventually, but the drug evidence piled up faster and the cops moved on that. The cops didn't have a case laid out ahead of time to charge both of them on neglect.

They clearly found something warranting charges during arrest, but they didn't have a full list of charges ready to go. The church member reports are a foundation but not a full case yet. It needs more investigation and evidence, so the only things they immediately charged on was whatever they had on the day.

I don't know the procedure for adding charges, like when they could be added given the case progression. But I speculate they needed the base charges so they could upgrade them later. The different charge on Kayla is looking less like a typo, and more like something specific they found, and may want to extend to Nick later as they develop the case.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

So did Nick's own kids report him? I'm lost everything is moving so fast.

They spoke to adults who then spoke to the pastor who then called the police. Assuming:
A) The unsubstantiated doc is correct on it being the pastor (High chance given it fits with the substantiated ones.)
B) That's all the reporting the police got

 

[RodgerDodger]

Legal Mindset is going over the warrant on stream. Nothing new except he said:


View attachment 6029717
I hope he does lmao I want to see his latest cope and denialism.

EDIT:

"They have specific animus toward me"

Were your children hungry, smelly, unwashed and wearing the same unwashed clothes for a week? Did the cops find 25 motherfucking grams of coke in your bedroom? Along with an unsecured loaded assault rifle?

The motives of the reporters are irrelevant when what is reported is factually correct, and actually criminal.

 

[newuser131]

a general question, after an arrest for drug possession, is it standard for the cops to test the defendants for drugs at the police station?

 

[Kiwi Yuga]

Is it possible for Nick to attack the search warrant on the basis of Fischer being the one who signed it? I assume that they are going to try and get her to recuse from the case itself considering his comments about her. Since the cokestream was used as part of the probable cause affidavit, I imagine this will be a vector of attack, to claim the judge did it to retaliate against him. Does anyone know if that argument could have any merit?

 

[GumboVariation]

Based Judge Fisher

 

[变性黑鬼]

Chances of a guilty plea - what’s the opinion?

It's a genuinely fascinating and difficult question, because any moron in Nick's position would plead guilty and use his legal skills to reduce his punishment to a bare minimum. First offender, has a family, is remorseful, you can probably think of more factors that could work in Nick's defense. All of these would combine to make an easy landing cushion for him.

But he's SO egotistical, so far gone. Refusing rehab??? If I were him I would take Eric July up on the offer to pay for his rehab lol. "Shiet nigga I didn't think you would actually take my comic book money."

There's a reason everyone is glued to the screen right now.

 

[GumboVariation]

Is it possible for Nick to attack the search warrant on the basis of Fischer being the one who signed it? I assume that they are going to try and get her to recuse from the case itself considering his comments about her. Since the cokestream was used as part of the probable cause affidavit, I imagine this will be a vector of attack, to claim the judge did it to retaliate against him. Does anyone know if that argument could have any merit?

What would be the purpose of that lmao? The drugs were found

 

[Swole McPole]

I pray for America. This cop is barely fucking literate. 8 year old children can write better.

Are you bitching about his penmanship here? Because the content seems fine? I also rue the day when they stopped teaching children cursive handwriting, but those days are long gone. We all use computers these days.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Is it possible for Nick to attack the search warrant on the basis of Fischer being the one who signed it? I assume that they are going to try and get her to recuse from the case itself considering his comments about her. Since the cokestream was used as part of the probable cause affidavit, I imagine this will be a vector of attack, to claim the judge did it to retaliate against him. Does anyone know if that argument could have any merit?

Almost no merit because there's no actual evidence that she isn't impartial. Just that nick is an asshole.

 

[FattyBomba]

Even my 80 yo mother, who has at most had two drinks of alcohol in her life and certainly no drugs, can recognize trackmarks and sores.


Today's really not the day to shit on cops. This guy did his job, did his research, got a warrant signed by a judge - if she's not nitpicking why should you? - and fucking arrested two negligent coked-out parents letting their kids run around hungry and smelly in public. And he's clearly a good cop.

Sacred Heart is smaller than where he is now, and it makes sense you step back in a larger pond. Jesus.

I disagree, every day is a great day to shit on cops!

 

[Gorton Colu]

Is it possible for Nick to attack the search warrant on the basis of Fischer being the one who signed it? I assume that they are going to try and get her to recuse from the case itself considering his comments about her. Since the cokestream was used as part of the probable cause affidavit, I imagine this will be a vector of attack, to claim the judge did it to retaliate against him. Does anyone know if that argument could have any merit?

Any defense is possible, but others more versed in theaw have commented on this and that that would be a retarded attack as any criminal can just go around insulting judges and magistrates to force recusals or throw out warrants.

 

[pee pee pooner]

Is it possible for Nick to attack the search warrant on the basis of Fischer being the one who signed it? I assume that they are going to try and get her to recuse from the case itself considering his comments about her. Since the cokestream was used as part of the probable cause affidavit, I imagine this will be a vector of attack, to claim the judge did it to retaliate against him. Does anyone know if that argument could have any merit?

A judge would need to actually show some bias besides doing her job for that to be a successful argument. Judges see defendants for multiple charges all the time and see defendants who are pissed at them all the time, the judge isn't presumed to be biased based on the defendant's actions. A defendant can't attack a judge and then benefit by an assumption that judge would be biased toward him, that would cause chaos

 

[Malaika]

Is it possible for Nick to attack the search warrant on the basis of Fischer being the one who signed it? I assume that they are going to try and get her to recuse from the case itself considering his comments about her. Since the cokestream was used as part of the probable cause affidavit, I imagine this will be a vector of attack, to claim the judge did it to retaliate against him. Does anyone know if that argument could have any merit?

No. Just like how a cop who dislikes you would not be barred from arresting you when you break the law. You'd have to prove that Fischer signed the Warrant specifically because she wanted to get at Nick, which you can't do unless you can physically prove that she didn't sign similar Warrants.

The warrant has strong probable cause so that's not going to happen.

 

[GumboVariation]

"Vagina juice you say?"