Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would we need a MN attorney to go to the county courthouse terminal and provide independent corroboration?
The leaker said it was a public terminal in any Minnesota courthouse. So anyone in the area can see if those terminals exist and if they do look it up.

Their post:
Balldowashers would insist that it's merely "alleged" by the state but yes, the document itself is genuine. Unfortunately CHIPS cases are not searchable in the online version of the court website, but they can be viewed by any member of the public at Courthouse View public access terminals in any given county courthouse.

P.S. Attached are a JPG version of the complete order for clipping convenience on various other interesting highlights, such as the Rekietas revoking consent to fork over their drug test results, the Rekietas refusing access to the bedroom on a post-arrest child protection site visit, several quotes suggesting that the kids may still be in regular foster care rather than with grandparents as originally assumed, etc. All big if true.
 
Last edited:
Could a physical copy have been made from screenshots of the actual document in the word processor and then printed?
Oh lord I have actually done that at work before, but it was for a training manual someone was having issues with (old people amirite). The idea that they would do this with a document like this would be amusing in a morbid way
 
Whoever leaked this committed a crime.
It should also be said that whoever leaked this (if true) did something pretty bad. This kind of thing will negatively affect a person's reputation and information about a child being exposed to drugs because of their neglectful parents should absolutely be confidential.

Obviously this is like two orders of magnitude less bad than exposing your child to fucking cocaine. But it's still fucking shitty.
 
The leaker said it was a public terminal in any Minnesota courthouse. So anyone in the area can see if those terminals exist and if they do look it up.
It's also a plausible lie that would have kept things up longer if Null hadn't immediately contacted a MN lawyer to get more information.
 
The leaker said it was a public terminal in any Minnesota courthouse. So anyone in the area can see if those terminals exist and if they do look it up.
This how Nick got his expose on the mass shooter Ron Soye

It's also a plausible lie that would have kept things up longer if Null hadn't immediately contacted a MN lawyer to get more information.
I wouldn't put it past the government to mess things up, technology wise.
 
So did they screenshot it, then print it, then scan the prints, then post it?
Screenshotting it would remove the metadata before it was sent to the printer, but at that point what's the point in printing it? You'd be better off just merging the images to a .PDF file by printing to .PDF. You wouldn't leave any traces on the print server that way. Then just wipe the screen shots and .PDF from the drive, and it's like you've never been there.
 
The leaker said it was a public terminal in any Minnesota courthouse. So anyone in the area can see if those terminals exist and if they do look it up.
If Minnesota's system is really this negligent with personal information, they are beyond retarded. There's no shot that just some random can go up to these terminals and with pull this up. I pray they aren't this bad, especially with the person info in juvi cases
 
Has anyone considered that this is all Nick playing four-d chess and sinking his reputation so badly that it's impossible for a court to find what he said about Montagram to be defamation because his own reputation would be so poor. There's no way he could be considered a reliable source. Surely we're just too incel-prudish to understand the machinations of such a great mind.

Getting his kids high on coke I mean, I don't think he would consider leaking fake documents. He isn't one to take half measures.
 
6/6 was his comeback stream, this says he was in court earlier that day. Did he really hear "You ain't getting the kids back for awhile" and take that as an opportunity to stream?
I mean, if this is real, then he’s been spending his time since finding out his little girl is on coke doing the following: driving around like a douche in the Lawpope-mobile while filming himself, hanging up an ugly Joker painting, going out for ice cream dates with his cokehead whore, attacking other people for his horrific decisions, and practicing his stand up routine to his Locals fans. In other words, doing everything *but* showing remorse for the fact that the majority of females living in his house (including a small child) are on coke.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back