US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[CharlesBarkley]

I'm just annoyed that redditors are acting like it's the start of "da revoluzion" when they all know they aren't gonna do shit. Like either get up off your ass and do it yourself or shut the fuck up.

Reddit's list of ultimate evil and who they violently fantazise about constantly.
1. Trump.
2. Null.
3. Kyle Rittenhouse.

 

[Javier]

https://x.com/NewsWire_US/status/1866874550476214429
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/M6FV6

My apologies for posting this not directly from the source, but I'm not well versed with the non-twitter/X social media platforms. It is, however, an interesting development, if true.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

https://x.com/NewsWire_US/status/1866874550476214429
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/M6FV6
View attachment 6740589
My apologies for posting this not directly from the source, but I'm not well versed with the non-twitter/X social media platforms. It is, however, an interesting development, if true.

https://truthsocial.com/@JohnFetterman/posts/113631217394443297

https://megalodon.jp/2024-1212-0153-26/https://truthsocial.com:443/@JohnFetterman/posts/113631217394443297

He shows up as a verified account.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Let me explain this in a way you might better understand: اصمت أيها الأحمق.

Ackshually, American history is British history.

Your founding fathers, early settlers and law-makes often killed people who got in the way of progress. How many stories are there from the first years of (post 1776) America of congressmen settling disputes through lethal duels?

This whole line of "don't be nasty or kill people" only holds weights when other avenues work; voting, campaigning, boycotting. These parasites are leaching money and killing with impunity, if they refuse to listen to the millions of voices, then they take their lives into their own hands.

 

[BikeLock]

Everything? Not even close lol. Blackmailing? Israel has never threatened to give them everything if we forsake the Chosen, it's self-evident that they'd do it because why not? Keep that kike kvetchin goin

Awww look a kike kvetcher is being sullen and sarcastic

They've given us plenty of their tech that has been very valuable. The chair force helmets with the super advanced HUDs and the software that makes them work, Israeli. Basically all our military drone tech and many of the parts, made in Israel. A lot of missile/drone defense tech is, you guessed it, Israeli. The targeting systems on our attack helicopters, Israeli. Most of our night-vision gear, Israeli. The reactive armor tech for our vehicles, Israeli. Infantry targeting laser range finders, Israeli. Active defense system for our APCs against light missiles and rockets, Israeli. Active protection system on our Abrams, Bradleys, and Strykers, Israeli. The Litening targeting pod that basically every US fighter has (except the F-35 and F-22), plus the A-10 and B-52, that greatly increases their target acquistion range and accuracy, Israeli

It's cute you think it's a one-way street. They give muchly value back for our friendship

Neat.
How many troops did they send to Iraq and Afghanistan to fight with us?

Oh....

 

[Gar For Archer]

Its never a "hard working black man that had a family and everyone loved him".

Hard-working black men with families aren’t anywhere near as likely to be putting themselves in these situations. Saint Floyd et al. aren’t dead because they’re black, they’re dead because they behaved like niggers.

 

[The Last Stand]

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1866693151010050433/

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Qi6AL

View attachment 6740348
View attachment 6740343

I'm guessing 2025 will be TCD. (Total CEO death.) Did I say it right?

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

Ackshually, American history is British history.

Your founding fathers, early settlers and law-makes often killed people who got in the way of progress. How many stories are there from the first years of (post 1776) America of congressmen settling disputes through lethal duels?

This whole line of "don't be nasty or kill people" only holds weights when other avenues work; voting, campaigning, boycotting. These parasites are leaching money and killing with impunity, if they refuse to listen to the millions of voices, then they take their lives into their own hands.

I do not go into the British politics thread and tell Brits how their society functions. I will sometimes make observations, but always couch it with "this is just my opinion and observation as an American."

You do not understand that contemporary US society is not the same as colonial times. The reason we broke away from the British is because they abused their power and behaved like autocrats. Our forefathers busted their asses to establish a society that would function without resorting to violence, either from the state or the citizen. There are failsafes, such as everyone being armed, which also serves as a deterrent for abuse of power. There are designed release valves, like freedom of speech. This is all done to create a society that can function without oppressive government or street-level violence.

 

[The Last Stand]

Ackshually, American history is British history.

Your founding fathers, early settlers and law-makes often killed people who got in the way of progress. How many stories are there from the first years of (post 1776) America of congressmen settling disputes through lethal duels?

No, no, no. American history is American history. British history leading up to the founding of America would be footnotes. That's no difference than Black people wanting to take credit for ALL history because they were there.

 

[Candlelight Desolation]

No, no, no. American history is American history. British history leading up to the founding of America would be footnotes. That's no difference than Black people wanting to take credit for ALL history because they were there.

I'll sum it up:

• US - UK
• Canada - France
• Mexico - Spain
• Brazil - Portugal
• Could have possibly had Alaska/Russia as well, but that fell through.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

I do not go into the British politics thread and tell Brits how their society functions. I will sometimes make observations, but always couch it with "this is just my opinion and observation as an American."

You do not understand that contemporary US society is not the same as colonial times. The reason we broke away from the British is because they abused their power and behaved like autocrats. Our forefathers busted their asses to establish a society that would function without resorting to violence, either from the state or the citizen. There are failsafes, such as everyone being armed, which also serves as a deterrent for abuse of power. There are designed release valves, like freedom of speech. This is all done to create a society that can function without oppressive government or street-level violence.

You mistunderstand, I ain't telling you how your society runs, I'm observing how it used to run.

Like you say, power-mad tyrants were succesfully dealt with by using force. It's a historic precedent. But now those same power-mad tyrans, who are arguably killing more Americans than the British Monarchy ever would, are to be protected because reasons?

Even after 1776, you still used violence to carve a society, in the same way we did, to great success. It was only until we both became pussies that the wankers got big for their boots.

No, no, no. American history is American history. British history leading up to the founding of America would be footnotes. That's no difference than Black people wanting to take credit for ALL history because they were there.

Are you discrediting the amazing accomplishments and inventions of blacks like; mud huts, spears, chimping out and ebonics?!?!??! For shame.

 

[Space Faring Marsupial]

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1866693151010050433/

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/Qi6AL

View attachment 6740348
View attachment 6740343

My hate boner for ceos wouldn't handle this coming true.

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

Like you say, power-mad tyrants were succesfully dealt with by using force. It's a historic precedent. But now those same power-mad tyrans, who are arguably killing more Americans than the British Monarchy ever would, are to be protected because reasons?

Even after 1776, you still used violence to carve a society, in the same way we did, to great success. It was only until we both became pussies that the wankers got big for their boots.

John Adams defended Thomas Preston and his soldiers because it was the right thing to do. John Adams saw first-hand the danger of mob violence: everyone in Boston wanted to see Preston and his men hang. No other lawyer would defend Preston and his men because they were afraid of being targeted by locals. Instead of saying "yeah, they are assholes, they deserve it," John Adams gave them fair legal representation. This is a core, foundational value of the United States of America.

Defending street-level violence (assassination) would horrify America's Founding Fathers, who promoted fair legal processes for resolving differences. This is the kind of shit that happened in the French Revolution, which the Founding Fathers wanted no part of.

You do not understand American history, colonial or otherwise.

 

[grocerygoblin]

Ben keeps digging the hole and the commenters keep going at him.

If it is true that his actions caused health insurance companies to pay out. Then Luigi actually saved several lives.

 

[StarkRavingMad]

This is basically my opinion. Settling disputes of any kind by killing people is not good. morally or practically. That is how mudhut societies work. However, as someone who has been fucked by insurance companies, I have no sympathy for a CEO getting capped by a customer that his company denied coverage to; nor do I have sympathy for his family, since there are families who lost loved ones because his company denied coverage for necessary care.

You can have contempt for these people and not support wanton murder at the same time.

I get Ben's point, even if it's tone-deaf. Leftists see this killing as a gold standard for change because they are, at their core, violent revolutionaries. Where Ben misses the mark is he defends the actions of these insurance companies rather than advocating for them to provide the fucking services that customers pay fees for. If health insurance companies aren't happy with their profit margin, then maybe they shouldn't have shilled for the Affordable Care Act.

I agree with literally everything said in this post.

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

I agree with literally everything said in this post.

Thank you.

I've been wanting to ask you: do you know anything about this Luigi Mangione guy and/or his family? He's supposedly part of the Maryland elite.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

Don't forget either party, at any time, could become so unreasonable that violence becomes the only option besides just giving up and walking.

BATNA can also be coercion.

 

[mandatorylurk]

Fetterman trying to be middle of the road Grog will only work if he actually walks the walk on some things. Vote for Trumps cabinet picks, you sweatshirt bitch.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

while conservatives have been angry at it.

Correction: Conservative MEDIA PERSONALITIES, not conservatives as a whole. As can be seen by Matt Walsh's and Ben Shapiro's meltdowns and massive pushback they are not speaking for their fans in this issue. There is a reason Trump hasn't even mentioned the case in passing.

No. I don't care he killed a Health insurance CEO no one should. But people should absolutely care about someone being assassinated in cold blood for fucks sake guys.

This is basically my opinion. Settling disputes of any kind by killing people is not good. morally or practically. That is how mudhut societies work. However, as someone who has been fucked by insurance companies,

The killing is legally wrong, but morally justified because the societal framework that should have allowed for the grievances of people like Luigi Mangione and other millions of americans to voice their issues and fix the problems of insurance fuckery have been systematically destroyed and blocked for decades at this point. People like Brian Thompson made peaceful change impossible, and as such guaranteed that a violent outburst would be inevitable.

Johnny's point about Thomas Preston and John Adams offers a decent parallel. In this context, it would be like if during the riot there had been literally no trial allowed to happen and it got simply blocked, and the authorities blanked declared the Redcoats innocent and moved on with denying to have anyone talk about it.

 

[draggs]

Neat.
How many troops did they send to Iraq and Afghanistan to fight with us?

Oh....

We never asked them, kike kvetcher

Of course the kike kvetcher handwaves the technology that has saved American lives by giving them a combat edge on the battlefield and quivers, "b-b-but d-d-did the k-k-kikes...?" lmao