Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 52 24.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 69 32.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 23 10.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 65 30.7%

  • Total voters
    212
Amen. One of the things that Nick has said that made me literally choke on my coffee was him saying she "is a strong lady.'"

1) (And this is petty, but trewwwwwww) she isn't a lady. 2) She is one of the weakest-minded bints on this site, I can't even put into words my contempt for her as a person, and especially a mother. Like I know she doesn't care about my opinion, but any spouse who literally sleeps through their husband's physical, mental, emotional and social decline is beyond contempt. And ditto for Nick. Any spouse that watches their wife sleep their life away instead of getting them help to deal with their emotional and mental problems is likewise beyond contempt. Part of the reason we get married and have wives and husbands is that you have someone around you who can tell you when you are being a massive fuckup.
She also sleeps through her husband driving drunk with HER children in the car, without a care in the world. There's so much she could do to stop it, but clearly never did.

Absolute shit stain.
 
You're mixing concepts. Whether or not it's a good idea to be married to/divorce Nick has nothing to do with whether the fact a lawyer practicing family law and also divorce law (which is...family law) being hired for a child case is "evidence" of a divorce arc.

It's "flimsy" bc just about every fucking lawyer who practices divorce law practices family law, and vice versa. Not all, but it can be assumed as the standard, even if they do some more than the other. A few specialize.
My joke was more that the evidence for wanting a divorce is clear, not that that's why she chose this lawyer.
 
She is married to and has children by the main attorney at the firm. She has listed herself as paralegal and "office manager" at the firm going back many years. She may have more unofficial experience than she seems to have on paper. But still I think she could have done better and I think it would have been helpful to go with someone who did alot of family law in that county & knows the local players.
I think Nick learned his lesson with Randazza. Big names or well versed lawyers are going to try and do things in the clients best interest and not just what the client wants. In the coke stream he even said he didnt trust them to defend him correctly.

I think going forward he is only going to work with an attorney he can direct. This will allow him to call the shots but still protect his ego when it doesnt work because he will blame them.
 
The law firm as a whole does criminal defense. But not the attorney Kayla has engaged for family court. The practice of Kayla's lawyer seems to be strictly family law and she isn't terribly experienced in even that. There are signs she has done some CPS work in her reviews, but her main practice seems to be divorce and custody law.
That doesn't seem to be the case. She seems to have a wide variety of cases including divorce and criminal ones.

She is married to and has children by the main attorney at the firm. She has listed herself as paralegal and "office manager" at the firm going back many years. She may have more unofficial experience than she seems to have on paper. But still I think she could have done better and I think it would have been helpful to go with someone who did alot of family law in that county & knows the local players.
The big problem with that strategy is that it's likely that everyone in Nick's county, or at least the legal establishment, probably hates him or at least knows of him and what they know is unlikely to be very good. Montevideo isn't that far from the Spicer/Willmar area and it wouldn't surprise me if they deliberately went over a county line to retain her.

She doesn't seem unqualified to me and looking from the outside I would definitely retain her over Frank the Barneswalker. It's not particularly a close call either.

The most interesting thing to me is that even if you assume that Kayla needs a separate attorney, which does make sense to me, for multiple reasons this woman doesn't seem to me to be the type of lawyer Nick would want to retain, and even less the type of lawyer Nick would want Kayla to retain. Not least because she's a woman, and Nick has had some problems with female attorneys. And female non-attorneys, like the woman he accused of lying in the court documents.

You know, I was originally going to critique the theory as too clever by half and not something anyone would do irl...but you make an excellent point that technicalities are Nick's one and only party trick.

And it might actually be a not-terrible strategy, petty technical arguments aside, with some other assurances. I don't know CPS standards for this particular brand of terrible. However, even if too eager to reunite, seems it should be an uphill battle pitching twitchy, weak-minded, too anxious or bombed to drive Kayla as miraculously and suddenly capable.
The problem is that the second home was already being used as a fig leaf to say that April wasn't technically living with them. That situation would have to change if he was going to try a new gambit.

On the other hand, if Kayla is planning on seeking a divorce, it would have to be a new development. At the time of the hot mic incident, based on what was said, the throuple had to still be an ongoing thing as of that point.
 
The law firm as a whole does criminal defense. But not the attorney Kayla has engaged for family court. The practice of Kayla's lawyer seems to be strictly family law and she isn't terribly experienced in even that. There are signs she has done some CPS work in her reviews, but her main practice seems to be divorce and custody law.

I don't buy into divorce speculation, but everything about the hiring seems a bit odd. But no more odd than Nick's strange choice of attorney. The rushed hiring of this attorney at such a late stage in the process is also strange.

One thing that is possible is that what we are seeing in all this is Nick's usual lazy nature, selfishness, inability to plan and tendency to do things only based on an immediate crisis. Things with CPS in court are going to happen sooner than the criminal case. They reached a point where the process forced Kayla to have an attorney and so Kayla has an attorney now.
Fucking unbelievable. You are facing losing your children and you hire someone with 4 years of actual experience? I haven't looked at her yet, but if what @Strix454 saw is correct, my analysis is: cheap. Or just inexperienced enough to make promises she shouldn't. Or perceived as malleable.
She is married to and has children by the main attorney at the firm. She has listed herself as paralegal and "office manager" at the firm going back many years. She may have more unofficial experience than she seems to have on paper. But still I think she could have done better and I think it would have been helpful to go with someone who did alot of family law in that county & knows the local players.

I could believe the laziness theory enough that I would not be surprised if it were true.

I still like my family intervention theory, and a familial or social connection from the law firm to the Slettas would bolster that conclusion as well as provide reason for the lackluster credentials. Possibly Nick has also soothed emotions enough that they cheated out on the lawyer because he is going to 'work with them'.

You know, I was originally going to critique the theory as too clever by half and not something anyone would do irl...but you make an excellent point that technicalities are Nick's one and only party trick.

As mentioned, I still like my own theory best--absent more evidence--but I would not be shocked if it were true. Nick has degraded his reputation so much over the last 2 years.

And the guns are potentially bigger than has been discussed much - even though there's not much talk about them, no real suggestion atp of specific concern about them beyond apparently being a fucking slob with gun hygiene like everything else

I expect them to bring that up as a strong arm tactic to bully Nick if he doesn't do what they want. It seems to me to be a potential aggravating factor (in the colloquial sense) that has been underplayed.

I think Nick learned his lesson

Bender.gif

Wait... you're serious? BIGGEST X to doubt!
 
I think Nick learned his lesson with Randazza. Big names or well versed lawyers are going to try and do things in the clients best interest and not just what the client wants. In the coke stream he even said he didnt trust them to defend him correctly.

I think going forward he is only going to work with an attorney he can direct. This will allow him to call the shots but still protect his ego when it doesnt work because he will blame them.
The irony of this is he shit all over Amber Heard for going through lawyers until she found some she could control during the Johnny Depp trial. I remember him and the panel saying what a terrible idea it was to try to boss your council around.
 
The irony of this is he shit all over Amber Heard for going through lawyers until she found some she could control during the Johnny Depp trial. I remember him and the panel saying what a terrible idea it was to try to boss your council around.
Nick Rekieta is a heckin' valid lawyer with a legal acumen measured in the dozens of Johnny Cochrans, and any legal strategy he suggests to his council must be the best because he is so awesome at the law (he has a license plate that says so).

He's definitely no Amber Heard!
:really:
 
Based out of Montevideo which is about an hour from Spicer.
This is supposedly Maggie Kluver.

I'm still struggling to get my head around the fact that Rekieta's hired the King of New York, Frank White as his lawyer.

Check it, I grew up a fuckin' screw up
Got introduced to the game, got a ounce and fuckin' blew up
Choppin' rocks overnight
The nigga Nick Rekieta tryin' ta turn into the white Frank White

Nicky Nicky Nicky, can't you see,
Sometimes your nose just hypnotize me,
And we just love your degenerate ways,
And now you're going broke but your lawyer's getting paid

I love it when you call me Thin Poppa,
Throw your hands in the air, if I could be any gayer,
I love it when you call me Thin Poppa,
To Jamaicans getting money, but bursting my punani,
I love it when you call me Thin Poppa,
I got a gat beneath the bed, please don't tell the fucking fed,
Because they'll come and take all of my babies, baby...
 
View attachment 6179326

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKk2w0l3phs

Maybe Nick was just happy that he was able to discuss American Beauty.
big-audience-draw.png
Well, the show has started. To the applause of... no one. Literally the only one watching is me. The chat is also entirely empty. Sometimes the number of viewers would reach the dizzying heights of 2, or even 3. Once, I saw a 4. Remember when Nick used to immediately drive hundreds or even thousands of live viewers to whatever no-name channel he appeared on?

Also, note how this is a premiere. I choose to believe that Nick requested that in order not to have to look at the chat, or answer superchats from trolls. Joke's on you, no one bothers to watch, or comment on, your appearances anymore.

P.S. 30 minutes since the show started. The viewership has risen to a steady 3. Guess even hatewatchers... don't.

Edit:
1720807990604.png

"Doubtful," lmao :story:
At least the chat is no longer empty. That was the entirety of it 70 minutes into the show, btw.
 
Last edited:
Nicky Nicky Nicky, can't you see,
Sometimes your nose just hypnotize me,
And we just love your degenerate ways,
And now you're going broke but your lawyer's getting paid
I got Kay in Spicer but Ape's much nicer
Mono-gamy? Not me, prefer poly (that's right)
All church-group hoes know it's the Balldo (c'mon)
Watchin' Cuties with Herrera all snooty (ha)
Now who's actin' all fruity? Who's lawsplainin' the 'tubes?
Them Balldos need lube, I'm acting the fool,
Get arrested, one gun, on possession,
Crack sessions, excuse my digression,
On blast, lie first, let the schedule lapse (haha)
That's how most of these so-called streamers pass (bye-bye)
At last, a lawyer splainin' bout coke and broads
Total farce, ménage à trois, buyin' expensive cars
I still leave you on the pavement
Superchat me more (uh-huh), no car payment (uh-uh)
At my arraignment, note for the plaintiff
My daughter's all up in my cocaine basement
Face it, not guilty (shh)
That's how I stay filthy (not guilty)
Richer than Ralphie, 'til you Kiwis come and get me (come on)
 
View attachment 6181868
Well, the show has started. To the applause of... no one. Literally the only one watching is me. The chat is also entirely empty. Sometimes the number of viewers would reach the dizzying heights of 2, or even 3. Once, I saw a 4. Remember when Nick used to immediately drive hundreds or even thousands of live viewers to whatever no-name channel he appeared on?

Also, note how this is a premiere. I choose to believe that Nick requested that in order not to have to look at the chat, or answer superchats from trolls. Joke's on you, no one bothers to watch, or comment on, your appearances anymore.

P.S. 30 minutes since the show started. The viewership has risen to a steady 3. Guess even hatewatchers... don't.
Fuck this stupid faggot for choosing to bring on a cokehead child abuser.

Is he so stupid he thinks it's still 2021-22, and Nick is that super famous lawtube trial streamer that will only bring positive growth?

Or maybe he loves American Beauty and wants to talk about it too. Doesn't matter what the reason is. There is no great explanation, and no punishment is greater than putting so much effort into a channel nobody gives a shit about.

Edit:
1720807990604.png

"Doubtful," lmao
:story:

At least the chat is no longer empty. That was the entirety of it 70 minutes into the show, btw.
Okay given this development, I suspect he thought he could benefit from all the drama around this guy.

Getting 3 viewers suggests it didn't work.
 
Last edited:
I got curious based on some thread discussion and went to the depths of internet squalor to find Aaron’s a-logs. They are fully convinced he is a lying sociopath that fakes human emotion and comes across as phony because he gets confused about what emotions to mimic. I’m not exaggerating, I’m quoting almost verbatim from comment threads with dozens of people. The Cumia verse is a retard hell I am never revisiting as close as I just got.

So makes complete sense why Nick is courting those people.
 
I expect them to bring that up as a strong arm tactic to bully Nick if he doesn't do what they want. It seems to me to be a potential aggravating factor (in the colloquial sense) that has been underplayed.
The gun charges are a thing they can threaten but you'll never know how it might play out in a trial. The rural areas are more lax on some gun stuff (since he also stored improperly, a state charge they could bring) but the drug + gun charge will hammer him in the eyes of the locals most likely.
More likely than not, the locals will have an urge to hammer him with all the charges given kids are involved regardless of his actual guilt. It'll be hard to stay impartial in such a small town because they'll be gossip if you don't follow the lynch mob, especially if the voir dire is shit. Hell, even in bigger towns we had niggers or muslims (European English: Rapefugee(s)) hang a jury because the accused was of their fellow brethren.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that they could throw the case with his money and connections but Nick doesn't seem to be in the good ole boys club to me.
the gun concern is not just that children can get to them, but that [esp a stressed-out drunken cokehead controlling and argumentative titular head of the family] might just put a gun to very bad use.
The titular murder-suicide chance now went up since he got caught smoking.

As a strong supporter of the 2A, Nick is likely not in safe possession of his firearm. One because he's possibly blasted out on crack (Influenced vs Intoxication, we won't know until trial if at all).
Two because appears that the kids would have access to the master bedroom (High on coke and the kid walks in and finds the gun). Just because Nick's in the room, doesn't mean that a kid could theoretically run in and grab it.
It was a rifle so either a younger kid finds it not knowing the fuck it is or toys around with it (or accidentally pulls the trigger) and shoots themself. The more common one imho is the 16 year old gets in a shouting match with his parents, rushes for the gun and offs himself in a sudden decision to end it. The latter is more common than you think and I have had the unfortunate incidence of having to deal with before. That's why they're kids, their brains aren't developed enough to sometimes realize that blowing your brains out isn't the best solution.
If Nick didn't have kids he could use the loaded firearm as a sex toy (There was a woman who did than and then ND'd into her self... Ouch), or have the gun loaded with the safety off on his chin on the muzzle while sleeping and I couldn't give a shit. I used to sleep with a loaded rifle when I lived in a shithole.
 
Last edited:
Amen. One of the things that Nick has said that made me literally choke on my coffee was him saying she "is a strong lady.'"

1) (And this is petty, but trewwwwwww) she isn't a lady. 2) She is one of the weakest-minded bints on this site, I can't even put into words my contempt for her as a person, and especially a mother. Like I know she doesn't care about my opinion, but any spouse who literally sleeps through their husband's physical, mental, emotional and social decline is beyond contempt. And ditto for Nick. Any spouse that watches their wife sleep their life away instead of getting them help to deal with their emotional and mental problems is likewise beyond contempt. Part of the reason we get married and have wives and husbands is that you have someone around you who can tell you when you are being a massive fuckup.
Nick is a narcissist and nobody on the planet including his wife, not even his god Juju, would have convinced him to stop doing what he was doing. Kayla's a pilled out idiot who probably is too weak and stupid to even approach the problems Nick has - the only right answer would be to leave him. NC is the only solution for people like him.
 
When it gets released, it's gonna make the front page of the site (Null himself put too much work into this for it not to). So unless you're the type of person who only logs into KF every few weeks (happenings drops off after a while), nobody here is gonna miss it.

Those consistently asking about it are annoying. We're on government bureaucratic time. You can't make them move any faster.


Bro, she's an A cup.

Please, for the love of God, seek better tits.


He was aping Ken White (Popehat). Him going with that was actually an insult to White, who was opposed to Vic's lawsuit. White is a more accomplished and knowledgeable attorney though.


Hardin isn't even "Internet people." Which eliminates like 90% of potential problems.
I know that, I’m saying with Warski and PPP constantly hyping up that it’ll be released any day now is what’s causing people to question. That and the insane speed the situation moved at for the first few weeks
 
Two because appears that the kids would have access to the master bedroom (High on coke and the kid walks in and finds the gun). Just because Nick's in the room, doesn't mean that a kid could theoretically run in and grab it.
Nick has claimed that that particular firearm had a trigger lock on it. You can judge that claim how you want.
 
Nick has claimed that that particular firearm had a trigger lock on it. You can judge that claim how you want.
In other words at some point in time that particular firearm had a trigger lock on it. Was this after the police raid? No idea. Was there a significant stretch of time where the firearm was in open at the house and DIDN'T have a trigger lock on it? Probably.
 
Back