Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Major]

It might even be true, but the fact that he even addresses the dress debacle is hilarious.

he is the king of petty little bitches

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

You cannot reasonably KNOW if you do, so the base assumption has to be that you don't.

As someone else pointed out, I didn't explain exactly what the statute says, it states:
"the image was obtained or created under circumstances in which the actor knew or reasonably should have known the person depicted had a reasonable expectation of privacy."

The point is the onus is on the state to show that you should have known there was a reasonable expectation of privacy. There is no "base assumption" for anything.

 

[Pagan Min]

he is the king of petty lttle bitches

With the way he was flirting with Aaron in that hot tub stream, I'd say he's probably the QUEEN of petty little bitches...

 

[ChromaQuack]

Nick is so bitchmade about shit. “He’s harassing us.”

You’ve done worse Nick. He’s talking shit about an ex-wife and you are running gay ops. He might’ve sent a photo of your slatternly wife to somebody and you made peace with someone who called her a whore and your kids a brood of retards.

I don't know if this is a bit of a leftover from the Autism Holy War on my mind or what, but I consider one of the 'seven seals of the fall into terminal cowdom' to use the word "harassment" in a way that means "I want this out of the internet NOW NOW NOW I AM A VICTIM".

What I'm trying to say is this: Nicky, you might as well just join breadtube and troon the fuck out at this point, the only thing you're missing is actively taking estradiol; you do have the thin skin, unwarranted self importance, verbiage and misguided assessment of your own intelligence that is required to be the very best of that sektur already.

Shit, they all have bullshit humanities degrees like creative writing over there, you have the added benefit of having a law degree and being a (non practicing) lawyer on top, carve your own niche in the land of faggotry you so obviously belong to.

 

[Fapcop]

Gawd, Nick is such a pathetic cuck.

Big balldo libertarian Nick. “Fuck da man! I refuse to pay my speeding tickets bootlickers!”

But as soon as he rightfully become a target of mockery, he runs right back to big daddy government to ask them to shut someone up.

He‘s literally more balldo than man right now.

 

[Potatoherder]

REKIETA WANTS AARON JAILED FOR BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE POLYCULE!

And this is why i believe Jack Murphy is less of a cuck than Nick. Jack had total life ruination done to him and he picked himself up and went to the next grift.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

As someone else pointed out, I didn't explain exactly what the statute says, it states:
"the image was obtained or created under circumstances in which the actor knew or reasonably should have known the person depicted had a reasonable expectation of privacy."

The point is the onus is on the state to show that you should have known there was a reasonable expectation of privacy. There is no "base assumption" for anything.

I think you are misunderstanding the law here.

A nude picture automatically comes with the expectation of privacy (unless made for distribution, i.e. Porn). If you cannot prove you had reasonable belief that sharing was ok, you are guilty of a misdemeanor. You know who is NOT guilty? The person receiving it.

 

[Desktop User2]

A video of what is supposed to be the full call has been posted

Sorry for the stupid intro timer, for some reason the moron posting it did a premiere instead of simply posting the clip and added things to the clip. I guess this is what passes for humor in the "Dabbleverse"

Local archive:
View attachment 6374185

Spoiler: YT embed

What a couple of massive faggots...

 

[keke]

Glad to see Nick whining about nonexistent harrassment when he harassed Maddox to the point of sending cease and desists because Maddox didn’t want to do a stream with him.

He's such a slimy piece of shit.

 

[Stackbodiesbro]

Imagine being Nick's attorney and watching your client continuously digging his hole deeper and deeper.

 

[Fallen Preacher]

He is basically a late 80's televangelist. The sex scandal, the drugs, the hubris...it's all there.

All we need is Gloomtube posting survival bunker supplies with Nick on Youtube (instead of shilling NFTs)

 

[TwinPeaksEnjoyer]

She specified it wasn't a selfie

View attachment 6374153

If Keanu said it was not a selfie then it's confirmed a selfie.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

All we need is Gloomtube posting survival bunker supplies with Nick on Youtube (instead of shilling NFTs)

April's Stinky Pussy NFTs would be an insta hit with the incel NFT bros.

 

[Fallen Preacher]

Big balldo libertarian Nick. “Fuck da man! I refuse to pay my speeding tickets bootlickers!”

The fucker still refuses to pay for his car registration!

Imagine being Nick's attorney and watching your client continuously digging his hole deeper and deeper.

CHACHING

 

[Pagan Min]

The fucker still refuses to pay for his car registration!

Bitch-boy Balldo's probably waiting for his father to pay it for him, instead of being a man & doing it himself...

 

[repentance]

Aaron's already unlikable per se, once the prosecution has the opportunity to stack the jury with wahmen or white knights in conjuction with Aaron's casual misogyny and Kayla's waterworks, that will seal his fate.

We know from those who attended the last hearing that Kayla appeared distressed in court. I have no doubt that she'll appear distressed on the witness stand.

Why the fuck doesn't he allow pausing/rewinds etc? I've never seen anyone do that, didn't even know it was an option.

Makes it a lot harder for clippers if you can't pause/rewind. I'm surprised more streamers don't do it.

 

[crab fucker]

Please take the case to trial, please take the case to trial, please take the case to trial. Come on Rackets, you know you can do it, prove all of us wrong.

 

[Nate Higgers]

Give me all the alarm clock stickers, but this basically cements Rekieta’s “heel turn” on his “reporting people to the police is gay, and being a libertarian is baste and red-suppositoried” act, right?

He’s just constantly doing, saying, or posting things that are complete hypocritical 180-degree heelturns on things that he had supposedly upheld and claimed as his principals when his “online career” was on the rise, and a lot of those supposed principals were what drew many of his subscribers to him to begin with. Now that he’s in the spotlight and his ass is the one in the defendants chair, he does a “rules for thee but not for me” about face when it comes to broadcasting his trial, reporting people to the police, or even just basic moral standards like “not bringing drugs into your house where your children live”.

I shouldn’t be surprised, and I’m basically preaching to the converted here. Like @AnOminous has said many times in the past, “If Nick’s mouth is open, it’s either to lie or to suck cock”.

 

[Vibralldo]

Give me all the alarm clock stickers, but this basically cements Rekieta’s “heel turn” on his “reporting people to the police is gay, and being a libertarian is baste and red-suppositoried” act, right?

He’s just constantly doing, saying, or posting things that are complete hypocritical 180-degree heelturns on things that he had supposedly upheld and claimed as his principals when his “online career” was on the rise, and a lot of those supposed principals were what drew many of his subscribers to him to begin with. Now that he’s in the spotlight and his ass is the one in the defendants chair, he does a “rules for thee but not for me” about face when it comes to broadcasting his trial, reporting people to the police, or even just basic moral standards like “not bringing drive into your house where your children live”.

I shouldn’t be surprised, and I’m basically preaching to the converted here. Like @AnOminous has said many times in the past, “If Nick’s mouth is open, it’s either to lie or to suck cock”.

Nick is Ralph now, he just does things that immediately satiate his id and then try to justify it after with technicalities

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

If you cannot prove you had reasonable belief that sharing was ok, you are guilty of a misdemeanor.

No, it would be for the prosecution to prove you should have reasonably known - this isn't an affirmative defense for the defendant. It's a point that the prosecution would have to prove as part of their case.

Your point about an automatic expectation doesn't cover this off, because if you receive and pass on a nude that you don't know the providence of you might reasonably believe that it was porn. Whether it is or isn't is immaterial, it's whether the prosecution can prove you reasonably should have known it wasn't authorized for distribution. That's contextual, not automatic.