Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Gorilla Man said:
I used to watch Tim Pool, until I started seeing his repetitive pattern of
Read bombastic headline > "but before we start...." [talks about how great his company is and and begs for money] > Read a little bit of the article > starts rambling, being a fence sitter and declaring CIVIL WAR for the milionth time
Can't stand the guy, but I don't remember him being a outright liar.
He sounded honest, as much as an arrogant adulterer can be

States/politicians fund media companies all the time
Fucking Anderson Cooper from CNN is a CIA agent
Am I supposed to discard valid arguments because the sociopaths in charge of my country don't like the sociopaths in charge of Russia?
Click to expand...
Are you Taylor from PKA?

Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
Technically, yes. Russia hired people to promote Trump and Republicans because they knew Trump would be easy to manipulate because he's a retarded narcissist who will do anything if you praise him. They hired westerners (like Pool) to promote him, Russians to post on sites like 4chan, Twitter, Facebook, etc... to promote him and made a bunch of fake accounts to do so
Click to expand...
this is so blatantly retarded and nigger-minded that it’s hilarious. Russian bot farms also promoted Bernie Sanders and even ran smear campaigns for Hillary. The goal isn’t Manchurian Candidate shit. It’s to promote general discord, similar to Air America and the talking points it presents that are often reflected, verbatim, in domestic media.

I get that most people are naive or only have so much time to do research on shit like this, but it’s not hard to set up an RSS feed and simply notice.
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
They didn't like hack or anything, but they did spread and promote outright lies through those channels.
Click to expand...
Last time I looked into this, wasn’t Russia behind the DNC hack leaks that exposed Donna Brazile leaking DNC primary debate questions to Hillary Clinton?
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
No, the Russian bots are in Russia. It's hysterical that you simpletons are coping like this :story:

You got duped, little guy. You've made yourself a terrible person based on Russian lies and you're doubling down on it. Even for a guy who hates education you're retarded.


Russian propagandists in the US were literally just busted and you're STILL in denial about it :story:

As I said, if you elderly bible thumpers would post different stuff, I'd be able to say different things. Instead you guys just tardrage about how much you love Russia and how much you hate gays/jews/blacks/women/America/etc

You'd think that even after shown proof that your love of Russia was due to Russian propagandists influencing you, you'd change your tune. Then again, you take pride in your intellectual disability and I know you simpletons love to be grifted
Click to expand...
you should kill yourself for being a uselessly retarded faggot that is good for nothing more than the heat your burning corpse comforts others.
thejackal2 said:
but maybe if I was being paid 400k to record a shitty little 10 minute youtube video that was in no way worth 4K, let alone 400K I'd at least ask my accountant to track down who exactly is so fucking stupid and why I'm the lucky fella cashing the checks.
Click to expand...
maybe you should not be such a stupid nigger to know that his casts are 2+ hours and not 10 minutes. How much of a mindless faggot are you that you think this brazenly bullshit garbage is going to fly? Moreover, why aren’t you murdered for being a mongoloid that does nothing but detract from the human race?
mlanguishi said:
Like a conservative version of breadtube.
Click to expand...
This is literally who he is and it’s become a disgusting trait among far too many that make “content creator” as their profession. One of the biggest changes I’ve made in watching channels, primarily on YT, is that a lot of what I now consume is professionals that use YT as a side hustle. MDs, construction contractors, professors, brewhouse managers, etc. It’s substantially more informative, even when discussing tangential subjects. Hearing a contractor talk about rise in labor and material costs is far more informative than hearing some shut-in faggot like Styxhexennigger666 talk about shit he read online that he barely understands and will never tacitly feel or even
Prj4MW8iPT3vmFM2rzDc said:
I'm an unironic Hannah Claire enjoyer.
But you're right, she's not like any kind of model attractive or anything like that. Despite being how I've self described. I'm not a simp or anything. If she started her own podcast/youtube/patron/OF, would give her exactly zero dollars. She's just better looking than most of the women who appear on the show and like her attitude and presence during episodes she's in.
Click to expand...
I think she would do a great interview show. She’s often the one that breaks IRL streams from roundtable ranting to asking a guest questions and having an actual conversation.

She’s not SI cover model hot, but she’s not a goblinoid. Girl is gonna need some epicanthal surgery down the road. Also, she uses the bottom of her mouth when she speaks, which looks odd because most speak with the middle or upper part of their mouth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supremeautismo, BrentHatleyisaCuck and Sammich
Not Even Twice said:
His first big whiff of the grifting opportunities in this particular part of the political commentary world, was after Trump did his "Last night in Sweden" and some right wing commentator (I believe it was Crowder) was offering to pay for any journo to go do a coverage of the alleged no-go zones in Sweden. Tim took the offer and went as a "lefty journo with an open mind" and it kind of escalated from there.
Click to expand...
While that was significant, Tim really cut his teeth during the Ferguson riots after Michael Brown. This was back when he had that police tape, from the guy who got shot outside of his apt in NYC, hung up in the background, the husky plushie, etc.

Watching him report after that guy in Ferguson got shot in the chest and fled to a nearby building, him saying he was leaving because things were getting too hot - that was the spark that lit the fire. His channel took off after that. Other big showings, like the Swedish no-go zone video, snowballed into the Outer-Beanie Heaven Skatepark that we have today.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Not Even Twice
ThisHill2DieOn said:
I think she would do a great interview show. She’s often the one that breaks IRL streams from roundtable ranting to asking a guest questions and having an actual conversation.

She’s not SI cover model hot, but she’s not a goblinoid. Girl is gonna need some epicanthal surgery down the road. Also, she uses the bottom of her mouth when she speaks, which looks odd because most speak with the middle or upper part of their mouth.
Click to expand...
the steel toe morning show guy that looks like the chud wojak would even probably show a picture of her to his friend and say "your boy didn't do to bad did he?" wouldn't he?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrentHatleyisaCuck

Tim had Kingsley Wilson as the guest.
Hannah & Raymond were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Tim truly must be short on money, now, because he has taken on a gold-selling sponsorship:


-Tim argues that people from non-Western countries conglomerating together, with no integration, & can lead to people eating cats, because that is the norm in their native land. Then, Tim argues that Democrats think bringing this up is racist, which he contends obfuscates how "they want food" & are resorting to hunting cats. This type of excuse reminded me of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez explaining away shoplifting TVs & Air Jordans as "they feel like they either need to shoplift some bread or go hungry". Thankfully, Hannah & Kingsley push back on the feline feasting as being cultural, not acts of desperation driven by hunger. Raymond decides to chime in, saying the large number of euthanised cats in shelters could be offered up as meat sources:


-Tim says there may be an update forthcoming on the lawsuit against the Harris campaign, "tomorrow [presumably 17 September]" & "you may find out from the news, before you find out from me":


-A super-chatter asks Tim why he did an ad read, despite saying the show was paid for by memberships. Tim argues that he refuses to do a mid-show ad read, not ones at the start of the show:
 
  • Informative
Reactions: anustart76

Tim had Andrew Wilson as the guest. No relation, as far as I am aware, to the previous guest, Kingsley Wilson, merely a funny little coincidence.

Hannah & Libby were the co-hosts.

*The panel talk about the pager bombing committed by Israel against targets in Lebanon. While Hannah remained silent for the most part, Andrew, Libby, & Tim went to great lengths to excuse the civilian casualties of the attack. The argument used is that war is, by nature, lacking rules which are artificially created & imposed by victors upon losers. Tim appends that the enemies of Israel would not operate under the rules of war, anyway: 41:36-52:09

*Here is the argument over the concept of rights Andrew & Tim had, mentioned by @Prj4MW8iPT3vmFM2rzDc. Andrew initially argues against Tim's concept of rights being necessary to continued living (e.g. even in the wilderness, you can speak freely, forage, defend yourself, etc.) because there are examples he can cite which are outside of the normative conditions for humans (e.g. the blind & deaf are unable to exercise a right to speak), or that nothing prevents someone using force to violate said rights (e.g. in the wilderness, nothing prevents him from crafting a spear & stabbing someone, or the government transgressing unjustly against the rights of citizens). Andrew contends Tim's concept of rights boils down to applications of force, either to ensure you have rights or can be denied them. Libby chimes in to say that the United States has a belief system centered around natural rights being intrinsic. Andrew agrees that it is a belief, but "based on..." what. Another back-&-forth with Tim ensues, where Tim counters that Andrew is engaging in "post-modern argument", which Andrew rejects is his position. Andrew finally explains he means rights "come from God" which humans are commanded to do, & whereas Tim's concept of rights is "an entitlement absent duty". Tim concedes that rights stem from God, but argues from a secular point that the universal expectation for life is to be fruitful & multiply, which rights promote & protect. While I am annoyed to have gone through this to summarise, I am glad to see Tim get some of his own medicine when it comes to how he treats guests & co-hosts that disagree with him: 52:09-1:09:35

*Andrew & Tim talk about how Sheev Palpatine did nothing wrong in repelling the Jedi that went to his office, attempting to force him to give up his executive powers, once the Clone Wars ended. I am just so surprised Tim defended a member of a minority religion, whose faith supports tricking non-believers to benefit the in-group. Who covertly manipulates the politics & economy of a nation, to upend the established order to gain power over all the unsuspecting masses. I am totally surprised by this. Apropos of nothing, did you see how in an earlier segment, Tim praised Israel's ingenuity in remotely killing members of Hezbollah & how war crimes are not real, after all his prior opposition to drone strikes by the United States?: 1:42:56-1:46:54

Clip Collection:
-Tim opens the show, talking about his two favourite topics; himself & Israel. Though he does err in stating that Israel only killed & injured "thousands of Hezbollah fighters" "with a degree of military sophistication I did not expect". The injured parties varied from members of Hezbollah to the Iranian ambassador & nearby non-combatants:


-Not only are their hectoring debate techniques similar, but Andrew & Tim share a love for pop culture. Tim highlights how the two had "a great conversation about how Palpatine did nothing wrong":


-Tim's complaint claims that the statements by the Harris campaign may have been the cause of "some crazy guy" to show up at one of the Branch Timidian properties. Now, Tim discloses that this bloke "attacked" one of his employees & police were called to deal with it:


-Tim compares his situation with that of Jeremy Jahns being harassed "from the Left" over his video review of "Am I Racist?". & who could survive the kinds of harassment Jeremy faced?:


-Andrew talks about how liberals comparing migrants throttling Canada geese in the park to "rednecks out in the country" hunting was disingenuous, as it does not happen "inside of towns, or inside of cities". Tim agrees with that being an absurd argument. This is despite Tim making a similar type of argument a mere eight days before this episode:


-Tim says they have updated the thumbnail, in hopes of expanding their reach:


Here is the new format:
1112un-1024x576.png

Versus the old:
1111un-1024x576.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: anustart76, Nicole E. Eggert, beets4borshenko and 2 others
Another episode of Ian being exhaustingly dumb as fuck and people trying to explain that reality actually does exist while Ian continues to drivel on about his obtuse bullshit.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: JamesWebbSlinger, anustart76 and Retink Retunk
JamesWebbSlinger said:
That is why I am here, to sift through the beanie boy's blathering for those precious moments to snip.

& I believe I found it in an episode from two years ago, featuring Andrew Branca & Jack Posobiec. Jack asks what the Zimmerman, Rittenhouse, & McMichaels' cases mean for Neighbourhood Watches. Andrew talks about the risks of assembling a "formalised group", as it could land all members in as accessories to a murder. This may lead into the least popular person being blamed, while the rest offer to cooperate. Tim brags that he rebels when faced with authority demanding things of him. Andrew & Jack joke that means Tim is the one going down for murder, After this, Tim calls Dominick Black, the person who turned state's witness in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial, & people like him "cowards & pathetic whiny little losers". "People are just weak", says Tim. He discloses that his father said when you commit a crime, do it by yourself, as a metaphor for ensuring "you don't have idiots with you" that could undermine something:
Click to expand...
Thanks for going through the effort of finding this. As always, your contributions to this community are invaluable.

Prj4MW8iPT3vmFM2rzDc said:
In tonight's episode, Tim and Andrew Wilson get into an autistic argument about the term "rights" all because Andrew wants to say because "god". Summary, they're both retarded even though they agree on what, and why but now how to get to why.
Click to expand...
I know very little about this guy; I watched three or four clips of him on youtube, and from what I could tell he's just a right wing debate bro who spends his time arguing with feminists and left wing debate bros. This argument between the two of them was an absolute waste of time, and if the other person hadn't been Tim, I probably would have stopped listening after about thirty seconds. But listening to Tim get progressively angrier as he got sucked deeper and deeper into a meaningless debate that he's not smart enough to win was a blast. If the entire thing was just Wilson deciding he felt like trolling Tim, my respect for him would go up by a notch.

JamesWebbSlinger said:
-Tim's complaint claims that the statements by the Harris campaign may have been the cause of "some crazy guy" to show up at one of the Branch Timidian properties. Now, Tim discloses that this bloke "attacked" one of his employees & police were called to deal with it:
Click to expand...
This moment actually confused me. Tim was extremely explicit in saying that the property that was trespassed was their old property, that it has nothing to do with them anymore, that he doesn't even know what's on the property now. Then a minute later he says that the trespasser assaulted one of his employees.

I would suggest that he ought to learn to keep his mouth shut, so as to not make it harder for his lawyers to argue his case, but after listening to Sean's reaction to the complaint, it probably would end up saving him money if his case gets dismissed sooner rather than later.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: JamesWebbSlinger
Retink Retunk said:
I don't really get what Beanie is suing over, is he mad he was part of some generic media hit piece for the millionth time?
Click to expand...
It goes something like this:

'Harris for President' campaign knowingly accused him of wanting to ensure total power for trump and advocating for executions of dems. Tim claims that this is false, and this incited some retard to come attack his staff.

Problem is, generally defamation is viewed from a perspective of a reasonable person. This is doubly so a problem when facts for the alleged defamation is readily provided by the defamer. Look, for example, at Biospherics, Incorporated v. Forbes, Inc., 151 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. 1998).
Screenshot 2024-09-19 153624.png

Tim Pool does not deny, for example, that he advocates for Trump to gain total control over the judiciary. See from the complaint:
Screenshot 2024-09-19 153843.png

Tim Pool also does not deny that he advocated for democrats to be locked up. His issue is that he said that there should be trials and investigations first. The question is whether a reasonable person would see this as a material misstatement of fact. After all, if Trump controls the investigation, it is reasonable to assume that it will find guilt, especially if you do not believe in Trump's character.

Tim also complains about being called Trump's operative (which has a broad selection of meanings). He asserts that this harms his journalistic reputation by making him seem biased. While that would be defamatory per se, he does concede that he is Trump's supporter and it is well known (not asserted in the complaint) that he voted for Trump in 2022. I struggle to see how this would be defamatory. Someone supporting Trump would necessarily be someone biased in favor of him. While Pool asserts that by "operative" 'Harris for President' meant he is being paid by Trump, that's not really the definition of operative (without stretching one of the definitions).

He claims that saying he has a "Project 2024 plan" is defamatory, but doesn't explain how, only stating that he didn't mention it in the clip which bore the defamation action, which is true.

As to the execution bit, he claims that:
1. It was Loomer which said that.
2. Loomer agreed with him that it should only be done upon a judicial finding of treason.

Problem is, the original tweet did not say "Tim pool wants to execute dems", but "Trump operatives say their [...] is to plan [...] jail and execute"

And indeed, as Tim concedes, Loomer did say that. "Their" refers to Tim for the first part, and Loomer for the second, which is evident after watching the clip 'Harris for President' attached. He also repeats that neither of them said the killings would be extrajudicial, but this again brings the point of whether there is actual investigation if an enemy controls it.

I really don't see much in the way of a defamation action here, by either claim or in totality.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Drag-on Knight 91873, Retink Retunk and JamesWebbSlinger
his brother is based though, how bad can tim be?

 
TheRaptorJesus said:
After years of saying he wouldn't do ad reads, he is suddenly considering it. I guess i'm going to stop listening when he becomes the daily wire jr. Money must be tight on the compound.
Click to expand...
Well, yeah, when you file a seemingly-doomed defamation lawsuit, money suddenly becomes very important. Lawsuits are expensive after all, especially if this somehow survives a motion to dismiss.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TheRaptorJesus
Nicole E. Eggert said:
This moment actually confused me. Tim was extremely explicit in saying that the property that was trespassed was their old property, that it has nothing to do with them anymore, that he doesn't even know what's on the property now. Then a minute later he says that the trespasser assaulted one of his employees.
Click to expand...
Best that I can guess would be that this property is where some of the Branch Timidian employees live, now that Tim relocated more of his operation to the new studio compound.



Tim had Natalie Winters, of Steve Bannon's War Room podcast, as the guest.
Ian & Shane were the co-hosts.

Clip Collection:
-Ian has now integrated "video game streamer" into his CV. & thankfully, he was playing the SsethTzeentach-approved game, Rimworld, instead of Fallout 76, in his most recent outing:


-Previously, Tim talked about he works 16-hour days to do his job, researching what topics to cover, etc. & yet, he still gets basic facts wrong. Here, Tim starts off saying, with great confidence, that the Republican dissenting votes to tie the SAVE Act to the continuing resolution to fund the U.S. government, must be coming from swing districts. Natalie has to correct Tim & say it is the "MAGA ones" that do not want to support the continuing resolution:


-Tim brings up the Beetlejuice sequel, & how Lydia is now a PTSD-ridden pill popper who lives in fear of the ghost's return. Ian has not seen the flick, but hopes she kicks the pill addiction, as it is very real to our modern age. This got a chuckle out of me, as Tim's former tech girl shares the same name:


-The panel begins to have an organic conversation about the first movies they ever saw, but before this can take off, Tim cuts it off to move to super-chats:


-Tim continues to defend Sheev Palpatine from people's criticisms, going so far as to say "at no point, in any of the films, do you see the Emperor do anything wrong". Tim contends you only see Palpatine exercising what amounts to political lobbying & "soft power without the use of force". Either Tim really is having his mind fogged by something which prevents him from seeing things for what they are, or he is just that pig-headed he cannot back down, now:
 
  • Informative
Reactions: anustart76
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back