Off-Topic Indoctrination Material for Toddlers and Children from Mainly LGBT Organizations - And Unique Niche Books That Fit Nowhere

[GenociderSyo]

Not totally relevant to the thread but I'm not sure where else to put this.

Anything being used to indoctrinate kids into any belief is welcome, Even positive unique things that explain stuff to kids that are odd like the conjoined twins thing.

 

[ZazietheBeast]

Yes, thank you! The video I had saved of it is this one lol:
View attachment 6056040

Why does gender questioning even NEED a flag?? Isn't that concept just transient enough that you could say you're nonbinary, or like..Just one gender or the other? It's like catching pokemon with all the flags and redundant shit

That video is practically a primer on what to watch out for in your kids media. Hell, there's plenty of uploaded books here that demonstrate the leftist lie that they're trying to beat to into kids that fag parades are just happy carnivals.

Except when you're there, it resembles a porn shoot gone too far with rampant debauchery everywhere. A trap to lure in kids so faggots can groom them or worse, fuck them right on the spot.

As for the flags everywhere, it stems from how leftists/tumblrites in general want to feel special. And so they need a special symbol to denote that they're special snowflakes that should be celebrated. Hence the made up sicknesses just to get that coveted preferrencial treatment. Except the harsh reality is, people are sick of it and tolerance is running out. As seen with people exasperated with fag month.

I then proceeded to attend a nerdy gathering 4 days later and promptly got a comment, "oh, rainbows!" on them. Panic set into my mind once again. Thankfully the commenter was an older gentleman who did not say anything weird. They have ruined the rainbow, a natural and beautiful sight. :[ They also fucked the quite pretty colorscheme of blue and pink together, I like spidergwens costume a lot but theyve SOILED IT

The rainbow is unironically one of the biggest victims in Current Year. I know for a fact faggots have been around for ages and desecrated the rainbow decades before... but if I remember correctly, the whole faggot movement and why they chose the rainbow is to show that faggotry is natural and as beautiful as everything else...

Except we have seen through Current Year that its anything but natural. As the whole movement is basically debauchery off the rails for homosexuals complete with fetishizing disease as they get hit with every contagion you can think of. Almost like God is taking revenge for desecrating his symbol of peace. If you ever wanted an IRL version of 120 days of Sodom, the current faggot sphere is where that is at. And the worst part about this is, if it was self-contained its one thing. However, the fact bisexuals are a thing and they want your kids to make more faggots out of... this is exactly why faggotry enablement in Current Year has to stop.

I also agree with blue and pink. Back at 2008 before troon enablement became a thing, it was yet another color scheme. Now it means "Suicide Colors".

 

[Marzipan Apple]

Anything being used to indoctrinate kids into any belief is welcome, Even positive unique things that explain stuff to kids that are odd like the conjoined twins thing.

In that case, here's another weird one. In season 3 episode 1 of Bluey, Bluey's dad has a conversation with his friend clearly about vasectomies/neutering.

Definitely not blatant indoctrination since it would certainly go over most kids' heads, but I still have no idea why it's in a show for 5 year olds.

 

[Bloo]

Yes, thank you! The video I had saved of it is this one lol:
View attachment 6056040

Why does gender questioning even NEED a flag?? Isn't that concept just transient enough that you could say you're nonbinary, or like..Just one gender or the other? It's like catching pokemon with all the flags and redundant shit

I’ve never actually watched that Blue’s Clues music video. I hadn’t peaked at the time it was released. Good fucking Lord. Does one of the beavers have mastectomy scars? (a question I never thought I’d ask) That’s insane. Not going to give girls a complex at all. I’ve seen a ton of fucked up shit on this site but this might be the worst, I feel sick.

”COME JOIN THE FUN”

(I'm aware that I’m very late to this)

 

[Kari Kamiya]

In season 3 episode 1 of Bluey, Bluey's dad has a conversation with his friend clearly about vasectomies/neutering.

Hurr hurr adult jokes in kids' shows.

Actually am wondering if they're making more dad jokes or something, or if suddenly Bluey's dad is regretting having kids. Like I recently came across this book at Wal-Mart and had a doubletake:

Why the fuck would you put "put down" anywhere near a dog character? I legit thought it was a death joke and thus would be about death—which as far as I know isn't the case.

(Also apparently the Target link for this book has two "2 stars", though it has no written reviews. Curious.)

 

[My cravat doesn't flutter]

I still have no idea why it's in a show for 5 year olds.

Sometimes writers toss in stuff for the parents they know are being forced to watch it with their kids.

 

[ZazietheBeast]

Sometimes writers toss in stuff for the parents they know are being forced to watch it with their kids.

This was definitely the case for old cartoons like "Reboot". The writers had to find a way to keep parent attention while watching the kid's shows. So some adult humor or references did the trick. But it was done in a clever way that the kid never picks up on it.

It also goes to show how shit these leftoid writers have become because the subtlety went out the window and you effectively have a kid's show for adults. Which is more or less what Sonichu animated is.

 

[Otterly]

But it was done in a clever way that the kid never picks up on it.

There’s a few in peppa pig which have made me laugh. The United Nations day at school where all the kids are dressed up as different countries with national dress. ‘America is in the sandpit…. Britain is on the slide…’ if it’s done cleverly and so it isn’t sexually inappropriate it can be funny.
The entire setup of Ben and holly for example, with the hardworking enthusiast elves and the lazy fairies is just funny. There’s a lot that goes over kids heads. Working in stuff that’s overtly sexual is grim though. A few dry laughs about Britain being a police state in peppa pig is funny

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

Does one of the beavers have mastectomy scars? (a question I never thought I’d ask)

Yes it does. That's absolutely the worst part of the whole thing, too. Maybe there is some coded pedo message in the flags, or maybe not- I wouldn't expect every designer to know the extensive lore around faggot vexillology. But without a doubt, that poor rodent has had a tit chop. Of only two of her 4 mammaries, so they can't even get the anatomy they're mutilating right.

What a horrific thing to put in front of the eyes of innocent toddlers, to make normal and ordinary in their minds.

Why the fuck would you put "put down" anywhere near a dog character?

Apparently it's how Englishydoo for "sending the children to bed" and concerns an incident in which dad was in charge of bedtime because mom was away:

https://blueypedia.fandom.com/wiki/Daddy_Putdown

 

[Random Internet Person]

Not totally relevant to the thread but I'm not sure where else to put this.
Ms. Rachel, the host of a YouTube show for toddlers, is facing backlash after people discovered that she left a comment on Dylan Mulvaney's TikTok, inviting him on her show.

She also recently shared a video on TikTok celebrating Pride month, which invited more controversy.

View attachment 6055898

Not surprised folks are saying no to Dylan Mulvaney because Dylan is cringe incarnate.

 

[The Judean People's Front]

I'm so sad. We loved Ms Rachel.

Sure, she had an "enby" on there singing songs, but since the identity shit was never brought up, I didn't care. My kid called the enby a "little boy" and I was like yeah whatever. But Dylan Mulvaney?? Fucking hell.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

Holy fuck. I have to put a lot of this under spoilers. I feel like I'm going to be on a list just for copying and pasting these.

Welcome to feminist sex-positive hell, ladies and gentlemen.

Spoiler

What have the authors done before? Oh, this:

 

[Bloo]

Holy fuck. I have to put a lot of this under spoilers. I feel like I'm going to be on a list just for copying and pasting these.

Welcome to feminist sex-positive hell, ladies and gentlemen.

View attachment 6106489View attachment 6106496

Spoiler

View attachment 6106490View attachment 6106491
View attachment 6106492
View attachment 6106494
View attachment 6106495
View attachment 6106498View attachment 6106499
View attachment 6106502
View attachment 6106508
View attachment 6106510

What have the authors done before? Oh, this:

View attachment 6106514

What’s the age range for these books? I think teaching pre-teens about basic puberty is fine but the art style looks way too juvenile. When I had basic puberty classes at like 11 the diagrams/ images were not like that at all.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

3-7 years. Kids this age could easily be hit up by adults showing them a book like this with naked kids to groom them into thinking it's normal and fine to view CP. These kinds of materials are a real gift to abusers.

 

[Bloo]

View attachment 6106639

3-7 years. Kids this age could easily be hit up by adults showing them a book like this with naked kids to groom them into thinking it's normal and fine to view CP. These kinds of materials are a real gift to abusers.

Oh fuck that. I was thinking maybe 10-11, even then it’s still odd. That’s so unbelievably concerning.

 

[Positron]

I have no objection to parents using a picture book to teach children, even very young children, genital anatomy. But such a book MUST include cautions against showing your genitals to other people, and against asking about, much less asking to see or touch, other people's genitals. Children MUST know that if someone who is not your parents or a doctor asks to see their genitals, they must get away at once and report it to their parents (not teachers). That book, with it drawings of young kids nonchalantly displaying their junks, is not aimed at parents wanting to satisfy their children's curiosity, but at pedos planning to groom.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

I have no objection to parents using a picture book to teach children, even very young children, genital anatomy. But such a book MUST include cautions against showing your genitals to other people, and against asking about, much less asking to see or touch, other people's genitals. Children MUST know that if someone who is not your parents or a doctor asks to see their genitals, they must get away at once and report it to their parents (not teachers). That book, with it drawings of young kids nonchalantly displaying their junks, is not aimed at parents wanting to satisfy their children's curiosity, but at pedos planning to groom.

Exactly this. NONE of these new "call them tricky people, not molesters" "bodily autonomy" books etc. mention that you have private parts that no one should touch without a medical reason even if you asked them to. Many of these books now simply refer to "middle parts" instead of "private parts," supposedly because "any part CAN be private if you want it to" but never saying "these parts are private absolutely regardless of how you personally feel about them or who you want to look at or touch them, if you want someone to touch or look at them, that's an inappropriate urge and you shouldn't do that."

All of them are straight-up 1970s party line for pedos about how whatever people consent to is fine. Teaching kids they have total freedom to consent to whatever they want, and showing a dozen kids lazily laying around with their privates hanging out, is a very specific type of grooming that adults today are being told is ackshully just fine and dandy.

 

[My cravat doesn't flutter]

I have no objection to parents using a picture book to teach children, even very young children, genital anatomy. But such a book MUST include cautions against showing your genitals to other people, and against asking about, much less asking to see or touch, other people's genitals. Children MUST know that if someone who is not your parents or a doctor asks to see their genitals, they must get away at once and report it to their parents (not teachers). That book, with it drawings of young kids nonchalantly displaying their junks, is not aimed at parents wanting to satisfy their children's curiosity, but at pedos planning to groom.

I'd say it's important for kids to know their own anatomy just for the sake of hygiene. Kids should know how to keep themselves clean. But seriously, can we go back to calling them "private parts"? Kids don't need to know the anatomical names of everything or how they function. I hate that people are teaching kids intimate details about masturbation like how to do it or what they should try. Masturbation is a private thing and kids should be allowed to explore their bodies on their own at their own pace.

edit: grammar

 

[Bloo]

I'd say it's important for kids to know their own anatomy just for the sake of hygiene. Kids should know how to keep themselves clean. But seriously, can we go back to calling them "private parts"? Kids don't need to the anatomical names of everything or how they function. I hate that people are teaching kids intimate details about masturbation like how to do it or what they should try. Masturbation is a private thing and kids should be allowed to explore their bodies on their own at their own pace.

This. Kids will figure it out naturally on their own, it’s fine. They don’t ever need instructions. The only time you should interfere is if they’re doing it in front of other people and that’s a massive red flag in itself.

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Ew, I'm getting flashbacks to the time my mom took out a picturebook from the library to draw clothes and obscuring objects over depictions of genitalia, both adult and kids. It was supposed to talk about "What if everyone just stopped wearing clothes? It's not normal to strip in public, keep it private and to the bath," but it seemed to kinda revel in showing full-frontal child nudity. This was in the late-90s/early-2000s.

Just how the fuck do they get away with mass-producing these groomer books?