Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Here's another goldie from the comments.

1732825462104.png

"Yeah he's probably right that we're all fucked up but at least we're not hurting anyone"
 
Here's another goldie from the comments.

View attachment 6697782

"Yeah he's probably right that we're all fucked up but at least we're not hurting anyone"
His following sentence "Just keep it under wraps like any other fetish" is sound advice too little, too late. If people would've just kept shit to themselves, no one probably would've cared.
 
ruh roh raggy
:null:

Their argument for furry stuff falls apart when you realize that anthropomorphic anthro entities don't actually exist IRL, though children do. They should save the "you're a zoophile" argument for the ones interested in actual bestiality/animal porn artwork. The degenerate in the first image is somewhat on the right track (still going to Auschwitz).
 
View attachment 6697834
From that tweet, Pedophilia is just a fetish guys. Jerking off to drawings of kids is just a fucking lifestyle i guess. I guess LGBT really should be renamed LGBTP+, damn.
"Dude, jerking off to kids is the same thing as" *checks notes* "Modern dating! Because, uh... They're both unhealthy. But I'm not gonna KILL people over dating!"

What the fuck did you think you were trying to say there, chief?
 
“Lolicons tend to be chill” is the biggest fucking lie ever told. Never have I seen even Fujos get half as vitriolic towards being called a spade as Lolicons do.

They wouldn't need to dogpile on anyone making fun of the slop they watch.
Lolicons are so "chill" that if you dare say that they are pedophiles or say KYS to them they immediately start flagging your account so you can get banned. The even better part is some of them pretend to be pro-free speech:



Edit: wording
 
Last edited:
"Dude, jerking off to kids is the same thing as" *checks notes* "Modern dating! Because, uh... They're both unhealthy. But I'm not gonna KILL people over dating!"

What the fuck did you think you were trying to say there, chief?
Look modern dating may be rough, but I think there's a difference between dating a actual woman and jerking off to children. I just have a hunch. That guy is so pornsick, you just know it.
Vile. Horrible. The "Child Corrected" one is especially disgusting.
Lolicons are so "chill" that if you dare say that they are pedophiles or KYS to them they immediately start flagging your account so you can get banned. The even better part is some of them pretend to be pro-free speech:

View attachment 6697936
Pretending to be free speech helps shield them from consequences, a common tactic.
 
View attachment 6697834
From that tweet, Pedophilia is just a fetish guys. Jerking off to drawings of kids is just a fucking lifestyle i guess. I guess LGBT really should be renamed LGBTP+, damn.
To this day, people like Mutahar (who will say something akin MAP flag is done in 4chan, all a psyop dude), and even alphabet-soupers will vehemently deny any association with pedophiles or zoophiles. I guess it's """common sense""", to perhaps save face, or to not give """their enemies""" (us) ammunition (or something).

I truly hope pedos and zoos attach themselves to the alphabet. Couldn't have happened to a nicer set of people. While the "P" is supposed to be "Pansexual", the infighting I hear is that bisexuals seem to be grifters, before the troons became an issue. And eventually... who knows?
 
“Lolicons tend to be chill” is the biggest fucking lie ever told. Never have I seen even Fujos get half as vitriolic towards being called a spade as Lolicons do.

They wouldn't need to dogpile on anyone making fun of the slop they watch.
I must disagree, I have seen fujos dogpile in the same way if a particular ship or degenerate aspect of a ship they like is questioned.

The difference is in exact tactics because the situation is different. Instead of deflecting by calling you a pedophile, they'll say you are bigoted against gays, for example.

They're both branches of the same diseased pornsick LGBTQMAP+ tree.
 
To this day, people like Mutahar (who will say something akin MAP flag is done in 4chan, all a psyop dude), and even alphabet-soupers will vehemently deny any association with pedophiles or zoophiles. I guess it's """common sense""", to perhaps save face, or to not give """their enemies""" (us) ammunition (or something).

I truly hope pedos and zoos attach themselves to the alphabet. Couldn't have happened to a nicer set of people. While the "P" is supposed to be "Pansexual", the infighting I hear is that bisexuals seem to be grifters, before the troons became an issue. And eventually... who knows?
I think people just want not to accept that pedophiles really, really want to be a sexuality and not a crime. They don't have to think as hard.
 
The problem with sexual deviancies is they cluster.

A lot of old-school gays supported NAMBLA's mission but were canny enough to realize they had to make a show of casting them out to win public acceptance.

The same thing happened with trannies back in the day too; there were instances where the gays in the US broke solidarity with the trannies when a legislative victory was in sight, saying the trannies would get their "rights" later.

That's why the post about Aethy regarding the shutdown casting the US political climate as queer suppression is not entirely wrong, in the sense that them considering themselves as part of queer subculture is basically correct.
 
The problem with sexual deviancies is they cluster.

A lot of old-school gays supported NAMBLA's mission but were canny enough to realize they had to make a show of casting them out to win public acceptance.

The same thing happened with trannies back in the day too; there were instances where the gays in the US broke solidarity with the trannies when a legislative victory was in sight, saying the trannies would get their "rights" later.

That's why the post about Aethy regarding the shutdown casting the US political climate as queer suppression is not entirely wrong, in the sense that them considering themselves as part of queer subculture is basically correct.
It reminds me of Android Raptor almost. She'd deny NAMBLA was a part of the gay shit, while at the same time shipping her Gundam anime boys together. It was all a mask. She didn't care if kids got fucked, she gooned to it in fact.
 
I think people just want not to accept that pedophiles really, really want to be a sexuality and not a crime. They don't have to think as hard.
It either must be "denial" or "barganing". Maybe add a mix of "anger", as they are always angry at us or anyone who thinks differently than them, usually those who ascribe to the "ideology". Yet with the things I see, and looking at history (especially at NAMbLA) you cannot tell me there are "coincidences", with the shit of "virtuous gays" trying to distance themselves. I can believe of a homosexual here who browses the farms and such, maybe even who may think differently of the overall movement and does the thinking for himself or herself - despises the movement, and that's fine.

What I don't believe is those who ascribe to the "alphabet soup", flag crap (rainbow shit), those MLM, FLF, whatever you have and then have the audacity to tell me they are virtuousos. No, I won't believe them, because they have some goal in mind. Tired of seeing people letting their guard down.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
Back