Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[John Andrews Stan]

enough women have talked about Pat Dixons sex life that you can't say he's a pornsick loser like Nick

Plenty of guys who have had lots of girlfriends and wives (Pat’s been divorced three times so far) are pornsick. Terry Crews for example has talked a lot about his porn addiction and how it’s often just more convenient to jerk off. Guys like Pat and Nick are so selfish that it’s a drag for them to have to consider giving a woman pleasure when they could just jerk off.

 

[Step out of the car sir]

I open the Epoch Times: life and tradition to find this. View attachment 6354122

Needs a Nick edit with a messier house and Coke on his beak

 

[The Internet Dick]

Nick in his his heart of hearts is too big of a pussy to ever take this to trial.

I've been in enough legal trouble in the past and watched enough courtroom dramas and episodes of Law & Order to think maybe Rekieta taking this shitshow of a coke-fueled crime spree to trial might be a bad idea, but I'm not Nick Rekieta, an entitled, morally bankrupt egomaniac with a LAWPOPE license plate.

The smart play (in my view) would've been to negotiate a plea deal shortly after arrest. I doubt the prosecutor would've pressed for jailtime for a first offender with addiction-related problems and a houseful of children--strict probation, sure, along with mandatory outpatient treatment and so on. My state has drug courts that establish strict boundaries and requirements (with jail if you fail) but many drunks and addicts go through it and come out sober and clean, ready for a new start on life. I personally know several people who have gone through it successfully. They got their lives back: happy families, good jobs, a new way of living, the works.

But Rekieta's a fool and fools do dumb shit. I bet he takes it to trial and don't give much for his chances.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

Plenty of guys who have had lots of girlfriends and wives (Pat’s been divorced three times so far) are pornsick

Ok but Mandy stadmiller and chrissy and at least one other hoe that was on the forum for Keith and the girl have said he's a good fuck. But I guess they're all lying whores.

 

[Humble Architect]

When you put it that way, his white bread ass statement to Eric July may have been accurate. He is the ultimate hood.

terrible with money, tons of kids he doesn't take care of, now blaming others for his own failures.

See, you get it.

It was the one honest thing Balldo ever said, he is that one, exceptional nigger.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Ok but Mandy stadmiller and chrissy and at least one other hoe that was on the forum for Keith and the girl have said he's a good fuck. But I guess they're all lying whores.

Being good in bed is a separate topic from being porn sick. This isn’t complicated.

 

[AnOminous]

He seethe about thr Balldo, being a cuck, and his children testing positive for cocaine. How much more can he handle?

I don't know, but I'm looking forward to seeing.

 

[KiwiChud]

- TFW
your son doesn't like Balldos.

 

[Daddy's Angry Juice]

I open the Epoch Times: life and tradition to find this. View attachment 6354122

"Some people have a low tolerance for stress and so they need to use it so they can tolerate more stress."

 

[RodgerDodger]

No, you can be be popped for just use, depending on how the law is written in the state/jurisdiction the use occurs in. To wit, my state law specifically prohibits someone to "possess OR use a narcotic drug" (emphasis added). I honestly could not tell you how frequently they pop people just for using drugs. It might be rare. I would imagine possession is more common thing that trips people up.

It's a pointless thing to discuss in this thread though IMO, because he's being charged with possession. The cokestream is something to laugh at (or be horrified at, YMMV), and it was one of the things the cops relied on to get the warrant, but him actually using the coke isn't a necessary element of the crimes he's currently charged with.

Some States do have laws against narcotics use. But they are rarely charged. Because unlike alcohol, it's really hard to prove usage and intoxication levels. So unless law enforcement actually witnesses it, they just don't bother. It's more trouble than it's typically worth.

 

[Taco Conspiracy]

Wow, there's been so much new information dropped and everyone from Civil Law to Meme Copium has had their say the last day. I really hope Nick won't stream tonight just to prove us all wrong yet again and set the record straight. All while we cry and whine on the farms as Nick corners his accusers (probably in an elevator) and demands they drop all charges!
Come on Nick! Tell us how in this next hearing you're going to kick the door in to the court house and show these Scandinavian Prudes how massive your LEGAL BALLS are! Then we will all have to proclaim that Nick is a super cool ultra masculine CHRISTIAN man fighting for our rights as Americans who can handle anything in his way! And a really great Father and Husband that definitely dosen't have a severe drug, alcohol and "everything else" addiction!

I probably wouldn't be able to sleep tonight if that happened...

 

[Je$ter]

I have seen cops roll up on a party where everyone was sipping nitrous from balloons and still didn't write any tickets or make arrests. They usually only really care about harder stuff like coke, meth, opiates, and ecstasy... Mushrooms have even been destigmatized and decriminalized in some states.

 

[Mr. Pierce]

I may be misinformed on this, but thought I recalled someone telling me that there was some philosophical/legal basis that the act of taking drugs was not criminal because there was an unrealised crime. People on drugs don't always commit other crimes, so they nail them on the sale and possession becuase the giverbemtn says it is illegal to possess or sell it, so the crime is commerical.

IANAL, but I think the issue people will tend to raise is mens rea is not established by post-facto evidence of consumption such as drug testing. That said, I am not aware of any successful challenges to these laws.

The "sale or possession" rationale only applies at a Federal level. Without an explicit Constitutional stipulation, a nexus with commercial activity is required for the Feds to regulate a matter.

It's a pointless thing to discuss in this thread though IMO, because he's being charged with possession.

Nor does MN criminalize using drugs. I just wouldn't want the non-US audience to think every state is required to be as pro-deviant as Minnesota.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

No, you can be be popped for just use, depending on how the law is written in the state/jurisdiction the use occurs in. To wit, my state law specifically prohibits someone to "possess OR use a narcotic drug" (emphasis added).

I think this is limited to the act of taking it. So caught in the act of smoking crack is "using" drugs but having crack in your system is not.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I think this is limited to the act of taking it. So caught in the act of smoking crack is "using" drugs but having crack in your system is not.

It's a very fine line and a logical one. I personally don't agree with the philosophy behind narcotics laws and enforcement, but my ideal drug scheduling and enforcement scheme has been called "cruel, inhuman and absolutely abhorrent to modern society". And those are the polite criticisms.

But that's not relevant to Crackets. As we now know as a fact (Deep Kiwi always delivers) and part of the court record, Crackets' kid had a shitload of coke given to her and he's a coke fiend who has passed his wife around. Done.

 

[dustnight]

View attachment 6354339
- TFW
your son doesn't like Balldos.

"Grandpa says you're a faggot, he says faggots go to hell!"

 

[Sharpeteer]

Wow, there's been so much new information dropped and everyone from Civil Law to Meme Copium has had their say the last day. I really hope Nick won't stream tonight just to prove us all wrong yet again and set the record straight. All while we cry and whine on the farms as Nick corners his accusers (probably in an elevator) and demands they drop all charges!

I probably wouldn't be able to sleep tonight if that happened...

I just got reminded the night of the cokestream, and day of the arrest. Literally stayed up all night as shit was lit, and so much was coming out at a rapid rate.

Was a great time man.

Will our favorite lawyer give us another druggie stream to cope, yet somehow still own the Kiwis?

 

[Mr.Bucket]

I just got reminded the night of the cokestream, and day of the arrest. Literally stayed up all night as shit was lit, and so much was coming out at a rapid rate.

Was a great time man.

Will our favorite lawyer give us another druggie stream to cope, yet somehow still own the Kiwis?

The day of the arrest I called a friend while at work and looked like an idiot working in a factory talking about someone getting arrested with a fuckload of coke.
I had to call him like 3 times until his anxious ass answered the goddamn phone. I wasn't gonna stop until he answered. We were both big former fans.

We laughed for like 15 minutes straight.

 

[HarblMcDavid]

Yes, I am aware the Spaghettios aren't canon for Nick to be holding, but I had to do something with that hand.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I think this is limited to the act of taking it. So caught in the act of smoking crack is "using" drugs but having crack in your system is not.

The reason they largely don't press for "in your system" is because doing so encourages bigger problems.

The easiest time to prove use and "in your system" is from incidents of overdose. Decades ago the emergency health care providers had a series of "come to Jesus" discussions with AG's and DA's. Basically telling them that medicine as a whole would no longer be cooperating with Law Enforcement in this matter. Because enforcing these laws discouraged people from seeking critically needed medical attention in life threatening emergency's. Enforcing the law was encouraging behavior that was killing a lot of people.

Eventually the cops and DA's got the message. And even if they didn't, ER's were no longer reporting overdose cases to the Police. In fact the list of things the Hospitals and Healthcare system would report dropped to pretty much just be "child abuse" and "rape only if the victim wants them to".