Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 53 24.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 72 33.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 24 11.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 66 30.3%

  • Total voters
    218
Nick seemed very sober and jovial last night. He is predicting a win.

I am in touch with 2 people close to Nick who are FAR better at deciphering Nick than others ITT who authored the OP and dismiss, make fights, and just say, “he lies.” Or, effectively “see the OP, dumbass!! " cred to validate or get a win from "newfags" who may have something to offer.

Close your circle further, girl - gatekeep away.

Clarebere was among the first to call Nick out with specifics and reciepts.. Nothing in the OP. She knew how much of an asshole Nick was, early on. Nothing. Null featured it, IIRC. Odd...

Anyway... Nick is very happy.

After consulting with a couple in and out of Nick’s circle… he’s either:
  1. Managed to seal the bodycams. (My position...) Please prove me wrong! Scandinavians are private people. MN has no obligation to make this public. It's all fairly gross.

didn't they file a motion to seal the juvenile evidence and it got rejected? if they're not sealing that, i find it very hard to believe they would seal anything else. "it's gross' and "Scandinavians are private people" are terribly weak premises.

  1. The test on the (then) 8 yo was wrong and MN stepped back. (It was crazy-high; I'm still baffled.)​
we've been over this countless times. the chances of the test being wrong or fake are incredibly low. it might indeed be wrong--we don't know for sure--but nick being happy is, again, pretty weak evidence.

  1. He’s gonna plead to make this go away. Tbh, that’s how may go. What is x months in probation when The State is exhausted by him, and believe he can keep together?! These are Scandinavians who avoid publicly. And, honestly, they are.
i would believe him pleading to make it go away but maintaining his innocence publicly. ralph set the precedent for doing exactly that, and his smooth-brained fans will remain none the wiser. he also gets to maintain his "the state is persecuting me and there's just nothing i can do about it" line.

We're all exhausted by him. Can we agree on that?
if keeping up with nick is exhausting you then log off. he's a literal who part of a reality internet drama extended universe that has less of an impact on your life than your amazon delivery guy.
 
No one has asked Nick because he'll say No.
Edit: Actually, I think Jersh asked publicly, but Nick would claim he doesn't watch every MATI segment about him in a seething rage and thus maintain he was never asked.

If Jersh goes out of his way to ask Nick directly, Nick will say No and then say "I never said I would sign the release" if confronted about it.
Completely agree. My comment was more sarcastic than anything.
 
They might not have an obligation but there's probably someone within the local scene (even potentially within the court) that has an interest in making it public. If he had sealed it, it'd be horrible in a different, because people would get the impression he's hiding something (because he would be), and not out of any desire to maintain privacy.
It's not a judicial record, it can't be "sealed." It's a public record of the executive branch of the Minnesota government.

It's up to the PD to release it or not, barring a court order to the contrary, and they've shown no indication of being unwilling to comply with the public records laws, and haven't raised any of the exemptions, but instead explicitly stated they're going to produce them.
 
What color confetti will Josh give us?
Gotta be red, green, and gold for the balldo batty boy.
1720746586677.png
 
Days since last Cynthia schizo post: 0
You never learn lmao.
I’m starting to think Cynthia is just manic Qayla barging in to the thread to drop steaming coiled red herrings out of her rotten snapper. Every time the BPDemon has her attention she shits up the thread like the most boring Oracle running obfuscation by acting like a retarded faggot.
 
It's been well over a year since you've been on this song and dance about how you know so much more than everyone but won't post anything about it, and you know what, considering one of the traits of people on this site is that they never learn even after being told thousands of times when they are being dipshits I think it's getting to the point where instead of Nick, we might start digging info on *you*.

I imagine there's quite a lot of juicy drama to be milked out of an imbecile who enters every conversation pretending to be wikileaks, pray nobody else shares that opinion.

She is not worth it. When lucid (and I assume her meds are working), she is actually a coherent person and can accomplish some actual archiving. When not, you get full schizo-theory, and that is entertaining in its own way--but only from a distance.

I recommend people point and laugh from a distance.

View attachment 6179326

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKk2w0l3phs

Maybe Nick was just happy that he was able to discuss American Beauty.

This is tone-deaf and stupid.

My predictions:

- Nick will lament that the film is 'misunderstood' in a pontificating manner and rant for 5-7 minutes on a strange tangent and twisted interpretation.

- He will have some pre-written notes that sound scripted and like something you would hear in a second-term literature class

- The host will be somewhat bewildered by Nick's bizarre takes

- Nick will make an uncomfortable amount of gay jokes

No disrespect to Claire (much love), but MANY people called out Nick way earlier than Claire. Oftentimes with receipts. For example, the Hedonism II stuff was confirmed I think before Claire even started talking about Rekieta (incidentally, for those that don't know, the early stages of that investigation is where the tripod meme comes from).

If Claire is to be mentioned in the OP, there are two things that stand out:

1. She highlighted Nick's "body destroyed" rant, and gave the best and earliest criticism of it. Something I think she was best qualified to do as a wife and mother herself.

2. Nick revelled in her being hacked and swatted. Which is definitely one of the grosser things he's done because that put her family in jeopardy.

Fair is fair, Claire deserves a mention in a mini-arc. Nick's gloating over her predicament was a tell and marked departure from his public moral base. His gloat clip is something I will have to add to the section.

What color confetti will Josh give us?

It would be simultaneously hilarious and horrifying if there were a confetti spray of Balldos...

Did you bug the Balldo?

Buggered by the Balldo, is more like...
 
Are you able to post a better resolution image of the first file? It's very hard to read.
Sorry about that - I thought monochrome made regular text more legible but missed that it fucked up darker areas in the exhibits. Attached is a greyscale making those about as good as they're gonna get. Even with that fixed a very quick skim still isn't seeing the "April called my son a retard" bit that Aaron keeps saying was missing, but maybe someone can find it. Or he could just feel free to post a copy of whatever it is that he thinks has been left out.
 

Attachments

It's not a judicial record, it can't be "sealed." It's a public record of the executive branch of the Minnesota government.
I though the law said they were not presumptively public outside of the people depicted (unless it was a shooting). I thought it became public when it was presented as evidence at trial. Here's the states interpretation. I guess Kandiyohi could be different.


Sorry about that - I thought monochrome made regular text more legible but missed that it fucked up darker areas in the exhibits. Attached is a greyscale making those about as good as they're gonna get. Even with that fixed a very quick skim still isn't seeing the "April called my son a retard" bit that Aaron keeps saying was missing, but maybe someone can find it. Or he could just feel free to post a copy of whatever it is that he thinks has been left out.

lol April was served in jail and put the address the "homeowner" said she didn't reside.
 
No disclosures are listed under Kaylas court case. On court day, can Kayla claim she's seen nothing because they didn't disclose anything to her, just Nick's attorney? Is that a disclosure violation? Why aren't they duplicating everything and making sure she gets everything Nick gets?
White does not appear to represent Kayla in the CPS case because his request to the judge to seal the juvenile records was cc'd to Kayla's CPS lawyer, John Mueller.
I guarantee Nick has told Kayla that he's got her legal issues covered. Just like he told April wrt her speeding ticket.
Nick probably has Kayla on his email provider, which he notoriously always has filled up his quota/inbox. He ran into this issue with the speeding tickets (for April), where the court said email service was returned as undeliverable.

Dude's a control freak, so that would track that he hosts her email. Or it could also well be that their digital footprints are as cluttered and unorganized as their physical lives.

Interesting new matter of public record attached. It's been discussed here before that Nick's attorney not filing an appearance in Kayla's criminal case doesn't mean much since it may just be unnecessary until some action needs to be taken like a motion, but the lack of joint representation and some recent changes in their CHIPS case may make one wonder just how much of a united front there really is.

As you'll see, Nick's initial attorney Weber and Kayla's initial attorney Mueller were not their selection and instead were court-appointed on May 24th in the midst of the emergency placement. Then, Nick had White replace Weber on June 14th to represent Nick only, and White filed June 17th discovery requests leading to the state's two disclosures that were naturally sent to "all parties" which would have included Kayla's court-appointed attorney.

Then on July 9th, the second business day after whatever was in that July 5th supplemental disclosure, Kayla all of a sudden hires her own attorney Kluver to replace Mueller, and Kluver appeared to be in quite a hurry to file a unilateral appearance and file new discovery requests on Kayla's behalf before even bothering to get around to having Mueller cosign a substitution later that day. Why on earth would Kayla go to all that trouble when joint representation by White would have been more efficient, and why on earth would Kayla's attorney be so concerned about making completely redundant discovery requests when surely every disclosure already provided to Nick through White would have also made its way to Kayla through Weber via Kayla's totally functional email address and/or via the shared mailbox where she and Nick are totally still living together? So odd...
Trouble in Paradise.jpg

lol April was served in jail and put the address the "homeowner" said she didn't reside.
Look closer - though serving her in jail would have been easiest, they must have forgotten to take the opportunity as the affidavit clearly states they served her at Nick's house the day after the arrest, as though she had darted straight there as soon as she was released (and perhaps even was tailed on the way there).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is why I'd be a terrible janny - I'd just temp-thread ban anyone that asks at this point. Even the slightest amount of thinking and reading the room will tell you if the footage is out of not.
I'd be worse. I would ban anyone who came in the thread for the sole purpose of asking about the bodycam footage for a year.

Speaking of...

For fuck's sake! I see some of you did an excellent job avoiding the demon and totally didn't get baited into shitting up the last few pages.
 
Last edited:
Back