Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 52 24.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 69 32.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 23 10.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 64 30.3%

  • Total voters
    211
There have even been a couple of examples of people with arguably more severe crimes than Rekieta (multiple counts of possession of CP or Criminal Sexual Misconduct with a child 13-15yo) who were merely suspended rather than disbarred.
I'm pretty sure some of those suspensions are effectively permanent and any attempt to reinstate them would be rejected. Disbarment is rare because it doesn't just kick you out of the profession (presumably at least in theory temporarily) but is also effectively anathema.

Still, that does seem like a very low number of disbarments.
Gaslighting his own children about morality is vile. Not as bad as failing to provide meals and hygiene, but awful nonetheless.
I hope the lesson they picked up isn't what he "taught" them, but that their dad is an absolute fucking retard.
 
I texted Mr. Bowl that Instagram picture of Nick. He sent this back to me.

IMG_3262.jpeg
 
It’s crazy that he didn’t just hire more help. There are indeed marriages with two useless partners. They’re called filthy rich people.

I dunno maybe the cost of living is just that damn high in Minnesota but he couldn’t find 2 Somalian women who could cook and clean? How much would you have to pay them $40,000-$50,000?
The curse of the trust fund child is that they have an innate need to downplay their wealth and complain about money. They never let down their optical guard. I’m not sure if this is something that they’re taught or something that occurs naturally.

You’ll hear them virtue signal about cutting a few corners that normal folk would find more than a nuisance than a help, but you’ll also see them buying $100k paintings and cars with their homes paid for, supporting their useless wife’s $4k a year lego habit.

I’m guessing that somewhere along the line, the “bad optics” of a few solid vetted full-time household workers that they could easily employ, outweighed the fact that they were drowning in their uselessness.
 
Last edited:
You seem to be too autistic to understand my point so let me spell it out for you. Nick is a shitty parent. He put in the bare minimum effort in his kids. Until he didn't. Kayla for what we have seen over the past 5 years is about as useful as a sackful of rotting potatoes and somehow did even less around the home than Nick.

I don't know why you're so autistically hellbent on shoving this "I'm defending Nick" narrative down my fucking throat. I'm not defending Nick. My post isn't about Nick. It's about how much of a useless bitch Kayla is. So unless you're doing it to do some Galaxy Brained simping for Our Wife, piss off. Marriages are doomed to failure when one party does nothing for the household. While Nick might not have done much, somehow Kayla did less.
You don't have to like or defend Kayla to rightfully assume she was more than likely the one who fed the kids, dressed them, changed their diapers, etc. at least before they both started doing drugs and spiraling. It absolutely comes off as noseguarding to act like Nick was running the house on the domestic side of things. You've brought this cope up multiple times.

Also nice use of 'you're just autistic and don't understand social cues', maybe you're more influenced by Nick than you want to admit. Please don't reply to this from the shower.
 
I don't believe this stuff about Nick being a victim of Kayla and that Nick is being honest when he complains about having to do so much work for the kids.
I trust the Faran Balanced texts more than I trust Nick. This narrative that Kayla was manipulated or controlled by Nick is fucking ludicrous. Everything we've seen from Nick indicates he's a weak, spineless, degenerate who got resources and fame and didn't know what else to do with it other than burn his life to the ground. But before any of that, we all learned firsthand from Kayla that she's pretty much useless around her own home. When these two divorce, all the shit flinging will come out. I'm sure this is the tip of the iceberg. I refuse to believe a woman who attempted to sneak Ketamine into fucking jail was somehow a victim.

It absolutely comes off as noseguarding to act like Nick was running the house on the domestic side of things. You've brought this cope up multiple times.

They had a nanny who did all those things for them. Kayla to her own admission can't cook and doesn't do fuck all. It's not Nose Guarding to say Kayla sucks just as much as Nick does and bears just as much blame and ire. Stop simping for Our Wife.
 
If you look a little deeper and on how that Rule is typically applied, "criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects" usually refers to criminal acts of fraud, theft, mismanagement of client money, etc.
RPC 8.4 in general is usually used as a catch-all, because most criminal acts relevant to a lawyer's trustworthiness are directly addressed by other rules. Like section (a) says it's a violation of the rules to. . .umm. . .violate the rules. Okay. And they got Bill Clinton under (d): "(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice" for his technically-not-quite-perjury where he slithered around honestly answering a question by manipulating the court into defining "sexual relations" in a way he could deny it.

It's fairly unusual to see 8.4 by itself, even though any act that violates any RPC, or attempts to do so, also by definition also implicates at least the (a) section of 8.4.

Clinton's case was fairly unusual and most cases of that sort wouldn't have resulted in a suspension, but given the context, I think it was entirely appropriate under the circumstances, seeing as the purported aim of the rule is specifically directed at the integrity of the profession.

I've read a fair number of bar discipline cases (they are often hilarious because of how absurdly bad the behavior is), and I usually see 8.4 cited in combination with some set of other rules.
 
Last edited:
I trust the Faran Balanced texts more than I trust Nick. This narrative that Kayla was manipulated or controlled by Nick is fucking ludicrous. Everything we've seen from Nick indicates he's a weak, spineless, degenerate who got resources and fame and didn't know what else to do with it other than burn his life to the ground. But before any of that, we all learned firsthand from Kayla that she's pretty much useless around her own home. When these two divorce, all the shit flinging will come out. I'm sure this is the tip of the iceberg. I refuse to believe a woman who attempted to sneak Ketamine into fucking jail was somehow a victim.
You don't have to believe Kayla is a victim to believe Nick wasn't pulling any weight either, you're the one creating a narrative that one of them has to be a victim. Repeatedly saying Nick was doing everything around the house or that it somehow led him to fuck up his life is fucking retarded, he spends 2-3 hours a day in the shower, 5-8 streaming (drinking), the rest reading this thread or being asleep. Where is the time in that to cook/clean? Blowing Kayla's shittiness out of proportion is sweeping for Nick full stop.
 
You don't have to believe Kayla is a victim to believe Nick wasn't pulling any weight either, you're the one creating a narrative that one of them has to be a victim. Repeatedly saying Nick was doing everything around the house or that it somehow led him to fuck up his life is fucking retarded, he spends 2-3 hours a day in the shower, 5-8 streaming (drinking), the rest reading this thread or being asleep. Where is the time in that to cook/clean? Blowing Kayla's shittiness out of proportion is sweeping for Nick full stop.
She's not gonna fuck you bro sis?

Edit: My bad.
 
Last edited:
I think mainly Rekieta has "thinks-with-his-dick-not-with-his-brain" problems.
He reminds me of Anthony Weiner. He could've had the world at his feet, if only he could keep it in his pants.
broccoli style Zoomer haircut
I remember when people called this "church lady hair".
I would kill to see Nick in a quick weave.
I don't believe this stuff about Nick being a victim of Kayla and that Nick is being honest when he complains about having to do so much work for the kids.
I agree. If he was doing all this work, do you really think he'd want to have five kids?
This is a man who prioritizes his own short-term pleasures above all else. If he was actually changing diapers, helping with homework, scheduling pediatrician's appointments, dealing with night feeds, while Kayla did nothing, he'd probably up his pull-out game after like, 2 kids tops. Maybe 3. But 5?
 
I trust the Faran Balanced texts more than I trust Nick. This narrative that Kayla was manipulated or controlled by Nick is fucking ludicrous. Everything we've seen from Nick indicates he's a weak, spineless, degenerate who got resources and fame and didn't know what else to do with it other than burn his life to the ground. But before any of that, we all learned firsthand from Kayla that she's pretty much useless around her own home. When these two divorce, all the shit flinging will come out. I'm sure this is the tip of the iceberg. I refuse to believe a woman who attempted to sneak Ketamine into fucking jail was somehow a victim.

This isn't about a 'narrative that Kayla was manipulated or controlled by Nick". This is about your bullshit narrative that poor "weak and spineless" Nick has to do all the work to take care of the kids and take care of the house. I say your narrative but that isn't really correct. Its NICK's own narrative. The one he has been going on and on about for months about how he is having to work so hard and is just so busy. The one that Nick uses to excuse almost every aspect of his behavior.

And every time you get called out on this, you spin it around to say that anyone who questions your noseguarding is spreading a Kayla simp narrative.

If you want to say that Kalya is lazy or does nothing around the house, I don't really care. But you start talking about how poor Nick has to do all the work in the house echoing Nick's own stupid narrative of how busy and overburdened he is because of the kids you are going to get called out on it.
 
I don't believe this stuff about Nick being a victim of Kayla and that Nick is being honest when he complains about having to do so much work for the kids.
He drove them around, that's it, if he had to do anything else he wouldn't have constantly bitched and complained about just that.
You don't have to like or defend Kayla to rightfully assume she was more than likely the one who fed the kids, dressed them, changed their diapers, etc. at least before they both started doing drugs and spiraling.
The fuck she did. They had a nanny for years. She didn't do dick. The instant the nanny was gone the kids were filthy and starving within days.
 
I'm pretty sure some of those suspensions are effectively permanent and any attempt to reinstate them would be rejected. Disbarment is rare because it doesn't just kick you out of the profession (presumably at least in theory temporarily) but is also effectively anathema.

Still, that does seem like a very low number of disbarments.
It almost certainly won't matter one way or the other for Rekeita. The faggot has no desire to practice law or do any amount of work whatsoever. Plus he's incompetent; certainly not the kind of lawyer who can make a living by picking and choosing which cases to take or even working for himself. If he were to shock the world and return to traditional work, he'd have to work for a firm or the government (unlikely to qualify at this point) & settle for $70k-$110k annually. Lazy bitchmade motherfucker couldn't even do an extra hour per week making calls at a cushy bank job (still bitches about it YEARS LATER), let alone devote the number of hours daily that up-and-coming attorneys endure. Make no mistake, he has never established any career growth as a lawyer; he'd be starting entirely from square 1 but with the added challenge of already having enemies, burnt bridges & a poor reputation.
 
It almost certainly won't matter one way or the other for Rekeita. The faggot has no desire to practice law or do any amount of work whatsoever. Plud he's incompetent; certainly not the kind of lawyer who can make a living by picking and choosing which cases to take or even working for himself.
If you have your license suspended and it's in any way related to substance use, you generally have to complete a course of treatment, either in a bar-approved treatment program or, in some cases, in a treatment program specifically run by the bar itself for its members. After that, you often have to work a probationary period under the supervision of another lawyer, sort of the bar equivalent of an AA sponsor.

I don't see him even doing the first, and even if he did, his "ODD," that is to say, his being a gigantic faggot, would prevent him from doing the second.
 
Back