Ava Chris Tyson / Christopher Stephen Tyson / “Christine Tyson” / “Chris The Meme God” - MrBeast’s litigious troon sidekick & divorcé. Lolicon-loving narcissistic queer

If she wasn't still willingly letting her freak pedophile ex-husband around her child I might feel some pitty for her, but I assume she's getting massive child support checks and that's why she's been so quiet.
It is really hard to take custody away from a father, especially when he hasn't been charged with anything. We don't know what the child support arrangement is because none of that information is public or has been discovered, yet. We don't know if she's "willingly" letting Chris around his son or not. She might not want him around, but if he has custody she legally can't keep his son away from him.
I'm assuming that she's being so quiet because posting receipts, spilling the tea, guesting on podcasts and going full internet-bloodsports-gladiator-mode when you have a child and are possibly involved in a custody situation that might change, is really, really stupid. She's putting her son first by keeping him out of the public eye.
 
You can see in realtime how all of these people are slowly reading the room and parroting everyone else as criticizing Chris becomes socially acceptable. All of these fucking YouTube commentators have no spines. Reputation over the truth all the time for these people.
anyone who isn't changing with the times is getting immediate pushback now too, it's obvious that so many people felt strongly against all this troonery bullshit and just felt too afraid to come out against it, but now that the winds have shifted it's nowhere near as taboo to say "you shouldn't support cutting off little 5 year old timmy's dick because he said he liked that lady's dress."
 
It is really hard to take custody away from a father, especially when he hasn't been charged with anything. We don't know what the child support arrangement is because none of that information is public or has been discovered, yet. We don't know if she's "willingly" letting Chris around his son or not. She might not want him around, but if he has custody she legally can't keep his son away from him.
I'm assuming that she's being so quiet because posting receipts, spilling the tea, guesting on podcasts and going full internet-bloodsports-gladiator-mode when you have a child and are possibly involved in a custody situation that might change, is really, really stupid. She's putting her son first by keeping him out of the public eye.
This.

I have no idea why people are acting like she's this awful bitch just sitting idly by and collecting child support money instead of helping her son when we have no evidence that's the case. Judging by her background, and the fact that she divorced Chris immediately when he trooned out, it's almost certainly the opposite.

Now if it does come out that she is actually a cunt doing all that, then sure. Hate away. But people continuing to want to be pissed at this sheltered Christian tradwife for her ex's behavior, and for things she hasn't even been proven to have done yet is fucking retarded.
 
I have no idea why people are acting like she's this awful bitch just sitting idly by and collecting child support money instead of helping her son when we have no evidence that's the case.
Why is "Kiwi Farms was right again" always so true? Because we care about evidence, and place more importance on evidence than assumptions.
Currently there's no evidence that she's getting massive child support checks from Chris. Their child support arrangement is not public knowledge. She's also employed, so that's evidence against her solely living off child support payments.
There's no evidence that she's "willingly" letting Chris around their child because we don't know how she feels about the matter. If a judge says a father gets to see his kid, then the father gets to see his kid, wether or not the mother thinks it's a good idea.
"Reeee, reee, she's a gold-digging whore who's failing to protect her son even though she legally can't keep her ex-husband away from his biological child" is an assumption that currently lacks evidence.
Will more evidence be revealed in the future? Possibly. Do we have that evidence now? No.
 
He cheated on his wife to have fag sex, tbh that makes my blood boil.

99% positive this closeted freak wouldn’t use protection, and gay sex carries a MUCH higher risk of STD’s and most of all AIDS.

All she did was (assumedly) be faithful to her freak husband, he could have brought her home AIDS.

Straight to the wall.
on top of that he put her son in drag and sexualized him to his pedo friend group
 
  • Like
Reactions: LimeRikki
If she wasn't still willingly letting her freak pedophile ex-husband around her child I might feel some pitty for her, but I assume she's getting massive child support checks and that's why she's been so quiet. I have no respect for some woman who puts a paycheck over the well being of her son.
Well yeah, you assume. Who knows what's going on? Maybe she really is as motherly as Lady Rackets is, maybe this terrible and actually narcissistic (as per his sister) troon is threatening devastating legal action that HE can afford if she even tries anything.

What can she do anyway? As has been explained however many pages back he has custody, and that's about it. As per the law she doesn't really have any material that could decisively challenge his rights, and even if she did he would make it quite literally hell to pay. He looks (and well, he acts) like the type to do so.

Let's dial down on the torches and pitchforks a lil, thus far this woman is an unknown variable in all of this.
 
It is really hard to take custody away from a father, especially when he hasn't been charged with anything. We don't know what the child support arrangement is because none of that information is public or has been discovered, yet. We don't know if she's "willingly" letting Chris around his son or not. She might not want him around, but if he has custody she legally can't keep his son away from him.
I'm assuming that she's being so quiet because posting receipts, spilling the tea, guesting on podcasts and going full internet-bloodsports-gladiator-mode when you have a child and are possibly involved in a custody situation that might change, is really, really stupid. She's putting her son first by keeping him out of the public eye.
Someone should email chris's ex with proof of him being a danger to her son so that way she can sue to block him from vistiation
 
it's interesting to see the calls for cooler heads to prevail when the farms speculates pretty often. all this talk of evidence is just funny. what evidence did people have to think chris was a freak before the logs dropped? shadman art that he hung up in his house that he shared with his wife who also saw it every day?

the cuntguarding is entertaining to read. at this point it's a safer bet to wait until she proves she wasn't in on it/permissive of it some how.
 
sheltered
I don't think she's sheltered. She might not know the ins-and-outs of autogynephilia, but most people don't.
She's employed and has a degree and presumably files taxes. No SAHM here.
I have no idea why people are acting like she's this awful bitch
Katie is pretty and blonde so we can't say that her being an ugly bitch drove her husband away. Katie is a licensed physician with a job so we can't call her a dumb whore who's stealing Chris's hard-earned money. Katie gave Chris a son so we can't go all Henry VIII all over everybody's ass and call her an empty egg carton. She's not overweight, so yelling about fat is right out. She's divorced, so we can't say that she's an evil collaborator who stayed because she's evil and stupid. She seems to maintain close relationships with her parents and grandfather, so we can't scream about fatherless behavior. But I'm sure if we all put our heads together, we can find a way to blame a woman for this man's behavior.
Someone should email chris's ex with proof of him being a danger to her son so that way she can sue to block him from vistiation
Please do not. Observe and report, never intervene. We are not an autistic illuminati and all that.
 
This is a morbid and disgusting question to ask but

Do you think Chris raped or sexually abused his son tucker while he was visting at the house?
Yes.

I believe he absolutely did, with the worst of it being perpetrated when Tucker was aged 0-4y. In all likelihood, he made his moves during the years when Tucker was too young to build concrete memories or even comprehend what was happening to him, making his abominable behavior easier to cover up.

Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean that Chris anally raped Tucker with his penis- I think Chris (like MJ with his alarms and secret room) had the foresight that discretion was a must, considering his physician ex-wife being in the picture. Any injuries would’ve been an instant red flag, so he had to be “subtle” enough with his abuse as to not create tell-tale evidence of said abuse. Ergo, he used his pinky instead of his penis, and probably snuck in little “tastings” during bath times and diaper changes. Maybe they slept in the same bed, with Tucker being totally naked. When potty training time came, Chris likely took an extremely active role, where he insisted on being present for every visit to the john. Knowing Tucker was getting older and older, Chris understood that these were some of the last times he’d be able to satisfy his voyeuristic tendencies/touch his son’s genitals without Tucker thinking it was too abnormal.

And remember, Chris had his own house in which to carry out these atrocities. A safe space, if you will, with plenty of privacy and nobody around to walk in on or interrupt him. For a sex-crazed pedophile like Chris, the opportunity was likely too good to pass up.

As much as it hurts to think about, the likelihood of this repulsive troonfreak NOT having done anything even slightly untoward to his son probably sits at 0%. And that’s a painful realization to have.


Marrying a good wholesome Christian girl also helps provide a shroud of 'goodness' to him, makes him appear decent to his family and friends, helps his cover.
Not only that, devout Christian girls are very easy to manipulate, which was a bonus for Chris.

It’s easy to defuse arguments/get them to look the other way on many things by simply pulling out the Bible like you actually care, and twisting a few scriptures around to rationalize your actions. A little christfagging, even if it’s insincere at heart and has shitty motives behind it, goes a long way with those girls.
 
Last edited:
Offtopic
Compelling writeup on early tranny psychology
The Tranny Takedown.png
 
Do you think people would forget this scandal in 10 years so mr beast can run for president?
Depends on how much more shit is exposed, but probably. People have very short attention spans and people as big and as rich as Mr. Beast have a way of sweeping things under the rug. Parents dont pay attention or care about what their kids are doing online, they just trust youtube to not let their kids get brainwashed by pedophiles (lol) and most people who are subscribed to Mr. Beast probably have no idea any of this is even happening. Youtube doesnt push "controversial" commentary channels to the same audience that subscribes to goyslop trash like Mr. Beast. Unless it gets plastered all over boomer news outlets like FOX for months straight i doubt anything at all will come of this unfortunately.
 
What was a naturally-occurring thing with YouTube watchers got amplified by the bots that YouTube uses, forcing all YouTubers to now do this if they want to have any hope of getting their content promoted.
Whoever made that change to the algorithm that made it mandatory to put a soyface on a thumbnail in order to get any kind of promotion - fucking die in a fire please.
Soy-face.png
 
Assuming this isn't bait, I don't want to hear another word out of you faggots that say "water marking your shit isn't worth it/doesn't do anything".
Not all watermarks are equal. "Original raws at x, archived and analysed by KF" is based and useful, "PROPERTY OF KIWI FARMS" feels like clout chasing.
 
it's interesting to see the calls for cooler heads to prevail when the farms speculates pretty often. all this talk of evidence is just funny. what evidence did people have to think chris was a freak before the logs dropped? shadman art that he hung up in his house that he shared with his wife who also saw it every day?

the cuntguarding is entertaining to read. at this point it's a safer bet to wait until she proves she wasn't in on it/permissive of it some how.
Yeah the cuntguarding is insane on this site. Anyone who said anything bad about balldos wife when the story first broke was told that she was just a helpless innocent woman and it was all his fault and that she was probably brainwashed and abused. Women always claim they're just as strong/smart/capable as men but get protected and defended by every woman and simp on the planet when it comes to taking any kind of responsibility for anything ever. Inb4 100 MATI and dumb stickers. Bring em on niggers.
 
Back