Nothing proves how retarded Nick is quite like his insistence that April living in a different building on the same plot of land is April "not living with him". Fooled absolutely nobody and gets proven false immediately. Why does he even bother lying about this shit? Does he think it raises his standing with a judge or jury for his throuple fucktoy to be living in his in-law apartment instead of in the same room as him and his wife?
The problem is that the second home was already being used as a fig leaf to say that April wasn't technically living with them. That situation would have to change if he was going to try a new gambit.
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Not necessarily all that new since it's unclear whether the case plans have had updates since the "plan established date" of June 23rd, but in any case the state filed them with the court on July 9th with no stated indication of what may or may not have changed in the interim. You will be pleased to see that the state isn't falling for that laughable "muh separate mailing address" gambit either, as their humiliating list of preconditions to return of custody includes even "unscheduled" site visits getting full access to "every room" in "both homes" on the overall compound, which must have been awkward for April. Good news for the children perhaps, but unfortunately a sign of very boring times to come now that the spare house is no longer usable for whatever backup stash they were speculated to have set aside there, so the long-awaited relapse arc is now that much less likely. Unless of course there's some third place to go disappear for days with his studio too inaccessible to stream about three huge stories right in his bailiwick.
Anyway there's plenty of other interesting stuff in there worth a read, including but not limited to different KCHHS caseworkers now handling this for some reason rather than that Sweep lady that Nick flat-out accused of perjury on his stream, or Nick's revocation of consent to release of his past hair test results not mattering much now that KCHHS is preconditioning custody on him submitting to not only random "UA's" and "ETG's" looking back a few days but also "hair tests" looking back several months all over again, or KCHHS' frustration with how the Rekietas' "invoking their 5th amendment right" kept being "a barrier to case planning tasks such as drug testing and talking about drug use" needed to move the process along, or Nick's required "mental health assessment" and "chemical use assessment" both being "not completed" after weeks to get such simple tasks done, or KCHHS' new insistence that Nick seethe through "meetings" of a "support network" that sounds akin to twelve-step programs he would tend to despise, or KCHHS' insistence that supervised visitation at a county facility continue for some reason, or other stuff I'm sure I missed in a quick skim, etc. etc. etc. Anyone think Father of the Year could have worked much harder than that to get his kids back sooner?
The naming of two of the kids is noteworthy to me in the Supplemental Discovery Disclosure.

...
My overall question: why are only two of the five kids named? That indicates to me that these two kids had something important to say.
I'd be remiss to speculate, but if you pore over the attached closely the five respective case plans do have some differences distinguishing two from the other three, which may shed some light on (or at least invite speculation on) why the county apparently found those two more concerning. Thoughts?
I still don't completely understand it, but this was a rather unusual brady violation in that some rando guy sent in material to the police during another case which is said to be evidence but may or may not be actual evidence.
Not that anything will stop Nick from doing the last one... He is going to skinwalk as Alec for the next few weeks.
Wait a minute, so wouldn't a natural takeaway from the Baldwin outcome be that every single time any given random internet schizo ever contacted KCSO with bogus leads about Nick's case, the state would have to disclose those communications to the defense in full, up to and including copies of this entire thread for each and every time that KCSO was sent a link to it, lest Nick bring up failure to disclose at a critical moment after a jury's already been empaneled? Hell, even reaching out to friends to have them bring about such a scenario would be just the sort of strategy to make Nick pat himself on the back for being oh-so-clever. All the Sean-vs-TSWG drama that resurfaced this weekend comes to mind, but since she denies her "alleged" contact with KCSO about all sorts of supposed proof that Nick was up, it's just being brought up as a purely hypothetical illustrative example of how a Baldwin/Brady scenario could be orchestrated by a defendant on purpose, in theory. Surely Nick could never have done such a thing, because no such "tips" from random internet people show up in the state's disclosures thus far and surely they'd never forget to include them in the next round.