Furry Fandom and Drama General

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
>make them feel the silence
a6846849-e98e-402c-9359-55eedaaa8241_text.gif
Zuma Deluxe is pretty fucking good
You're not a real gamer if you didn't grow up in a time when every single bar had a Zuma machine
 
>make them feel the silence
View attachment 6629089

You're not a real gamer if you didn't grow up in a time when every single bar had a Zuma machine
It’s funny because that’s the guy that sperged out about Moo Deng being “abused” and said how it’s pathetic right wingers got upset about a squirrel.

Very odd hyper animal obsessed fella.
 
Given how Boozy Badger's takes on recent events have become increasingly unhinged over time (especially after the recent election) I’m wondering if he’d make a good subject for a standalone thread. I don’t follow him as closely as some other furry lolcows, but it’s been a while since I wrote an OP, so I'd like to gauge other Kiwis' interest in whether he’d be a good candidate or not before I start working on a new OP.

Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe he’s generally well-received in the furry community. At least, that’s the impression I got from looking into his work. His tweets and legal opinions have even been linked in other cow threads for a while. But, like all furries, he just can’t seem to stay out of drama and oversharing. Apparently, he’s reached the point of posting some gross nudes of himself publicly.
 
Given how Boozy Badger's takes on recent events have become increasingly unhinged over time (especially after the recent election) I’m wondering if he’d make a good subject for a standalone thread. I don’t follow him as closely as some other furry lolcows, but it’s been a while since I wrote an OP, so I'd like to gauge other Kiwis' interest in whether he’d be a good candidate or not before I start working on a new OP.

Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe he’s generally well-received in the furry community. At least, that’s the impression I got from looking into his work. His tweets and legal opinions have even been linked in other cow threads for a while. But, like all furries, he just can’t seem to stay out of drama and oversharing. Apparently, he’s reached the point of posting some gross nudes of himself publicly.
I'm not sure he's interesting enough, but I'd love to see it.

This summer he went on a lovely rant about Chevron. "We need experts to make rules! I'm a lawyer, I barely know anything about the field I practice law over".

Not everyone is at your incompetentce level, Boozy.
 
It’s funny because that’s the guy that sperged out about Moo Deng being “abused” and said how it’s pathetic right wingers got upset about a squirrel.

Very odd hyper animal obsessed fella.
"No bad tactics, only bad people."
It shouldn't be shocking that someone only seems concerned with the wellbeing of animals when it suits them.
Don't coyotes eat small dogs and cats? They're a hated pest for a reason.
They also traffic illegals!
Wait, wrong coyotes.
 
Last edited:
And any livestock they can manage to kill or drag away.
They're scavengers, virtually nothing is off limits. If they find it or can manage to kill it they're happy.
I also recall cases of toddlers being attacked by coyotes. So what exactly did this furry mean by that comparison?
Furries are going to literally eat your children.
I'm loosing it over this post. Not surprised that he didn't compare furries to jellyfish.

View attachment 6630377
Coyotes have been kicked out of 109 communities and every single time it was the human's fault.
Some say farmers have killed over six million of them!
 
Given how Boozy Badger's takes on recent events have become increasingly unhinged over time (especially after the recent election) I’m wondering if he’d make a good subject for a standalone thread. I don’t follow him as closely as some other furry lolcows, but it’s been a while since I wrote an OP, so I'd like to gauge other Kiwis' interest in whether he’d be a good candidate or not before I start working on a new OP.

Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe he’s generally well-received in the furry community. At least, that’s the impression I got from looking into his work. His tweets and legal opinions have even been linked in other cow threads for a while. But, like all furries, he just can’t seem to stay out of drama and oversharing. Apparently, he’s reached the point of posting some gross nudes of himself publicly.
If Boozy continues on the well-tread downward path to Hell all other furries seem to follow, he should have a thread. Since he’s such an archetypical furry I’m sure that soon enough he’ll be posting full body nudes, starting an Onlyfans for his jerkoff videos, setting up another Onlyfans for him and his wife to fuck on, getting art of his fursona fucking other furries who aren’t his wife (she won’t complain - don’t kink shame!)….


…. I’m sorry Boozy, are you complaining about Trump, or yourself? I swear he only hates Trump out of jealousy; they both have that “Imma asshole and that makes me awesome” thing going on only, Trumps actually successful.IMG_9170.jpeg
 
Don't coyotes eat small dogs and cats? They're a hated pest for a reason.
And babies! They'll kill and eat anything they can sink their teeth into and contaminating wolf populations due to crossbreeding. But even despite the horrendous issues they cause, they're still too good to be compared to these people. Coyotes are just wild animals that aren't capable of knowing any better.
 
basically, it's a document made by the Heritage Foundation, a right wing religious think tank. A lot of furries are panicking over it because they think Trump will enact it into law. Funnily enough, the GOP and Trump have distanced themselves from Project 2025, so their fears are unfounded.
To be fair, his VP wrote the foreword. It's where I first saw his name. That said, I don't think the Republicans will be able to do anything controversial. Their party is hardly United right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crispy Pancake
To be fair, his VP wrote the foreword. It's where I first saw his name. That said, I don't think the Republicans will be able to do anything controversial. Their party is hardly United right now.
Most likely, the GOP has had in-faction disputes for years between MAGA and RINOs that worked against them in 2016-2020, plus those in favor of the impeachment angle back then.
 
Don't coyotes eat small dogs and cats? They're a hated pest for a reason.
Yes, and with more and more urban developments encroaching on their territory they've only gotten worse about coming into suburban and even urban neighborhoods for food. And by food, I mean your pets.
 
To be fair, his VP wrote the foreword. It's where I first saw his name. That said, I don't think the Republicans will be able to do anything controversial. Their party is hardly United right now.
Well, the foreword was written by Kevin D. Roberts who is the president of the The Heritage Foundation, so I'm not sure what you mean by VP.

That said, Trump has laid out everything he plans on do with his Agenda47... so easy to make the joke... and one of the first things is a literal digital Bill of Rights. Of course, given how furries and migrating to BlueSky in order to craft their echo chambers. I somehow don't think they'd be happy with that either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiggie_Tiger
Zuma Deluxe is pretty fucking good
Oh, definitely. It's one of the best puzzles games that I'm shit at

To be fair, his VP wrote the foreword. It's where I first saw his name. That said, I don't think the Republicans will be able to do anything controversial. Their party is hardly United right now.
Even the most conservative Supreme Court Justices take the Constitution in a very literal sense - rather than overlooking aspects of it to achieve the ends of the guy who recommended them for appointment. Supreme Court Justices tend to do as they want, and even the conservative justices have gone against Trump (as I recall, Brett Kavanaugh was in favour of impeachment).

Even if Trump did try to ban furries (presumably whilst high on meth or something), it'll probably be overturned by the Supreme Court.

I'm loosing it over this post. Not surprised that he didn't compare furries to jellyfish.

View attachment 6630377
Guess someone likes baby back ribs, but not necessarily from a pig...

I bet they have, but I'm not going to loo- of fucking course they did.

(nsfw obviously)
To be fair, the guy saying that hyenas aren't canines is actually correct. The rest... I hate that I laughed at the pictures, I didn't even think it looked great as much as I didn't think they'd try to have humour...
 
You can have multiple quotes in a single post fwiw. All zenforo based forums have a multiquote feature.
Even if Trump did try to ban furries (presumably whilst high on meth or something), it'll probably be overturned by the Supreme Court.
I'm sorry, but I can't not post this.
 
Don't know if this counts as furry drama but this is just bizarre.
David Paul Ihnen / skylos is a zoophile diaperfur who programmed for bestiality producer Petlust in the 2000s. Yesterday someone tweeted his thread at someone he was replying to and it launched him into defense mode..
Screenshot_20241111_135348_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20241111_135356_Chrome.jpg
Until he went into some sort of schizoid breakdown and reposted his own dog sex content to 'own' the troll.
Screenshot_20241111_202130_Chrome.jpg

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/hGfIV / https://archive.ph/4ZI6d
Screenshot_20241111_172956_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back