Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

[Wallace]

View attachment 6067421

Funny how the troons know what a women is when it comes to porn. Unlearn your genital fetish, bigot!

 

[klarine]

Isn't homosexuality among animals rape ?

This is an interesting topic because it looks like its a demonstration of power over another male, male cats mount eachother all the time to show they are dominant. I always wonder if it was the same for humans before we developed civilizations.

On birds like penguins sometimes two males or two females raise an egg together(edit to clarify, usually eggs that lost their biological parents or abandoned eggs) but I'm not sure if they try to mount eachother like cats and lions do

 

[DSHK]

Lil pooner is mad she doesnt have a dick to fuck around in college with

 

[Peaches Demure]

This is an interesting topic because it looks like its a demonstration of power over another male, male cats mount eachother all the time to show they are dominant. I always wonder if it was the same for humans before we developed civilizations.

On birds like penguins sometimes two males or two females raise an egg together(edit to clarify, usually eggs that lost their biological parents or abandoned eggs) but I'm not sure if they try to mount eachother like cats and lions do

Let's see... agriculture goes back roughly 12,000 years. "Civilization" as in, the definition being a society with central leadership and division of labor (ergo the existence of social classes), going back roughly half of that, I would say no. Anatomically modern humans have existed for roughly 200,000 years, and while it's not possible to evaluate exactly how humans in prehistory (i.e. before written records existed) functioned psychologically or behaviorally, it's pretty safe to assume that individuals who were solely sexually oriented toward their own sex existed in pre-history as well.

"Sexual identity" is a 20th century social construct. Sexual orientation is not, and sexual behavior can vary greatly depending on external/environmental factors. All cultures have their own linguistic definition of an effeminate male, so it's pretty clear that the such an occurrence is innate in every given demographic.

 

[Gondolindrim]

View attachment 6067086
View attachment 6067087

Sex work doesn't require you to be "pretty" silly. Anyway, I wonder what series of events led to this person concluding that their transition is the source of their problems. If I had to guess, something with the medicine unbalanced them terribly. Maybe they missed a lot of days at work or maybe their mood was always sour. Whatever it is, it certainly sounds like they're close to udnerstanding that this way of life is horrible and completely over-glamorized by the internet.

 

[Susanna]

Uh oh. More internecine quarrels.
Link Archive
View attachment 6067414

Looks like comments are unsupportive this time.

View attachment 6067421

Porn boards are the only ones Reddit admins allow to discriminate against trannies. It’s kind of remarkable that that’s where they draw the line. Feminists, lesbians, and women’s clubs aren’t allowed to say “no trannies please”, that’s literal genocide, but men jerking off is too important to allow troons in even though they’d be downvoted and never even appear in the top twenty posts.

 

[𝓗𝓾𝓰𝓱 𝓦𝓸𝓽𝓶𝓪𝓮𝓽]

View attachment 6067758

“[my vagina is] just a waste of space and an extra hole at risk of infection”

Theres a lot to unpack in that sentence alone, but I’m already employed full time. Does she think women have amholes that need to be dialated like troons do? Does she just not wash her coochie, or worse douches it? How can your brain be so fried that the immediate word association you have to ’vagina’ is ‘infection?’ Ugh

 

[Geraldine]

but men jerking off is too important to allow troons in even though they’d be downvoted and never even appear in the top twenty posts.

Emphasis added.

Maybe the ban is for their protection because being downvoted that much might provoke suicide.

 

[Hepativore]

Here is a thread in the r/phallo section of Reddit where you have a pooner lamenting the horrible complications she is probably facing as a post-phallo pooner...yet the cope inevitably follows on how it is "Totes worth, doods!" which is reinforced by the pooners in the comments.

https://www.reddit.com/r/phallo/comments/154njxm/thoughts_on_my_phalloplasty_a_life_saving/?sort=new

I can tell that I’ve fucked up the longevity and health of my body in the long term. Maybe that’s anxiety talking I’m not sure but you can just kinda tell how your body is doing I feel like (I’m not a medical professional just telling you what my body feels haha). I get UTIs more frequently with no idea what the cause is (is it cause I swam in that pool? Is it cause I didn’t drink enough water? Is my urine not all leaving my body? Is it just a coincidence and maybe it’s not phalloplasty at all maybe my kidney problems are coming back from when I was 4! But I sure didn’t have this problem right before surgery!). But I just feel (and I don’t have really even have medical anxiety like that, maybe I’m developing it lowkey) but that someday, be it 6 months from now or 60 years, that I will have serious physical health trouble, maybe infections or incontinence or a permanent catheter or something. Here, Let me try to explain what I’m talking about when I say my post op body feels like physical health longevity wise: For example: when I pee and I gotta milk the urine out, that just doesn’t feel right and healthy AT ALL tbh. Yes, I’ve talked to my surgeons and showed them videos of me peeing and milking urine out after and they said it’s normal for phallo patients (and my surgeons say everyone who has a longer urethra aka a penis has to do it! But I’ve talked to cis men in my life, it is not the same as what I’m doing. If I don’t milk the urine out after I piss, a whole puddle goes everywhere and when I milk an entire extra stream comes out. When cis men milk the urine out, it’s a few droplets or they have no idea what I mean when I talk about this problem (at least the men I’ve talked to)). Lowkey if anyone has a medical explanation, that may lessen my anxiety about it and prove me wrong fr. My thought is, about this milking thing specifically, how can I be sure just cus nothing comes out after I’m done milking the urine out, that every little bit is out. How do I know there’s not the tiniest amount of urine stuck in my created urethra and causing all these UTIs? Or other long term health issues? Cause that’s what my feeling is. And another thing that feels unhealthy/ hurt my physical health longevity, my urethra just feels different in an unhealthy and unnatural way. It feels weird in certain positions, doesn’t hurt just feels weird (which I don’t think people with natal penises get that weird unhealthy burning / shocking sensation from laying down a certain way or positioning their legs a certain way but hey I haven’t asked lmao. Maybe that’s why I and others with penises manspread idk). And another thing man is that now post op,no doctor really knows what to do with me in terms of urethra/ genital problems. Like yeah you can say they didn’t like treating me even preop purely bc I’m a transsexual even pre bottom surgery just because there’s not a lot of research of long term physical health effects of HRT or a hysterectomy so young, etc. but now post op doctors just don’t even know how my urethra works, which I feel I surely am going to have serious issues with my urethra in the future. Here’s an example/ physical health concern: What if, and this might be me developing health anxiety, but what if one day I get a sudden fistula (which they say doesn’t happen suddenly but seriously how do they know what will happen after the phallus is old asf) or something else happens, some as of yet random unknown complication, and I lose the ability to urinate completely and suddenly, like an emergency situation where no urine can exit my body. Would the doctor even be willing to put in a suprapubic catheter for me or would he be too scared of idk just the fact that they might get sued or something. Or even say the doctors not even transphobic, he just genuinely has no knowledge of how my post op genitals operate. And I’ll probably not happen to live near a Phallo expert that I could rush to in an emergency (I don’t rn and don’t have plans to but you never know ig).

Other gems...

Thanks for the insight. Ig I j kinda was worried bc when my doctor was explaining that “all people w long urethras have to milk” my dad and brother pulled me aside and said they didn’t know if that was normal cus they never experienced it, so it just made me feel like I had compromised my long term physical health (which is something I chose to do but still feel anxious about it sometimes)

She has no idea how male anatomy works...what a surprise.

But never fear, the cope brigade sends in an airdrop of emergency validation!

Fuck doctors you got this. If you are ever in an emergency situation tell them you need to be scoped if they have to touch your urethra. Tell them you had previous surgery that makes it necessary if they fight you ask for a SP. I don’t worry about those unknown things. I think once you find control of your body/situation all that stuff will disappear.

You tell 'em Aiden! Fuck those whitecoats and their fancy-schmancy medical degrees! All you have to do is clap your hands if you believe and all of your post-SRS complications will magically go away!

Thank you for sharing your experience. One of the main reasons I want a Phallo is because of the longer urinary tract. I already suffer from chronic UTIs and was hoping that not having a short uretha would make infections fewer and farther between. There's not a lot of info about this out there, other than the risk of UTIs is higher right after surgery. I would be willing to deal with that at first if it meant long term I had less UTIs (right now we're talking like, every other month even with good hygeine and d-mannose supplementation).
But yes, I completely understand the anxiety of UTIs. People who don't have them that often dont understand how traumatic they can be.
These are all things I will bring up when I go for my surgery consult next year!

Um...generally if you are having chronic UTIs from HRT, phalloplasty and attempting to reroute your urinary system is only going to make them worse.

If she had a halfway-decent consultation with a medical professional, this would be blatantly spelled out to her in no uncertain terms.

 

[California Newt]

Let's see... agriculture goes back roughly 12,000 years. "Civilization" as in, the definition being a society with central leadership and division of labor (ergo the existence of social classes), going back roughly half of that, I would say no. Anatomically modern humans have existed for roughly 200,000 years, and while it's not possible to evaluate exactly how humans in prehistory (i.e. before written records existed) functioned psychologically or behaviorally, it's pretty safe to assume that individuals who were solely sexually oriented toward their own sex existed in pre-history as well.

"Sexual identity" is a 20th century social construct. Sexual orientation is not, and sexual behavior can vary greatly depending on external/environmental factors. All cultures have their own linguistic definition of an effeminate male, so it's pretty clear that the such an occurrence is innate in every given demographic.

If there's no evidence, then why is it safe to assume that there were exclusive homosexuals in pre-history? There may have been, but what makes it safe to assume that?

Spoiler: thoughts on the use of grand-narratives and thought-control regarding deviant sexuality

It's important to avoid myth-making, which is what evopsych boils down to (in many cases—not all). You can use post-hoc tall tales about lemurs and cave-men to justify any psychological model. I'm not saying that you're doing that; I can understand how many peoples' first instinct would be to speculate in an evopsych direction. What I'm saying is that by sticking to that mindset, we're playing into the hands of the people who dream up these false identity-taxonomies as weapons against the population.

"Sexual orientation" is not a useful category. It is an illegitimate cognitive entity that exists to reify phenomena of diverse causes into an "innate human quality" falsely-so-called. @Mellow Malevolent is correct to use a phenomenological approach here. The one thing that the powers that be don't want you to do is take a phenomenological approach. They want us thinking in pre-approved categories that color how we interpret our most basic human drives. They absolutely under no circumstances want you to deconstruct those categories.

I'll use an example that builds off of the idea that @Mellow Malevolent was talking about earlier—diverse types and causes of homosexuality: Today, in academic religious studies literature, you'll often come across the term "Christianities" rather than "Christianity"; the idea here is that, because there were so many early groups calling themselves Christian (coming from what they call the "Jesus movement") that all disagreed with each other, there is no one identifiably monolithic—and therefore, by implication, no "true"—Christianity.

You would never be permitted to apply the same principles to homosexuality or transgenderism. You are not allowed to deconstruct those identities. Any differences are to be understood as points on a "spectrum"—the implication being that, while these behaviors manifest differently, they still authentically share some kind of causal or foundational essence that legitimizes their consolidation into one category.

There are three main questions that they don't want us to ask:

• What are the components of this experience, divorced from how the approved taxonomy colors it in my mind?
• What are the psychological causes; what's going on inside of me?
• Most importantly: now that I've answered the first two questions, can I do better? Is there a better and fuller way to exist than this?

Conversely, here are some questions they'd love you to ask:

• What's a justification in evospych grand-narratives that I can find to explain away my behavior, without examining my internal states?
• What label can I use to classify myself?
• Now that I have a taxonomical label and a mythology to describe this behavior that I've assumed is an innate part of my soul, how can I keep those big meanies from trying to carve that chunk out of me?

I'm sure that you personally already know all (or most) of this, but I wanted to get the thought out.

I don't know that you can really make the argument that something occurring in every society means it's innate. Using that same reasoning, you could say that rape is innate. Would anyone honestly and seriously argue for a "rape orientation"?

 

[FrancineCansMcGee]

Porn boards are the only ones Reddit admins allow to discriminate against trannies. It’s kind of remarkable that that’s where they draw the line. Feminists, lesbians, and women’s clubs aren’t allowed to say “no trannies please”, that’s literal genocide, but men jerking off is too important to allow troons in even though they’d be downvoted and never even appear in the top twenty posts.

Yeah, it's like if you have a subreddit about lesbian dating the discrimination would not be allowed. But if it's just lesbian porn then it is. That does not make sense.

 

[California Newt]

Porn boards are the only ones Reddit admins allow to discriminate against trannies. It’s kind of remarkable that that’s where they draw the line. Feminists, lesbians, and women’s clubs aren’t allowed to say “no trannies please”, that’s literal genocide, but men jerking off is too important to allow troons in even though they’d be downvoted and never even appear in the top twenty posts.

Yeah, it's like if you have a subreddit about lesbian dating the discrimination would not be allowed. But if it's just porn then it is. That does not make sense.

That's interesting. Does this also hold for pooners?

 

[Peaches Demure]

"Sexual orientation" is not a useful category.

Yes, it is, because it takes a phenomenological approach. It describes a persistent, consistent and exclusive pattern of sexual arousal to certain types of stimulus (in males, to male bodies). Note that I don't mention anything about how one came to inhabit those arousal patterns; it is very possible that not all types of homosexuality are etiologically similar. That is beside the point, really. Sexual orientation describes what, not how or why.

If there's no evidence, then why is it safe to assume that there were exclusive homosexuals in pre-history? There may have been, but what makes it safe to assume that?

I already answered that; historically, across cultures (including those that had never reached "civilization" level development as such) that are in no way connected or linked with one another, this type of man is described. Infer from that what you will.

 

[batteredpancakes]

Porn boards are the only ones Reddit admins allow to discriminate against trannies.

Yeah, it's like if you have a subreddit about lesbian dating the discrimination would not be allowed. But if it's just lesbian porn then it is. That does not make sense.

You're both forgetting that like 90% of the trannies on Reddit are transbians. Their claims about being woman is a selfish desire and thus only extend to themselves.
They are attracted to real woman and most have a lesbian fetish so it's expected the Janny Trannys would want the porn subs to exclude cock and balls.

 

[California Newt]

Yes, it is, because it's takes a phenomenological approach. It describes a persistent, consistent and exclusive pattern of sexual arousal to certain types of stimulus (in males, to male bodies). Note that I don't mention anything about how one came to inhabit those arousal patterns; it is very possible that not all types of homosexuality are etiologically similar. That is beside the point, really. Sexual orientation describes what, not how or why.

I already answered that; historically, across cultures (including those that had never reached "civilization level development as such) that are in no way connected or linked with one another, this type of man is described. Infer from that what you will.

This doesn't address my criticism of orientation as a category, although I can see why you think it does. My problem isn't that orientation fails to classify a range of phenomenal experience; it's that there's no legitimate reason to group together these behaviors by symptom rather than cause (at least not in such a way that you'd need a new word), and that the category—while it does describe a range of phenomena—does so while purposefully obscuring the causes. The concept of "orientation" was created for the purposes of political activism. By who, you ask? By John Money.


A number of pages related to orientation omit this, by the way—as does chatGPT, which pretends not to know. I'd prefer not to use terminology made for evil purposes by the pedophile trans-progenitor John Money.

What I was saying about phenomenal experience is that it should be used to understand the subject rather than myth-making through evopsych.

I edited my original post to add this question after you wrote this, so I'll ask again here: rape occurs in every society. Is there a "rape orientation"? Is rape innate?

Edit:

Yeah, autism-rate me when I point out that you, while posting in an anti-trans thread, get the vocabulary that you use to describe yourself from the guy who invented them. Clearly I'm owned. Clearly internalizing newspeak coined by psychopaths is the level-headed way to go.

 

[Coo Coo Bird]

Here is a thread in the r/phallo section of Reddit where you have a pooner lamenting the horrible complications she is probably facing as a post-phallo pooner...yet the cope inevitably follows on how it is "Totes worth, doods!" which is reinforced by the pooners in the comments.

How do I know there’s not the tiniest amount of urine stuck in my created urethra and causing all these UTIs? Or other long term health issues? Cause that’s what my feeling is. And another thing that feels unhealthy/ hurt my physical health longevity, my urethra just feels different in an unhealthy and unnatural way. It feels weird in certain positions, doesn’t hurt just feels weird (which I don’t think people with natal penises get that weird unhealthy burning / shocking sensation from laying down a certain way or positioning their legs a certain way but hey I haven’t asked lmao.

Never change, pooners.

 

[ram ranch dressing]

Is there a "rape orientation"? Is rape innate?

Yes, people of that orientation are pretty common. They're called "niggers."

 

[monstrous bubo]

Some interesting posts @California Newt but I gotta rate you for this. I’d hate myself if I didn’t.

 

[California Newt]

Some interesting posts @California Newt but I gotta rate you for this. I’d hate myself if I didn’t.

I set myself up for it.

Glad I'm communicating though

@Peaches Demure Apologies for getting hostile. I don't know how I'd respond if I learned some psycho made up the words I use to describe myself. Must be spooky

 

[Candidate No 7]

This is one of the most gruesomely spectacular you-on-social-media vs you-in-real-life examples I have ever come across.

Meet "Pandora Holmes" aka The Scout Panda, a British gay man who had the shit beaten out of him by family, cracked and reacted by transing up - a familiar story.

There he is describing his transition journey three months ago:

There he is crapping on TERFs a month ago and demonstrating he has never listened to a word they say:

And erm, here he is locked up in a psychiatric institution now, Sherwood Oaks Hospital in Nottinghamshire.

Some of the comments are unintentionally amusing.



"Please stay safe in the mental institution where you claim you are being genocided". I don't think he can expect the furry/anime army to storm the hospital soon.

I don't know why he has been locked up, but it is presumably for extreme acts against himself or others.

(Incidentally, how do they make those videos where an avatar reads their lines? I'm completely ignorant of this sort of thing.)