Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
I learned one thing.

Well, I knew it already.

All of you are retarded. This community is retarded. You guys have no concept of how to deal with things you don't like and that is absolutely fascinating considering what sort of a forum this is. I don't know how we ended up with a population that is 50% transgender/lgbt-"ally", but it has slowly rotted away at what the very notion of a lolcow is. We've become Imgur-lite, a shitty, reactionary website filled with easily offended prudes who can't even stomach something they don't like being on the same domain name as where they post.

You people are so fucking easy to troll, all one has to do is make an alt account and say something disagreeable to end up with a 400 reply thread in under 12 hours. This has happened numerous times. Introman isn't here to troll, but he knows how preposterously easy it is to offend the LGBT community. He's a contributor to RoK, a troll website, which is the parent company that owns Reaxxion, also a troll website. I've said this multiple fucking times and nobody believes it because you'd all rather cry about dumb shit.
Is this a copypasta or did I miss something?
 
Constructive possession requires proving intent to exercise control over the contraband.
No, they only need knowledge of it and ability to control it. If you know there are illegal drugs in your medicine cabinet and you have access/control over it, that's constructive possession. The knowledge of it is the only state of mind required. Intention is not required.

"Intent" would imply that both Nick and Kayla could claim the other was the one with addiction and they had no intent to possess. That's exactly the opposite of "constructive possession" and why both are charged and both can be found guilty.
 
Not to seem like I'm encouraging crime, but if some awful person did manage to record the trial and it ended up here, what are the consequences? Especially if it's something like a hidden body cam that only captures the audio, so you couldn't identify the recorder.
Courts have metal detectors and airport style X-ray machines. ANYTHING you try and hide on your body they will find. If you tape some stupid shit to your body like a wire they will find it and you will be prosecuted.

Enjoy prison, stalker child.
 
I can't believe myself I drew 4(!) pictures about Rekieta (and he is not even my favorite btw).

I've made a few variations, maybe the other dialogue bubble is unnecessary, but here it is:

rackets-maybe-she-is-a-diaper-fetishist3.pngrackets-maybe-she-is-a-diaper-fetishist2.pngrackets-maybe-she-is-a-diaper-fetishist.png
Have fun.
 
ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG!

Seeing as how everyone is announcing what they will do then I would like to announce that I will NOT be attending the courts on account of the fact that I have better things to do. Even if I didn't, I can add nothing to the proceeding nor would I be of any use in recording the court. As such, I'm happy to leave this to people better suited to the task.

I'm aware that this doesn't help Null's argument about recording the court but I'd recommend that if you find yourself in my useless position then don't attended the court. Wait patiently for info to be dropped on laugh in the comfort of you own home as I will.
 
I wish I was surprised that not looking like a total retard in court requires this much discussion here.
Sir, do you know where you are? Have you seen our average user at work? Well, I'm sure you have read both the pages preceding AND following your pertinent statement so by now I'm sure the gentleman has a grasp of what the Farms entail.

IMA GO TO THE CIURT N DOX ALL YEW KIWIS N RAISE MAH MIDDLE FINGERS AT Y'ALL AND THE CIURT YEAH THAT'S MAH FUCKIN LEGUHL MINDSET CUZ I AINT GOIN BACK TO JAIL!! FUCK YOUR CANDY ASS HIGH-O COUNTY, BISH!
If there's anything amazing that this thread has produced lately it's the Ralphamale defence. Ralph just crashes your trial with no survivors as a detractor, you get off scot-free. Lol.
 
I highly doubt his lawyer would risk his license to practice law by endorsing a letter he did not pen.
Nick was angry with his original lawyer because she worked on her own initiative and didn't make the absurd objections that her client demanded, he likely shopped around for a lawyer who would see things 100% his way and act as little more than his mouthpiece. Nick is the one in control here, he's the one pulling every string, his lawyer is simply repeating what Nick tells him to. That doesn't mean the lawyer hasn't bought into Nick's bullshit, but in the end it's still Nick's bullshit.
 
Yes the important things about these filings is that they show that Nick's lawyer is also a window licking moron who cannot write a motion to save his life.

All he had to do was write a brief paragraph or two citing the rule. This is highly effective, one, its short so people actually read it, two, its correct, and you just fucking win, and three, you make Nool and his lawyer look like a sperg for not reading the rule properly.

Instead they wrote a 15 page spergout about irrelevant shit that is immediately going to have them on the judge's bad side.
 
Question for the court people here, how common is it for people to court watch?
Hi have an aunt who works for a courthouse. She’s told me that a lot of retired people like to sit in the courtroom all day as it’s the only source of consistent entertainment for them.
Courts a matter of public record so it’s your legal right to attend so long as you’re not disruptive and/or the case doesn’t have special protections
 
No-one is saying it so I’ll say it: April and Kayla are planning to (justifiably) pin it all on Nick.
It think you are giving way too much credit to drug addled whores. This applies to anyone who think Nick is also engaged in some Machiavellian attempt to pin it on April or Kayla.
 
Ya yawn just talking of buying court transcript for that hearing, last hearing didn’t go so well for few party. Way Josh asking even one chill and don,t go full retard in court. In all
For fuck's sake use an app to translate your posts into comprehensible English.
 
It think you are giving way too much credit to drug addled whores. This applies to anyone who think Nick is also engaged in some Machiavellian attempt to pin it on April or Kayla.
I could see the latter, though. He would never be very brazen, very direct about it or try to pin it ALL on the both of them. But I can very well see Nick gaslighting them into agreeing that there was this or that about the snow that's their fault, in a way that fucks them over and saves his ass just a little more.

Nick is a remorseless narcissist who's incapable of ever thinking he's done anything wrong. If he could get away with it by blaming it all on some side piece like April he would if he had no further use for her as a cum receptacle. But that's not the case, and she has enough leverage on him so the Balldo stays on.
 
Back