Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Angry Crustacean]

The charge isn't DOING drugs, it is possessing them. The state has to prove that she was in possession of the drugs that they found in someone else's bedroom. How do you suppose they can prove that beyond a reasonable doubt?

Positive drug tests from the time of the arrest is evidence of drug possession in some capacity, the unencrypted texts from Aaron mentioning drugs, and whatever she said in interviews with the police.

The prosecutor would probably have no issue trotting her in front of a jury to see a coke-bloat addict and try for a conviction with circumstantial evidence. And if she takes a plea deal and provides testimony against Nick, even better.

 

[Harm]

Positive drug tests from the time of the arrest is evidence of drug possession in some capacity, the unencrypted texts from Aaron mentioning drugs, and whatever she said in interviews with the police.

The prosecutor would probably have no issue trotting her in front of a jury to see a coke-bloat addict and try for a conviction with circumstantial evidence. And if she takes a plea deal and provides testimony against Nick, even better.

To add onto this: By establishing that she lived there, which she did, and by pointing out the contents of her wallet being literally covered in the drugs, which they were. I'm not sure if that necessarily meets the legal standards set by case law and the statutes, but to a layman it's obvious enough facts to establish that she was in possession of those drugs too.

 

[Goatchoker]

To add onto this: By establishing that she lived there, which she did, and by pointing out the contents of her wallet being literally covered in the drugs, which they were. I'm not sure if that necessarily meets the legal standards set by case law and the statutes, but to a layman it's obvious enough facts to establish that she was in possession of those drugs too.

Isn’t the argument against her being charged for in possession of, the same as someone saying “these aren’t my pants!!!!” While getting arrested with drugs in said pants?

 

[Harm]

Isn’t the argument against her being charged or in possession of, the same as someone saying “these aren’t my pants!!!!” While getting arrested with drugs in said pants?

Pretty much. It's the nigger-brained attitude that they can outsmart the people who do this for a living with word games. "That depends on what the definition of 'of' is!"

 

[Oxyjen]

I do wonder if the charge has been made after further interviews with the rekeitas.

It might be that “possession” hinges on whether she lived there or not, so it comes back to the differing live-in nanny story. Did Nick concede that she was in fact living there, and not “just visiting”?

The facts may have been initially confusing, if they asked if she had a room there. The answer would have been “no”. But they didn’t realize until later that she was sharing the bed, so that is arguably also her room where the drugs were found.

 

[Fish Maggot]

Spoiler: Off-Topic Aleisha Sweep Conspiracy Theory - Warning: Image Heavy

Apologies in advance, the flickr links refused to archive, but I have attached images that are relevant from the links.
Additional note: While searching for links, I found a post by user "八岐大蛇" (which I cannot seem to tag, sorry!) that touches on this also.

Out of curiosity, searching Kayla's name brings up a flickr account that appears to have been completely ground zero'd in terms of content (why I think that instead of an unused account, I'll get into).

What remains, however, is her following, with a familiar name appearing: One Aleisha Sweep.

Spoiler: Ebidence

As we know, Aleisha Sweep is the name of a government employee that appeared on some of the police reports, though the spelling varies depending on where you look.
Why, then, does her name come up in this fifteen-year-old Flickr account? And why are their following lists so similar?

Spoiler: Following

Admittedly, I know nothing of Flickr etiquette or anything else in regards to how/why/what people post and comment, but one common theme that I've noticed, is the way that others comment on the photos.

Spoiler: Comments

To me, it reads as though they were all classmates who made these Flickr accounts for assignments. This may further be supported by the fact that some of the accounts have albums listed with names such as "Project" or "Assignment", followed by a number.

Spoiler: Albums

If so, it would put both Kayla and Aleisha in the same circle for however long that course was going on for.
I assume she also had content on there once for the class, but nuked it likely at the advice of McBalldo - that, or the images have been made private.
Of course, this is all merely speculation until proven in a court of law.


Is there something more to be gleaned from this? Maybe. I have no basis beyond the above information, but I wonder if the contempt that Nick had for the named Aleisha Sweep also had something to do with a previous encounter. Perhaps Kayla had something of her own to say when it was Aleisha Sweep assigned to their case.

Or is this all some technicolour bullshit served fresh from the FanfictionFarms? You decide!

 

[Angry Crustacean]

I do wonder if the charge has been made after further interviews with the rekeitas.

It might be that “possession” hinges on whether she lived there or not, so it comes back to the differing live-in nanny story. Did Nick concede that she was in fact living there, and not “just visiting”?

Aaron gets called in as a witness to verify his videos that they were all sleeping in the same bed and is asked what he understood their living arrangement to be.

 

[BathTubShine]

Funny(and weird) how Baldo has been screaming on the interwebs that he was outside and not in posession of any drugs and that state has to prove that coke was his and other parts of his soon to be defence.
Now you have living fleshlight and gollum at the bedroom with 26 grams of coke and April's credit cards on a coke plate with a smaller vial of coke directly on top of the cards and a snort tube. Oh and her purse somewhere between master bedroom and the drug den toilet.
Cucky saying April is a friend visiting and Gollum blabbering to cops that April is a Live-In nanny.
So one has to wonder will Nick just try to pin the drugs on the other 2 members of the cult, and do they accept the consequences for their cult leaer?

REMEMBER KIDS - Always talk to the police, it will help your case tremendously!

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

My and others issues with Nick’s interpretation of Christianity is that if you present your opinions about the Bible then others will come to discuss those beliefs. Especially when Nick whines about how others “project a morality” onto him.

He also comes off like a misogynist whenever he talks about women. The Bible stories especially. He sounds like a gleeful incel about the “wives obey your husband” bit while ignoring the rest of Ephesians 5 when talking to someone like Megan Fox (not toe thumbs Megan Fox) when he was still putting on airs.

I can only imagine how much his Church Group hated him when he tried defending his Bible Study. I guarantee he was like a creepy uncle.

 

[Vibralldo]

I do wonder if the charge has been made after further interviews with the rekeitas.

It might be that “possession” hinges on whether she lived there or not, so it comes back to the differing live-in nanny story. Did Nick concede that she was in fact living there, and not “just visiting”?

The facts may have been initially confusing, if they asked if she had a room there. The answer would have been “no”. But they didn’t realize at the time she was sharing the bed.

If only people tried to tell Nick that publicly talking about his case and acting degenerate would fuck his case up

Guess there's nothing else Nick can do and he has to keep publicly swinging and doing drugs

 

[AnOminous]

I would urge anyone interested in this aspect of Nick’s degeneracy to read up on cult leaders like Charlie Manson and David Koresh. You’ll see a lot more of Nick in them than you might have expected.

One major difference is he's a complete cuck. Absolutely nobody respects a cuck.

He's going to cope with the fact that tattoos aren't literally, technically permanent. Skin grafting is a thing. Any little niggle for this skeleton freak to cope and sneed. I suggest a microplane cheese grater for his horrendous balldosnek.

>get busted
>go to jail
>have house tossed
>face felonies
>lose kids
I BETTER GET MUH GAY SNEK TATTOO COLORED IN!

Always there taking care of the priorities!

 

[Harm]

though the spelling varies depending on where you look

According to voting records and gov't salary listings, the Flickr spelling is correct and that probably is her. The court documents similarly made the i and e mistake with the Rekieta's names.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

If only people tried to tell Nick that publicly talking about his case and acting degenerate would fuck his case up

Guess there's nothing else Nick can do and he has to keep publicly swinging and doing drugs

will DSP outlive another one, chat?

 

[TurdThrower]

I don't see anything at all they could charge Aaron with related to Nick and company.

Maybe the child neglect stuff, but even that seems like a stretch since Aaron was not there during the raid. Personally think he’s in the clear but NAL.

 

[Vibralldo]

will DSP outlive another one, chat?

Implying Nick isn't a walking corpse

 

[Harm]

Maybe the child neglect stuff, but even that seems like a stretch since Aaron was not there during the raid. Personally think he’s in the clear but NAL.

Legal Mindset said that he'd heard Aaron was going to be charged, but then walked it back hard once people started sharing the clip of him saying it. I highly doubt they're going to charge him too, but this revelation goes to show how it's not a done deal either way.

 

[Oxyjen]

Always talk to the police. After all, they aren’t very smart so you can easily pull the wool over their eyes and talk your way out of any serious trouble. Keeping quiet just makes you look guilty!

 

[Ethan Ralph Is 5'1"]

Rekieta only started streaming like this again in order to be able to prove to the court that he's a public figure, and releasing the bodycam footage would be to the detriment to his income etc. (as per Minnesota law)
He's been trying to work them and prevent it from being released this whole time.
He wouldn't have given a shit about his streams otherwise.
What a fucking faggot.
His spiteful Bible reading streams probably comes from that as well, since he loves playing these little games.
There's nothing he loves more than deceiving people while they're none the wiser.

 

[Strix454]

The charge isn't DOING drugs, it is possessing them. The state has to prove that she was in possession of the drugs that they found in someone else's bedroom. How do you suppose they can prove that beyond a reasonable doubt?

Its constructive possession they have to prove. And they have most of the factors:

- She was in the bedroom when the warrant was served on the house.
- Her credit cards were not only in the bedroom but next to the drugs (if not covered in drugs) and presumably used to prepare the drugs.
- Her purse was near the bedroom. That wasn't mentioned by accident in the report. It will be a factor used against her.
- To anyone in the bedroom, the presence of the drugs and drug-related equipment was obvious.

Her credit cards in the bedroom next to the drugs is really bad for her on this charge. It connects her to them in a way that its really difficult (if not impossible) for her to explain away.

She has the best chance of any of the three in terms of beating the charge in front of a jury, but her chances of beating it are still very low.

 

[Maude Snew]

Jesus, that is a solid sixhead Cokey Crackets has. He should copy the late Niki Lauda and sell ad space up there.

Pretty likely that he copies that part where he crashes his car and get burned heavily the way Nick drives high and drunk in a high powered car he can't handle in weather it's not made to handle. Least now the kids won't be with him.