Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 37 31.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 39 32.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 13 10.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 29 24.4%

  • Total voters
    119
Shit like this stream is why I think Nick might actually take this garbage to trial.

I don't think he has good legal representation, but more importantly, his ego refuses to allow him to see reality. I don't know when reality will kick in if not when a Jury announces a guilty verdict for this loser.
I'm starting to believe dick masterson who goes by juju the cow while getting pegged in the asshole gasses nick up making him believe he'll win the trial.
 
Nick acknowledging tonight in chat that his mods are starting to mute people in his chats.
Mods still pretending they're not.

BUT MUH FREEZE PEACH!
REKIETA.png REKIETA.png
EDIT: second screenshot
 
Now he is discrediting Barnes’ insistence that Nick was targeted by the authorities for being a liberty-minded influencer.

Yes, Barnes, you’re that fucking off-base that even the beneficiary of your lunacy is distancing himself from it.
I bet that they've never/barely communicated. If they have, I imagine they'd claim attorneys privilege on communication but it feels like one of them will make an argument in Nicks defence on video and the others run with it once it's been seen.

I believe this will be the start of Barnes switching sides. His ego won't allow him to change his argument now and pretend there's better arguments, his questionable reputation as an attorney depends on him making the best arguments for people.

This is 100% barnes out. He's lost in the court of public opinion. He will move to, my arguments the best to win and then it'll be, I didn't know all this info at the start, this is disgusting, disavow.

2 massive narcissistic egos this big could never work together for long.
 
As a lawyer, if this goes to trial, what’s the likelihood of the prosecution using clips of Nick being a smug asshole on these streams as character evidence against him?
The character of the defendant is generally irrelevant to the prosecution unless he or his attorney makes it a part of his defense. "My client is a good, upstanding trad dad, there's no way he could do stuff like this" would do it. This is the legal doctrine of "opening the door," there's often a lot that the prosecution can't bring up about a defendant, unless the defense brings it up first.
This would be an extremely stupid thing to do, of course, which makes it kinda likely knowing the Balldo.
 
She can either get a bond and just $2000 or paying nothing but she subject to random drug/alcohol testing. Also, they let her go in the begin just assume she was just a visitor but I assume later on they found she was living there was the Rekieta's and decided to charger her.
Seems like an obvious choice to me. Why would anyone pay?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vecr
What WAS that stream?! The subtext was defending April.
His mods are banning again lmao
It was mayhem. My pet theory is that Kimmy Jo (a new mod as of a few months ago) is April. She was deleting comments within seconds.
There should be some amazing analysis of this stream by Nick's critics.
Where would they even start?
 
Nick acknowledging tonight in chat that his mods are starting to mute people in his chats.

BUT MUH FREEZE PEACH!
It's been that way for a while. His credibility and consistency on the free speech issue was destroyed over a year ago in his Locals. The only thing that's changed is more people are seeing it, and in real time.

Also, he had all hands on deck the first YouTube stream after his arrest. Even Ty Beard was in there with a wrench.
 
Pretty sure balldo is here right now reviewing his perfomance. Here balldo, lying and gaslighting does work and for a long time, but you've been doing it for years, it gets very obvious and tiresome. The few people who still support you are midwest trucrime moms and 45+ year old boomer guys who don't know anything about the Internet. You're not convincing anyone or proving anything with these coping streams.
 
Didn't watch the stream, but the fact that he got really mad at the April alogging shows at this point that he cares more about Ape than his own wife. Remember, he has lambasted his wife on stream multiple times (destroyed body, etc). Would not be surprised if April is now the head bitch, and Kayla is just the side bitch now.
Part of me thinks that if he had complete freedom of movement, he'd divorce Kayla and marry April. Recall that stream where he bitched that he's not lucky to be married without a prenup.

I also think it might cause friction with the parents (the children's grandparents) that could imperil access to the family wealth.

Once again, one big issue here is he decided to do all this retarded degenerate shit in his 40s, after being married for such a long time, and after having five kids. This was never going to work for him.
 
Is that Whiskey in the soda cup?
Nah sweetie. It's that good 'ol Midwest Mickey D's Sweet Tea!

There should be some amazing analysis of this stream by Nick's critics.
Where would they even start?
I can hear/see the former coke head and that fat fuck all the way from Toronto now...
WHOOOOOOOAAAAAA ! ! !
WHOOOOOOAAAA BUDDY ! ! !
NO NO NO NO NO ! ! !
NICK NOOOOOOOO ! ! !
RETARD ALERT ! ! ! RETARD ALERT ! ! ! RETARD ALERT ! ! !
IMG_4542.PNG
For those wondering, KC said on their DSP/Moon stream days ago they were taking 2 weeks off.
However, this might change things . . . . . . . . . . . .
 
The character of the defendant is generally irrelevant to the prosecution unless he or his attorney makes it a part of his defense. "My client is a good, upstanding trad dad, there's no way he could do stuff like this" would do it. This is the legal doctrine of "opening the door," there's often a lot that the prosecution can't bring up about a defendant, unless the defense brings it up first.
This would be an extremely stupid thing to do, of course, which makes it kinda likely knowing the Balldo.

Imagine the prosecution having the Dear John stream on standby for that door being opened lol
This actually came up during Rittenhouse as well I believe, where the defense brought up something about social media, and the prosecution brought up the social media post where Rittenhouse had said something about how looters should be shot. It ended up being a big fight in that case I believe, where they sent the jury out and argued in front of the judge for half an hour or so about whether they could bring that up due to the defense 'opening the door' to that.
 
Back