Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 22 36.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 21 35.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 4 6.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 13 21.7%

  • Total voters
    60
Now I'll admit I'm no expert but I doubt there are many calories in negro spunk.
You forget that Nick takes Negro spunk by the hundreds of loads. It adds up.
Dammit! I was hoping so bad he would start getting into it with more people in the chat, but sadly he used whatever grey matter that was left in his brain to screech at SEAN in private. I was disappointed.
But SEAN SEAN SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNN! REEE REEE!

Isn't that supposed to change his mind immediately?
 
He tried to be clever ("clever") bc he hasn't a leg to stand on. Smoke and mirrors, and a million more figurative sayings that translate to "bullshit."
He had a straightforward argument. He chose not to make it straightforward. I can only assume he did it to make it seem like there is more than what it is? I thought his best bet was being candid, brief and forthright with the court. One paragraph. It's still a weak argument but better than the mysteriousness nonsense he wants to imply.

Pomplun told the court he obtained a video from Rekieta Law. He disclosed the source because it's an obvious material fact. He provided the court with clips that he also said were derived from video from Rekieta Law. However, after watching hours of video from the Rekieta Law channel, Pomplun would know that Rekieta Law videos don't have watermarks. Furthermore he knows that he didn't receive the so-called "coke stream" from the same channel as all the other Rekieta Law videos. Pomplun didn't disclose that these sources were different. He lied to the court by presenting that he obtained all the video from the same source. Again, the fact that he described the source indicates that he believed it was material and he also believed that he need to lie about the critical stream he claims illustrates drug use. Deliberately lying about a material fact is the defining criteria for Franks hearing. Whether the video is different is not material to determing whether the warrant is valid just as the lab test results are not material. The state deceived the court for the purposes of obtaining the warrant and that is improper on its face.

It's a stronger argument in one paragraph than Nick made in pages of nonsens. It's still a weak argument (because they have a weak case) but Nick wanting to insinuate he actually wasn't on coke and the video was manipulated and Pomplun can't detect drug use is just hurting him and obfuscating his argument. The prosecutors rebuttal missing his point but not obviously missing it is the result. He's writing the rakes directly into his story. lolcow.

View attachment 6366176
Nick (or an account impersonating him) has just superchatted Sean $100

EDIT: A second superchat has hit the stream
View attachment 6366185
What do the symbols mean? Would the real Nick have a check mark and a wrench?
 
But SEAN SEAN SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNN! REEE REEE!

Isn't that supposed to change his mind immediately?
Out of all the people he has to regret pissing off Sean the most. Glorious to see the reaping.

That would've taken restraint and if Nick had that he wouldn't be where he is now.
 
Balldo sent in the whoreclown.
IMG_9851.jpeg
 
It's a stronger argument in one paragraph than Nick made in pages of nonsens. It's still a weak argument (because they have a weak case) but Nick wanting to insinuate he actually wasn't on coke and the video was manipulated and Pomplun can't detect drug use is just hurting him and obfuscating his argument. The prosecutors rebuttal missing his point but not obviously missing it is the result. He's writing the rakes directly into his story. lolcow.
It's actually difficult to figure out what Nick's lawyer is claiming as he doesn't really go through things point by point.

However, reading it again, I think he is trying to claim the video can't be in evidence, cos Nick hid it, the cop didn't say how he got it and so he assumes it is a brady violation as the cop didn't turn over a search warrant in discovery. He is trying to be clever. So clever nobody can figure out what he is saying.
 
It's actually difficult to figure out what Nick's lawyer is claiming as he doesn't really go through things point by point.

However, reading it again, I think he is trying to claim the video can't be in evidence, cos Nick hid it, the cop didn't say how he got it and so he assumes it is a brady violation as the cop didn't turn over a search warrant in discovery. He is trying to be clever. So clever nobody can figure out what he is saying.
They are insinuating the warrant was obtained illegally because of <things> but fail to bring evidence or testimony to prove the claim.

It reads a lot like they are arguing so they can claim things in the court of public opinion, when people who pay attention to what is going on (in particular actual lawyers) can see right away that the motions and claims made by Nick (and his lawyer) are worthless.
 
I swear this attention whore just wants to be involved so badly.
While taking Ls from Kurt, Sean and Josh (Meme Copium) he has also been seething on Xitter all day.
Apparently there has also been a breakdown in relations with Vito, who started arguing with Dick.

Nick really is waging a war on 7 fronts.

1725089366363.png
 
While taking Ls from Kurt, Sean and Josh (Meme Copium) he has also been seething on Xitter all day.
Apparently there has also been a breakdown in relations with Vito, who started arguing with Dick.

Nick really is waging a war on 7 fronts.

View attachment 6366356
I doubt very much will come of it. Dick won't let it.
 
I swear this attention whore just wants to be involved so badly.
She used to be one of Cumia's worthless dingleberries that was cut off. I wonder if she was using Aaron to grow her own channel and then realized Nick was the bigger catch, maybe Nick offered her something behind the scenes, or maybe Nick is just another step to get on Dick Masterson's show. Who knows, but she seems like a worthless clout goblin who's desperately trying to latch onto whoever she can, and will twist whatever knife into whoever's back to get there.
 
Fatness is temporary.
Cuckoldry is eternal.
It cannot be Balldo without some coke and drugs involved. The coke cartel lives with the insanity of being a self-proclaimed and actually non-practicing lawyer burning bridges and cause manic towards involved retards in the coke frenzy of his failing career.
Nick really is waging a war on 7 fronts.
View attachment 6366356
Trying to lifting up your failing career by ratio the same pedophile that Juju tries to argue with is not the way to live. The shit he sounds and made literally made him look more like a gayer drugged up communist than that pedophile Vito. Not only that, Nick is also a nepotistic baby with the Balldoverse, and the involved piss poor lawyers that would cooperate with the Balldo to make worthless alleges as a meaning to get Nick away scot-free from prison and continue the coke mania. In the end, the state made better arguments than what the Balldo and his lawyers would do and claim more excuses during the run.
 
Back