Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 53 24.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 72 33.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 24 11.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 66 30.3%

  • Total voters
    218
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Blaming Ty is retarded. Chupp is an absolutely blisteringly incompetent judge to the upteenth degree and is a man who should've never been placed in a robe. He's a terrible judge who deserves to be fired if it were at all possible. He did not do his job and just looked for every excuse to throw away any case that touched his desk so he can go golfing. He did not give a shit.
Those are not mutually exclusive. Without Ty botching a routine administrative task and then withdrawing virtually all of his evidence, there was nothing left to appeal. Even then, it took the appeals court over a year to choke out some excuse for upholding Chupp's own botch job. It was really a clusterfuck of failure on all sides, with Samuel Johnson the only legal professional involved who didn't disgrace the profession.
wouldn't that mean no one can be called as a witness if they claim self-incrimination?

Sounds like a great get out of jail card.
They can give you immunity. Or convict without your testimony. Also, if you're already convicted of it, you can't claim self-incrimination for something you're already not in jeopardy over.

It certainly beats the tyrannical British bullshit that it was enacted in response to.
 
So the DUI Guy thing is what caused the initial rift in Lawtube. Nick did a stream where he talked about the whole thing and how he didn't like groups and drama, but looking back at what we know now he clearly loved the drama and wanted to farm it.

What caused the major break was when Nick got banned from youtube LegalBytes and Hoeg Law did not back Nick and basically seemed to think that since he broke youtube's rules he should have been kicked off. I think Kurt was on the stream when that happened and did come to Nick's defense. This event led to Legal Mindset becoming chief balldoguard for awhile. He wanted explicit loyalty pledges to Nick from other lawtube members.

I believe after this happened Nick did go scorched earth on LegalBytes and I think revealed she struggle sessioned Legal Mindset at her wedding over Nick.

Take out the mentions of lawtube, and anyone reading this would think this is describing a bunch of teenage idiots, not middle-aged people with advanced degrees. (Who also happen to be idiots.)
 
His biggest selling point is his expertise. Facing 20+ years in prison destroys that. Also consider that with no real interesting cases, that makes him have to use his Dick Masterson impression, and hes not very good at that.
I'm talking about legalbytes, not rekieta.
Did you quote the wrong post?
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Blaming Ty is retarded
I disagree, Ty made a lot of stupid mistakes that were his own damn fault.
- The gigabrain strategy of dumping thousands of pages of documents into the record was his idea, and it just annoyed all the judges.
- The gigabrain strategy of filing everything at the last nanosecond also just annoyed everyone and made some of his filings late.
- The Ron Toye deposition was hilarious for us but ultimately a waste of time. Ty never bothered getting the Twitter tweets authenticated (subpoenaing an original copy from Twitter or whatever) and he had no backup plan for Toye going full retard on the stand.
- He didn't have an immediate, simple answer for Chupp when asked "What are Vic's damages?"
- He didn't know how to preserve his objections for appeal without annoying the judge
- The notary screwup was of course rank incompetence
- He spent his own time bloviating on Nick's show while leaving his staff to make court submissions that were late and full of unprofessional spelling and formatting errors
- And he was fat before he got Nick's AIDS.
 
Shortass rundown: Legal Bytes and Hoeg Law disavowed DUI Guy for his over-the-top reaction to testimony in the Depp Trial. Nick and his cabal didn't. At some point Nick was talking shit, and Legal Bytes responded with a prerecorded response that was premiered, so it looked live on YouTube. I believe she privated the vid afterward, because the chat was full of trolling. It was a fun time.
FYI: Just because Nick is a cunt, doesn’t mean that Legal Bytes can’t also be a cunt.

Because she was. Money and viewership got to her head, and she decided she was the administrator of lawtube inc. lawyers collective.

DUIGuy was making faces during the Depp trial and I believe she made some comments about how that did not fit the "decorum of the court" or something. I think she banned him from her channel, he may have shared private messages prior however, it was a weird and childish thing for her to worry about honestly

Legal Bytes decided that DUIguy wasn’t worthy of the Lawtube stamp of approval, mostly because he laughed along with everyone else, when he was inside the courtroom.

Being a total thundercunt, she didn’t just softban him from HER channel, but also told other lawtubers not to have him on.

It was a very junior high kinda drama. Just junior high with hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table in superchats.
 
Last edited:
It's not just about training, I don't know about Minnesota, but where I'm from the only people who can give testimony as to someone being drunk from their behavior alone are police. Others who give evidence would instead have to say they were behaving like they were drunk.

This alone is not enough to convict someone, of say drink driving, without additional evidence from testing, but the point is that it allows the police to then use that as a basis to require a breathalyzer test.

The point is, it serves as a bit of a legal fiction. Plus, the standard of evidence for the warrant isn't reasonable doubt - it's basically preponderance of evidence, and for that purpose, training on these sorts of behaviors would suffice even if imperfect.
Sure, and that is probably good enough for an EMT to deliver meds or a cop patting down a public intoxication case on the sidewalk.
I can elaborate on the EMS side.
Cops tend to do the bare minimum training outside SWAT paramedics so that's EMR if at all (They don't wanna bother). Very basic retard stuff so they wouldn't know too much about seizures or strokes.

EMS is not allowed to "diagnose" (This is a touchy subject), we're allowed to treat according to standing orders of a doctor who signed off on protocol, the state's standing directives, and under the medical direction some poor shmuck ER Physician on call that day. In other words, compared to a doctor, we prescribe (not under our name, technically under the Medical Director, an MD) very limited medications, we cannot treat outside of our scope of practice (Eg: Diagnose a brain tumor versus a guy's hand being amputated) nor in a manners not-approved. In most states EMS may not certify a person is dead. You'd have to have a really good justification to deviate from protocol and usually if you don't, call the Medical director lest you get assfucked liability wise. Do medics do nonstandard shit all the time? Yes, sometimes everyone turns a blind eye if it's not insane like chopping off someone's arm because they nicked their finger, or just because the standard is outdated. Some EMS organizations I wouldn't trust to suck dick for cock if they were a troon.

For example. An EMT-B is not allowed to prescribe or start IVs (without other licensing usually, depends on state). If I, a theoretical EMT-B, am the only responder in say, 2 hour range (unlikely) of someone with bloodloss because our paramedic got killed dodging stray (coke) bullets (an experience only Brazilians or Ukranians can relate to) from Balldoman while trying to start an IV on a bloodbag, I could call up the medical director (after it's safe for me) and go "Hey, I just lost my paramedic and I need guidance because helps 2+ hours away and this guy is 100% going to die with my current scope of practice". To which the MD might tell me to do something I would not be normally authorized to do.
Hint: Just because we aren't allow doesn't mean we don't know how. I have started many IVs because the hospital/Ambu was short staffed. YMMV

Also in our paperwork we wouldn't just write "Mr. Slave showed signs consistent of alcohol intoxication", it is too vague. But we also aren't cops and hate paperwork too, so we would ideally write "Mr. SLAVE showed ataxia, slurred speech, alongside the smell of alcohol in their breath alongside a prolapsed rectum from anal fisting, while MR. VANDARKHOME had a latex glove on his left hand stuck inside the rectum of Mr. SLAVE while having 300 bucks inside his jabroni outfit causing friction burns on his testicles".
If the lawyer asks "Mr. JOCKSTRAP, you fucking retard, what the fuck does this indicate?" My response would be "What's written in my run report is what are the signs/symptoms I observed".

tl;dr: In short, EMS doesn't get paid enough (Like 10-20 USD/hour lmao) to get sued for malpractice, toss the responsibility to the RN and MDs.

I'm sure our retired mod can explain the legal implications of this better than I can.
The one I'm surprised about is Faran. I really expected her to come out and demand validation since now there's no doubt Nick really told her what she leaked back then. What's more likely, that she got her life together and is staying out of internet drama or that she died from alcohol poisoning?
Too busy trying to have alcohol fermenting in her vagina to sate her addiction?
especially Ron Coleman, they would always try to walk back jokes made by other or give "well we shouldn't joke like that..." statements. It was incredibly annoying
The other part that really did her in was that she threw down the gauntlet at Nick and Legul Mindeset to come on and "debate" (read: Fancy IBS) and they just went on their own show to shit talk her and she cried like a little bitch, and her .mil husband went full gravy seal pasta on commenters.
 
As far as I can tell the timeline is this:
April is Mirandized, response is an unequivocal statement asserting that right (I would like to speak with my lawyer present), handed off to another LEO, LEO asks a question and she responds.

:really:"I didn't say that."

On May 23, 2024, exterior to Defendant’s home, April Imholte was Mirandized by Deputy Braness.44 When asked if she would like to say anything, April Imholte told Deputy Braness, “I would like to remain silent until my lawyer’s present.”45 Deputy Braness ceased any attempt to question April Imholte further.46 Approximately four minutes late, Deputy Braness headed towards the house to retrieve a pair of shoes for April Imholte. Deputy Baumann took control of April Imholte.47 Deputy Braness headed back towards Defendant’s home, when he about-faced and told Deputy Pomplun and Deputy Baumann that “I did Miranda and asked for a lawyer.”48 Despite this affirmative notice that April Imholte had invoked her Miranda rights, Deputy Pomplun conducted a custodial interrogation of her to elicit incriminatory statements, by telling her side of the story.49

I understand why you would think it says that, because it's written in such a way for you to think it's saying that. But look at that paragraph - it has direct quotations and lots of details about April invoking the 5th and the cops communicating that they understood that, but a single sentence with no quotes or details about the "custodial interrogation". They're hand waving over that because it probably wasn't the cop continuing to ask questions despite April invoking her rights, it was probably April just talking on her own. You can't take Nick's/White's conclusions/assertions at face value.

We all know how stupid and full of bad faith the portion of the motion regarding the video is, you have to read the rest of the document knowing it's just as bad faith. "Deputy Pomplun conducted a custodial interrogation of her" should be read as if you know it's as stupid as "Deputy Pomplun lied because he said he watched MY video, which was impossible because it was private (not removed)"
 
He saved Vic by recommending Ty Beard, Nick's friend who lost the case by fucking up a simple filing and fled, leaving Vic with a $300k debt to his accusers.

It ended up being about double that.

Nick may be as much of a moron as he's trying to sound like but I think he'll talk a big game until it's hopeless, then take any decent non-jail deal. This has some serious humor value too because you know he'll be seething up a storm and people will constantly taunt him about pussying out and licking the jackboots.

He seethe about thr Balldo, being a cuck, and his children testing positive for cocaine. How much more can he handle?

I know the thread concensus is that Nick is taking it to trial, but I still think he's just trying to get it all thrown out. If he can't, he'll get whatever he can thrown out and use that as the starting point for a deal. The worst case scenario in Nick's mind will be to have all his shit dragged out into public, including redacted bodycam. He'll cope about pleading being what's best for his family etc.

I disagree. I do not believe the consensus is that he will take it to trial, but that he is DUMB ENOUGH to do so.

I believe he will plea out after all his tricks fail, and then rage when his deal is not as good as any prior offer was. He will sulk for a while, then accept it, and finally seethe on stream for weeks.

Even when his daughter was found to have consumed cocaine under his care, I knew it was wheat that was the real problem! THE GUBMENT TOOK OUR WHEAT

Your Honour! It was just wheat! I was trying to make fresh bread for a nice meal for for my family and I got wheat on my nose! Do you know how HARD it is to provide for 5 children and be a streamer! Of course not!

This isn't correct, the act of taking drugs is a crime in 12 states. This is a great example of Nick being busy enjoying Blue State laxity while posturing as a Red Team supporter.

I may be misinformed on this, but thought I recalled someone telling me that there was some philosophical/legal basis that the act of taking drugs was not criminal because there was an unrealised crime. People on drugs don't always commit other crimes, so they nail them on the sale and possession becuase the giverbemtn says it is illegal to possess or sell it, so the crime is commerical.
 
I believe he will plea out after all his tricks fail, and then rage when his deal is not as good as any prior offer was. He will sulk for a while, then accept it, and finally seethe on stream for weeks.
I think he will take a plea but will try to spin it as a W. He’ll say that his arguments were so powerful and amazing that the judge and state gave him an incredible plea offer and he took it because “I just want to put this behind me, even though we would have won sooooo easily if it went to trial, that’s why they offered me a plea.”

Edit: and of course a condition of the plea will be that he “can’t talk about the case details anymore, although I wish I could tell you!!”
 
As a Child of the 80's I always used Razor blades myself
Most hipsters nowadays use their drivers license. With all the fentynal in distribution the invisible hand of the market has has trimmed the coke scene down to worry free dipshits and retarded thrillseekers.
I think he will take a plea but will try to spin it as a W.
Nick in his his heart of hearts is too big of a pussy to ever take this to trial.
 
Last edited:
I may be misinformed on this, but thought I recalled someone telling me that there was some philosophical/legal basis that the act of taking drugs was not criminal because there was an unrealised crime. People on drugs don't always commit other crimes, so they nail them on the sale and possession becuase the giverbemtn says it is illegal to possess or sell it, so the crime is commerical.
No, you can be be popped for just use, depending on how the law is written in the state/jurisdiction the use occurs in. To wit, my state law specifically prohibits someone to "possess OR use a narcotic drug" (emphasis added). I honestly could not tell you how frequently they pop people just for using drugs. It might be rare. I would imagine possession is more common thing that trips people up.

It's a pointless thing to discuss in this thread though IMO, because he's being charged with possession. The cokestream is something to laugh at (or be horrified at, YMMV), and it was one of the things the cops relied on to get the warrant, but him actually using the coke isn't a necessary element of the crimes he's currently charged with.
 
It's a pointless thing to discuss in this thread though IMO, because he's being charged with possession. The cokestream is something to laugh at (or be horrified at, YMMV), and it was one of the things the cops relied on to get the warrant, but him actually using the coke isn't a necessary element of the crimes he's currently charged with.
Yes, cokestream was relevant mostly because they knew he was streaming from his house and he came back from the bathroom break with fucking coke on his nose, meaning the coke was probably in the house.
 
I open the Epoch Times: life and tradition to find this.
1724795958945.png
 
he is going to have a fucking field day with her.
Is he though? Her body is better than literally everyone else involved in this sector. Finding out she's a butterface isn't really the own it should be. Ethan would give his left nut to have a woman as good as Chrissy
Given that, why would you hoard two dimensional images of said vagina?
He just thinks they look neat, also enough women have talked about Pat Dixons sex life that you can't say he's a pornsick loser like Nick. He's closer to a white version of one of those niggers you see in porn. Certain types of women put up with him being a loser because he can throw their back out. At a certain point though women realize a guy that smokes blunts all day and listens to rap and is broke and fine living like that isn't worth it.
 
Back