Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dude is barely coherant these days. Can't pay his speeding tickets. Driving around with expired tabs. And even in the good days his YouTube thumbnails looked like ass. There is no way he had anything to do with this leak, other than buying the cocaine.
If he didn't fake it (this includes having a balldo washer legal friend or Dax's goons fake it) then the only reasonable assumption is that it's legit and he leaked it (or had it leaked by proxy), which means when it's inevitably found out that he did, his defense attorney is going to drop him by Monday and he'll probably get found out before the omnibus hearing.
 
The Quatering tweeted this out then deleted it 20-30 mins later. Glad I still had this in my clipboard.
View attachment 6101959
Jesus Christ QuarterPounder, you couldn't wait for confirmation before wanting twitter likes? If it's real, you're blasting the information of his kids being a victim of his shitty decision for no reason. if it's not real, you're putting out false info about the kids of a dude you were friendly with saying they got high on coke. Attention is a hell of a drug
 
There's really only one explanation for why Nick singled out his "favorite" to give drugs to. Cocaine is expensive, I don't think this happened accidentally at all since she must have been doing it regularly to reach such a high level and if Nick shares his expensive cocaine with someone 2-3 times a week then there's probably a really fucking awful reason for it. No doubt they gave her whiskey also. Maybe there's a reason she is the only one who has night terrors and acts out violently.
 
This better be fucking fake. I can't decide what's worse, the kid getting into the drugs through parental incompetance, or Nick letting the favorite have drugs and the varying possible implications of that
Yeah I sure hope we weren't about to have another Thorp family situation.
 
If there is someway to find records relating to Rekieta’s kids being in foster care wouldn’t that support the authenticity of the document?

Also, where did the claim that the kids were staying with relatives come from?
 
Stains on document appear to be liquor. Who would be high up enough to access the document, smell of liquor, and have a grudge against Rekieta?

Fischer_Jennifer.jpg
 
If there is someway to find records relating to Rekieta’s kids being in foster care wouldn’t that support the authenticity of the document?

Also, where did the claim that the kids were staying with relatives come from?
Obviously different states have different lingo and policy, but in some places kids being placed with relatives the relatives are considered foster parents for that time
 
If he didn't fake it (this includes having a balldo washer legal friend or Dax's goons fake it) then the only reasonable assumption is that it's legit and he leaked it (or had it leaked by proxy), which means when it's inevitably found out that he did, his defense attorney is going to drop him by Monday and he'll probably get found out before the omnibus hearing.
Something similar to what I was going to float, regarding who could have produced a forgery. Nick may not be able to himself, but could he have paid someone who could? It wouldn't even need to be a balldowasher, just someone with a price Lord Balldo is willing to pay.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: feral cat #6385
IT / Consultancy people can get a hold of these items. I wonder if its possible that some one who works tech at MN or is contracted via IT has access to servers and grabbed it. Many tech consultancy firms are given literally the keys to the castle including juvenile judicial systems after signing massive NDAs which explains the burner account.

Its definitely possibly real and its more than just the case workers who potentially have access.
If it were an IT consultant who lifted it off a server, the document would be clean with no cursor. They would probably leave in the metadata too because it wouldn't be traceable back to them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back